Abstract
Italian-language versions of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children (PANAS-C; Laurent et al. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338, 1999) and Physiological Hyperarousal Scale for Children (PH-C; Laurent et al. Psychological Assessment, 16, 373–380, 2004) were developed. Students (N = 1026; M age = 12.05 years, SD = 1.49) from central Italy completed these scales. Measures were evaluated based on criteria from previous studies resulting in an 11-item PANAS-C PA scale (α = .88), a 13-item PANAS-C NA scale (α = .87), and a 14-item PH-C (α = .85). Confirmatory factor analyses resulted in best-fit indices that favored a 3-factor model consistent with the tripartite model of anxiety and depression. Similar to results reported with the original English-language and other translations of these measures, scores on the PA scale were lower and scores on the NA and PH scales were higher for older girls than older boys and younger boys and girls. Findings suggested that the psychometric properties of the Italian-language versions of the PANAS-C and PH-C were similar to the English-language versions and other translated versions of the measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The PA scale of the PANAS and PANAS-C are 10 and 12 items, respectively. The NA scale of the PANAS and PANAS-C are 10 and 15 items, respectively. Laurent et al. (1999) note that 5 items from the PANAS PA scale (i.e., active, excited, interested, proud, strong) appear on the PANAS-C PA scale, and 7 items from the PANAS NA scale (i.e., afraid, scared, nervous, jittery, guilty, ashamed, upset) appear on the PANAS-C NA scale. For a detailed discussion of the development of the PANAS-C and its relation to the PANAS, readers are referred to Laurent et al. (1999) and Laurent and Ettelson (2001).
References
Beaujean, A. A., Freeman, M. J., Youngstrom, E., & Carlson, G. (2012). The structure of cognitive abilities in youths with manic symptoms: A factorial invariance study. Assessment, 19, 462–471.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 179–192.
Byrne, B. B. (2016). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5, 51–65.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Chin, E. G., Ebesutani, C., & Young, J. (2013). Application of the tripartite model to a complicated sample of residential youth with externalizing problems. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44, 469–478.
Chorpita, B. F., & Daleiden, E. L. (2002). Tripartite dimensions of emotion in a child clinical sample: Measurement strategies and implications for clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1150-1160. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.70.5.1150
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2006). Distress and fear disorders: An alternative empirically based taxonomy of the “mood” and “anxiety” disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 481–483.
Cummings, C. M., Caporino, N. E., & Kendall, P. C. (2014). Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: 20 years after. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 816–845.
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75.
De Bolle, M., De Fruyt, F., & Decuyper, M. (2010). The affect and arousal scales: Psychometric properties of the Dutch version and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Assessment, 17, 241–258.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532–560.
Greaves-Lord, K., Ferdinand, R. F., Sondeijker, F. E. P. L., Dietrich, A., Oldehinkel, A. J., Rosmalen, J. G. M., Ormel, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2007). Testing the tripartite model in young adolescents: Is hyperarousal specific for anxiety and not depression? Journal of Affective Disorders, 102, 55–63.
Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128–140.
Hankin, B. L., Wetter, E., & Cheely, C. (2008). Sex differences in child and adolescent depression: A developmental psychopathological approach. In J. R. Z. Abela & B. L. Hankin (Eds.), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents (pp. 377–414). New York: Guilford.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research, Methods, 6, 53–60.
Jacques, H. A. K., & Mash, E. (2004). A test of the tripartite model of anxiety and depression in elementary and high school boys and girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 13–25.
Kiernan, G., Laurent, J., Joiner Jr., T. E., Catanzaro, S. J., & MacLachlan, M. (2001). Cross-cultural examination of the tripartite model with children: Data from the Barretstown studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 359–379.
Laurent, J., & Ettelson, R. (2001). An examination of the tripartite model of anxiety and depression and its application to youth. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 209–230.
Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner Jr., T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., Osborne, L., & Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338.
Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2004). Development and preliminary validation of the physiological hyperarousal scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 16, 373–380.
Laurent, J., Joiner Jr., T. E., & Catanzaro, S. J. (2011). Positive affect, negative affect, and physiological hyperarousal among referred and nonreferred youths. Psychological Assessment, 23, 945–957.
Lonigan, C. J., Hooe, E. S., David, C. F., & Kistner, J. A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: Confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 374–386.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indexes: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315–353). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stevanovic, D., Laurent, J., & Lakic, A. (2013). Measuring positive affect, negative affect and physiological hyperarousal among Serbian youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 107–117.
Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131–141.
Watson, D. (2009). Differentiating the mood and anxiety disorders: A quadripartite model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 221–247.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
van Widenfelt, B. M., Treffers, P. D. A., de Beurs, E., Siebelink, B. M., & Koudijs, E. (2005). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8, 135–147.
Yamasaki, K., Katsuma, R., & Sakai, A. (2006). Development of a Japanese version of the positive and negative affect schedule for children. Psychological Reports, 99, 535–546.
Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111–122.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported, in part, by a Bando 2013 grant from Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio di Pistoia e Pescia. The authors wish to thank the deans, teachers, staff, parents and students of B. Sestini (Agliana, Pistoia, Italy), Roncalli-Galilei (Pistoia, Italy), and Raffaello (Pistoia, Italy) schools.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in the current study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, and with the ethical principles of the American Psychological Association. Informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of the students who participated, and assent was obtained from each student.
Conflict of Interest
Enrica Ciucci, Andrea Baroncelli, Giovanna Tambasco, Jeff Laurent, Salvatore J. Catanzaro and Thomas E. Joiner, Jr. declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Experiment Participants
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of participants in this study. Students provided oral assent before completing the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., Tambasco, G. et al. Measuring Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and Physiological Hyperarousal among Italian Youth: Translations of the PANAS-C and PH-C. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 39, 373–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9596-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9596-8