SpringerLink
Log in

Community structure and species diversity of forest vegetation in a protected area of Western Himalayan region of India

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The monitoring of species diversity is a key pre-requisite for understanding and managing forest ecosystems. The vegetation assessment of the forests at the habitat and community levels in the forest ecosystems can help in its proper monitoring and formulation of conservation strategies. With this aspect, the present study was conducted in the Shimla water catchment Sanctuary (SWCS) of Western Himalayan region from 2011 to 2014. A total of 476 species of vascular plants were recorded with angiosperms (101 families, 307 genera, and 431 species), gymnosperms (3 families, 7 genera, and 9 species), and pteridophytes (11 families, 17 genera, and 36 species). Among these 39 species were the trees, 81 shrubs, 320 herbs, and the remaining 36 species were pteridophytes. The quantitative analysis showed the presence of 312 species at varying altitudes, aspects, slopes in the different identified communities. Further, tree communities were delineated based on IVI while shrub communities on the basis of relative density. A total of twenty-one forest communities (trees 15 and shrubs 6) were identified in the altitudinal range between 1850 to 2750 m above msl. In general, Shannon diversity index (H’) for trees ranged from 1.40 to 2.10, seedlings (0.67–1.51); saplings (0.62–1.72); shrubs 2.02–3.16 and herbs 2.47–4.38 while the values of concentration of dominance for trees ranged from 0.17 to 0.45, whereas in seedlings these values varied from 0.28 to 0.77. Saplings showed a range of 0.18–0.57, shrubs from 0.03 to 0.17, and herbs 0.03–0.16 for the values of Cd. The similarity values were evaluated by the Jaccard index among different communities in the tree, seedling, sapling, shrub, and herb layers which showed the presence and absence of various species. More than 50 per cent similarity was found in the shrub layer (77 community pairs) followed by seedling layer (61 community pairs), sapling layer (47 community pairs), and tree layer (44 community pairs). Least similarity (less than 50 per cent) was found for herb layer (7 community pairs) with maximum dissimilarity. The high level of dissimilarity can be attributed to the high level of disturbance in the forest layer. The application of vegetation indices can be a useful tool in predicting the structure of the forest vegetation and also vital in develo** adequate management strategies for conservation of plant diversity. In the SWCS, the plant communities with high species diversity and more heterogeneity require specific conservation strategies as these can be considered as rich zones or pockets of floral diversity in this ecosystem. Invasions by non-native species can be a threat to the forest flora that needs proper management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anton, C., Young, J., Harrison, P. A., Musche, M., Bela, G., Feld, C. K., Harrington, R., Haslett, J. R., Pataki, G., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Skourtos, M., Sousa, J. P., Sykes, M. T., Tinch, R., Vandewalle, M., Watt, A., & Settele, J. (2010). Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2979–2994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardakani, M.R. (2004). Ecology. Tehran University Press, pp. 340.

  • Arya, S. C., & Samant, S. S. (2017). Assessment of vegetation and prioritization of communities for conservation in Latakharak alpine meadows of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, West Himalaya India. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(9), 1349–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C., Mersey, B., & Ferrer, E. A. (2011). Has the earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471, 51–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, S. F., & Chen, H. (2010). Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity? Ecology, 91, 1931–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. A., & Rickard, W. H. (1995). Alien taxa in the North American shrub steppe four decades after cessation of livestock grazing and cultivation agriculture. Biological Conservation, 68, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockway, D. G. (1998). Forest plant diversity at local and landscape scales in the Cascade Mountains of South western Washington. Forest Ecology and Management, 109, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, N. S., & Thakur, S. (1995). Conservation of plant genetic resources of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Forestry, 18, 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, V., & Macdonald, S. E. (2010). The influence of canopy patch mosaics on understory plant community composition in boreal mixed wood forest. Forest Ecology & Management, 259, 1067–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, A.O. (2020). Comparative Analyses of Diversity and Similarity indices of WestBank Forest and Block a Forest of the International institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Lbadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Forestry Research, Article ID 4865845, 8 pages.

  • Collett, H. (1921). Flora simlensis: A handbook of the flowering plants of simla and the neighbourhood. Thacker Spink and Co., Calcutta, pp. 652.

  • Curtis, J. T., & McIntosh, R. P. (1950). The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phyto-sociological characters. Ecology, 31, 434–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, P. (1960). The origin and growth of plant communities. In: Zarrow, M.X. (Ed.), Growth in Living 435 System: Proceedings of International Symposium on Growth, Purdue University, Indiana. Basic Books, New York, pp. 573–603.

  • Das, S. C., Alam, M. S., & Hossain, M. A. (2018). Diversity and structural composition of species in dipterocarp forests: A study from Fasiakhali wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research, 29, 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0548-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, U., Rawal, R. S., & Samant, S. S. (1997). Structural diversity and representativeness of forest vegetation in a protected area of Kumaun Himalaya, India Implications for Conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 1045–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, S., & Cabido, M. (2001). Vive la difference: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 646–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolezal, J., & Srutek, M. (2002). Altitudinal changes in composition and structure of mountain temperate: A case study from the western carpathians. Plant Ecology, 158, 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, G., & Devi, A. (2013). Plant diversity, population structure, and regeneration status in disturbed tropical forests in Assam, northeast India. Forestry Research, 24, 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0409-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elourard, C., Pascal, J. P., Pelissier, R., Ramesh, B. R., Houllier, F., Durand, M., Aravajy, S., Moravie, M. A., & Gimaret-Carpentier, C. (1997). Monitoring the structure and dynamics of a dense moist evergreen forest in the Western Ghats (Kodagu District, Karnataka, India). Tropical Ecology, 38, 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENVIS Centre on Wildlife and Protected Area. (2020). Sponsored by Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (Govt. of India). http://wiienvis.nic.in/Database/Himachal_Pradesh_7823.aspx.

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 557–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.B. (1993). Nature reserves of the Himalaya and mountains of central Asia. IUCN Publication, pp. 137–290.

  • Greig-Smith, P. (1957). The use of random and contiguous quadrates in the study of the structure of the plant communities. Annals of Botany, 16, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. A., & Chen, H. (2008). Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in the boreal forest. Ecological Monographs, 78, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslett, J. R., Berry, P. M., Bela, G., Jongman, R. H. G., Pataki, G., Samways, M. J., & Zobel, M. (2010). Changing conservation strategies in Europe: A framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2963–2977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICIMOD. (2015). International symposium on Transforming Mountain Forestry. 18–22 January, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India. A conference brief.

  • Jackson, S. T., & Hobbs, R. J. (2009). Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history. Science, 325, 567–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, H. C., & Samant, S. S. (2004). Assessment of forest vegetation and conservation priorities of communities in a part of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, West Himalaya. Part 1. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11, 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala, C. P., & Mathur, V. B. (2002). Patterns of plant species distribution in the Trans- Himalayan region of Ladakh, India. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13, 751–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, K. A. (1973). Quantitative and Dynamics Plant Ecology (2nd ed.). Elbsd & Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, M., & Samant, S. S. (2019). Compositional and structural diversity of Forest vegetation in Kais Wildlife Sanctuary, North Western Himalaya: Conservation Implications. Journal of Biodiversity, 19(1–2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, M. (2007). Assessment of floristic diversity and conservation status of plants in Kais Wildlife Sanctuary of Himachal Pradesh in North-western Himalaya. Ph. D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, pp. 208.

  • Li, Q., Yang, L., & Zhou, J. (2002). Comparative analysis on species diversity of hill closed afforested plant community in Bei**g Jiulong Mountain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 13, 1065–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G. M., Bennett, K. D., Jackson, S. T., Paducci, L., Smith, F. A., Smol, J. P., & Willis, K. J. (2008). Impacts of climate change on species, populations and communities: Palaeobiogeographical insights and frontiers. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 32, 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirdavoodi, H. R., & Zahedi, P. H. (2005). Determination of suitable species diversity model for Meghan playa plant association and effect of some ecological factors on diversity change. Pajuhesh and Sazandegi, 68, 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, B. P., Tripathi, O. P., Tripathi, R. S., & Pandey, H. N. (2004). Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, K.C. (1991). Manual of Plant Ecology. Oxford and IBH Publishing, pp. 508.

  • Monarrez-Gonzalez, J. C., Gonzalez-Elizondo, M. S., Marquez-Linares, M. A., Gutierrez-Yurrita, P. J., & Perez-Verdin, G. (2020). Effect of forest management on tree diversity in temperate ecosystem forests in northern Mexico. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0233292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D., & Ellenberge, H. (1974). Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Willey and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulchand, R. (2013). Floristic diversity of the Patnadevi forest, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Environment Research and Development, 7, 1430–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, T. H., Heard, M. S., Isaac, N. J., Roy, D. B., Procter, D. E., Eigenbrod, F., Freckleton, R., Hector, A., Orme, C. D. L., Petchey, O. L., Proenca, V., Raffaelli, D., Suttle, K. B., Mace, G. M., Martin-Lopez, B., Woodcock, B. A., & Bullock, J. M. (2015). Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(11), 673–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oommen, M. A., & Shanker, K. (2005). Elevational species richness patterns emerge from multiple local mechanisms in Himalayan woody plants. Ecology, 86, 3039–3047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. (1984). The interpretation of Ecological Data: A primer on classification and ordination. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polunin, O., & Stainton, A. (1984). Flowers of the Himalaya (p. 580). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, D., & Kapoor, K. S. (2015). Assessment of floristic diversity of Shimla water catchment sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh. India. Indian Forester, 141(12), 1244–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, M. S., & Samant, S. S. (2009). Prioritization of habitats and communities for conservation in the Indian Himalayan region: A state-of-the-art approach from Manali wildlife sanctuary. Current Science, 97, 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, M. S., Samant, S. S., & Rawat, Y. S. (2011). Plant communities and factors responsible for vegetation pattern in an alpine area of the North-western Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Science, 8, 817–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, D., Kapoor, K. S., Samant, S. S., & Bhatt, A. (2020). Plant species conservation priority index for preparing management strategies: A case study from the Western Himalayas of India. Small Scale Forestry, 19(4), 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, D., Kapoor, K.S., & Singh, V.R.R. (2013). Hydrological and Ecological studies towards integrated water resource management: a case study of Shimla water catchment Sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh. In: Asia Pacific workshop on forest hydrology-water and forests: beyond traditional forest hydrology, pp. 160–165.

  • Rana, M.S. (2007). Assessment of floristic diversity and conservation prioritization of communities for conservation in Manali Wildlife Sanctuary of Himachal Pradesh in North-western Himalaya. Ph. D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, pp. 228.

  • Rawat, G. S., & Singh, S. K. (2006). Structure and composition of woody vegetation along the altitudinal and human use gradients in Great Himalayan National Park, North-western Himalaya. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy, 76, 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawat, B., Gairola, S., & Rawal, R. S. (2015). Assessing Conservation values of Forest communities in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve: Plant diversity, species distribution, and endemicity. Journal of Mountain Science, 12(4), 878–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M.R., and Gilliam, F.S. (2003). Response of the herbaceous layer to disturbance in eastern forests. In: The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America, editors Gilliam, F.S. and Roberts, M.R., Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

  • Royo, A. A., & Carson, W. P. (2006). On the formation of dense understory layers in forest worldwide: Consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1345–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samant, S.S., & Joshi, H.C. (2004). Floristic diversity, community patterns and changes of vegetation in Nanda Devi National Park. In: Biodiversity Monitoring Expedition Nanda Devi 2003. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, pp. 39–54.

  • Samant, S.S., Joshi, H.C., Arya, S.C., & Pant, S. (2002). Studies on the structure, composition and changes of vegetation in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve of west Himalaya. Final Technical Report, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.

  • Shannon, C. E., & Wiener, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Rana, J.C., Devi, U., Randhawa, S.S., & Kumar, R. (2014). Floristic diversity and distribution pattern of plant communities along altitudinal gradient in Sangla valley, Northwest Himalaya. The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 264878.

  • Sharma, A., & Samant, S. S. (2013). Diversity, structure, and composition of forest communities in Hirb and Shoja catchments, of Himachal Pradesh, North West Himalaya. India. International Journal of Botany, 9(1), 50–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2007). Assessment of plant diversity and conservation status of forest vegetation in a cold desert biosphere reserve of the Western Himalaya. Thesis submitted to Kumaun University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Kothari A, & Pande P, (1990). Directory of national parks and sanctuaries in Himachal Pradesh: Management status and profiles (p. 164). Indian Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Silva K R, Verheyen P Ponette Q, Bay E, Sioen G, Titeux H, Peer T V, de P, Meerbeek KV 2018 Tree diversity mitigates defoliation after a drought-indeuced tip** point Global Change Biology 24 9 4304 4315

  • Stevens, G. C. (1992). The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: An extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. American Naturalist, 133, 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J., Quinn, J. F., Ruggiero, M., & Waggoner, G. S. (1995). Status of biotic inventories in U.S. National Parks. Biological Conservation, 71, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I., Mackey, B., Mc Nulty, S., & Mosseler, A. (2009). Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change: a synthesis of biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Technical series no. 43, Montreal, Canada, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

  • Tilman, D., & Lehman, C. (2001). Human-caused environmental change: Impacts on plant diversity and evolution. PNAS, 98(10), 5433–5440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, A., Singh, O.P., Singh, M., & Bhan, S.C. (2010). Climate of Shimla. Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) Report.

  • Ugland, K. I., Gray, J. S., & Ellingsen, K. E. (2003). The species- Accumulation curve and Estimation of species richness. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 72(5), 888–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Maarel, E. (1996). Vegetation dynamics and dynamic vegetation science. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 45, 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K. J., & Bhagwat, S. A. (2010). Questions of importance to the conservation of biological diversity: Answers from the past. Climate of the past, 6, 759–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, M., & Naaf, T. (2009). Herb layer response to broadleaf tree species with different leaf litter quality and canopy structure in temperate forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M., & Sun, O. J. (2013). Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology & Management, 300, 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The officials of Forest department, especially Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF, Shimla), and forest guards of SWCS, Shimla are highly acknowledged for their kind cooperation during the entire period of research work. Financial support provided by G.B. Pant institute of Himalayan Environment & Development, Almora (UK) under project No. GBPI/IERP/12-13/03/14 is also highly acknowledged. Thanks are also due to the Ex-Director Dr. V.P. Tiwari for providing facilities to carry out research work and staff of Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Shimla for their cooperation during entire period of research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India

    Dipika Rana

  2. Forest Ecology and Climate Change Division, Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Panthaghati, Shimla, 171013, India

    Dipika Rana, Kulraj Singh Kapoor & Sher Singh Samant

  3. Environmental Technology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource and Technology, Palampur, 176061, India

    Anupam Bhatt

Authors
  1. Dipika Rana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kulraj Singh Kapoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anupam Bhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sher Singh Samant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipika Rana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 105 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rana, D., Kapoor, K.S., Bhatt, A. et al. Community structure and species diversity of forest vegetation in a protected area of Western Himalayan region of India. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 14011–14032 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02020-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02020-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation