Log in

Content Validity and Reliability of a Self-Report Measure of Medication Nonadherence in Hepatitis C Treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Nonadherence to direct-acting agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C (HCV) decreases viral response. To measure nonadherence to DAAs, a reliable, valid, and easily implemented method is needed.

Aims

The goals of this study were to refine a previously validated (in patients with hypertension) self-report measure of extent of nonadherence and reasons for nonadherence in the context of DAAs and to obtain initial evidence of content validity and reliability.

Methods

Phase I involved two focus groups with patients with HCV (n = 12) and one focus group with prescribers of HCV medications (n = 6) to establish content validity of reasons for nonadherence. Subsequent cognitive interviews with patients (n = 11) were conducted to refine items. Phase II was a prospective cohort study involving weekly administration of the refined measure by telephone to patients (n = 75) who are prescribed DAAs to evaluate reliability and consistency with viral response.

Results

In the cohort study, internal consistency ranged from acceptable (α = .69) to very high (α = 1.00) across time points and was quite high on average (α = .91). Across the 75 participants, there were 895 measurement occasions; of those, nonadherence was reported on only 27 occasions (3%), all of which occurred in the first 12 weeks. These 27 occasions represented 19 (26%) different individuals. At 12 weeks, 1 (1%) of patients had a detectable HCV viral load; at 12–24 weeks posttreatment, 4 (5%) had a sustained viral response. Nonadherent patients reported an average of 1.41 reasons for nonadherence.

Conclusions

This multi-method study established content validity of reasons for nonadherence and reliability of extent of nonadherence. High rates of adherence and viral response were consistent with previous studies using other nonadherence measurement methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petruzziello A, Marigliano S, Loquercio G, et al. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: an up-date of the distribution and circulation of hepatitis C virus genotypes. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:7824–7840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kabiri M, Jazwinski AB, Roberts MS, et al. The changing burden of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: model-based predictions. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:170–180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Razavi H, ElKhoury AC, Elbasha E, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden and cost in the United States. Hepatology. 2013;57:2164–2170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Meer AJ, Veldt BJ, Feld JJ, et al. Association between sustained virological response and all-cause mortality among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced hepatic fibrosis. Jama. 2012;308:2584–2593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naggie S, Muir AJ. Oral combination therapies for hepatitis c virus infection: successes, challenges, and unmet needs. Annu Rev Med. 2017;68:345–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lo Re V 3rd, Teal V, Localio AR, et al. Relationship between adherence to hepatitis C virus therapy and virologic outcomes: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:353–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McHutchison JG, Manns M, Patel K, et al. Adherence to combination therapy enhances sustained response in genotype-1-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1061–1069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Voils CI, Hoyle RH, Thorpe CT, et al. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence. J Cin Epidemiol. 2011;64:250–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Voils CI, King HA, Neelon B, et al. Characterizing weekly self-reported antihypertensive medication nonadherence across repeated occasions. Patient Preference Adherence. 2014;8:643–650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Voils CI, Maciejewski ML, Hoyle RH, et al. Initial validation of a self-report measure of the extent of and reasons for medication nonadherence. Med Care. 2012;50:1013–1019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Blalock DV, Zullig LL, Bosworth HB, et al. Self-reported medication nonadherence predicts cholesterol levels over time. J Psychosom Res. 2019;118:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weidenbacher HJ, Beadles CA, Maciejewski ML, et al. Extent and reasons for nonadherence to antihypertensive, cholesterol, and diabetes medications: the association with depressive symptom burden in a sample of American veterans. Patient Preference Adherence. 2015;9:327–336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cornelius T, Voils CI, Birk JL, et al. Identifying targets for cardiovascular medication adherence interventions through latent class analysis. Health Psychol. 2018;37:1006–1014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonner JE, Esserman DA, Golin CE, et al. Self-efficacy and adherence to antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Evon DM, Esserman DA, Bonner JE, et al. Adherence to PEG/ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C: prevalence, patterns, and predictors of missed doses and nonpersistence. J Viral Hepatitis. 2013;20:536–549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Evon DM, Golin CE, Bonner JE, et al. Adherence during antiviral treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C: a qualitative study of patient-reported facilitators and barriers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:e41–e50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guest G, Namey E, McKenna K. How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods. 2017;29:3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Namey E, Guest G, McKenna K, et al. Evaluating bang for the buck: a cost-effectiveness comparison between individual interviews and focus groups based on thematic saturation levels. Am J Eval. 2016;37:425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Willis G. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Lincoln YS, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, et al. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38:33–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, et al. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the/Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Mak. 2007;27:672–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, et al. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002;40:771–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health. 1999;14:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernandez S, Chaplin W, Schoenthaler AM, et al. Revision and validation of the medication adherence self-efficacy scale (MASES) in hypertensive African Americans. J Behav Med. 2008;31:453–462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker DR, Juday TR, Manthena SR, et al. The impact of ribavirin on real-world adherence rates in hepatitis C patients treated with sofosbuvir plus simeprevir. ClinicoEcon Outcomes Res. 2015;7:637–642.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen T, Townsend K, Gordon LA, et al. High adherence to all-oral directly acting antiviral HCV therapy among an inner-city patient population in a phase 2a study. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:310–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cunningham EB, Amin J, Feld JJ, et al. Adherence to sofosbuvir and velpatasvir among people with chronic HCV infection and recent injection drug use: the SIMPLIFY study. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;62:14–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rogal SS, McCarthy R, Reid A, et al. Primary care and hepatology provider-perceived barriers to and facilitators of hepatitis CtTreatment candidacy and adherence. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:1933–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4608-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Phillips FH, Barnes D. Social support and adherence for military veterans with hepatitis C. Clin Spec. 2016;30:38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zacks S, Beavers K, Theodore D, et al. Social stigmatization and hepatitis C virus infection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:220–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zickmund S, Ho EY, Masuda M, et al. “They treated me like a leper”. Stigmatization and the quality of life of patients with hepatitis C. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:835–844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the PRIME-MD 1000 study. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;272:1749–1756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gellad WF, Thorpe CT, Steiner JF, et al. The myths of medication adherence. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:1437–1441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dominitz JA, Boyko EJ, Koepsell TD, et al. Elevated prevalence of hepatitis C infection in users of United States veterans medical centers. Hepatology. 2005;41:88–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Falade-Nwulia O, Suarez-Cuervo C, Nelson DR, et al. Oral direct-acting agent therapy for hepatitis c virus infection: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:637–648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend special thanks to Andrew Muir, MD MHS, and Christine Hunt, MD, for their clinical input and Jamiyla Bolton, Jahdai Dawes, Leslie Gaillard, Tina Lucas, Elizabeth Strawbridge, and Cherisa Williams for their assistance with recruitment and data collection. The views represented in this article represent those of the authors and not those of the VA or the United States Government.

Funding

Phase I of this study was supported by an investigator-initiated grant from Vertex Pharmaceuticals to Dr. Voils. Phase II of this study was funded by the Department of Medicine at Duke University Medical Center. Effort on this paper was supported by resources and facilities at the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in Madison and Durham and by a Research Career Scientist award to Dr. Voils from the Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA; RCS 14-443) and a VA HSR&D Career Development Award to Dr. Gellad (CDA 14-158).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrine I. Voils.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Gellad is cofounder and holds equity in Higgs Boson Inc. No other author declares a conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voils, C.I., King, H.A., Thorpe, C.T. et al. Content Validity and Reliability of a Self-Report Measure of Medication Nonadherence in Hepatitis C Treatment. Dig Dis Sci 64, 2784–2797 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05621-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05621-7

Keywords

Navigation