Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) technology has potential advantages for application in STEM education. However, existing relevant studies lack a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the impact of AR on student achievement in STEM education. In this study, a meta-analysis of 33 studies published in eight SSCI journals of educational technology between 2010 and 2023 found that AR had a moderate impact (ES = 0.586) on student achievement in STEM fields, and the overall impact tended to increase gradually over time across years. Analysis of the six moderator variables revealed that AR had a more positive effect on student achievement in science and math, and that its intervention effects were better in primary and lower secondary education. The positive effects of AR were better with the integration of tablet and smartphone-like mobile devices. AR was predominantly multimedia-based in presenting STEM-related content, but integration of other pedagogical approaches had the potential to achieve better results. AR had the strongest contribution to student STEM achievement when the duration of the experiment was 1 week-1 month. In informal environments, AR was more effective in terms of intervening in student achievement in STEM education. Finally, this study offers some suggestions for future research and application of AR in STEM education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and materials are available upon request to the corresponding author.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ajit, G. (2021). A systematic review of augmented reality in stem education. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4280
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054
AlNajdi, S. M. (2022). The effectiveness of using augmented reality (AR) to enhance student performance: Using quick response (QR) codes in student textbooks in the Saudi education system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1105–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10100-4
Altmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900
Álvarez-Marín, A., & Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á. (2021). Augmented reality and engineering education: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(6), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004005
Avci, S. K., Coklar, A. N., & Istanbullu, A. (2019). The Effect of Three Dimensional Virtual Environments and Augmented Reality Applications on The Learning Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. EGITIM VE BILIM-Education and Science, 44(198), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2019.7969
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1): Springer Publishing Company.
Bassyouni, Z., & Elhajj, I. H. (2021). Augmented reality meets artificial intelligence in robotics: A systematic review. Frontiers in Robotics and A, I, 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.724798
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
Bekerman, Z., Burbules, N. C., & Silberman-Keller, D. (2006). Learning in places: The informal education reader (Vol. 249): Peter Lang.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., ... & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of educational research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
Bhagat, K. K., Liou, W.-K., Michael Spector, J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). To use augmented reality or not in formative assessment: A comparative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489857
Bhagat, K. K., Yang, F.-Y., Cheng, C.-H., Zhang, Y., & Liou, W.-K. (2021). Tracking the process and motivation of math learning with augmented reality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3153–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10066-9
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis: John Wiley & Sons.
Cai, S., Chiang, F.-K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1181094
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018
Chang, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2022). Concept map** in technology-supported K-12 education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications from 2001 to 2020. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 07356331211073798. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211073798
Chang, R.-C., Chung, L.-Y., & Huang, Y.-M. (2016). Develo** an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.982131
Chang, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & education, 71, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.022
Chatzopoulos, D., Bermejo, C., Huang, Z., & Hui, P. (2017). Mobile augmented reality survey: From where we are to where we go. IEEE ACCESS, 5, 6917–6950. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2698164
Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001
*Chen, C.-C., Chen, H.-R., & Wang, T.-Y. (2022). Creative situated augmented reality learning for astronomy curricula. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 148–162. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48660130
Chen, C. H., Yang, C. K., Huang, K., & Yao, K. C. (2020). Augmented reality and competition in robotics education: Effects on 21st century competencies, group collaboration and learning motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 1052–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12469
Chen, Y.-H., & Wang, C.-H. (2018). Learner presence, perception, and learning achievements in augmented–reality–mediated learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1399148
Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.
Chu, S. T., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications. Computers and education: Artificial intelligence, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and Education: In the Educational Forum. Informa UK Limited, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344014000287
Echeverría, A., Améstica, M., Gil, F., Nussbaum, M., Barrios, E., & Leclerc, S. (2012). Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative games in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.027
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students’ academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12350
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem-based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers and Education,142
Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M.-C., Seguí, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education 64, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.015
*Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189–201.
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071
Garzón, J., Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
Gecu-Parmaksiz, Z., & Delialioglu, O. (2019). Augmented reality-based virtual manipulatives versus physical manipulatives for teaching geometric shapes to preschool children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3376–3390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12740
*Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2017). Flow experience and educational effectiveness of teaching informatics using AR. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 78–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26229207
Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Applications of augmented reality in informal science learning sites: A review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9734-4
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis: Academic press.
Higgins, J., Altman, D., & Sterne, J. (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1. 0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook. cochrane. org, 243–296.
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses. Bmj, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
*Hou, H.-T., Fang, Y.-S., & Tang, J. T. (2021). Designing an alternate reality board game with augmented reality and multi-dimensional scaffolding for promoting spatial and logical ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1961810
Hsiao, H.-S., Chang, C.-S., Lin, C.-Y., & Wang, Y.-Z. (2016). Weather observers: A manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.834829
Hsiao, K.-F., Chen, N.-S., & Huang, S.-Y. (2012). Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.486682
Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z
Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive, 3(2).
Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2014.062346
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
*Ibáñez, M. B., Portillo, A. U., Cabada, R. Z., & Barrón, M. L. (2020). Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course. Computers & Education, 145, 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103734
Kajonmanee, T., Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Chaipah, K. (2020). A personalised mobile learning system for promoting STEM discipline teachers’ TPACK development. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 215–235.
Kalemkuş, J., & Kalemkuş, F. (2022). Effect of the use of augmented reality applications on academic achievement of student in science education: meta- analysis review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2027458
*Kao, G. Y.-M., & Ruan, C.-A. (2022). Designing and evaluating a high interactive augmented reality system for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107245
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kim, M., & Dopico, E. (2016). Science education through informal education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 439–445.
Kljun, M., Geroimenko, V., & Čopič Pucihar, K. (2020). Augmented Reality in Education: Current Status and Advancement of the Field. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented Reality in Education: A New Technology for Teaching and Learning (pp. 3–21). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_1
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Adoption of virtual and augmented reality for mathematics education: A sco** review. IEEE Access, 10, 13693–13703. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3145991
Li, Y., Wang, K., **ao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Lin, H.-C.K., Chen, M.-C., & Chang, C.-K. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817435
Lin, T.-J., Duh, H.B.-L., Li, N., Wang, H.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011
Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
Liu, Q., Yu, S., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Xu, S. (2021). The effects of an augmented reality based magnetic experimental tool on students’ knowledge improvement and cognitive load. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12513
Mattar, J. (2018). Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20055
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85–139): Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group*, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., & Pellas, N. (2022). A systematic map** review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1
Olsson-Collentine, A., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. (2020). Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 146(10), 922. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000294
Ozdemir, M., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S., & Demir, M. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality applications in the learning process: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(74), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.9
Panciroli, C., Fabbri, M., Luigini, A., Macauda, A., Corazza, L., & Russo, V. (2023). Augmented Reality in Arts Education. In Springer Handbook of Augmented Reality (pp. 305–333): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67822-7_12
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective sixth edition: Pearson.
Sindre, G., Giannakos, M., Krogstie, B. R., Munkvold, R., & Aalberg, T. (2018). Project-based learning in IT education: definitions and qualities. Uniped, 41(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1893-8981-2018-02-06
Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
Siriwardhana, Y., Porambage, P., Liyanage, M., & Ylianttila, M. (2021). A survey on mobile augmented reality with 5G mobile edge computing: Architectures, applications, and technical aspects. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(2), 1160–1192. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2021.3061981
Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013
Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1091
Thees, M., Kapp, S., Strzys, M. P., Beil, F., Lukowicz, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 108,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316
Vemer, E., Coleman, M., Ganong, L. H., & Cooper, H. (1989). Marital satisfaction in remarriage: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 713–725. https://doi.org/10.2307/352170
Wahono, B., Lin, P.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1
Wang, L.-H., Chen, B., Hwang, G.-J., Guan, J.-Q., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0
Wang, Y. H. (2017). Using augmented reality to support a software editing course for college students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12199
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S.W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Xu, W.-W., Su, C.-Y., Hu, Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of augmented reality on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09982-z
Yang, F.-C.O., Lai, H.-M., & Wang, Y.-W. (2023). Effect of augmented reality-based virtual educational robotics on programming students’ enjoyment of learning, computational thinking skills, and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 195,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104721
*Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2017). How augmented reality enables conceptual understanding of challenging science content. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 156–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.20.1.156
Yousef, A. M. F. (2021). Augmented reality assisted learning achievement, motivation, and creativity for children of low-grade in primary school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 966–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12536
Zhang, J., Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.003
Funding
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, PR China (No. LY20C090002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
**ao-Ming Wang designed the research, interpreted the data and drafted the work; Dan-Dan Yu and **ao-Han Yu participated in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the work; Gwo-Jen Hwang gave some advice and revised the conclusion; Feiming Li took part in the analysis of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The ethical requirements for research in this selected university were followed.
Consent to participate
The participants all agreed to take part in this study.
Consent for publication
The publication of this study has been approved by all authors.
Conflicts of interest
There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, XM., Yu, DD., Yu, XH. et al. Impacts of augmented reality-supported STEM education on students' achievement: A meta-analysis of selected SSCI publications from 2010 to 2023. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y