Log in

The (ir)relevance of the abandoned criterion II for the diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently updated the diagnostic criteria for serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS). One of the three previous diagnostic criteria (criterion II2010) is now abandoned: ≥ 1 serrated polyp (SP) proximal to the sigmoid in a first-degree relative (FDR) of a patient with SPS. Individuals fulfilling this abandoned criterion now receive the same surveillance recommendations as all FDRs of patients with SPS. We aimed to compare the incidence of advanced neoplasia (AN) in FDRs with vs. without fulfillment of the abandoned criterion II2010. We retrospectively recruited FDRs of patients with SPS who underwent a colonoscopy, and stratified them according to fulfilment of criterion II2010 at baseline. Our primary and secondary outcomes were AN incidence during surveillance and at baseline, respectively. We included 224 FDRs of patients with SPS, of whom 36 (16%) fulfilled criterion II2010 at baseline. One hundred and five underwent surveillance after baseline. Criterion II2010-positive FDRs were at increased risk of AN, both during surveillance (hazard ratio 8.94, 95% CI 2.15–37.1, p = .003) as well as at baseline (adjusted odds-ratio 9.30, 95% CI 3.7–23.3, p < .001). FDRs of patients with SPS that underwent colonoscopy and fulfilled the abandoned criterion II2010 for SPS diagnosis were at increased risk of AN at baseline and during surveillance in this small, retrospective cohort study. Our results should be interpreted with caution but suggest that adherence to surveillance recommendations for all FDRs of patients with SPS is important, especially for those that would have fulfilled the now abandoned criterion II2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carballal S, Rodríguez-Alcalde D, Moreira L, Hernández L, Rodríguez L, Rodríguez-Moranta F, Gonzalo V, Bujanda L, Bessa X, Poves C, Cubiella J, Castro I, González M, Moya E, Oquiñena S, Clofent J, Quintero E, Esteban P, Piñol V, Fernández FJ, Jover R, Cid L, López-Cerón M, Cuatrecasas M, López-Vicente J, Leoz ML, Rivero-Sánchez L, Castells A, Pellisé M, Balaguer F (2015) Colorectal cancer risk factors in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome: a large multicentre study. Gut 65(11):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IJspeert JEG, Rana SA, Atkinson NS, van Herwaarden YJ, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME, Sanduleanu S, Bisseling TM, Spaander MC, Clark SK, Meijer GA, van Lelyveld N, Koornstra JJ, Nagtegaal ID, East JE, Latchford A, Dekker E, Dutch workgroup serrated polyps & polyposis (2017) Clinical risk factors of colorectal cancer in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicentre cohort analysis. Gut 66(2):278–284. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodriguez-Alcalde D, Carballal S, Moreira L, Hernandez L, Rodriguez-Alonso L, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Gonzalo V, Bujanda L, Bessa X, Poves C, Cubiella J, Castro I, Gonzalez M, Moya E, Oquinena S, Clofent J, Quintero E, Esteban P, Pinol V, Fernandez FJ, Jover R, Cid L, Saperas E, Lopez-Ceron M, Cuatrecasas M, Lopez-Vicente J, Rivero-Sanchez L, Jung G, Vila-Casadesus M, Sanchez A, Castells A, Pellise M, Balaguer F (2018) High incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance in serrated polyposis syndrome. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0656-5557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Snover DC, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. In: Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis syndrome, Lyon, pp 160–165

  5. Torlakovic E, Snover DC (1996) Serrated adenomatous polyposis in humans. Gastroenterology 110(3):748–755. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosty C, Brosens LAA, Nagtegaal ID (2019) Serrated polyposis. In: WHO classification of tumours. digestive system tumours, vol 1. 24–26

  7. Bettington M, Brown I, Rosty C, Walker N, Liu C, Croese J, Rahman T, Pearson SA, McKeone D, Leggett B, Whitehall V (2018) Sessile serrated adenomas in young patients may have limited risk of malignant progression. J Clin Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0000000000001014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoogerbrugge N, Dekker E, Duijvendijk P, Van Hest LP, Van Leerdam M, Ligtenberg MJL, Mourits MJE, Morreau J, Saveur L, Schoenaker I, Seppen J, Sijmons RH, Wagner A, de Wilt JHW (2015) Richtlijn Erfelijke Darmkanker. Oncoline. www.oncoline.nl/erfelijke-darmkanker. Accessed 2 Jan 2017

  9. Hazewinkel Y, Tytgat KM, van Eeden S, Bastiaansen B, Tanis PJ, Boparai KS, Fockens P, Dekker E (2014) Incidence of colonic neoplasia in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome who undergo annual endoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 147(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasen HFA, Hes FJ, de Jong MM (2017) Erfelijke en familiaire tumoren—Richtlijn voor diagnostiek en preventie. Stichting opsporing erfelijke tumoren, pp 54–55, vol 6

  11. IJspeert JEG, Bevan R, Senore C, Kaminski MF, Kuipers EJ, Mroz A, Bessa X, Cassoni P, Hassan C, Repici A, Balaguer F, Rees CJ, Dekker E (2016) Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: a European overview. Gut 0:gutjnl-2015-310784. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310784

  12. IJspeert JEG, Van Doorn SC, Van Der Brug YM, Bastiaansen BAJ, Fockens P, Dekker E (2015) The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 82(5):870–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL, Eckert GJ, Rex DK (2011) Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(1):42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Balaguer F, Pellise M (2014) Colorectal cancer: serrated polyposis–should we screen first-degree relatives? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(6):333–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cubiella J, Marzo-Castillejo M, Mascort-Roca JJ, Amador-Romero FJ, Bellas-Beceiro B, Clofent-Vilaplana J, Carballal S, Ferrándiz-Santos J, Gimeno-García AZ, Jover R, Mangas-Sanjuán C, Moreira L, Pellisè M, Quintero E, Rodríguez-Camacho E, Vega-Villaamil P (2018) Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018. Gastroenterología y Hepatología. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.07.012

  16. Oquinena S, Guerra A, Pueyo A, Eguaras J, Montes M, Razquin S, Ciaurriz A, Aznarez R (2013) Serrated polyposis: prospective study of first-degree relatives. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283598506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hazewinkel Y, Koornstra JJ, Boparai KS, van Os TA, Tytgat KM, Van Eeden S, Fockens P, Dekker E (2015) Yield of screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with serrated polyposis syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 49(5):407–412. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boparai KS, Reitsma JB, Lemmens V, van Os TAM, Mathus-Vliegen EMH, Koornstra JJ, Nagengast FM, van Hest LP, Keller JJ, Dekker E (2010) Increased colorectal cancer risk in first-degree relatives of patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. Gut 59(9):1222–1225. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.200741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Herwaarden YJ, Verstegen MHP, Dura P, Kievit W, Drenth JPH, Dekker E, Ijspeert JEG, Hoogerbrugge N, Nagengast FM, Nagtegaal ID, Bisseling TM (2015) Low prevalence of serrated polyposis syndrome in screening populations: a systematic review. Endoscopy 47(11):1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1392411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Erichsen R, Baron JA, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Snover DC, Torlakovic EE, Pedersen L, Frøslev T, Vyberg M, Hamilton SR, Sørensen HT (2016) Increased risk of colorectal cancer development among patients with serrated polyps. Gastroenterology 150(4):895–902.e895. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA (2010) Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology 139(5):1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, Weiss JE, Amos C, Srivastava A (2017) Risk of metachronous high-risk adenomas and large serrated polyps in individuals with serrated polyps on index colonoscopy: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. He X, Wu K, Ogino S, Giovannucci EL, Chan AT, Song M (2018) Association between risk factors for colorectal cancer and risk of serrated polyps and conventional adenomas. Gastroenterology 155(2):355–373.e318. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AGCB, JEGI, and ED: study conception & design. AGCB, JEGI, DR-A, SC, FB, JJK, and SAR: acquisition of data. AGCB: drafting of the manuscript and statistical analysis. All authors: analysis & interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content, technical & logistical support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelien Dekker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author FB have endoscopic equipment on loan of Fujifilm, and he received an honorarium for consultancy from Sysmex, and speaker’s fee from Norgine. The author MP received research grant from Fujifilm, received consultancy fee from Norgine and speaker’s fee from Olympus, Norgine, Casen Recordati and Janssen. The author ED have endoscopic equipment on loan of Olympus and FujiFilm, receive a research grant from FujiFilm and he received a honorarium for consultancy from FujiFilm, Tillots and Olympus and a speakers’ fee from Olympus and Roche.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bleijenberg, A.G., IJspeert, J.E., Rodríguez-Alcalde, D. et al. The (ir)relevance of the abandoned criterion II for the diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Familial Cancer 19, 153–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-019-00156-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-019-00156-2

Navigation