SpringerLink
Log in

Predatory impacts of the invasive ‘killer shrimp’ Dikerogammarus villosus on a resident amphipod and isopod (Crustacea: Malacostraca) are influenced by water quality and habitat type

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus has invaded Central European and British freshwaters and its arrival is associated with biodiversity decline, as D. villosus is predatory towards many macroinvertebrate taxa, including resident amphipods such as Crangonyx pseudogracilis and isopods such as Asellus aquaticus. I investigated how differential physiological tolerance, habitat use and predation may drive coexistence or exclusion among D. villosus and resident ‘supertramp’ prey such as C. pseudogracilis. Experiments revealed that D. villosus could not survive 12 h in the extremely poor water qualities that C. pseudogracilis and A. aquaticus commonly live. Experiments manipulating oxygen levels, revealed low survivorship of C. pseudogracilis and A. aquaticus in the presence of D. villosus at higher oxygen levels but this survivorship increased significantly as oxygen levels fell. Predation of C. pseudogracilis by a resident amphipod Gammarus pulex followed a similar pattern but was much less severe and A. aquaticus appeared resistant to G. pulex predation. Mesocosm experiments showed that C. pseudogracilis survivorship in the presence of D. villosus increased when dense vegetation was present compared to bare substrate. Survivorship of A. aquaticus was uniformly poor in all habitats. Taxa with high environmental tolerance and adaptability may be resistant to this invader’s worst impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbačiauskas, K., V. Semenchenko, M. Grabowski, R. S. E. W. Leuven, M. Paunovic, M. O. Son, B. Csanyi, S. Gumuliauskaite, A. Konopacka, S. Nehring, G. van der Velde, V. Vezhnovetz & V. E. Panov, 2008. Assessment of biocontamination of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in European inland waterways. Aquatic Invasions 3: 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, E., S. Fielder & D. Böhme, 2009. Effects of invasive benthic macroinvertebrates on assessment methods of the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 635: 309–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balke, M., I. Ribera, L. Hendrich, M. A. Miller, K. Sagata, A. Posman, A. P. Vogler & R. Meier, 2009. New Guinea highland origin of a widespread arthropod supertramp. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 276: 2359–2367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beggel, S., J. Brandner, A. F. Cerwenka & J. Geist, 2016. Synergistic impacts by an invasive amphipod and an invasive fish explain native gammarid extinction. BMC Ecology 16: 32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, D. G., C. Caseys, R. D. Cousens, M. A. Hahn, S. M. Heredia, S. Hűbner, K. G. Turner, K. D. Whitney & L. H. Rieseberg, 2015. What we still don’t know about invasion genetics. Molecular Ecology 24: 2277–2297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boets, P., K. Lock, M. Messiaen & P. L. M. Goethals, 2010. Combining data-driven methods and lab studies to analyse the ecology of Dikerogammarus villosus. Ecological Informatics 5: 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boets, P., I. S. Pauwels, K. Lock & P. L. M. Goethals, 2014. Using an integrated modelling approach for risk assessment of the ‘killer shrimp’ Dikerogammarus villosus. River Research and Applications 30: 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruijs, M. C. M., B. Kelleher, G. Van der Velde & A. Bij de Vaate, 2001. Oxygen consumption temperature and salinity tolerance of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: indicators of further dispersal via ballast water transport. Archive für Hydrobiologie 152: 633–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, A. C. & G. Free, 2008. Incorporating invasive alien species into ecological assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Aquatic Invasions 3: 361–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, R., 2000. The distribution of the gastropods Theodoxus fluviatilis (L.) and Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray) in lakes on the Ǻland Islands, southwestern Finland. Boreal Environmental Research 5: 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, K. E., K. L. Mathers, D. Constable, C. Gerrard & P. J. Wood, 2018. Substrate preferences of coexisting invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus and Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, under field and laboratory conditions. Biological Invasions 20: 2187–2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P., 1986. Ecology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devin, S., C. Piscart, J. N. Beisel & J. C. Moreteau, 2003. Ecological traits of the amphipod invader Dikerogammarus villosus on a mesohabitat scale. Archive fűr Hydrobiologie 158: 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M., 1974. Colonization of exploded volcanic islands by birds: The supertramp strategy. Science 184: 803–806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. T. A., 1996. Post-invasion amphipod communities of Lough Neagh, N. Ireland: influences of habitat selection and mutual predation. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 756–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. T. A. & D. Platvoet, 2000. Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 267: 977–983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. T. A., S. E. Faloon & R. W. Elwood, 1998. Active brood care in an amphipod: influences of embryonic development, temperature and oxygen. Animal Behavior 56: 663–672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. T. A., D. Platvoet & D. W. Kelly, 2002. Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1078–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J., L. Cohen & P. Jarvis, 2008. Practical Statistics for Field Biology, 2nd ed. Wiley, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, B. & D. C. Aldridge, 2013. The ‘dirty dozen’: socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 757–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBNNSS, 2017. GB non-native species secretariat species alerts. http://www.nonnativespecies.org/alerts/index.cfm.

  • Gledhill, T., D. W. Sutcliffe & W. D. Williams, 1993. British Freshwater Crustacea Malacostraca: a Key with Ecological Notes. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publications No. 52. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, C., S. Worischka, E. Mehler, J. Becker, R. Gergs & C. Winkelmaan, 2015. The trophic function of Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) in invaded rivers: a case study in the Elbe and Rhine. Aquatic Invasions 10: 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. G., 1976. The distribution of the freshwater Malacostraca in the area of the Mersey and Weaver River Authority. Freshwater Biology 6: 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1960. The Biology of Polluted Waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermacz, Ł., A. Dzierżyńska, T. Kakareko, M. Poznańska & J. Kobak, 2015. The art of choice: predation risk changes interspecific competition between freshwater amphipods. Behavioural Ecology 26: 656–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermacz, Ł., A. Dzierżyńska-Białonczyk & J. Kobak, 2017. Predator diet, origin or both? Factors determining responses of omnivorous amphipods to predation cues. Hydrobiologia 785: 173–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, J., B. Westerwald, A. Kiechle, W. Chen, B. Streit, S. Klaus, M. Oetken & M. Plath, 2016. Pronounced species turnover, but no functional equivalence in leaf consumption of invasive amphipods in the river Rhine. Biological Invasions 18: 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzler, W., A. Kley, G. Maye, D. Waloszek & G. Maier, 2009. Mutual predation between and cannibalism within several freshwater gammarids: Dikerogammarus villosus versus one native and three invasives. Aquatic Ecology 43: 457–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kley, A. & G. Maier, 2005. An example of niche partitioning between Dikerogammarus villosus and other invasive and native gammarids: a field study. Journal of Limnology 64: 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koester, M. & R. Gergs, 2014. No evidence for intraguild predation of Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) at an invasion front in the Untere Lorze, Switzerland. Aquatic Invasions 9: 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, J., Ł. Jermacz & A. Dzierżyńska-Białończyk, 2015. Substratum preferences of the invasive killer shrimp Dikerogammarus villosus. Journal of Zoology 297: 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, J., M. Rachalewski & K. Bącela-Spychalska, 2016. Conquerors or exiles? Impact of interference competition among invasive Ponto-Caspian gammarideans on their dispersal rates. Biological Invasions 18: 1953–1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, J., L. Jermacz, J. Marcinczyk, E. Bartoszynska, D. Rutkowska & K. Pawlowska, 2017. Abiotic factors affecting habitat selection by two invasive gammarids Dikerogammarus villosus and Pontogammarus robustoides. Hydrobiologia 797: 247–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koester, M., B. Bayer & R. Gergs, 2016. Is Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea, Gammaridae) a ‘‘killer shrimp’’ in the River Rhine system? Hydrobiologia 768: 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewelyn, J., B. L. Phillips, R. A. Alford, L. Schwarzkopf & R. Shine, 2010. Locomotor performance in an invasive species: cane toads from the invasion front have greater endurance, but not speed, compared to conspecifics from a long-colonised area. Oecologia 162: 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C. & D. Platvoet, 2005. The predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus on native Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda); influences of differential microdistribution and food resources. Journal of Zoology 267: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C. & J. T. A. Dick, 2014. Differential physicochemical tolerances, habitat utilization and predation drive patterns of coexistence and exclusion among invasive and resident amphipods. Freshwater Biology 59: 1956–1969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C. & D. Platvoet, 2013. Factors influencing the macro- and micro-distribution of Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) within an invaded river system; could artificial structures such as fish passes facilitate the establishment and spread of the ‘killer shrimp’? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 23: 667–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick & R. W. Elwood, 1997. The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus (Crustacea : Amphipoda); perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. Biological Reviews 72: 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., R. W. Elwood & J. T. A. Dick, 1999. Differential microdistributions and interspecific interactions in coexisting Gammarus and Crangonyx amphipods. Ecography 22: 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick & R. W. Elwood, 2000. Differential physico – chemical tolerances of amphipod species revealed by field transplantations. Oecologia 124: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick, R. W. Elwood & W. I. Montgomery, 2001. Coexistence among native and introduced freshwater amphipods (Crustacea); habitat utilisation patterns in littoral habitats. Archive für Hydrobiologie 151: 591–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick, C. Gibbins, R. W. Elwood & W. I. Montgomery, 2002. A reappraisal of the Gammarus: Asellus ratio as an index of organic pollution in rivers. Water Research 36: 75–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. Prenter, M. Briffa, N. J. Fielding, J. T. A. Dick, G. E. Riddell, M. J. Hatcher & A. M. Dunn, 2004. The replacement of a native freshwater amphipod by an invader: roles for environmental degradation and intraguild predation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 1627–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick, F. R. Gell, R. Selman, P. Lenartowicz & H. B. N. Hynes, 2009. A long-term study (1949-2005) of experimental introductions to an Island; freshwater amphipods (Crustacea) in the Isle of Man (British Isles). Diversity and Distributions 15: 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., D. Platvoet, J. T. A. Dick, N. Fielding, A. Constable, N. Hall, D. Aldridge, T. Renals & M. Diamond, 2010. The Ponto-Caspian ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), invades the British Isles. Aquatic Invasions 5: 441–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick, D. Platvoet & M. Briffa, 2011. Direct and indirect effects of species displacements; the invading amphipod crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus can disrupt aquatic ecosystem energy flow and function. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., P. Boets & D. Platvoet, 2012. ‘Killer shrimps’, dangerous experiments and misguided introductions; how freshwater shrimp (Crustacea: Amphipoda) invasions threaten biological water quality monitoring in the British Isles. Freshwater Reviews 5: 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, C., P. Boets, K. Lock & P. L. M. Goethals, 2013. Potential effects of the invasive ‘killer shrimp’ (Dikerogammarus villosus) on macroinvertebrate assemblages and biomonitoring indices. Freshwater Biology 58: 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madgwick, G. & D. C. Aldridge, 2011. Killer shrimps in Britain: hype or horror? The facts about our latest invasive animal. British Wildlife 22: 408–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. & K. Grabow, 2008. Das Risiko der Verschleppung neozoischer Amphipods beim Überlandtransport von Yachten. Risk of spreading of non-indigenous Amphipoda due to overland transport of recreation boats. Lauterbornia 62: 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maazouzi, C., C. Piscart, J. C. Pihan & G. Masson, 2009. Effect of habitat-related resources on fatty acid composition and body weight of the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus in an artificial reservoir. Fundamentals of Applied Limnology 175: 327–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster, S., M. Scheepmaker, D. Platvoet & N. Broodbaker, 1992. Drastic changes in the amphipod fauna (Crustacea) of Dutch inland waters during the last 25 years. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 61: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rewicz, T., M. Grabowski, C. MacNeil & K. Bacela-Spychalska, 2014. The profile of a ‘perfect’ invader – the case of the killer shrimp. Dikerogammarus villosus. Aquatic Invasions 9: 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L. & D. Dudgeon, 2010. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, J. M., A. M. J. Lane & D. G. George, 1999. The United Kingdom Environmental Change Network: Protocols for Standard Measurements at Freshwater Sites. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. Natural Environment Research Council, Huntingdon, Cambs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D. A. & J. R. Bevan, 1995. The impact of airport deicing on a river: the case of the Ouseburn, Newcastle Upon Tyne. Environmental Pollution 88: 321–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel, M. C., E. P. Healy, G. Van der Velde & A. Bij de Vaate, 2007. Interference competition among native and invader amphipods. Acta Oecologia 31: 282–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Fiona MacNeil and Carl Haynes of Summerfield Farm campsite for use of all facilities and cold rooms. Thanks to the Government Laboratory, Isle of Man. Thanks also to Nina Birkby of the Environment Agency of England and Wales and Mark Briffa of the University of Plymouth. Thanks to Katya Kovalenko and referees whose comments improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Aquatic Consultant, Brookvale Cottage, Main Road,, Union Mills, Isle of Man, British Isles, IM4 4AJ, UK

    Calum MacNeil

Authors
  1. Calum MacNeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calum MacNeil.

Additional information

Handling editor: Katya E. Kovalenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacNeil, C. Predatory impacts of the invasive ‘killer shrimp’ Dikerogammarus villosus on a resident amphipod and isopod (Crustacea: Malacostraca) are influenced by water quality and habitat type. Hydrobiologia 833, 53–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3881-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3881-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation