Log in

Coupled Influence of Compaction and Moisture on Unsaturated Soil Response in Triaxial Tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unsaturated soils are the major component of both natural and artificial earth structures, and they exhibit less predictable behavior than saturated soils. Presently, the world is experiencing pronounced impacts from climate change. Sudden heavy rainfalls and droughts both result in fluctuating soil moisture levels, meaning that soil responds differently to infrastructure loads. Accordingly, a better understanding is needed of failure causes in unsaturated soils. This research was conducted to investigate the coupled behavior of unsaturated soil with varying degrees of compaction and moisture change. Samples were prepared at 81% and 88% degrees of compaction with moisture content ranging from 10 to 25% on both sides of optimum moisture content for silty soil. Different parameters such as suction, porewater pressure, and deformation were carefully measured at every stage of the triaxial test, from sample placing to the shearing phase. The results show that there is more compressive soil behavior when there is a lower degree of compaction, i.e., 81%, along with moisture content of 15–25%. Where there is a higher degree of compaction at 88%, dilative behavior is more evident, which changes to compressive behavior as the moisture content increases. Any change in moisture content (increase or decrease) during the lifecycle of any earthen structure necessitates a long time to stabilize its suction value (decrease or increase) if it compacted to a degree that still exhibits a compressive response. This slow recovery of suction, specifically from the wetting to the drying cycle, is not favorable for soil stability upon loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be available if the request is made to the authors.

Abbreviations

ε a :

Axial strain (%)

u a :

Pore air pressure (kPa)

u w :

Pore water pressure (kPa)

σ 3 :

Confining pressure (kPa)

σ d :

Deviatoric stress (kPa)

ε v :

Volumetric strain (%)

m.c. :

Moisture content (%)

e :

Void ratio

\({\gamma }_{d}\) :

Dry unit weight (kN/m3)

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors duly acknowledge the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory at Saitama University for providing its research facilities for conducting this research.

Funding

The authors declare that they have no funding issues involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Kamran Hussain Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests or conflicts of interest that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, I., Shah, S.K.H., Ahmad, T. et al. Coupled Influence of Compaction and Moisture on Unsaturated Soil Response in Triaxial Tests. Geotech Geol Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-02807-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-02807-3

Keywords

Navigation