Log in

Effect of rearing density on the expression of fitness-related traits in male sand field crickets (Gryllus firmus)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rearing density has profound effects on life-history decisions for develo** organisms because, for example, it can foreshadow the sexual competitive environment potentially experienced in adulthood. Increased sexual competitiveness should favour greater investment in pre- or post-copulatory sexually selected traits such as weaponry or testes, while sexual-signaling traits that attract mates from a long distance should be favoured in low density populations. High density environments should also trigger density-dependent prophylaxis in which individuals increase their investment in immunity. In this study, we experimentally investigated the effect of rearing density on the adult expression of an immunological trait (i.e., melanization response) as well as pre- (i.e., mandible length, harp size) and post-copulatory (i.e., testis size) sexually selected traits in male Gryllus firmus crickets. We found that all morphological traits positively intercorrelated within each environment whereas melanization response was unrelated to any other measured trait. We also found that high-density males produced larger mandibles (weaponry), contrary to expectation, and stronger immunological responses (degree of melanization), in line with expectation, than their low-density counterparts. As predicted, low-density males produced larger harps, a trait involved in sexual signaling. Our results suggest that male G. firmus facultatively partition resources in a manner that maximizes fitness in the environment they expect to encounter as adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GTEQH.

References

  • Anderson RM, May RM (1979) Population biology of infectious diseases: part I. Nature 280:361–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum S, Heifetz Y (1999) Density-dependent physiological phase in insects. Ann Rev Entomol 44:317–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey NW, Gray B, Zuk M (2010) Acoustic experience shapes alternative mating tactics and reproductive investment in male field crickets. Curr Biol 20:845–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark HC (1989) Songs and the physics of sound production. In: Huber F, Moore LTE (eds) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA, pp 227–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretman A, Fricke C, Westmancoat J, Chapman T (2016) Effect of competitive cues on reproductive morphology and behavioral plasticity in male fruitflies. Behav Ecol 27:452–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (2003) Testis size increases with colony size in cliff swallows. Behav Ecol 14:569–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter SC, Hails RS, Cory JS, Wilson K (2004) Density-dependent prophylaxis and condition‐dependent immune function in Lepidopteran larvae: a multivariate approach. J Anim Ecol 73:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen OC, Li C-H, Sykes EME et al (2022) Density-dependent prophylaxis in freshwater snails driven by oxylipin chemical cues. Front Immunol 13:153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJ (1995) Continuous variation in reproductive strategy as an adaptive response to population density in the moth Plodia interpunctella. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 261:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halekoh U, Højsgaard S (2014) A kenward-roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – the R package pbkrtest. J Stat Softw 59:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hissmann K (1990) Strategies of mate finding in the european field cricket (Gryllus campestris) at different population densities: a field study. Ecol Entomol 15:281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken D (2001) Sex and death: microevolutionary trade-offs between reproductive and immune investment in dung flies. Curr Biol 11:R379–R380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, Ward PI (2001) Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol Lett 4:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iba M, Nagao T, Urano A (1995) Effects of population density on growth, behavior and levels of biogenic amines in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zoolog Sci 12:695–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson T, Symonds M, Elgar M (2017) Anticipatory flexibility: larval population density in moths determines male investment in antennae, wings and testes. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 284:20172087

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge K, Bonanno V (2008) Male weaponry in a fighting cricket. PLoS ONE 3:e3980

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kasumovic MM, Brooks RC (2011) It’s all who you know: the evolution of socially cued anticipatory plasticity as a mating strategy. Q Rev Biol 86:181–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly C (2018) The causes and evolutionary consequences of variation in female mate choice in insects: the effects of individual state, genotypes and environments. Curr Opin Insect Sci 27:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CD, L’Heureux V (2021) Effect of diet and rearing density on contest outcome and settlement in a field cricket. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CD, Tawes B, Worthington A (2014) Evaluating indices of body condition in two cricket species. Ecol Evol 4:4476–4487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knell RJ (2009) Population density and the evolution of male aggression. J Zool 278:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 361:319–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaître J, Ramm S, Hurst J, Stockley P (2011) Social cues of sperm competition influence accessory reproductive gland size in a promiscuous mammal. Proc Biol Sci 278:1171–1176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar M, Patil I et al (2021) Performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J Open Source Softw 6:3139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkiewicz A, Tumialis D, Pezowicz E et al The effect of density on the breeding optimization of the tropical house cricket Gryllodes sigillatus (Walker) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

  • Nylin S, Gotthard K (1998) Plasticity in life-history traits. Ann Rev Entomol 43:63–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G, Lessells C, Simmons L (2013) Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male-male competition. Evolution 67:95–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters TM, Barbosa P (1977) Influence of population density on size, fecundity, and developmental rate of insects in culture. Ann Rev Entomol 22:431–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version: 4.2.3. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Saglam I, Roff D, Fairbairn D (2008) Male sand crickets trade-off flight capability for reproductive potential. J Evol Biol 21:997–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuber H, Jacot A, Brinkhof M (2003) The effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 270:1779–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1986) Inter-male competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav 34:567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary Consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press

  • Simons AM, Roff DA (1994) The effect of environmental variability on the heritabilities of traits of a field cricket. Evolution 48:1637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons AM, Roff DA (1996) The effect of a variable environment on the genetic correlation structure in a field cricket. Evolution 50:267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siva-Jothy MT, Moret Y, Rolff J (2005) Insect immunity: an Evolutionary Ecology Perspective. Adv Insect Physiol 32:1–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P, Seal N (2001) Plasticity in reproductive effort of male dung flies (Scatophaga stercoraria) as a response to larval density. Funct Ecol 15:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan GN, Govedich FR, Burd M (2004) Social group size, potential sperm competition and reproductive investment in a hermaphroditic leech, Helobdella papillornata (Euhirudinea: Glossiphoniidae). J Evol Biol 17:574–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker SE, Roberts JA, Adame I et al (2008) Heads up: sexual dimorphism in house crickets (Acheta domesticus). Can J Zool 86:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb KL, Roff DA (1992) The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim Behav 44:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wey TW, Réale D, Kelly CD (2019) Developmental and genetic effects on behavioral and life-history traits in a field cricket. Ecol Evol 9:3434–3445

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Cotter SC (2009) Density-dependent prophylaxis in insects. In: Whitman DW, Ananthakrishnan TN (eds) Phenotypic plasticity of insects: mechanisms and consequences. Science Publishers Inc., Plymouth, UK, pp 381–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Reeson AF (1998) Density-dependent prophylaxis: evidence from Lepidoptera-baculovirus interactions. Ecol Entomol 23:100–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Thomas MB, Blanford S et al (2002) Co** with crowds: density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5471–5475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grants to CDK and DR as well as by funding from Canada Research Chairs (CDK).

Funding

CDK wishes to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canada Research Chairs program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TWW: Designed experiment and collected data. VL: Collected data. DR: Designed experiment. CDK: Designed experiment, analyzed data, wrote manuscript, dealt with all reviewer comments, and manuscript revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clint D. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, C.D., L’Heureux, V., Wey, T.W. et al. Effect of rearing density on the expression of fitness-related traits in male sand field crickets (Gryllus firmus). Evol Ecol 37, 835–846 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10251-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10251-7

Keywords

Navigation