Log in

The kinetics of remodeling of a calcium sulfate/calcium phosphate bioceramic

  • BIOMATERIALS-TISSUE INTERACTION IN HUMANS
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last years considerable research and development activity have been expended to find new ceramic bone substitutes for the treatment of bone defects. However in many cases the drawback of synthethic bone substitutes are the slow graft incorporation and remodelling into the host bone. The purpose of this study was to analyze the kinetics of resorption and new bone formation of new calcium sulfate (CaSO4)/calcium phosphate (CaPO4) bioceramic engineered to enhance its bone forming properties. We prospectively evaluated the results of a series of 15 hips with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) treated at with core decompression and injection of the CaSO4/CaPO4 composite. In all hips, a quantitative computed tomography (QTC) scan was taken within one week after the surgery, at 12 months, 2 years and finally with a minimum of 4 years follow-up. The mean HU in the immediate post-operative period was 1445 (Range 1388–1602); At one year the mean HU strongly decrease at 556.6 HU (P < 0.01); The mean HU at 2 years follow-up further decreased to 475.1. The mean HU at 4 years was unchanged. The quantitative and qualitative CT scan data of this series indicates that the CaSO4-CaPO4 ceramic composite resorbs over a narrow timeframe and the gradual resorption of the graft within the defect provides an ideal environment for the direct new bone growth that propagates across the defect.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bohner M, Galea L, Doebelin N. Calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes: Failures and hopes. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32:2663–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitehouse MR, Ashley WB. The use of ceramics as bone substitutes in revision hip arthroplasty. Materials. 2009;2:1895–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Urban RM, Turner TM, Hall DJ, Inoue N, Gitelis S. Increased bone formation using a calcium sulfate and calcium phosphate composite graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:110–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hungerford DS. The use of an injectable calcium sulphate/calcium phosphate composite in the treatment of the osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone J Surg Br. 2009;91:331.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Civinini R, De Biase P, Carulli C, Matassi F, Nistri L, Capanna R, Innocenti M. The use of an injectable calcium sulphate/calcium phosphate bioceramic in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Int Orthop. 2012;36(8):1583–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinberg ME, Steinberg DR. Classification systems for osteonecrosis: an overview. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:273–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Houndsfield GN. Nobel Award address. Computed medical imaging. Med Phys. 1980;7(4):283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris WH. Traumatic arthiritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsson S, Hannink G. Injectable bone graft substitutes: current products, their characteristics and indications and new developments. Injury. 2011;42:S30–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bucholz RW. Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ambard AJ, Mueninghoff L. Calcium phosphate cement: review of mechanical and biological properties. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(5):321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, Liu W, Schnitzler V, Tancret F, Bouler JM. Calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution: chemistry, handling and mechanical properties. Acta Biomaterialia. 2014;10:1035–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ginebra MP, Traykova T, Planell JA. Calcium phosphate cements as bone drug delivery systems: a review. J Control Release. 2006;113:102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginebra MP, Espanol M, Montufar EB, Perez RA, Mestres G. New processing approaches in calcium phosphate cements and their applications in regenerative medicine. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2863–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginebra MP, Canal C, Espanol M, Pastorino D, Montufar EB. Calcium phosphate cements as drug delivery materials. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:1090–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernstein A, Niemeyer P, Salzmann G, Südkamp NP, Hube R, Klehm J, Menzel M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Bohner M, Görz L, Mayr HO. Microporous calcium phosphate ceramics as tissue engineering scaffolds for the repair of osteochondral defects: histological results. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7490–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, Hartjen C, Watson JT, Kim PT. The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urban RM, Turner TM, Hall DJ, Infanger S, Cheema N, Lim TH. Healing of large defects treated with calcium sulfate pellets containing demineralized bone matrix particles. Orthopedics. 2003;26(5 Suppl):s581–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo H, Wei J, Liu CS. Development of a degradable cement of calcium phosphate and calcium sulfate composite for bone reconstruction. Biomed Mater. 2006;1(4):193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu X, Chen X, Chen C, Wang G, Gu Y, Geng D, Mao H, Zhang Z, Yang H. Evaluation of calcium phosphate and calcium sulfate as injectable bone cements in sheep vertebrae. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(6):333–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner TM, Urban RM, Gitelis S, Kuo KN, Andersson GB. Radiographic and histologic assessment of calcium sulfate in experimental animal models and clinical use as a resorbable bone-graft substitute, a bone-graft expander, and a method for local antibiotic delivery: one institution’s experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83-A Suppl. 2001;2(Pt 1):8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu G, **ao L, Fu H, Bi D, Ma H, Tong P. Study on injectable and degradable cement of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate for bone repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(2):627–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fillingham YA, Lenart BA, Gitelis S. Function after injection of benign bone lesions with a bioceramic. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(7):2014–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Evaniew N, Tan V, Parasu N, Jurriaans E, Finlay K, Deheshi B, Ghert M. Use of a calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite in the surgical management of primary bone tumors. Orthopedics. 2013;36(2):e216–22. doi:10.3928/01477447-20130122-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Landgraeber S, Theysohn JM, Classen T, Jäger M, Warwas S, Hohn HP, Kowalczyk W. Advanced core decompression, a new treatment option of avascular necrosis of the femoral head--a first follow-up. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2013;7(11):893–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lazik A, Landgraeber S, Claßen T, Kraff O, Lauenstein TC, Theysohn JM. Aspects of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head, treated by advanced core decompression. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44(10):1467–75. doi:10.1007/s00256-015-2192-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Classen T, Warwas S, Jäger M, Landgraeber S. Two-year follow-up after advanced core decompression. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 14 (2015). doi:10.1002/term.2056.

  29. Kotnis NA, Parasu N, Finlay K, Jurriaans E, Ghert M. Chronology of the radiographic appearances of the calcium sulphate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite following resection of bone tumours–a preliminary study of the normal post-operative appearances. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(5):563–70. doi:10.1007/s00256-010-1037-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan V, Evaniew N, Finlay K, Jurriaans E, Ghert M, Deheshi B, Parasu N. Chronology of the radiographic appearances of the calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite following resection of bone tumors: a follow-up study of postoperative appearances. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015;15:21–7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Civinini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Civinini, R., Capone, A., Carulli, C. et al. The kinetics of remodeling of a calcium sulfate/calcium phosphate bioceramic. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 28, 137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5940-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5940-5

Navigation