Log in

Research on the strategic alliance innovation system evolution mechanism: the perspective of knowledge flow

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a new framework was established for studying the evolution of strategic alliance innovation system. Based on data from 514 questionnaires, knowledge absorption capacity, knowledge potential, and knowledge transfer capacity were extracted to constitute variables for strategic alliance innovation system, and incentive mechanism was taken as a control variable for system evolution. A dynamic system evolution model was established based on the correlations between variables, for the purpose of analyzing correlations between knowledge absorption capacity, knowledge potential, knowledge transfer capacity and their evolution trends under incentives of different intensities. The following findings were obtained: Incentive mechanism can promote the evolution of strategic alliance innovation system, and strong incentives can shorten the cycle of system evolution. In the evolution of strategic alliance innovation system, knowledge absorption capacity is a core variable dominating system evolution and is positively correlated with knowledge transfer capacity. The gap between knowledge sources and recipients gradually narrows, and there is a critical value of knowledge potential for improving knowledge absorption capacity and knowledge transfer capacity. Under the premise of enhanced knowledge absorption capacity, the evolution of the innovation system is more stable when knowledge transfer capacity and knowledge potential reach a relatively balance state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adobor, H., McMullen, R.S.: Strategic purchasing and supplier partnerships-the role of a third party organization. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 20(4), 263–272 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Azzawi, S.F.: Stability and bifurcation of pan chaotic system by using Routh-Hurwitz and Gardan methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(3), 1144–1152 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Amaldoss, W., Staelin, R.: Cross-function and same-function alliances: how does alliance structure affect the behavior of partnering firms? Manag. Sci. 56(2), 302–317 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arora, A., Athreye, S., Huang, C.: The paradox of openness revisited: collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Res. Policy 45(7), 1352–1361 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489), 1390–1396 (1981)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Barney, J.B.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 110–120 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S.: :“Coopetition” in business networks-to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Ind. Mark. Manag. 29(5), 411–426 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop, K., D’Este, P., Neely, A.: Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Res. Policy 40(1), 30–40 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., Seppänen, R.: Playing the collaboration game right-balancing trust and contracting. Technovation 25(5), 497–504 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouncken, R.B., Fredrich, V.: Business model innovation in alliances: successful configurations. J. Bus. Res. 69(9), 3584–3590 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouncken, R.B., Pesch, R., Gudergan, S.P.: Strategic embeddedness of modularity in alliances: innovation and performance implications. J. Bus. Res. 68(7), 1388–1394 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bouncken, R.B., Pesch, R., Reuschl, A.: Copoiesis: mutual knowledge creation in alliances. J. Innov. Knowl. 1(1), 44–50 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Caniëls, M.C.J., Verspagen, B.: Barriers to knowledge spillovers and regional convergence in an evolutionary model. J. Evolut. Econ. 11(3), 307–329 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chellappa, R.K., Saraf, N.: Alliances, rivalry, and firm performance in enterprise systems software markets : a social network approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 849–871 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q. 35, 128–152 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: Determinants of timeliness in product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 11(5), 381–396 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S.: Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process. J. Manag. 24(1), 21–42 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., Tidd, J.: Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition: absorptive capacity dynamics over time. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 104, 57–65 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Desyllas, P., Sako, M.: Profiting from business model innovation: evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto industry. Res. Policy 42(1), 101–116 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dirk, C., Georg, L.: Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany. Econ. Transit. 14(1), 101–131 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dyer, B., Singh, H.: The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(4), 660–679 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fang, E.: The effect of strategic alliance knowledge complementarity on new product innovativeness in China. Organ. Sci. 22(1), 158–172 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fang, S.-C., Yang, C.-W., Hsu, W.-Y.: Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: the perspective of knowledge governance. J. Knowl. Manag. 17(6), 943–957 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreras-Méndez, J.L., Fernández-Mesa, A., Alegre, J.: The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: a deeper look. Technovation 54, 48–61 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fink, K., Roithmayr, F.: Knowledge potential measurement-theoretical framework and case studies. In: Hawamdeh, S. (ed.) Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation and Technology. World Scientific, New Jersey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frankort, H.T.W.: When does knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances increase new product development? The moderating roles of technological relatedness and product-market competition. Res. Policy 45(1), 291–302 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gebrekidan, D.A., Awuah, G.B.: Interorganizational cooperation: a new view of strategic alliances: the case of Swedish firms in the international market. Ind. Mark. Manag. 31(8), 679–693 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Genç, N., Öykü İyigün, N.: The role of organizational learning and knowledge transfer in building strategic alliances: a case study. Proc Social Behav Sci 24, 1124–1133 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gerwin, D., Ferris, J.S.: Organizing new product development projects in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 15(1), 22–37 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gomes, E., Barnes, B.R., Mahmood, T.: A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals. Int. Bus. Rev. 25(1), 15–27 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gravier, M.J., Randall, W.S., Strutton, D.: Investigating the role of knowledge in alliance performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(4), 117–130 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T.: What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv. Bus. Rev. 77(2), 106–116 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ho, M.H.-W., Wang, F.: Unpacking knowledge transfer and learning paradoxes in international strategic alliances: contextual differences matter. Int. Bus. Rev. 25(1), 287–297 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hohberger, J., Almeida, P., Parada, P.: The direction of firm innovation: the contrasting roles of strategic alliances and individual scientific collaborations. Res. Policy 44(8), 1473–1487 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hynes, N., Wilson, J.: Co-evolutionary dynamics in strategic alliances: the influence of the industry lifecycle. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 79(6), 1169–1175 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Im, G.-Y., Rai, A.: Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Manag. Sci. 54(7), 1281–1296 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.K.: Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30(1), 146–165 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jansen, J.J.P., Van de Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Manag. J. 48(3), 999–1015 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jantunen, A.: Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 8(3), 336–349 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang, X., Bao, Y.C., **e, Y., Gao, S.X.: Partner trustworthiness, knowledge flow in strategic alliances, and firm competitiveness: a contingency perspective. J. Bus. Res. 69(2), 804–814 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang, X., Jiang, F.-F., Cai, X.-L., Liu, H.: How does trust affect alliance performance? The mediating role of resource sharing. Ind. Mark. Manag. 45, 128–138 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kasahara, H., Shimotsu, K., Suzuki, M.: Does an R&D tax credit affect R&D expenditure? The Japanese R&D tax credit reform in 2003. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 31, 72–97 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kauser, S., Shaw, V.: The influence of behavioral and organization characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. Int. Mark. Rev. 21(1), 17–52 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Khamseh, H.M., Jolly, D.R.: Knowledge transfer in alliances: determinant factors. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(1), 37–50 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koza, M.P., Lewin, A.Y.: The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3), 255–264 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lakpetch, P., Lorsuwannarat, T.: Knowledge transfer effectiveness of university-industry alliances. Int. J. Org. Anal. 20(2), 128–186 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lane, P.J., Lubatkin, M.: Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strat. Manag. J. 19(5), 461–477 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., Sparks, J.: The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3), 285–305 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lau, A.K.W., Lo, W.: Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: an empirical study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 92, 99–114 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lavie, D., Miller, S.R.: Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4), 623–646 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lee, Y.S.: Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Res. Policy 25(6), 843–863 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Lichtenthaler, U.: Determinants of absorptive capacity: the value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31(5), 600–610 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Liu, M.-S.: Impact of knowledge incentive mechanisms on individual knowledge creation behavior: an empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 32(5), 442–450 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Luo, Y.: Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strateg. Manag. J. 23(10), 903–919 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Luo, Y., Oded, S., Haresh, A.: Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis. Strateg. Manag. J. 29(5), 545–556 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Maietta, O.W.: Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: a perspective from a low-tech industry. Res. Policy 44(7), 1341–1359 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Massey, A.P.: Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: a model of media selection and use. MIS Q. 30(1), 99–114 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Moorman, C., Miner, A.S.: The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. J. Mark. Res. 34(1), 91–106 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Musarra, G., Robson, M.J., Katsikeas, C.S.: The influence of desire for control on monitoring decisions and performance outcomes in strategic alliances. Ind. Mark. Manag. 55, 10–21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Oh, E.-T., Chen, K.-M., Wang, L.-M., Liu, R.-J.: Value creation in regional innovation systems: the case of Taiwan’s machine tool enterprises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 100, 118–129 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Owen, S., Yawson, A.: Information asymmetry and international strategic alliances. J. Bank. Financ. 37(10), 3890–3903 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Oxley, J., Wada, T.: Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements. Manag. Sci. 55(4), 635–649 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Panteli, N., Sockalingam, S.: Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organization alliances: framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decis. Support Syst. 39(4), 559–617 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Prabhu, J.C., Chandy, R.K., Ellis, M.E.: The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? J. Market. 69(1), 114–130 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rayna, T., Striukova, L.: University-industry knowledge exchange: an exploratory study of open innovation in UK universities. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 18(4), 471–492 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Robson, M.J., Katsikeas, C.S., Bello, D.C.: Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: the role of organizational complexity. Organ. Sci. 19(4), 647–665 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Roels, G., Tang, C.S.: Win-win capacity allocation contracts in coproduction and codistribution alliances. Manag. Sci. 63(3), 861–881 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rossi, F.: The governance of university-industry knowledge transfer. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 13(2), 155–171 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rothaermel, F.T.: Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(6–7), 687–699 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ryu, C., Kim, Y.J., Chaudhury, A., Rao, H.R.: Knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing, and learning-from-others. MIS Q. 29(2), 245–278 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sciascia, S., D’Oria, L., Bruni, M., Larrañeta, B.: Entrepreneurial orientation in low-and medium-tech industries: the need for absorptive capacity to increase performance. Eur. Manag. J. 32(5), 761–769 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Szulanski, G.: The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82(1), 9–27 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tseng, C.-Y., Pai, D.C., Hung, C.-H.: Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in KIBS. J. Knowl. Manag. 15(6), 971–983 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Velu, C.: Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms. Technovation 35, 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wu, W.Y., Shin, H.-A., Chan, H.-C.: The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 4646–4653 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yaprak, A.: Dynamic learning and strategic alliances: a commentary essay. J. Bus. Res. 64(10), 1128–1130 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zahra, S.A., George, G.: Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(2), 185–203 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zander, U., Kogut, B.: Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empiricaltest. Organ. Sci. 6(1), 76–92 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Zhao, J.Y., **, X., Su, Y.: Resource allocation under a strategic alliance: How a cooperative network with knowledge flow spurs co-evolution. Knowl.-Based Syst. 89, 497–508 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zollo, M., Reuer, J.J., Singh, H.: Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 13(6), 701–713 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has been partly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (IDs: 71602041, 71602042); National Social Science Key Project of China (ID: 14AGL004); Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (ID: QC2017082); Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (ID: 14YJC630142); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (ID: HEUCF170904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianyu Zhao or ** **.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Dong, L. & **, X. Research on the strategic alliance innovation system evolution mechanism: the perspective of knowledge flow. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 4), 9209–9227 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2113-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2113-3

Keywords

Navigation