Log in

Long-Term Daily Equity Returns Across Sectors of the Oil and Gas Industry, 2000–2019

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study considers return variation across five sectors of the oil and gas industry. Between 2000 and 2020, firms in refining and marketing and exploration and production had the highest daily expected returns. Exploration and production and equipment and services had the greatest variation with equity market risk and was greater than downstream transportation and pipeline and refining and marketing. By sector, firms in refining and marketing and exploration and production had the greatest equity market risk, whereas integrated and transportation and pipeline had the lowest. Across all sectors, firm returns are positively related to size and value effects. Fracking and non-traditional recovery techniques have increased the likelihood of well completion, decreased equity risk, and decreased expected returns across the oil and gas industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Fama–French factors are constructed using the six value-weighted portfolios that represent size and book-to-market values. Small-minus-big is the daily average on small equity portfolios, less the average nine big stock average returns, the size effect for an equity. High-minus-low is the average return on two value portfolios, less the average return on two growth portfolios, the value effect. Robust-minus-weak is the average returns on two operating profitability portfolios, less average returns on the two weak operating portfolios, a profitability effect. Conservative-minus-weak is two average returns on conservative investment portfolios, less the average returns on two aggressive investment portfolios.

References

  • Baumeister C, Kilian L (2016) Forty years of oil price fluctuations: why the price of oil may still surprise us. J Econ Perspective 30(1):139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumester C, Hamilton J (2019) Structural interpretation of vector autoregressions with incomplete identification: revisiting the role of oil supply and demand shocks. Am Econ Rev 109(5):1873–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer D, Kesselring R (2016) The relationship between US retail gasoline and crude oil prices during the great recession: “rockets and feathers” or “balloons and rocks” behavior? Energy Econ 55:200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson SA (2020) United States Oil and Gas Stock Returns with Multi-Factor Pricing Models: 2008-2018. North Am J Econ 54

  • Coase R (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4:386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (2020)  Oil and Petroleum Products Explained: Where Oil Comes From. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/where-our-oil-comes-from.php. Accessed 31 Jan 2021

  • Faff R, Brailsford T (1999) Oil Price Risk and the Australian Stock Market. J Energy Finance Dev 4:69–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock market prices. J Bus 38(1):34–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J Financ 47(2):427–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (1993) Common risk factors on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33:3–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French F (1995) Size and book to market factors in earnings and returns. J Financ 50:131–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (1996) Multifactor Explanations of Asset Asset Pricing Anomalies. J Finance 51:55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (2015) A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. J Financ Econ 116:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J (1983) Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. J Polit Econ 91(2):228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) “Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J Financ 48(1):65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian L (2008) The economic effects of energy price shocks. J Econ Lit 46(4):871–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian L (2009) Not all oil price shocks are alike: disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. Am Econ Rev 99(3):1053–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew J, Vasawou M (2000) Can book to market, size, and momentum be risk factors that predict economic growth? J Financ Econ 57:221–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litner J (1965) Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. J Financ 20(4):587–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1963) The variation in certain specific prices. J Bus 36(4):394–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning D (1991) Petrol prices oil price rises and oil price falls: some evidence for the UK Since 1972. Appl Econ 23(9):1535–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41:867–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Naddha M (2011) Oil risk exposure: the case of U. S. oil and gas sector. Financ Rev 46:165–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mork KA, Olsen O, Mysen HT (1994) Macroeconomic Responses to Oil Price Increases and Decreases in Seven OECD Countries. Energy J 15(4):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34(4):768–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novy-Marx R (2013) The other side of value: the gross profitability premium. J Financ Econ 108:642–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman S (2000) Prices rise faster than they fall. J Polit Econ 108:466–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajgopal S (1999) Early Evidence on the Informativeness on the SEC’s Market Risk Exposures: The Case on Commodity Price Risk Exposure of Oil and Gas Producers. Account Rev 74:251–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2001) Risk Factors in Stock Returns of Canadian Oil and Gas Companies. Energy Econ 23:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanusi MS, Ahmad F (2016) Modelling Oil and Gas Stock Returns using Multi Factor Asset Pricing Model including Oil Price Exposure. Finance Res Lett 18:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19(3):425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman S, Wei K, **e F (2004) Capital investments and stock returns. J Financ Quantitat Analys 39:677–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I appreciate comments from Jim Peach, Roger Olien, Eddie Garza, Jon Finch, and Joe Seibert.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Alan Carson.

Ethics declarations

Research Involving Human Participants or Animals

I declare that no humans or animals are involved in this research project.

Informed Consent

As this is a sole author study, all participants are informed of results from the study, and no persons or animals is included as subjects for the study. So, there is informed consent for this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carson, S.A. Long-Term Daily Equity Returns Across Sectors of the Oil and Gas Industry, 2000–2019. J Ind Compet Trade 22, 125–143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-021-00374-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-021-00374-4

Keywords

JEL Codes

Navigation