Abstract
Host plant resistance, in integrated systems, could be a critical tool for reducing thrips damage to seedling cotton. Plant breeders, however, need information regarding the genetic nature of resistance for effective and efficient introgression into breeding material. Trials were conducted in 2011–2014 at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Lubbock to elucidate the genetic nature of thrips resistance and the gains to be expected from visual phenotypic selection. Another objective was to validate a visual rating system for assessing thrips feeding injury in seedling cotton. Broad sense heritability (H 2) ranged 41–67%, depending on the family. H 2 was higher in families with a day-neutral resistant parent than those with a photoperiodic resistant parent. Observed segregation ratios fit 3:1, 13:3, and 11:5 expected resistant/susceptible ratios, although nearly all of the phenotypic distributions exhibited closer fits to two-gene models. Additionally, the visual rating scale utilized in these evaluations exhibited a strong correlation (r s = 0.884) with directly-quantifiable leaf area reduction data. These results suggest that thrips resistance is a dominant trait, under a high level of genetic control. There also appears to be at least a second gene (Thr2) aiding in genetic control of resistance. Actual gain from selection ranged 2–21% per cycle of selection, depending on the selection intensity. Optimum selection intensity in these evaluations was 5%, resulting in an approximate 21% gain. These evaluations revealed that host plant thrips resistance varies widely in cotton and can be sufficiently captured and advanced by plant breeders using visual selection.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10681-017-1861-0/MediaObjects/10681_2017_1861_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal AA, Kobayashi C, Thaler JS (1999) Influence of prey availability and induced host-plant resistance on omnivory by western flower thrips. Ecology 80:518–523
Akhtar ZR, Tian JC, Chen Y, Fang Q, Hu C, Chen M, Peng YF, Ye GY (2010) Impacts of six Bt rice lines on nontarget rice feeding thrips under laboratory and field conditions. Environ Entomol 39:715–726
Andrus CF, Wade BL (1942) The factorial interpretation of anthracnose resistance in beans. Tech Bull 810, US Dep Agric, Washington, DC
Arif MJ, Siahl IA, Ulla S, Gogi MD, Sial MA (2004) Some morphological plant factors effecting resistance in cotton against thrips (Thrips tabaci L). Int J Agric and Biology 6:544–546
Arnold MD, Dever JK, Elkins HD, Sheehan MA (2010) Development of a thrips resistant, adapted cotton cultivar for the Texas High Plains: screening, crossing, and field trials. In: Proceedings 2010 Beltwide Cotton Conference, National Cotton Council, Cordova, TN, pp 872–875
Arnold MD, Dever JK, Parajulee MN, Carroll SC, Flippin HD (2012) Simple and effective method for evaluating cotton seedlings for resistance to thrips in a greenhouse, and a thrips species composition on the Texas High Plains. Southwest Entomol 37:305–313
Ballard WW (1951) Varietal differences in susceptibility to thrips injury in upland cotton. Agron J 43:37–44
Bowman DT, McCarty JC Jr (1997) Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) tolerance in cotton: sources and heritability. J Entomol Sci 32:460–471
Buckley PA (1987) Mendelian genes. In: Cooke F, Buckley PA (eds) Avian genetics: a population and ecological approach. Academic Press Ltd, San Diego, pp 1–44
Davidson RH, Lyon WF (1986) Pests of cotton. Insect pests of farm, garden, and orchard. Wiley, New York, pp 212–226
Frey KJ, Horner T (1955) Comparison of actual and predicted gains in barley selection experiments. Agron J 47:186–188
Gannaway JR (1989) Registration of eight cotton germplasm lines. Crop Sci 29:834
Gawaad AAA, Soliman AS (2009) Studies on Thrips tabaci Lindman: IX Resistance of nineteen varieties of cotton to Thrips tabaci L and Aphis gossypii G. J Appl Entomol 70:93–98
Guo Z, Xu P, Zhang Z, Guo Y (2012) Segregation ratios of colored grains in F1 hybrid wheat. Crop Breed and Appl Biotechnol 12:126–131
Hague SS, Smith CW, Berger G, Clement J, Jones DC (2011) Variation in an extra-long staple Upland x medium staple Upland cotton F2 population. J Cotton Sci 15:265–270
Hawkins BS, Peacock HA, Steel TE (1966) Thrips injury to upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) varieties. Crop Sci 6:256–258
Hollis P (2015) Cotton growers saw thrips resistance in 2014. Penton Agriculture. http://www.southeastfarmpress.com/management/. Accessed 30 Jan 2017
Huseth AS, Chappell TM, Langdon K, Morsello SC, Martin S, Greene JK, Herbert A, Jacobson AL, Reay-Jones FP, Reed T, Reisig DD, Roberts PM, Smith R, Kennedy GG (2016) Frankliniella fusca resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides: an emerging challenge for cotton pest management in the eastern United States. Pest Manag Sci 72:1934–1945
Miko I (2008) Epistasis: gene interaction and phenotype effects. Nature Educ 1:197
Nazamani IA, Talpur MA, Khuhro RD, Nizamani SM (2002) Relative resistance of cotton cultivars to sucking complex. J Appl Sci 2:686–689
Obrist LB, Klein H, Dutton A, Bigler F (2005) Effects of Bt maize on Frankliniella tenuicornis and exposure of thrips predators to prey-mediated Bt toxin. Entomol Exp Appl 115:409–416
Poulos JM, Reifschneider FJB, Coffman WR (1991) Heritability and gain from selection for quantitative resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in Capsicum annuum L. Euphytica 56:161–167
Quisenberry JE, Rummel DR (1979) Natural resistance to thrips injury in cotton as measured by differential leaf area reduction. Crop Sci 19:879–881
Shukla AN (2009) Extensions to Mendelian analysis. Genetic material and analysis, vol 1. Discover Publ House Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, pp 124–141
Soper DS (2013) P-value calculator for a Chi square test. Dr Daniel Soper. http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx?id=11. Accessed 30 Jan 2017
Stanton MA, Stewart JM, Tugwell NP (1992) Evaluation of Gossypium arboreum L germplasm for resistance to thrips. Genet Res and Crop Evol 39:89–95
US Dep Agric Agric Marketing Serv (USDA-AMS) – Cotton and Tobacco Progr (2016) Cotton varieties planted—2016 crop. US Dep Agric. http://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/cnavar.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017
Wright RJ, Thaxton PM, El-Zik KM, Paterson AH (1998) D-subgenome bias of Xcm resistance genes in tetraploid Gossypium (cotton) suggests that polyploid formation has created novel avenues for evolution. Genetics 149:1987–1996
Zhang J, Fang H, Zhou H, Hughs SE, Jones DC (2013) Inheritance and transfer of thrips resistance from Pima cotton to Upland cotton. J Cotton Sci 17:163–169
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express thanks to Valerie Morgan, Carol Kelly, Joel Arce, Leslie Wells, Troy Arce, Monica Sheehan, Jimmy Mabry, Lyndon Schoenhals, Brad Harris, Trey Cutts, Juliana Osorio, and Ryan Gregory for outstanding technical assistance, all of whom were essential to the success of this research. This research was conducted with partial financial support from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (NIFA-OREI) and the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wann, D.Q., Dever, J.K., Arnold, M.D. et al. Genetic analysis and gain from selection of thrips resistance in cotton. Euphytica 213, 70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1861-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1861-0