Log in

Modeling and Optimization of COD Removal from Leachate by Electrocoagulation: Application of Central Composite Design

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the treatment of leachate by the electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum electrodes. A response surface methodology (RSM)-based central composite design (CCD) was carried out to design the experiments, develop a statistical model, assess the relationship between the four variables, and predict the responses, namely, the chemical oxygen demand (COD). The removal efficiency of COD, biological organic matter (BOD5), and turbidity were about 90%, 92.3%, and 99.6%, respectively, under optimum operational conditions, i.e., initial pH (5.3), current intensity (1.2 A), electrolysis time (75 min), and stirring speed (150 rpm). The operating cost of the current EC treatment was 0.6 €/m3. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (R2) revealed a satisfactory agreement between observed and expected results. Therefore, RSM is an appropriate approach to determine the key parameters for electrocoagulation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Li, X., Song, J., Guo, J., Wang, Z., & Feng, Q. (2011). Landfill leachate treatment using electrocoagulation. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 1159–1164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandes, A., Pacheco, M. J., Ciriaco, L., & Lopes, A. (2015). Review on the electrochemical processes for the treatment of sanitary landfill leachates: present and future. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 176, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boumechhour, F., Rabah, K., Lamine, C., & Said, B. M. (2012). Treatment of landfill leachate using Fenton process and coagulation-flocculation. Water Environ. J., 27(1), 114–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smaoui, Y., Chaabouni, M., Sayadi, S., & Bouzid, J. (2016). Coagulation flocculation process for leachate pretreatment and optimization with response surface methodology. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(31), 14488–14495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asaithambi, P., Beyene, D., Abdul Aziz, A. R., & Alemayehu, E. (2018). Removal of pollutants with determination of power consumption from landfill leachate wastewater using an electrocoagulation process: optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Applied Water Science, 8(2), 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouhezila, F., Hariti, M., Lounici, H., & Mameri, N. (2011). Treatment of the OUED SMAR town landfill leachate by an electrochemical reactor. Desalination, 280(1–3), 347–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pooja, G. S., & Indu, S. T. (2014). Enhanced removal of COD and color from landfill leachate in a sequential bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 170, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghanbari, F., & Moradia, M. (2014). Application of response surface method for coagulation process in leachate treatment as pretreatment for Fenton process: Biodegradability improvement. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 4, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. APHA/AWWA/WEF. (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th, ed. The Public Health Association, Washington, DC. USA.

  10. Chattoraj, S., Mondal, N. K., Das, B., Roy, P., & Sadhukhan, B. (2014). Biosorption of carbaryl from aqueous solution onto Pistia stratiotes biomass. Applied Water Science, 4(1), 79–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponnusami, V., Krithika, V., Madhuram, R., & Srivastava, S. N. (2007). Biosorption of reactive dye using acid-treated rice husk: factorial design analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(1–2), 397–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghafari, S., Aziz, H. A., Isa, M. H., & Zinatizadeh, A. (2009). Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation-flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2–3), 650–656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma, A. K., & Chopra, A. K. (2017). Removal of nitrate and sulphate from biologically treated municipal wastewater by electrocoagulation. Applied Water Science, 7(3), 1239–1246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thuy, K., & Lim, K. (2011). Response surface methodological approach to optimize the coagulation-flocculation process in drinking water treatment. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(7), 1126–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karichappan, T., Venkatachalam, S., & Jeganathan, P. M. (2014). Optimization of electrocoagulation process to treat grey wastewater in batch mode using response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, Engineering, 12(1), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gengec, E., Kobya, M., Demirbas, E., Akyol, A., & Oktor, K. (2012). Optimization of baker’s yeast wastewater using response surface methodology by electrocoagulation. Desalination, 286, 200–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye, J., Zhang, P., Hoffmann, E., Zeng, G., Tang, Y., Dresely, J., & Liu, Y. (2014). Comparison of response surface methodology and artificial neural network in optimization and prediction of acid activation of Bauxsol for phosphorus adsorption. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225(12), 2225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dia, O., Drogui, P., Buelna, G., Dube, R., & Ihsen, B. S. (2017). Electrocoagulation of biofiltrated landfill leachate. Fractionation Org. matter Influ. Anode Material, 168, 1136–1141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huda, N., Raman, A. A. A., Bello, M. M., & Ramesh, S. (2017). Electrocoagulation treatment of raw landfill leachate using iron-based electrodes: Effects of process parameters and optimization. Journal of Environmental Management, 204, 75–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guesmi, F., Louati, I., Hannachi, C., & Hamrouni, B. (2016). Comparison of adsorption models for the removal of fluorides, nitrates and sulfates by adsorption onto AFN membrane. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 51(2), 106–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ogedey, A., & Tanyol, M. (2017). optimizing electrocoagulation process using experimental design for COD removal from unsanitary landfill leachate. Water Science and Technology, 76(11), 2907–2917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Djafarzadeh, N., Safarpour, M., & Khataee, A. (2014). Electrochemical degradation of three reactive dyes using carbon paper cathode modified with carbon nanotubes and their simultaneous determination by partial least square method. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 31(5), 785–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kobya, M., Demirbas, E., Bayramoglu, M., & Sensoy, M. T. (2011). Optimization of electrocoagulation process for the treatment of metal cutting wastewaters with response surface methodology. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 215(1–4), 399–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Güçlü, D. (2015). Optimization of electrocoagulation of pistachio processing wastewaters using the response surface methodology. Desalination and Water Treatment, 54(12), 3338–3347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanafi, F., Assobhei, O., & Mountadar, M. (2010). Detoxification and discoloration of Moroccan olive mill wastewater by electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 174(1–3), 807–812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Holt, P. H., Barton, G. W., Wark, M., & Mitchell, A. A. (2002). A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 211(2–3), 233–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tak, B. Y., Tak, B., Kim, Y. J., Park, Y. J., Yoon, Y. H., & Min, G. H. (2015). Optimization of color and COD removal from livestock wastewater by electrocoagulation process: Application of Box-Behnken design (BBD). Journal of industrial and engineering chemistry, 28, 307–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thirugnanasambandham, K., Sivakumar, V., & Maran, P. J. (2014). Efficiency of electrocoagulation method to treat chicken processing industry wastewater-modeling and optimization. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 45(5), 2427–2435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Katal, R., & Pahlavanzadeh, H. (2011). Influence of different combinations of aluminum and iron electrode on electrocoagulation efficiency: application to the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Desalination, 265(3), 199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Manoj, P., Wagh, P., & Nemade, D. (2015). Treatment of distillery spent wash by using chemical coagulation (CC) and electro – coagulation. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 3(5), 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Veli, S., Arslan, A., & Bingöl, D. (2016). Application of response surface methodology to electrocoagulation treatment of hospital wastewater. Clean-Soil Air Water, 44(11), 1516–1522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vlyssides, A. G., Karlis, P. K., & Mahnken, G. (2003). Influence of various parameters on the electrochemical treatment of landfill leachates. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry., 33(2), 155–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Myers, R. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (2nd ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kabuk, H. A., İlhan, F., Avsar, Y., Kurt, U., Apaydin, O., & GonulluT. , M. (2013). Investigation of leachate treatment with electrocoagulation and optimization by response surface methodology. Clean-Soil Air Water, 1(9999), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors present their recognition to the head of the Process Engineering department of the Faculty of Applied Sciences, UKM Ouargla, for his corporation. The authors are also grateful to Pr. Dr. Toudert Ahmed Zaid (Department of Chemical Engineering, National polytechnic school, Algiers, Algeria) for his guidance and valuable advice. We thank the anonymous reviewers whose corrections and constructive suggestions have significantly increased the overall quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R Lessoued wrote the paper, designed experiments, performed the statistical analysis, and participated in the interpretation of the data. Baameur and A Tabchouche contributed to the analysis of the results, helped to draft the manuscript, and participated in its revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ridha Lessoued.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lessoued, R., Baameur, L. & Tabchouche, A. Modeling and Optimization of COD Removal from Leachate by Electrocoagulation: Application of Central Composite Design. Environ Model Assess 26, 423–432 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-021-09765-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-021-09765-7

Keywords

Navigation