Abstract
A 28/38 GHz quad-port cross-shaped antenna printed on a 0.203 mm Roger RO4003 substrate is designed and fabricated for 5G networks. The antenna consists of a rectangular patch radiator with three triangle slots to enhance the antenna's impedance matching. The four elements are arranged in a cross-shaped layout to achieve the desired compactness of 29 mm × 24.2 mm × 0.203 mm. A thin parasitic strip is inserted between the second and fourth elements to enhance the port isolation. The designed antenna is simulated by utilizing the CST simulator. The antenna achieved S11 < -10 dB at 28 / 38 GHz, with isolation ≥ 20 dB. Furthermore, the E- and H-planes within the anechoic chamber are evaluated to validate the MIMO antenna radiation patterns and gain. The MIMO parameters are calculated, simulated, tested, and its outcomes are under the standard level which confirms the MIMO diversity feature. The ECC of the structure is < 0.001, the DG ≥ 9.95 dB. and the CCL was ≤ 0.2 bit/s/Hz across the dual working band.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The fifth generation (5G) technology is the next step in mobile communication [1]. It enables immersive multimedia, audio, streaming video, and the internet. 5G technology is more advanced and enticing [2]. When the new 5G network was deployed, it brought new features such as faster mobile broadband and faster download and upload speeds for IoT. These new functionalities allow businesses to remotely control devices considerably more quickly and effectively than before [3]. Furthermore, Millimeter-wave offers viable solutions to all 5G needs [4]. Because the available bandwidth is substantially bigger than the occupied frequency of the radio spectrum, it will deliver much higher data rates and wider channels to many users [5]. The studies clarify that the optimum solution for 5G cellular communications is found to be in the mm-wave range between 28 and 38GHz [6].
In wireless communication systems, the antenna functions as a transceiver. So, the antenna should be small and lightweight, with optimal working bands and strong radiation performance [7]. However, the multipath problem is one of the most essential issues for any communication system. So, most research is towards to MIMO antenna. Any MIMO system should be able to increase the data rate without increasing power [8]. Another crucial parameter of any MIMO system is its size, which should be as small as feasible [9]. As a result, the radiating pieces should be placed as near together as feasible, taking into account the isolation factor [10]. Several mm-wave microstrip antenna topologies have been built, simulated, and analyzed for 5G applications in the 28 GHz and 38 GHz bands, or individually [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Ref [11] described a microstrip patch antenna for 28 GHz in millimeter wave. It features an impedance bandwidth of 4.6% and a high gain of 13.5 dB. This is accomplished by creating four four-element patch antenna arrays. Ref [12] investigated a 4 × 4 dual-band MIMO antenna for millimeter wave bands operating at 28 GHz and 38 GHz obtained a wide band of 14.3% and 5.26%, respectively and had an EBG construction that increased mutual coupling. Ref [13] presented a multi-band MIMO antenna constructed with a user-impact analysis for 4G and 5G mobile terminals. Ref [14] proposed antenna worked at a frequency of 5.3 GHz, which is suitable for future 5G services. Ref [15] presented a four-port T-shaped MIMO antenna that has a bandwidth from 22.43 to 31.66 GHz and is designed with a total dimension of 24 × 24 mm2. Ref [16] introduced an eight-element MIMO antenna for smart 5G devices that operates in the frequency spectrum 24.25 to 27.5 GHz. It has achieved isolation of 15 dB with a gain of 6.4 dBi. In [17], a six-element for 28/38 GHz with high gain is presented. It features impedance bandwidths of 27.7 to 28.1 GHz and 36.9 to 39.5 GHz, with realized gains of 13 and 10.01 dBi, respectively. Ref [18] proposed a quad-port dual-band MIMO antenna array for 5G communications that operates at 28 and 38 GHz. This setup provides a high gain of 7.9 and 13.7 dB at 28 and 37.3 GHz, respectively. Ref [19] introduced a 28/38 GHz patch antenna with an H-shaped slot for the MIMO applications. The antenna has an impedance bandwidth of 27.6—28.5 GHz and 36.9—38.9 GHz, with achieved gains of 9.0 dBi and 5.9 dBi. An inset-fed planar antenna array was operated at 28.44 /39.49 GHz with isolation ≥ 25 dB and gain values of 5.59 dBi and 5.70 dBi, as given in [20]. This study investigates the design and fabrication of a compact quad-port 28/38 GHz MIMO antenna. The cross-shape arrangement of parts is used to improve the port isolation while also achieving the requisite compactness. The distance between the radiating parts is short, so a parasitic strip is added to improve the port isolation. The MIMO parameters were computed and tested with a reasonable trend between the two outcomes.
The novelty of this design can be summarized as: (1) this design has a compact size (29 mm × 24.2 mm × 0.203 mm) which saves more space when increasing the number of ports. (2) It achieved a reasonable gain of 8.1/7.22 dB with the isolation ≥ 20 dB between ports at 28/38 GHz. (3) It achieved good levels of MIMO parameter values (The ECC of the structure is < 0.001, the DG ≥ 9.95 dB. and the CCL was ≤ 0.2 bit/s/Hz) which confirms the suitability of the antenna for 5G dual-band communication.
2 Antenna Structure
Figure 1 illustrates the single antenna layout. It consists of a rectangular patch with three triangle slots in its top edge to enhance the impedance matching. This design is etched on a Roger RO4003 with εr = 3.55, tan δ = 0.0027, and thickness = 0.203mm. The single antenna is investigated by the CST simulator to optimize the dimension. Table 1 presents the optimum dimensions. The antenna has been fabricated, and the model is illustrated in Fig. 2. The experimental data is tested by utilizing the ZVA67 VNA. The antenna operated at 28.2 GHz with S11 < -10 dB from 27.86 GHz to 28.77, and at 37.45 GHz with S11 < -10 dB from 37.07 GHz to 37.76 from the simulation results. It also worked at 28.1 GHz from 27.44 GHz to 28.83 and 37.81 GHz from 37.63 GHz to 38.08 GHz from the tested results.
The best results are obtained by develo** the antenna structure as shown in Fig. 3. Antenna #1 is a conventional patch antenna with a full ground to work at the fundamental mode at 28.5 GHz as shown in the dotted red line in Fig. 3. To control the second band, a single triangle slot is etched on the top of the patch as shown in Fig. 3 (Antenna #2) to make the antenna to be operated at 28.1GHz and reduced a little bit the second band as illustrated in the dashed blue line in Fig. 3. Finally to tune the second band to 37.5 GHz, three slots on the top of the patch are developed (Antenna #3) as shown in the black solid line in Fig. 3. Figure 4 illustrates the single antenna's current distribution at two frequencies 28 /37.5 GHz. The current is collected around the patch at 28 GHz and around the triangular slots at 37.5 GHz which illustrates the contribution of each part in the radiation.
The radiation characteristics in different planes ( x–z and y–z) for the structure at 28/37.5GHz are shown in Fig. 5. The antenna has a broadside pattern at ϴ = 0° because of the presence of the full ground plane. As well, it is observed that the difference between Co / Cross polarization ≥ 20 dB in both planes confirms its diversity.
To investigate the antenna performance in terms of reflection coefficient, parametric studies at different antenna dimensions are conducted. The effect of the patch width (Wp) on the reflection coefficient is illustrated in Fig. 6(a). it is seen that by increasing the Wp, the two resonance frequencies are affected. As well, the effect of the slot width (T) on the reflection coefficient is illustrated in Fig. 6(b). it is clear that by increasing the T, a small shift is observed at the 28 GHz band while the 38 GHz band is highly affected.
The effect of the changing x and y on the reflection coefficient is illustrated in Fig. 7. it is seen that by increasing the x and y, the two resonance frequencies are affected as illustrated in Fig. 7. It is seen that the antenna should designed carefully to achieve the desired two 28/38 GHz bands.
3 Quad-Port Mimo Configuration
The quad MIMO antenna is examined in this section. Figure 8 shows the development of the recommended MIMO antenna. The antenna elements in the three stages are aligned face-to-face and orthogonally to the other elements. MIMO#1 is a quad-MIMO antenna with a full substrate and ground. It operates at 29 GHz and 38.5 GHz, as depicted by the dashed red line in Fig. 9. The substrate and ground plane are then sliced along the four edges in MIMO#2. It is organized in a crisscross pattern to make the design more compact. It runs at 28.4 / 38 GHz, as shown in the dashed blue line in Fig. 9. Finally, MIMO#3 is developed by adding a parasitic strip between the elements to enhance its isolation. It works at 28.1 GHz and 37.8 GHz as shown in the black solid line in Fig. 9. The differences between the resonance frequencies and the single antenna in Fig. 2 are due to the coupling effects between ports. The isolation between ports in the three stages is shown in Fig. 10. The isolation is ≥ 20 dB in the three stages while we choose the third one which achieves the desired frequency 28/38 GHz bands.
Figure 11 shows the current distributions of the MIMO antenna at 28 /38 GHz. It's observed that the isolation is achieved by focusing the current around the ports with a small amount transferred to other ports and the most current is concentrated around the patch and the triangular slots.
4 Results and Discussion
As shown in Fig. 12, the antenna area is reduced to 24.2 × 29 mm2 by arranging the four elements adjacent to each other. The radiators are separated by 1.2 mm. The antenna has been fabricated and its model is illustrated in Fig. 12(b) and its measuring setup is shown in Fig. 12(c). The antenna is operated at 28.1 GHz with S11 < -10 dB beginning from 27.75 GHz to 28.65 and at 37.8 GHz with S11 < -10 dB beginning from 37.1 GHz to 38.24 from the simulation outcomes, and at 28.1 GHz with S11 < -10 dB beginning from 27.5 GHz to 29.3 and at 37.81 GHz with S11 < -10 dB beginning from 37.5 GHz to 38.2 GHz from the tested outcomes as shown in Fig. 13. Additionally, the isolation at port 1 is ≥ 20 dB at 28/38 GHz, confirming the strong isolation between ports seen in Fig. 14. It is observed that there is a good match between the two outcomes. However, a slight shift is introduced due to the fabrication and testing arrangement, as well as human error in the fabrication process.
Figure 15 depicts the experimental setup for testing the MIMO antenna radiation patterns and gain. The horn reference antenna is meant to operate between 26 and 40 GHz and serves as a transmitter antenna, while the MIMO antenna under test is placed at 50 cm as a receiving antenna. The MIMO antenna rotates in both the azimuth and elevation planes. The reference antenna is connected to VNA port 1 and the MIMO antenna is attached to port 2 of the VNA, and the antenna gain is estimated from the S21 as [21, 22]. The tested normalized radiation patterns in comparison with the simulated one at 28 GHz and 38 GHz in both two x–z and y–z planes are illustrated in Fig. 16. The antenna has a broadside pattern at ϴ = 0° because of the presence of the full ground plane with a good matching between the two outcomes. The simulated gain of the antenna at 28 GHz and 38 GHz is 8.5 dBi and 7.8 dBi while the testes gain at the same frequency bands is 8.1dBi and 7.22 dBi.
Finally, the MIMO performance is investigated by calculation of the ECC, DG, CCL, Mean Effective Gain (MEG), and the Total Active Reflection Coefficient MIMO parameters. There are several equations utilized to extract these parameters [23,24,25,26,27]. These parameters are calculated at port 1. The ECC between ports is calculated using S-parameters and radiation patterns as Eqs. (1), (2) [26, 27] and its outcomes are displayed in Fig. 17.
The value of the ECC is ≤ 0.001 within the desired dualbands. The DG is calculated and related to ECC as Eq. (3) [26] and its outcome is illustrated in Fig. 18.
The DG had values ≥ 9.95 dB within the desired dualbands.
Also, the CCL is calculated and extracted using Eqs. (4), (5) [27] and its outcome is shown in Fig. 19.
The CCL achieved a value ≤ 0.2 bit/s/Hz within the desired dual bands.
Further, the MEG and the TARC are calculated and extracted using equations in [26, 27]. The TARC has achieved -20dB and -18 dB at both 28/38 GHz with around the same results when the phases are changed as shown in Fig. 20 while the MEG achieved -3dB at 28/38 GHz frequency bands.
The tested outcomes are compared to the simulated ones with a good trend between them. All of these parameters are lower than the acceptable level which confirms the system isolation and diversity.
Table 2 compares the literature review designs [28,29,30,31,32,33,34] to the proposed antenna to assess the suggested antenna performance. It is noted that the proposed compact MIMO antenna has supported the 5G applications with a smaller size with a greater level of isolation, gain, BW, and MIMO characteristics.
5 Conclusion
This study designs and fabricates a compact quad-port cross-shaped antenna with improved port isolation. The single antenna is made up of a rectangular patch radiator with three triangle slots along the top edge for good matching. The proposed MIMO antenna model was tested to validate the simulation results. The reported MIMO antenna operates in two bands at 28/38 GHz with isolation ≥ 20 dB. The results of the simulation and experiment are consistent. The MIMO antenna radiation patterns and gain were validated by testing the E and H planes within the anechoic chamber. A reasonable gain of 8.1 dBi and 7.22 dBi at 28 /38 GHz, respectively have been introduced. Also, the antenna has achieved a good MIMO performance between ports. The ECC, DG, CCL, MEG, and TARC have achieved values ≤ 0.001 ≥ 9.95 dB, ≤ 0.2 bit/s/Hz, -3 dB, and -20/-18 dB over the two working bands. All these features would support the reported work to be more convenient in the 5G network applications.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Aziz, H. S., & Naji, D. K. (2020). Printed 5G MIMO antenna arrays in smartphone handset for LTE bands 42/43/46 applications. Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, 90, 167-184.
Lak, A., Adelpour, Z., Oraizi, H., & Parhizgar, N. (2021). Design and SAR assessment of three compact 5G antenna arrays. Scientific reports, 11(1), 21265.
Yu, B., Yang, K., & Yang, G. (2017). A novel 28 GHz beam steering array for 5G mobile device with metallic casing application. IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation, 66(1), 462-466.
Rafique, U., Khalil, H., and Rehman, S. U. (2017). Dual-band microstrip patch antenna array for 5G mobile communications. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS)
Ullah, R., Ullah, S., Umar, S. M., Ullah, R., & Kamal, B. (2019, July). Design and Modeling of a 28/38/60/70/80 GHz Antenna for Fifth Generation (5G) Mobile and Millimeter Wave (mmW) Applications. In 2019 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
Abdelatif, N., Zamel, H. M., Attiya, A., & Awamry, A. (2020). Multi-band mm-wave antenna for 5G-WiGig communication systems. Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, 99, 133-143.
Ahmad, W., & Khan, W. T. (2017, March). Small form factor dual band (28/38 GHz) PIFA antenna for 5G applications. In 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM) (pp. 21–24). IEEE.
Alnemr, F., Ahmed, M. F. A., & Shaalan, A. A. (2021). A compact 28/38 GHz MIMO circularly polarized antenna for 5 G applications. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 42, 338-355.
Elfergani, I., Iqbal, A., Zebiri, C., Basir, A., Rodriguez, J., Sajedin, M., ... & Ullah, S. (2020). Low-profile and closely spaced four-element MIMO antenna for wireless body area networks. Electronics, 9(2), 258.
Aboelleil, H., Ibrahim, A. A., & Khalaf, A. A. (2021). A compact multiple-input multiple-output antenna with high isolation for wireless applications. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 108, 17-24.
Phalak, K., & Sebak, A. (2014, November). Aperture coupled microstrip patch antenna array for high gain at millimeter waves. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT) (pp. 13–16). IEEE.
Tu, D. T. T., Thang, N. G., Ngoc, N. T., Phuong, N. T. B., & Van Yem, V. (2017, October). 28/38 GHz dual-band MIMO antenna with low mutual coupling using novel round patch EBG cell for 5G applications. In 2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC) (pp. 64–69). IEEE.
Ojaroudi Parchin, N., Jahanbakhsh Basherlou, H., Al-Yasir, Y. I., Ullah, A., Abd-Alhameed, R. A., & Noras, J. M. (2019). Multi-band MIMO antenna design with user-impact investigation for 4G and 5G mobile terminals. Sensors, 19(3), 456.
Khan, A., Geng, S., Zhao, X., Shah, Z., Jan, M. U., & Abdelbaky, M. A. (2020). Design of MIMO antenna with an enhanced isolation technique. Electronics, 9(8), 1217.
Khan, M. I., Khan, S., Kiani, S. H., Ojaroudi Parchin, N., Mahmood, K., Rafique, U., & Qadir, M. M. (2022). A compact mmWave MIMO antenna for future wireless networks. Electronics, 11(15), 2450.
Shoaib, N., Shoaib, S., Khattak, R. Y., Shoaib, I., Chen, X., & Perwaiz, A. (2018). MIMO antennas for smart 5G devices. IEEE access, 6, 77014-77021.
Jayanthi, K., & Kalpana, A. M. (2023). Design of Six Element MIMO Antenna with Enhanced Gain for 28/38 GHz mm-Wave 5G Wireless Application. Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 46(2).
Aghoutane, B., Das, S., Ghzaoui, M. E., Madhav, B. T. P., & El Faylali, H. (2022). A novel dual band high gain 4-port millimeter wave MIMO antenna array for 28/37 GHz 5G applications. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 145, 154071.
Liu, P., Zhu, X. W., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, C., & Jiang, Z. H. (2020). Patch antenna loaded with paired shorting pins and H-shaped slot for 28/38 GHz dual-band MIMO applications. IEEE Access, 8, 23705-23712.
Rafique, U., Agarwal, S., Nauman, N., Khalil, H., & Ullah, K. (2021). Inset-fed planar antenna array for dual-band 5G MIMO applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C, 112, 83-98.
El-Hassan, M. A., Farahat, A. E., & Hussein, K. F. (2022). Millimetric-wave quad-band MIMO antennas for future generations of mobile communications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B, 95, 41-60.
Mohamed, H. A., Edries, M., Abdelghany, M. A., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2022). Millimeter-wave antenna with gain improvement utilizing reflection FSS for 5G networks. IEEE Access, 10, 73601-73609.
Ibrahim, A. A., Ahmed, M. I., & Ahmed, M. F. (2022). A systematic investigation of four ports MIMO antenna depending on flexible material for UWB networks. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14351.
Thaysen, J., & Jakobsen, K. B. (2006). Envelope correlation in (N, N) MIMO antenna array from scattering parameters. Microwave and optical technology letters, 48(5), 832-834.
Ibrahim, A. A., & Ali, W. A. (2022). High isolation 4-element ACS-fed MIMO antenna with band notched feature for UWB communications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 14(1), 54-64.
Sharma, P., Tiwari, R. N., Singh, P., Kumar, P., & Kanaujia, B. K. (2022). MIMO Antennas: Design Approaches, Techniques and Applications. Sensors, 22(20), 7813.
Desai, A., Kulkarni, J., Kamruzzaman, M. M., Hubálovský, Š., Hsu, H. T., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2022). Interconnected CPW fed flexible 4-port MIMO antenna for UWB, X, and Ku band applications. IEEE Access, 10, 57641-57654.
Khalid, M., Iffat Naqvi, S., Hussain, N., Rahman, M., Fawad, Mirjavadi, S. S., ... & Amin, Y. (2020). 4-Port MIMO antenna with defected ground structure for 5G millimeter wave applications. Electronics, 9(1), 71.
Marzouk, H. M., Ahmed, M. I., & Shaalan, A. H. A. (2019). Novel dual-band 28/38 GHz MIMO antennas for 5G mobile applications. Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, 93, 103-117.
Sabek, A. R., Ali, W. A., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2022). Minimally coupled two-element MIMO antenna with dual band (28/38 GHz) for 5G wireless communications. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 43(3-4), 335-348.
Hasan, M. N., Bashir, S., & Chu, S. (2019). Dual band omnidirectional millimeter wave antenna for 5G communications. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 33(12), 1581-1590.
Cuneray, K., Akcam, N., Okan, T., & Arican, G. O. (2023). 28/38 GHz dual-band MIMO antenna with wideband and high gain properties for 5G applications. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 162, 154553.
Sharawi, M. S., Podilchak, S. K., Hussain, M. T., & Antar, Y. M. (2017). Dielectric resonator based MIMO antenna system enabling millimetre‐wave mobile devices. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 11(2), 287-293.
Aboualalaa, M., & Mansour, I. (2023). Dual-band End-fire Four-element MIMO Antenna Array Using Split-ring Structure for mm-wave 5G Applications. IEEE Access.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). Funding not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mai. F. Ahmed ,Ahmed A. Ibrahim and Mohamed I. Ahmed prepared the simulation, Mai. F. Ahmed , Ahmed A. Ibrahim and Shaymaa M. Gaber prepared figures Mai. F. Ahmed , Ahmed A. Ibrahim writing the first draft, Mohamed I. Ahmed prepared the fabrication and measurements of all designs, Shaymaa M. Gaber revised the final paper and all authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
No human or animal participation in this work.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, M.F., Ahmed, M.I., Ibrahim, A.A. et al. Quad-port 28/38 GHz Antenna with Isolation Improvement for 5G Wireless Networks. J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-024-00993-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-024-00993-y