SpringerLink
Log in

Fire Performance of EPS ETICS Facade: Effect of Test Scale and Masonry Cover

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many fire disasters have occurred on the thermoplastic expanded polystyrene (EPS) external thermal insulation composite systems (ETICS) installed vertically on the building facade. Thus, it is important to understand the reaction-to-fire performance of EPS ETICS and the effect of sample scale, orientation, and masonry cover in fire tests. In this work, both specimens of EPS alone and EPS ETICS with masonry cover are tested under three different scales, (1) 0.01-m2 small-scale cone calorimeter test (ISO 5660-1), (2) 1-m2 intermediate-scale test (ISO 14696), and (3) 7-m2 larger-scale test (JIS A 1310). Results show that the impact of sample orientation is important, because the heated vertical EPS can melt and flow away without ignition, and the masonry cover limits the flow of EPS melts. The peak heat release rate per unit area (pHRRPUA) in the small-scale test doubles that of the large-scale facade test with a vertical flame spread, so that it cannot be simply scaled up. Moreover, the masonry cover on the EPS ETICS can significantly reduce the burning rate and HRR by a factor of 50%, and it is effective from small-scale to large-scale fires. The embedded rock-wool fire barrier inside the EPS ETICS can significantly reduce the vertical flame-spread rate and HRR. This work helps understand the scale-effect of facade fire test and quantifies the effect of masonry cover on lowering facade fire hazards.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barreira E, de Freitas VP (2013) Experimental study of the hygrothermal behaviour of external thermal insulation composite systems (ETICS). Build Environ 63:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nilica R, Harmuth H (2005) Mechanical and fracture mechanical characterization of building materials used for external thermal insulation composite systems. Cement Concrete Res 35:1641–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolbrecki A (2015) Model of fire spread out on outer building surface. Bull Polish Acad Sci Tech Sci 63:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khan AA, Lin S, Huang X, Usmani A (2021) Facade fire hazards of bench-scale aluminum composite panel with flame-retardant core. Fire Technol

  5. MacLeod G (2018) The Grenfell tower atrocity. City 22:460–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandilaras I, Atsonios I, Zannis G, Founti M (2014) Thermal performance of a building envelope incorporating ETICS with vacuum insulation panels and EPS. Energy Build 85:654–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang S, Huang X, Chen H, Liu N, Rein G (2015) Ignition of low-density expandable polystyrene foam by a hot particle. Combust Flame 162:4112–4118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wessies SS, Chang MK, Marr KC, Ezekoye OA (2019) experimental and analytical characterization of firebrand ignition of home insulation materials. Fire Technol 55:1027–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doroudiani S, Omidian H (2010) Environmental, health and safety concerns of decorative mouldings made of expanded polystyrene in buildings. Build Environ 45:647–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo S, ** flow behaviors on the downward flame spread of a wide XPS foam. Fire Technol 55:2055–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. **e Q, Zhang H, Ye R (2009) Experimental study on melting and flowing behavior of thermoplastics combustion based on a new setup with a T-shape trough. J Hazard Mater 166:1321–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin GJ, Bicknell AD, Bradbury GP, White N (2006) Effect of construction method on the fire behavior of sandwich panels with expanded polystyrene cores in room fire tests. J Fire Sci 24:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu Q, ** C, Griffin G, Jiang Y (2014) Fire safety evaluation of expanded polystyrene foam by multi-scale methods. J Therm Anal Calorim 115:1651–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshioka H, Nishio Y, Tamura M, Yoshida M, Noguchi T, Ohmiya Y et al (2014) Facade tests on fire propagation along combustible exterior wall systems. Fire Sci Technol 33:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nishio Y, Yoshioka H, Noguchi T, Ando T, Tamura M (2013) Experimental study on fire propagation over combustible exterior facades in Japan. MATEC Web of Conferences: EDP Sciences, p 04001

  16. Mikkola E, Hakkarainen T, Matala A (2013) Fire safety of EPS insulated facades in residential multi-storey buildings. MATEC Web of Conferences: EDP Sciences, p 04002

  17. Mandilaras I, Atsonios I, Zannis G, Founti MJE (2014) Thermal performance of a building envelope incorporating ETICS with vacuum insulation panels and EPS. Buildings 85:654–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofmann A, Kaudelka S, Hauswaldt SJF (2018) Fire safety of FACADES with polystyrene foam insulation. Materials 42:466–474

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hajduković M, Knez N, Knez F, Kolšek J (2017) Fire performance of external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS) facades with expanded polystyrene (EPS) insulation and thin rendering. Fire Technol 53:173–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou B, Yoshioka H, Noguchi T, Ando T (2018) Experimental study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS) masonery facade reaction-to-fire performance. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 8:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou B, Yoshida M, Noguchi T, Ando T (2020) Experimental study on vertical temperature profile of buoyant window spill plume from intermediate-scale compartments. Fire Mater (in press)

  22. Zhou B, Yoshioka H, Noguchi T, Ando TJF (2018) Effects of opening edge treatment and EPS thickness on EPS external thermal insulation composite systems (ETICS) facade reaction-to-fire performance based on JIS A1310 standard facade fire test method. Materials 42:537–548

  23. Zhou B, Yoshioka H, Noguchi T, Wang K, Huang X (2021) Upward fire spread rate over real-scale EPS ETICS Facades. Fire Technol

  24. Rossi M, Camino G, Luda M (2001) Characterisation of smoke in expanded polystyrene combustion. Polym Degrad Stabil 74:507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bakhtiyari S, Taghi-Akbari L, Barikani M (2010) The effective parameters for reaction-to-fire properties of expanded polystyrene foams in bench scale. Iran Polym J 19:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang X, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Sun J (2012) Thickness effect on flame spread characteristics of expanded polystyrene in different environments. J Thermoplast Compos 25:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu Q, ** C, Jiang Y (2014) Analysis of the relationship between MCC and thermal analysis results in evaluating flammability of EPS foam. J Therm Anal Calorim 118:687–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stec AA, Hull TR (2011) Assessment of the fire toxicity of building insulation materials. Energ Build 43:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Torero JL (2013) Scaling-Up fire. Proc Combust Inst 34:99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumm M, Söderström J, Lönnermark A (2013) EPS insulated facade fires from a fire and rescue perspective. MATEC Web of Conferences: EDP Sciences, p 05003

  31. Bjegovic D, Pecur IB, Messerschmidt B, Milovanovic B, Alagusic M. Influence of fire barriers on fire performance of facades with combustible insulation. MATEC web of conferences: EDP Sciences, p 05006

  32. ISO 5660-1 (2015) I. Reaction-to-fire tests—heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate—part 1: heat release rate (cone calorimeter method). International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland

  33. ISO 14696 (2009) I. Reaction-to-fire tests—determination of fire and thermal parameters of materials, products and assemblies using an intermediate-scale calorimeter (ICAL)

  34. JISA1310 (2015) Test method for fire propagation over building facades

  35. Tsai K-C (2009) Orientation effect on cone calorimeter test results to assess fire hazard of materials. J Hazard Mater 172:763–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Babrauskas V (2016) Heat release rates. Springer, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, pp 799–904

    Google Scholar 

  37. Huang X (2018) Critical drip size and blue flame shedding of drip** ignition in fire. Sci Rep 8:16528

  38. Sun P, Lin S, Huang X (2020) Ignition of thin fuel by thermoplastic drips: An experimental study for the drip** ignition theory. Fire Safety J 115:103006

  39. Janssens M, Urbas J (1996) Comparison of small and intermediate scale heat release data. Proceedings of Interflam, p 26–29

  40. Kusch P, Knupp G (2004) Headspace-SPME-GC-MS identification of volatile organic compounds released from expanded polystyrene. J Polym Environ 12:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge reviewers for the meaningful content discussion. The authors gratefully acknowledge Masamichi Tamura and Yutaka Tanaike from University of Tokyo, Yuhei Nishio, Miki Nakamura, and Yuji Kanda from Tokyo University of Science for preparation of the experiment and the help in the experimental operation, and Zilong Wang from HK PolyU for valuable comments on the analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Bei**g, 100083, China

    Biao Zhou & Kai Wang

  2. Department of Fire Engineering, Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0802, Japan

    Hideki Yoshioka

  3. Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan

    Biao Zhou & Takafumi Noguchi

  4. Department of Building Services Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, BLK Z, 181 Chatham Road South, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ZS 832, China

    **nyan Huang

Authors
  1. Biao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hideki Yoshioka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takafumi Noguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. **nyan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Biao Zhou or **nyan Huang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 9537 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 7333 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, B., Yoshioka, H., Noguchi, T. et al. Fire Performance of EPS ETICS Facade: Effect of Test Scale and Masonry Cover. Fire Technol 59, 95–116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01195-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01195-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation