Abstract
Metallic nanoparticles, in particular gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), offer a wide spectrum of applications in biomedicine. A crucial issue is their cytotoxicity, which depends greatly on various factors, including morphology of nanoparticles. Because metallic nanoparticles have an effect on cell membrane integrity, their shape and size may affect the viability of cells, due to their different geometries as well as physical and chemical interactions with cell membranes. Variations in the size and shape of gold nanoparticles may indicate particular nanoparticle morphologies that provide strong cytotoxicity effects. Synthesis of different sized and shaped bare AuNPs was performed with spherical (~ 10 nm), nanoflowers (~ 370 nm), nanorods (~ 41 nm), nanoprisms (~ 160 nm) and nanostars (~ 240 nm) morphologies. These nanostructures were characterized and interacting with cancer (HeLa) and normal (HEK293T) cell lines and cell viability tests were performed by WST-1 tests and fluorescent live/dead cell imaging experiments. It was shown that various shapes and sizes of gold nanostructures may affect the viability of the cells. Gold nanospheres and nanorods proved to be more toxic than star, flower and prism gold nanostructures. This may be attributed to their small size and aggregation process. This is the first report concerning a comparison of cytotoxic profile in vitro with a wide spectrum of bare AuNPs morphology. The findings show their possible use in biomedical applications.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles in medicine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83:761–9.
Zhang Y, Xu D, Li W, Yu J, Chen Y. Effect of size, shape, and surface Modificationon cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles to human hep-2 and Canine MDCK Cells. J Nanomater. 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/375496.
Han J, Li J, Jia W, Yao L, Li X, Jiang L, Tian Y. Photothermal therapy of cancer cells using novel hollow gold nanoflowers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:517–26.
Chen H, Zhang X, Dai S, Ma Y, Cui S, Achilefu S, Gu Y. Multifunctional gold nanostar conjugates for tumor imaging and combined photothermal and chemo-therapy. Theranostics. 2013;3:633–49.
Ambrosone A, del Pino P, Marchesano V, Parak WJ, de la Fuente JM, Tortiglione C. Gold nanoprisms for photothermal cell ablation in vivo. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2014;9:1913–9.
Austin LA, Mackey MA, Dreaden EC, El-Sayed MA. The optical, photothermal, and facile surface chemical properties of gold and silver nanoparticles in biodiagnostics, therapy, and drug delivery. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88:1391–417.
Tang Y, Shen Y, Huang L, Lv G, Lei C, Fan X, Lin F, Zhang Y, Wu L, Yang Y. In vitro cytotoxicity of gold nanorods in A549 cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;39:871–8.
Koua L, Sun J, Zhai Y, He Z. The endocytosis and intracellular fate of nanomedicines: Implication for rational design. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2013;8:1–10.
Aswathy SA, Daizy P. Facile one-pot synthesis of gold nanoparticles using tannic acid and its application in catalysis. Physica E. 2012;44:1692–6.
Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed AM. Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem Mater. 2003;15:1957–62.
Straney PJ, Andolina MC, Millstone JE. Seedless initiation as an efficient, sustainable route to anisotropic gold nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2013;29:4396–403.
Kozanoglu D, Hazar Apaydin D, Cirpan A, Esenturk EN. Power conversion efficiency enhancement of organic solar cells by addition of gold nanostars, nanorods, and nanospheres. Org Electron. 2013;14:1720–7.
Daizy P. Rapid green synthesis of spherical gold nanoparticles using Mangifera indica leaf. Spectrochim Acta A. 2010;77:807–10.
Stewart ME, Anderton CR, Thompson LB, Maria J, Gray SK, Rogers JA, Nuzzo RG. Nanostructured plasmonic sensors. Chem Rev. 2008;108:494–521.
Alsawafta M, Wahbeh M, Truong VV. Plasmonic modes and optical properties of gold and silver ellipsoidal nanoparticles by the discrete dipole approximation. J Nanomater. 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/457968.
Noguez C. Surface plasmons on metal nanoparticles: The influence of shape and physical environment. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:3806–19.
Kowalska E, Mahaney OP, Abe R, Ohtani B. Visible-light-induced photocatalysis through surface plasmon excitation of gold on titania surfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:2344–55.
Dhumale VA, Shah PV, Mull IS, Sharma RB. Switching of hydrophilic to ultra hydrophilic properties of flower-like gold nanostructures. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256:4192–5.
Minati L, Benetti F, Chiappini A, Speranzaet G. One-step synthesis of star-shaped gold nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2014;441:623–8.
Millstone JE, Park S, Shuford KL, Qin L, Schatz GC, Mirkin CA. Observation of a quadrupole plasmon mode for a colloidal solution of gold nanoprisms. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:5312–3.
Navarro JRG, Liotta A, Faure AC, Lerouge F, Chaput F, Micouin G, Baldeck PL, Parola S. Tuning Dye-to-particle interactions toward luminescent gold nanostars. Langmuir. 2013;29:10915–21.
Jiang X, Weise S, Hafner M, Rocker C, Zhang F, Parak WJ, Nienhaus GU. Quantitative analysis of the protein corona on FePt nanoparticles formed by transferrin binding. J Roy Soc Interface. 2010;7:5–13.
Connor EE, Mwamuka J, Gole A, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD. Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small. 2005;1:325–57.
Davis ME. Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:771–82.
Jiang Y, Deng Z, Yang D, Deng X, Li Q, Sha Y, Li C, Xu D. Gold nanoflowers for 3D volumetric molecular imaging in tumor study by photoacoustic tomography. Nano Res. 2015;8:2152–61.
Navarro JRG, Manchon D, Lerouge F, Blanchard NP, Marotte S, Leverrier J, Marvel J, Chaput F, Micouin G, Gabudean AA, Mosset A, Cottacin M, Baldeck PL, Kamada K, Parola S. Synthesis of pegylated gold nanostars and bipyramids for intracellular uptake. Nanotechnology. 2012;23:465602–8.
Patra HK, Banerjee S, Chaudhuri U, Lahiri P, Dasgupta AK. Cell selective response to gold nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2007;3:111–9.
Fratoddi I, Venditti I, Cametti C, Russo MV. How toxic are gold nanoparticles? the state-of-the-art. Nano Res. 2015;8:1771–99.
Drobne D. Nanotoxicology for safe and sustainable nanotechnology. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2007;58:471–8.
Onoue S, Yamada S, Chan H. Nanodrugs: pharmacokinetics and safety. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;14:1025–37.
Visalli G, Bertuccio MP, Iannazzo D, Piperno A, Pistone A, Di Pietro A. Toxicological assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on A549 human lung epithelial cells. Toxicol in Vitro. 2015;29:352–62.
Ankamwar B. Size and shape effect on biomedical applications of nanomaterials, biomedical engineering-technical applications in medicine, Dr. Radovan Hudak editor. InTech, 2012, p. 93–114.
Hauck TS, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW. Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity, and gene expression in mammalian cells Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small. 2008;4:153–9.
Alkilany AM, Nagaria PK, Hexel CR, Shaw TJ, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small. 2009;5:701–8.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the National Centre for Research and Development under research grants: “Nanomaterials and their application to biomedicine” (PBS1/A9/13/2012), “Development of an innovative technology using transgenic porcine tissues for biomedical purposes” (INNOMED/I/17/NCBR/2014) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woźniak, A., Malankowska, A., Nowaczyk, G. et al. Size and shape-dependent cytotoxicity profile of gold nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 28, 92 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5902-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5902-y