Abstract
In this theoretical review paper, we provide a developmental–sociocultural framework for the role of social media (SM) in adolescent girls’ body image concerns, and in turn, depressive symptoms and disordered eating. We propose that the features of SM (e.g., idealized images of peers, quantifiable feedback) intersect with adolescent developmental factors (e.g., salience of peer relationships) and sociocultural gender socialization processes (e.g., societal over-emphasis on girls’ and women’s physical appearance) to create the “perfect storm” for exacerbating girls’ body image concerns. We argue that, ultimately, body image concerns may be a key mechanism underlying associations between adolescent girls’ SM use and mental health. In the context of proposing this framework, we provide empirical evidence for how SM may increase adolescent girls’ body image concerns through heightening their focus on (1) other people’s physical appearance (e.g., through exposure to idealized images of peers, celebrities, and SM influencers; quantifiable indicators of approval); and (2) their own appearance (e.g., through appearance-related SM consciousness; exposure to idealized self-images; encouraging over-valuing of appearance; and peer approval of photos/videos). Our framework highlights new avenues for future research on adolescent girls’ SM use and mental health, which recognize the central role of body image.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Smart phones and social media are central to adolescents’ lives. In 2018, 95% of U.S. teens reported having access to a smartphone, with smartphone ownership nearly universal across gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic background (Anderson & Jiang, 2018a). One of the most common activities in which teens engage via smartphones is social media use; according to Common Sense Media, 70% of U.S. teenagers report using social media (SM) multiple times per day (Rideout & Robb, 2018). Rates of mental health symptoms, including depression (Keyes et al., 2019), eating disorders (Galmiche et al., 2019), and suicidal ideation and behavior (CDC, 2017) have risen among adolescents, particularly girls, in recent years. In addition, recent revelations, first reported by the Wall Street Journal (“The Facebook Files,” 2021), have called attention to social media companies’ internal research findings suggesting that their products may negatively impact the mental health of teens, and particularly teen girls. These factors have contributed to high-profile and controversial public debates regarding the role of SM use in contributing to adolescent mental health, including a series of congressional hearings and legislative proposals aiming to curb the potential negative influence of SM use on teens (Blumenthal & Blackburn, 2022).
Despite conflicting findings across studies examining associations between social media use and mental health, a consensus is emerging that adolescent girls have different experiences with SM than boys. Notably, highly visual SM—such as Instagram, Snapchat, Tumblr, Tik Tok, and Facebook—are especially common among adolescent girls (Anderson & Jiang, 2018a). Adolescents view highly edited images of peers, celebrities, and “influencers.” These images and videos often include thin and toned women, promoting exercise and healthy eating (Tiggemann & Zaccardo, 2018), or ultra-thin, sexually suggestive images of women encouraging weight loss (Ghaznavi & Taylor, 2015). An emerging body of work has documented associations between adolescents’ use of SM and heightened body image concerns (e.g., de Vries et al., 2016; Marengo et al., 2018; Rodgers et al., 2020) and has found higher levels of SM-related appearance concerns among girls compared to boys (e.g., Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020; Nesi et al., 2021; Rodgers et al., 2020; Zimmer-Gembeck et al., 2021). Yet this work is often absent from prevailing debates about the potential harms of social media, which frequently reference oversimplified measures of “screen time” (see Granic et al., 2020) and do not take into account the unique appearance-related SM experiences of many adolescent girls. Thus, the field has lacked a unifying theoretical framework for understanding the exacerbation of body image concerns as a potential mechanism underlying associations between adolescent girls’ SM use and mental health. The development of such a framework is vital to the future of research on adolescent SM use.
In this theoretical review paper, we provide an organizing framework for research on the role of SM in contributing to girls’ body image concerns, and in turn, their depressive symptoms and disordered eating. We integrate theoretical perspectives and empirical findings from developmental, clinical, and social psychology, as well as media and communication studies. Our goal is to provide a developmental–sociocultural framework that addresses why and how SM may affect the body image of adolescent girls in particular. Specifically, we propose that the features of SM (e.g., idealized images of peers, quantifiable feedback) intersect with broader developmental and social processes in adolescence (e.g., salience of peer feedback and social status, heightened self-consciousness in the form of the “imaginary audience”) and sociocultural gender socialization processes (e.g., emphasis on girls’ and women’s physical appearance) to create the “perfect storm” for exacerbating girls’ body image concerns, and for some girls, worsening their mental health. Prior theoretical reviews and empirical papers have proposed specific pathways through which SM use may increase body image concerns, yet existing publications have focused on disordered eating without addressing depressive symptoms and/or have not focused specifically on adolescent developmental considerations (see Perloff, 2014; Rodgers & Melioli, 2016; Rodgers, 2016; Rodgers et al., 2020). No prior theoretical reviews have explored how SM features, cultural factors, and biopsychosocial factors may come together to affect girls’ body image, depressive symptoms, and disordered eating during the adolescent developmental period.
Figure 1 shows our full developmental–sociocultural theoretical framework. In the first part of this paper, we provide an overview of depression and disordered eating among adolescent girls. Next, we discuss relevant theoretical perspectives on adolescent girls’ body image concerns, including theories regarding gender-specific sociocultural appearance pressures, features of adolescence as a developmental period, and features of SM. Next, we provide empirical evidence for how these factors may collectively increase body image concerns in adolescent girls, through two primary processes: body image concerns in relation to adolescent girls’ increased focus on (1) other people’s appearance on SM and (2) their own appearance on SM. Throughout the paper, we highlight how these processes contribute to body image concerns and, in turn, depression and disordered eating.
A systematic literature review is beyond the scope of this theoretical paper; however, we highlight relevant empirical studies and reviews where applicable. Additional boundaries of this review are as follows: First, we focus on cisgender girls, although we address the need for more research on SM use and body image concerns of adolescents of other genders. Second, our focus is on adolescents, rather than adult women, and we focus primarily on the developmental periods of early and middle adolescence (roughly ages 11–17), with some empirical findings included from late adolescent and emerging adult samples when especially relevant. Third, we emphasize highly visual SM (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok) rather than other types of SM (e.g., primarily text-based sites; multi-player video gaming). Highly visual SM apps are the types of SM that adolescent girls use most frequently (Rideout & Robb, 2018) and which have been most consistently linked to body image concerns (Saiphoo & Vahedi, 2019).
Finally, while a broad range of other mental health outcomes have been examined in relation to adolescent girls’ social media use (e.g., anxiety, suicidal ideation and behavior), we focus here on depressive symptoms and disordered eating as mental health outcomes for two key reasons. First, decades of research prior to the advent of SM documented that depressive symptoms and disordered eating increase at the transition from childhood to adolescence and are higher among adolescent girls than boys (e.g., Maughan et al., 2013; Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2011). Second, these outcomes have received extensive research attention in the context of adolescent girls’ and young women’s SM use (e.g., Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020; Saunders & Eaton, 2018; Twenge & Farley, 2020; Wilksch et al., 2020). Notably, there may be important ways in which SM use positively influences adolescent girls’ body image and mental health (see, e.g., Rideout & Robb, 2018; Granic et al., 2020; Hamilton et al., 2021). Our goal in this paper is not to argue that the effects of SM on mental health are exclusively negative but rather to examine body image concerns as mechanisms that could help explain girls’ SM-related mental health challenges when they do emerge.
Adolescent Girls’ Body Image Concerns, Depressive Symptoms, and Disordered Eating
Although body image concerns begin in childhood for girls, they spike at the transition to adolescence (Rodgers et al., 2014). U.S. estimates suggest that approximately 81% of adolescent girls and 55–67% of adolescent boys experience at least some dissatisfaction with their bodies (Lawler & Nixon, 2011; Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2006). The increase in body dissatisfaction in adolescence is likely caused by numerous developmental transitions, including biological, social, and psychological changes (Markey, 2010). Girls’ body image typically worsens during puberty (Klump, 2013), when increases in body fat move them farther from the thin ideal. Further, their social status becomes determined by physical attractiveness (Mayeux & Kleiser, 2020), while simultaneously, they experience increased self-consciousness (Elkind, 1967). Body-image concerns are a key risk factor for depressive symptoms and disordered eating. Depressive symptoms increase markedly during adolescence, especially among girls (Maughan et al., 2013), and rates of depression among adolescents have increased in recent years (Geiger & Davis, 2019). Disordered eating also increases during adolescence, with nearly half of adolescent girls engaging in disordered eating behaviors, compared to less than a third of boys (Holm-Denoma et al., 2014; Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2011). The perceived discrepancy between the ideal body and one’s own body—which results from peer, parental, and media influences (Thompson et al., 1999)—has been associated with adolescents’ increased depressive symptoms (Solomon-Krakus et al., 2017) and disordered eating behaviors (Halliwell & Harvey, 2006; Shroff & Thompson, 2006), with findings particularly robust for adolescent girls. Longitudinal studies with adolescents provide robust empirical support for the link between body dissatisfaction and subsequent disordered eating and depressive symptoms, particularly among girls (Ferreiro et al., 2014; Sharpe et al., 2018; Stice et al., 2011).
Theories Regarding Gender-Related Sociocultural Appearance Pressures
Gender differences in the emphasis on and pursuit of physical attractiveness are rooted in gendered norms and roles. Western notions of femininity, into which adolescent girls are socialized, include the pursuit of thinness and (often excessive) investment in one’s appearance (Mahalik et al., 2005; Tolman & Porche, 2000). Feminist social critics and scholars argue that prescriptions of physical beauty function to keep women subordinate to men (Dworkin, 1974; Wolf, 1990), and indeed recent experimental work suggests that support of women’s intense pursuit of appearance ideals is motivated by attempts to maintain hierarchical power differentials between men and women (Ramati-Ziber et al., 2020). Despite major sociocultural shifts in gender roles in the past decades (e.g., women in the workforce), the emphasis on appearance remains central to women’s role in society. For example, in a study conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2017, when asked what trait U.S. society most values in women, the most common response was physical attractiveness (35% of respondents), whereas respondents believed men were most valued for morality (33%), financial success (23%), and ambition (19%; Parker et al., 2017).
Several theories, proposed before the advent of SM, address how gender-related sociocultural pressures may socialize girls to over-emphasize their physical appearance. For example, the tripartite influence model of body image proposes that three sociocultural forces—peers, parents, and the media—influence girls’ and women’s body image through two primary mechanisms: (1) encouraging internalization of the thin ideal, and (2) fostering appearance comparisons (Thompson et al., 1999). Internalization of the thin ideal refers to the extent to which an individual internalizes culturally defined standards of beauty, which at the time of the tripartite model’s publishing focused primarily on thinness (Thompson et al., 1999). Appearance comparisons are connected to Festinger’s (1954) social comparison theory, which proposes that individuals engage in social comparison in order to estimate their own social status relative to others. Social comparison has been linked to body dissatisfaction in boys and girls, with especially robust findings for girls (Jones, 2001). More broadly, since its proposal in 1999, the tripartite influence model has received widespread empirical support and is used as a guiding framework for eating disorder prevention with adolescents (Pennesi & Wade, 2016).
Another key theory for understanding body dissatisfaction is objectification theory, which proposes that in a culture that sexually objectifies women’s bodies, girls and women learn to adopt an observer’s perspective of their bodies and to habitually monitor their bodies—i.e., to engage in self-objectification (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) proposed that these experiences usually begin at the transition from childhood to adolescence, as girls’ bodies begin to attract the gaze, sexualization, and evaluation of others. Furthermore, they proposed that women’s disproportionate rates of depression and eating disorders may be explained in part by experiences related to sexual objectification and self-objectification (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). Contemporaneously, McKinley and Hyde (1996) proposed the related construct of objectified body consciousness, which describes women’s tendencies to view their bodies as others see them (i.e., body surveillance), to internalize cultural beauty standards, and to experience body shame when appearance ideals are not achieved. Both theories emphasized how Western cultural contexts socialize young women to over-value physical attractiveness; to devote substantial cognitive, emotional, and financial resources toward attempts to achieve cultural beauty standards; and to experience body image concerns, shame, and distress when these standards cannot be achieved (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996). Dozens of studies have provided empirical support for adolescent girls’ self-objectification and body surveillance as risk factors for mental health concerns (see Daniels et al., 2020). For example, multiple longitudinal studies find support for self-objectification as a prospective predictor of adolescent girls’ depressive symptoms and disordered eating (e.g., Impett et al., 2011; Slater & Tiggemann, 2012).
In the more than two decades since these sociocultural theories related to physical appearance concerns were published, Western beauty standards for women and girls have continued to prioritize thinness, while evolving to also encompass toned muscles and curviness (e.g., Deighton-Smith & Bell, 2018). Importantly, psychological research on body image has focused predominantly on White women and girls and on Eurocentric beauty ideals including thinness, light skin, Eurocentric facial features, light-colored eyes, and straight hair. While scholars have increasingly called for attention to culturally specific appearance ideals and greater diversity in research on body image and disordered eating (e.g., Beccia et al., 2019; Burke et al., 2020; McEntee et al., 2020; Watson et al., 2019; Wilfred & Lundgren, 2021), the majority of studies cited in the current paper relied on predominantly White samples from Western nations, reflective of the current research literature on social media use and body image among young women. The role of diverse sociocultural appearance ideals and the intersection of social media use and body image for Girls of Color is a critical area of future work, discussed further in our Limitations and Future Directions section.
Theories Regarding Features of Adolescence as a Developmental Period
The processes discussed above may be relevant to girls and women of various ages, but perhaps especially during adolescence—a developmental period characterized by complex biopsychosocial changes that promote identity exploration, the initiation of romantic and sexual relationships, sensation and reward seeking, and increased self-consciousness (see Dahl et al., 2018). During adolescence, rapid development occurs in the socioaffective circuitry of the brain (i.e., amygdala, striatum, medial prefrontal cortex), and pubertal hormones may disproportionately affect neurotransmitter activity within these regions (Somerville, 2013). Such neural changes are thought to heighten teens’ emotional reactivity and social sensitivity. Indeed, the adolescent developmental period is marked by increased salience of social norms and importance of peer feedback for an individual’s self-evaluation and identity development (Brechwald & Prinstein, 2011). Furthermore, pubertal development leads to alterations in body weight and shape, bringing girls farther from the sociocultural body ideal of thinness (Markey, 2010). Additionally, adolescents experience imaginary audience ideation, a cognitive experience involving heightened self-consciousness in which adolescents believe they are the focus of others’ attention (Elkind, 1967). In the context of these complex biological, cognitive, and interpersonal changes, an appearance culture develops during adolescence that dictates normative appearance-related behaviors and reinforces beauty ideals, in which peers frequently discuss physical attractiveness and how to improve it, ultimately encouraging social comparison and exacerbating body dissatisfaction (Jones et al., 2004). Moreover, these developmental processes are exacerbated for girls, who are simultaneously being socialized into adult gender roles (Hill & Lynch, 1983) that include women’s investment in their physical appearance (Mahalik et al., 2005; Tolman & Porche, 2000). For example, relative to adolescent boys, girls are more likely to view their self-worth as contingent on appearance (e.g., Burwell & Shirk, 2009; Li & Mustillo, 2020). Additionally, during adolescence, physical attractiveness becomes important for social status among girls (Mayeux & Kleiser, 2020). Given that adolescent girls are socialized to prioritize physical appearance and are highly attuned to peers, social comparisons may be particularly impactful during this developmental stage. These features of adolescence make it a developmental period of especially high risk for body dissatisfaction and associated mental health concerns.
Theories Regarding the Features of Social Media
In the decades since the theories above were introduced, SM has become a primary source through which young women receive and transmit information about beauty standards and engage in self-objectification and social comparison (Perloff, 2014; Rodgers, 2016). Theoretical perspectives on SM have increasingly moved away from considerations of specific platforms and instead have emphasized an “affordances” approach—i.e., considering specific facets of SM that impact individuals’ experiences (boyd, 2010; Granic et al., 2020; Moreno & Uhls, 2019). The idea that the online environment shapes individuals’ experiences and behaviors has a long tradition in computer-mediated communication (CMC) theories. In particular, these theories rely on the premise that individual communication patterns are “mediated” by the technological context in which they occur (see Walther, 2011). Building on these principles, psychology and media effects scholars have argued that SM sites are made up of unique features (e.g., “24/7” availability, publicness) that impact, or even transform, adolescents’ social experiences and developmental processes (boyd, 2010; Nesi et al., 2018a; Subrahmanyam & Šmahel, 2011; Valkenburg & Peter, 2011).
In our theoretical transformation framework, Nesi et al., (2018a, 2018b) synthesize and build on affordances identified in prior literature to describe seven features of social media: visualness, quantifiability, availability, publicness, permanence, asynchronicity, and cue absence (Nesi et al., 2018a, 2018b). The framework describes how specific features of SM may intersect with developmental characteristics of adolescence to transform interpersonal relationships. Permanence, for example, is a feature of SM describing the permanent accessibility of content, which draws on prior discussions of persistence (boyd, 2010) and retrievability (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011) and may increase adolescents’ attention to their appearance in SM photos. The visualness feature of SM encourages a focus on one’s own and one’s peers’ physical appearance; its public nature and 24/7 availability allow constant access to peers’ and one’s own photos; and its quantifiability encourages peer feedback (often based on adolescents’ appearance in photos/videos). In this paper, we revisit the seven features described in the transformation framework and discuss their important role in adolescent girls’ body image. In Table 1, we provide definitions of each feature, as well as examples of how each feature may impact adolescents’ experiences of body image.
Body Image Concerns as a Key Mechanism Linking Social Media Use with Mental Health
In this section, we provide theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence for how SM may increase adolescent girls’ body image concerns, and in turn, depressive symptoms and disordered eating (see Table 2). As noted previously, we did not undertake a systematic review of the literature. Rather, our goal was to propose a theoretical framework, and to highlight key findings from the research literature on adolescents’ social media use, appearance concerns, and mental health in service of this framework. To identify relevant articles, we conducted literature searches in PsycInfo, with an updated search completed in November 2021. These searches were designed to identify papers that focused on adolescence or emerging adulthood, social media use, appearance-related concerns and processes, and indicators of well-being or mental health symptoms related to depression or disordered eating. We prioritized incorporating studies that included participants in the early and middle adolescent developmental periods (roughly aged 11–17) and which used longitudinal or experimental designs. We included studies with late adolescent or emerging adult samples (roughly ages 18–25) when the findings were especially relevant and/or when rigorous empirical evidence from younger samples was lacking (e.g., rigorously controlled experimental studies were more common in college samples than in younger adolescent samples). When stronger evidence was not available, we incorporated cross-sectional study designs. Whenever possible, we cited studies from multiple nations and cultural contexts. We also incorporated qualitative research findings when possible, as these studies allow us to center adolescents’ voices regarding rapidly evolving phenomena for which researchers often lack validated quantitative measures.
In this section, we first describe how the features of SM may exacerbate girls’ body image concerns in relation to exposure to the physical appearance of other people (i.e., exposure to idealized images of peers, exposure to images of celebrities and influencers, quantifiable indicators of approval). Second, we describe how the features of SM may exacerbate girls’ focus on their own physical appearance.
Social Media and the Physical Appearance of Others
With its combination of peer and media cultures, and its 24/7 presentation of curated and edited images, SM likely increases adolescent girls’ focus on other people’s physical appearance. A growing body of work suggests that focusing on other people’s photos, more so than overall time on SM, is associated with adolescent girls’ and young women’s body dissatisfaction, and in turn, depressive symptoms and disordered eating (e.g., Cohen et al., 2018; Meier & Gray, 2014). Furthermore, a meta-analytic review of 63 independent samples of adolescents and adults found that the relationship between SM use and body image disturbance is particularly strong for appearance-focused SM use (Saiphoo & Vahedi, 2019). Images of others on social media may be of peers whom adolescents know in their offline lives, unknown same-aged peers or those they only know online, celebrities, or a novel SM-specific reference group: influencers, defined as individuals who gather large followings based on their SM presence (De Veirman et al., 2019). Consistent with the tripartite influence model of body image (Thompson et al., 1999), and Perloff’s (2014) and Rodgers’ (2016) theoretical frameworks for SM use and body dissatisfaction, the two primary processes by which exposure to others’ images may affect girls’ body image and mental health include social comparison, whereby adolescents compare themselves to the physical appearance of others, and internalization of appearance ideals, whereby the prevailing sociocultural norms and values relating to physical appearance are conveyed to SM users through attractive images. These ideals are further conveyed via quantifiable feedback (e.g., number of “likes”), as well as the comments others post on those images.
Focus on Others’ Appearance: Peers, Celebrities, Influencers
Within adolescents’ known, offline peer groups, SM likely exacerbates adolescent “peer appearance culture,” which was first articulated prior to the advent of modern SM (Jones et al., 2004). Peers’ SM photos are often curated and edited via filters, blemish correctors, and resha**/resizing tools (Chua & Chang, 2016). By engaging in social comparison with these idealized images of one’s friends and peers, adolescent girls may increase the perceived discrepancy between their ideal and actual appearance, resulting in body dissatisfaction (e.g., Scully et al., 2020). In an experimental study with British young women aged 17–25, participants who were assigned to browse their Facebook feed reported significantly worse mood following this exposure than a control group, and for women high in social comparison tendencies, exposure to their Facebook feed predicted greater dissatisfaction with their own face, hair, and skin (Fardouly et al., 2015). In a longitudinal study of adolescents in Norway, higher levels of “other-oriented social media use” (e.g., liking and commenting on others’ posts) were found to predict worse appearance self-esteem across ages 10–14 for girls but not boys (Steinsbekk et al., 2021). According to social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954), individuals are more likely to compare themselves to similar others. Comparisons to known peers—the most similar targets—could enhance the potential detrimental effects of SM on adolescent girls’ body image by providing highly edited images that still depict an unattainable standard of beauty. Social comparison theory also states that individuals are motivated to compare themselves to others in self-relevant domains (Festinger, 1954). Given the sociocultural importance placed on girls’ and women’s appearance (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), adolescent girls, compared to boys, may be particularly motivated to evaluate their SM appearance relative to their friends’ and peers’.
Exposure to idealized images of unknown, same-aged peers via social media may have similar effects. For example, a recent experimental study in the Netherlands demonstrated that adolescent girls exposed to edited Instagram photos of roughly same-aged peers reported worse body image, particularly if they showed higher social comparison tendencies, than those exposed to unedited photos. Furthermore, girls in the edited photos condition described these photos as realistic, preferred them to those in the unedited condition, and had trouble detecting that the bodies had been reshaped (Kleemans et al., 2018). These findings demonstrate that adolescent girls may engage in upward social comparisons without recognizing that their comparison targets are unrealistic (or simply unreal) portrayals of peers. Given that SM provides adolescents opportunities to follow anyone with a public profile, their access to attractive online peer comparison targets—including unknown same-aged peers and online-only friends—may be essentially unlimited. Future research should disentangle the effect of social comparisons to known peers vs. unknown, distant peers. It is possible either (1) that adolescent girls are better able to identify photo-editing techniques in known peers’ photos, recognizing the discrepancy with what the peer looks like in “real life,” or (2) that known peers seem to be particularly relevant comparison targets, whose appearances seem attainable and realistic, despite photo-editing techniques.
Adolescents using SM likely also view idealized images of celebrities and influencers. Prior to the advent of SM, celebrity images were available to adolescents only via traditional media. In research on mass media effects, investigators have found that even brief exposure to beauty-focused magazines leads to increases in women’s body dissatisfaction (Groesz et al., 2002). Through these sources, adolescents had already been highly attuned to the physical appearance of celebrities. As previously noted, the “peer appearance culture” also has implications for body image (Jones, 2001; Jones et al., 2004). SM blends these two reference groups, as users scroll through “feeds” that showcase content from both peers and celebrities, all in one place (Johnson et al., 2019). Celebrities may begin to feel like more relevant and realistic sources of social comparison to the adolescents who follow them (Bond, 2016). SM sites have also introduced the novel reference group of influencers. Some are first “discovered” through non-SM channels, such as reality TV, while others are “everyday people” who become famous based on their SM content (van Eldik et al., 2019). Among young women, one of the most common routes to becoming a SM influencer is through physical attractiveness, such as by demonstrating beauty routines or simply by being “hot” (Knorr, 2017; Leskin, 2019).
Emerging evidence suggests that exposure to influencer content focused on beauty or fitness is associated with increased negative mood, anxiety, and body dissatisfaction among young adults (Kohler et al., 2020; Lowe-Calverley & Grieve, 2021). In an experiment with Canadian college women aged 18–25, those assigned to compare the size of their body parts to the body parts of attractive Instagram models reported worse confidence, and elevated appearance and weight dissatisfaction, relative to participants in an appearance-neutral condition (McComb & Mills, 2021). Furthermore, SM influencers may post “thinspiration” and “fitspiration” content (i.e., content idealizing thin or fit bodies that is purported to “inspire” thinness or fitness; Boepple & Thompson, 2016), which tends to increase young women’s body dissatisfaction (Robinson et al., 2017). Experimental work indicates even brief exposure to such content may have negative effects on young women’s state body satisfaction and mood (e.g., Prnjak et al., 2020; Rounds & Stutts, 2021). In more extreme cases, SM content may be “pro-ana” or “pro-mia,” developed specifically to encourage eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa (Bardone‐Cone & Cass, 2007). Although we are not aware of published peer-reviewed work in this space, a recent report from the non-profit organization Tech Transparency Project (2021) suggests that when adolescent girls search for dieting content, SM’s algorithms may lead them toward extreme “thinspiration” or even “pro-ana” content. Importantly, with the blurring of peer and celebrity culture, adolescents viewing SM images are likely consuming media from diverse social comparison targets. Thus, research that examines adolescents’ exposure to their own SM feeds (e.g., Fardouly et al., 2015; Steinsbekk et al., 2021) may not be equipped to differentiate between the effects of viewing known peer, unknown same-aged peer, celebrity, and influencer images.
Processes by Which Social Media Increases Focus on Others’ Physical Appearance: Social Comparison and Quantifiable Indicators of Approval
One of the primary ways that SM image exposure affects adolescents’ body image and mental health is through social comparison (see Perloff, 2014; Rodgers, 2016). A systematic review of 20 studies, focused on the impact of SM on body image and disordered eating within adolescent and adult samples, concluded that social comparison mediates the association between SM use and worsened body image and eating concerns (Holland & Tiggemann, 2016). Since that time, many more studies have examined social comparison related to appearance-focused SM use. For example, appearance comparisons were found to mediate the association between selfie behaviors and body esteem among adolescent girls in Singapore, regardless of whether the social comparisons were downward, lateral, or upward (Chang et al., 2019). Among adolescent girls in Ireland, social comparison with one’s friend group on SM mediated the association between SM use and body dissatisfaction, particularly when girls perceived themselves to be less attractive than their friend group (Scully et al., 2020).
The other major process through which exposure to others’ images on social media may affect body image and mental health is through internalization of sociocultural appearance ideals, particularly the thin ideal (see Thompson et al., 1999; Perloff, 2014). SM has become a primary source through which young women receive information about beauty standards, with unprecedented access to advertisements and posts from peers, celebrities, and SM influencers (Perloff, 2014), as well as personalized ad content (Knoll, 2016). As proposed by Rodgers (2016), SM may increase the pressure to be thin, which can lead to thin-ideal internalization and social comparison, and in turn, body dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Consistent with these assertions and with the tripartite influence model of body image, which focused on traditional media use (Thompson et al., 1999), empirical support has mounted for the roles of thin-ideal internalization and, simultaneously, social comparison, as mediators of the link between SM use and body dissatisfaction. For example, in an Australian sample, SM use was associated with adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction via social comparison, thin-ideal internalization, and internalization of appearance ideals (Rodgers et al., 2020). Additionally, among Australian adolescents, both social comparison and appearance-ideal internalization mediated the association between higher SM engagement and lower body satisfaction and well-being (Jarman et al., 2021).
SM’s quantifiable indicators of approval may further exacerbate the focus on others’ appearance. Emerging evidence with adult women suggests that the number of “likes” on others’ idealized photos may not directly lead to body image concerns (Lowe-Calverley & Grieve, 2021; Tiggemann et al., 2018). However, many adolescents interpret “likes” as indicators of attractiveness (e.g., Mascheroni et al., 2015). A recent experimental study found that exposure to positive appearance-focused comments on Instagram led to young adults’ more positive appraisal of the attractiveness of the person in the photo (Kim, 2020). If adolescents witness peers, influencers, and celebrities receiving appearance-focused comments or high numbers of “likes” for photos that highlight physical beauty, they may learn to associate physical attractiveness with approval, validation, and status. Appearance-focused comments, “likes,” and other quantifiable metrics may reinforce cultural norms regarding the importance of beauty.
Social Media and One’s Own Physical Appearance
SM not only exposes adolescents to other people’s images; it also increases the focus on one’s own appearance. According to self-presentation theories, adolescents are motivated to use impression management strategies to present themselves in a positive light, particularly in relation to their physical appearance (Leary, 1996; Schlenker & Pontari, 2000). Furthermore, objectification theory posits that girls and women learn to value their appearance and sexual appeal above other attributes, due in large part to sexually objectifying media (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). Given that SM allows for constant self-presentation to an ever-present audience, SM use is likely to increase girls’ focus on—and perhaps concerns about—their own physical appearance.
Appearance-Related Cognitions and Self-Presentation on Social Media
In the era of SM, the “imaginary audience” (Elkind, 1967) may no longer be imaginary; even when offline, adolescents may monitor their bodies to prepare for the possibility of being photographed or filmed (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2019, 2020). SM offers the ideal platform for adolescents to fastidiously monitor and evaluate their own attractiveness, engaging in self-presentation strategies to increase the likelihood that peers will provide positive appearance-based feedback. Numerous studies have now linked adolescents’ and young adults’ SM use with traditional measures of self-objectification (e.g., Manago et al., 2015; Salomon & Brown, 2020; Skowronski et al., 2020; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2016). Additionally, empirical evidence from adolescent girls in China suggests that those who post more selfies and have high imaginary audience ideation engage in more self-objectification (Zheng et al., 2019).
Adolescents may also experience appearance-related cognitions that are specific to SM, with possible implications for body image and mental health. For example, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found that U.S. adolescent girls who evaluated their own appearance during video-chat interactions (e.g., Zoom) were more likely to report depressive symptoms concurrently and two weeks later (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2022). Furthermore, recent work from our team has examined adolescents’ appearance-related SM consciousness (ASMC), defined as a set of thoughts and behaviors reflecting individuals’ ongoing awareness of whether they might look attractive to a SM audience (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2019, 2020). These experiences include thinking about how attractive one’s SM photos look to others and imagining how one’s body would look in a SM picture even when alone (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020). In two samples of high school-aged U.S. adolescents, girls reported higher levels of ASMC than boys (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020). Importantly, controlling for time on SM, ASMC was cross-sectionally associated with higher body surveillance, body shame, and body comparison, suggesting that the subjective experience of preoccupation with one’s appearance on SM may indeed supersede the impact of “screen time” (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020). Moreover, ASMC was associated with depressive symptoms and disordered eating when controlling for body surveillance and time on SM (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020). Our recent longitudinal work found that higher ASMC predicts adolescents’ higher depressive symptoms one year later (Maheux et al., 2022).
Posting and Editing Selfies
Whether or not girls become preoccupied with their appearance on SM, the frequent taking, editing, and posting of images of the self (or “selfies”) may directly impact body image. Experimental work with young adult women has found that taking a selfie leads to greater anxiety, less confidence, lower feelings of physical attractiveness (Mills et al., 2018), greater self-objectification (Salomon & Brown, 2020), and greater negative mood and facial dissatisfaction (Tiggemann et al., 2020). Notably, these findings have held whether or not the selfie was edited (Mills et al., 2018; Tiggemann et al., 2020) and whether or not the participant posted the selfie (Salomon & Brown, 2020). However, some longitudinal research with adolescents has found that selfie editing, but not selfie posting, predicts body and face dissatisfaction over time (Wang et al., 2021). Longitudinal work is needed to understand long-term outcomes associated with exposure to body-positive content, particularly among adolescent girls.
Individual Differences in Adolescents’ Social Media Use Experiences
Both media effects theories (e.g., differential susceptibility model; Valkenburg & Peter, 2013) and theories of developmental psychopathology (e.g., neurobiological sensitivity to context theories; Ellis et al., 2011) emphasize that youth may differ considerably in the degree to which environmental factors influence them. More research is needed to identify individual differences that help explain why some adolescents are more affected by SM than others. Several studies included in the current review provide preliminary empirical support for individual-level moderators that should be investigated in future work, such as social comparison tendencies (Fardouly et al., 2015; Kleemans et al., 2018), investment in appearance (Lonergan et al., 2020; Nesi et al., 2021), sensitivity to peer feedback (Lee et al., 2020), and levels of imaginary audience ideation (Zheng et al., 2019). Individual differences in pubertal status and timing will also be important to consider: pubertal status has been hypothesized to play a role in adolescents’ responses to SM (Orben et al., 2022), and early pubertal timing has been associated with risk for poor body image and eating disorders (Mendle et al., 2007). Furthermore, co-construction models of SM use highlight that youth are not merely passive consumers of SM, but rather are actively involved in constructing their online environments (Subrahmanyam et al., 2006); and uses and gratifications theory highlights the agency of individuals in seeking out specific media exposure (see Rodgers, 2016). Thus, individual differences in the ways youth use and experience SM, partially based on sociodemographic and identity factors, likely have profound implications for their body image and subsequent mental health, and more research is needed to better understand these differences. For example, research suggests that sexual minority adolescents use SM in different ways and experience unique challenges compared to heterosexual youth (e.g., identity development and management in online communities; McConnell et al., 2017), but research has yet to examine how SM use may impact sexual minority adolescents’ body image.
Gender Identity
While the majority of theoretical and empirical work on SM and body image focuses on adolescent girls and highlights girls’ unique vulnerabilities to body image and mental health problems associated with SM use, adolescents of other genders are also vulnerable to these outcomes. Recent work has highlighted the need to further understand the pervasiveness of presentations of male lean and muscular appearance ideals on SM (Gültzow et al., 2020), and potential effects on internalization of the muscular ideal, appearance anxiety, and body dissatisfaction (Fatt et al., 2019; Seekis et al., 2021). Although the association between SM use and appearance concerns may be similar for boys and girls (Fardouly & Vartanian, 2016; Holland & Tiggemann, 2016; Jarman et al., 2021), the majority of studies do find that girls report higher appearance investment and concerns generally (e.g., Choukas-Bradley et al., 2020; Hawes et al., 2020) and higher depressive symptoms related to SM use (e.g., McCrae et al., 2017; Simoncic et al., 2014; Twenge et al., 2018), suggesting that gender differences, such as those resulting from early gender socialization, may predispose girls to both. To our knowledge, no published work has examined the role of SM use in body image concerns among gender minority youth, although research has begun to explore gender minority adolescents’ unique body image concerns more broadly (e.g., Romito et al., 2021). Future work should examine how gender minority adolescents experience appearance-related SM use, including how gendered appearance ideals may differentially affect adolescents who identify with binary versus nonbinary identities.
Race, Ethnicity, and Intersectionality
An important next step for the field of research on SM use and body image is to carefully consider the role of racial and ethnic identity. We have focused on “adolescent girls” throughout this paper, yet it is important to note that many studies have included predominantly White samples and most have not explored questions about intersectionality—i.e., the ways in which multiple social identities (e.g., race/ethnicity, class, gender) intersect to yield unique experiences related to power, privilege, and oppression, which cannot be understood through “additive” identity models (Crenshaw, 1989). The lack of focus on racial/ethnic identity represents a widespread issue in psychological science (Roberts et al., 2020), and researchers from the body image and disordered eating literatures have recently called for an intersectional perspective and a clearer focus on the experiences of People of Color (e.g., Beccia et al., 2019; Burke et al., 2020; McEntee et al., 2020; Watson et al., 2019). Beauty ideals within a society are culturally constructed, and the dominant cultural beauty ideal for women represented in Western mainstream media is thin, able bodied, and White. Research suggests that in the U.S., Black and Latinx adolescents are less preoccupied with thinness than their White peers, desiring a curvier appearance or being more tolerant of a higher weight status (Jones et al., 2007; Schooler & Daniels, 2014). However, Girls and Women of Color in the U.S. may still feel pressure to conform to Eurocentric beauty ideals, potentially experiencing dissatisfaction with weight in addition to other, culturally specific appearance concerns, such as dissatisfaction with facial features or skin tone (Lowy et al., 2021; Wilfred & Lundgren, 2021; Winter et al., 2019). The extent to which adolescent Girls of Color endorse various cultural notions of beauty, and the role of these ideals in their body image and mental health, has yet to be fully addressed in research.
Additionally, important questions remain to be answered about how SM may affect the transmission and internalization of beauty ideals among adolescent Girls of Color. To our knowledge, no published work has focused specifically on the role of social media in culturally relevant appearance concerns among Girls of Color. Because SM allows users to generate their own content and to seek out content from others, it is possible that adolescent Girls of Color are exposed to more culturally relevant beauty ideals via SM, compared to traditional media. For example, through SM, Black adolescent girls may be exposed to more images of Black women than are available in mainstream mass media, and these images may depict a broader range of beauty ideals (e.g., related to body size and shape, hair, skin tone). If this is the case, exposure to culturally relevant and representative content may promote more positive body image. On the other hand, it is possible that for some Girls of Color, SM could worsen body image by presenting beauty standards that are still unattainable despite the content being more culturally relevant. Notably, adolescents are able to cultivate their SM feeds to display the content most relevant to their interests or identity, and racial and ethnic minority girls may use SM for racial and ethnic identity exploration (Harlow & Benbrook, 2019; Williams & Gonlin, 2017). It is unclear if photo-based activity that enhances one’s identity characteristics could help or harm adolescents’ mental health and body image. Future work should examine unique risk and protective factors within racial/ethnic groups that may influence associations among SM use, body image, and other mental health concerns. In our research team’s ongoing qualitative interview study, we are hearing from many Black young women in their twenties that social media may indeed be a “double-edged sword”; for example, women have described, on the one hand, increased representation of diverse body types and appearance norms, and on the other hand, heightened appropriation of Black culture and Afrocentric features, with complex implications for appearance norms and pressures for Girls of Color (Ladd et al., 2022).
Need for a Broader Range of Methodologies
Using a broader range of methodologies will advance our understanding of the ways in which body dissatisfaction underlies associations between girls’ SM use and mental health. The majority of studies of adolescents’ and young adults’ appearance-related SM experiences have relied on self-report and single time-point study designs, which do not allow conclusions regarding the temporality of adolescents’ SM use, body image, and mental health. More longitudinal and experimental studies are sorely needed. It is important for future research to incorporate multi-method approaches, including multiple levels of analysis and time points. For example, neuroimaging and psychophysiological methods could illuminate the biological underpinnings of SM-related body dissatisfaction, whereas eye-tracking, pupillometry, and facial affect recognition may serve as objective measures of behavioral and cognitive responses to SM during experimental tasks. Furthermore, the use of temporally sensitive measures, such as EMA methods, can be used to assess short-term, dynamic associations among constructs of interest (e.g., Pouwels et al., 2021), while longitudinal studies across multiple years can assess trait-level indicators of SM use, body image concerns, and mental health symptoms. Finally, qualitative methods remain a critically important component of multi-method work in this field, especially given their potential to elucidate the lived experiences of understudied groups of adolescents, such as those with intersecting minoritized identities. For example, in our research team’s recent qualitative interviews with U.S. Black young women, we have learned about gendered racialized experiences with social media and body image that are not yet reflected in published work or validated scales (Ladd et al., 2022).
Clinical Implications
Assessing and intervening to promote positive body image remain an important, transdiagnostic component of healthy development among adolescent girls. It is essential for mental health professionals to consider the role of SM in clients’ presenting concerns. Given the current state of the literature, we recommend that clinicians not necessarily focus on reducing the overall time adolescent girls spend using SM and instead focus on assessing and intervening on how they spend that time. We have focused here on how appearance-related SM behaviors may increase the risk for body image concerns, depressive symptoms, and disordered eating. However, other SM behaviors may promote positive mental health and well-being, such as those that promote identity exploration, creative expression, community building, and meaningful conversations with friends (e.g., Anderson & Jiang, 2018b; Ma et al., 2021; Maheux et al., 2021; and see Hamilton et al., 2021). We recommend the following as preliminary guidelines for clinicians’ work with adolescent girls: (1) If the adolescent client is struggling with body image concerns, the clinician might assess whether she is engaging with SM in ways that may exacerbate these concerns, such as through upward social comparisons, editing selfies, or following beauty-oriented influencer content; (2) if yes, the clinician might try using techniques from evidence-based approaches to treating other problematic behaviors, such as motivational interviewing, urge-surfing, and cognitive restructuring approaches (e.g., Bowen & Marlatt, 2009; Harris et al., 2017; Naar-King, 2011; Sudhir, 2015), to encourage the client to spend more time on SM or offline activities that improve, rather than worsen, her body image and mental health. Notably, these guidelines are preliminary and should be evaluated in future research.
School- and community-based preventive interventions can educate girls regarding SM-related risks for body image concerns, by increasing media skepticism, awareness of advertisers’ motives, and rejection of unrealistic appearance ideals (e.g., Gordon et al., 2020; McLean et al., 2016). Initial evaluation of a classroom-based SM literacy intervention showed evidence of modest improvements in girls’ dietary restraint and depressive symptoms over time (Gordon et al., 2021). Another single-session classroom-based intervention utilizing cognitive dissonance techniques and SM literacy skills found improved thin ideal internalization one week after the intervention, an effect sustained to the 8-week follow-up, among girls but not boys (Bell et al., 2021). Other promising intervention/prevention approaches to reducing problematic SM use, which are not specific to body image but which have preliminary empirical support, include values alignment and mindfulness approaches (Galla et al., 2018, 2021). The coming years will likely see an increase in the number of evidence-based approaches to hel** adolescents use SM in ways that align with their values and promote positive well-being.
Conclusions
Our developmental–sociocultural framework integrates theoretical perspectives from across psychological science and other disciplines, exploring how developmental, sociocultural, and SM-specific factors influence adolescent girls’ body image and subsequent mental health. We identify and elaborate on these broad theoretical factors, as well as more specific SM experiences related to physical appearance. The framework emphasizes a focus on examining body image concerns as a mechanism underlying associations between SM use and adolescent girls’ mental health concerns. In doing so, we highlight a new avenue for future research on adolescent girls’ social media use and mental health, which recognizes the central role of body image.
Data Availability
This review paper does not include any formal quantitative or qualitative analysis for which data are available. Thus, no relevant data are available to share.
References
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018a). Teens, social media & technology. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018a/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018b). Teens’ social media habits and experiences. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018b/11/28/teens-social-media-habits-and-experiences/
Bardone-Cone, A. M., & Cass, K. M. (2007). What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(6), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20396
Beccia, A. L., Baek, J., Jesdale, W. M., Austin, S. B., Forrester, S., Curtin, C., & Lapane, K. L. (2019). Risk of disordered eating at the intersection of gender and racial/ethnic identity among US high school students. Eating Behaviors, 34, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2019.05.002
Bell, B. T., Taylor, C., Paddock, D. L., Bates, A., & Orange, S. T. (2021). Body talk in the digital age: A controlled evaluation of a classroom-based intervention to reduce appearance commentary and improve body image. Health Psychology Open, 8(1), 20551029211018920.
Berne, S., Frisén, A., & Kling, J. (2014). Appearance-related cyberbullying: A qualitative investigation of characteristics, content, reasons, and effects. Body Image, 11(4), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.08.006
“Blumenthal and Blackburn introduce comprehensive kids' online safety legislation” (2022). Retrieved on April 6, 2022 from https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-and-blackburn-introduce-comprehensive-kids-online-safety-legislation
Boepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2016). A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49(1), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22403
Bond, B. J. (2016). Following your “friend”: Social media and the strength of adolescents’ parasocial relationships with media personae. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0355
Bowen, S., & Marlatt, A. (2009). Surfing the urge: Brief mindfulness-based intervention for college student smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017127
boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 47–66). Routledge.
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x
Burke, N. L., Schaefer, L. M., Hazzard, V. M., & Rodgers, R. F. (2020). Where identities converge: The importance of intersectionality in eating disorders research. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(10), 1605–1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23371
Burnell, K., George, M. J., Kurup, A. R., & Underwood, M. K. (2021). “Ur a freakin goddess!”: Examining appearance commentary on Instagram. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000341
Burwell, R. A., & Shirk, S. R. (2009). Contingent self-worth and gender differences in adolescent depression: A commentary. Sex Roles, 61(11–12), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9694-5
Carey, R. N., Donaghue, N., & Broderick, P. (2013). Peer culture and body image concern among Australian adolescent girls: A hierarchical linear modelling analysis. Sex Roles, 69(5–6), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0305-0
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017). Youth risk behavior surveillance system. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2017/ss6708.pdf
Chang, L., Li, P., Loh, R. S. M., & Chua, T. H. H. (2019). A study of Singapore adolescent girls’ selfie practices, peer appearance comparisons, and body esteem on Instagram. Body Image, 29, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.03.005
Choukas-Bradley, S., Maheux, A. J., Roberts, S. R., Hutchinson, E. A., Lu, C., Ladouceur, C. D., & Silk, J. S. (2022). Picture-perfect during a pandemic? Body image concerns and depressive symptoms in U.S. adolescent girls during the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Children and Media. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2039255
Choukas-Bradley, S., & Nesi, J. (2020). Applying developmental theory to adolescent peer influence processes in the social media context. In N. van Zalk & C. Monks (Eds.), Online peer engagement in adolescence: positive and negative aspects of online social interaction. Abingdon: Routledge.
Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Galla, B. M. (2020). The Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness Scale: Development and validation with adolescents. Body Image, 33, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.017
Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Higgins, M. K. (2019). Camera-ready: Young women’s appearance-related social media consciousness. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000196
Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part A), 190–197. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011
Cohen, R., Fardouly, J., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2019). #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1546–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819826530
Cohen, R., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2018). ‘Selfie’-objectification: The role of selfies in self-objectification and disordered eating in young women. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.027
Cohen, R., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2020). The case for body positivity on social media: Perspectives on current advances and future directions. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320912450
Couture Bue, A. C. (2020). The looking glass selfie: Instagram use frequency predicts visual attention to high-anxiety body regions in young women. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106329
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8.
Dahl, R. E., Allen, N. B., Wilbrecht, L., & Suleiman, A. B. (2018). Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature, 554(7693), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25770
Daniels, E. A., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016a). The price of sexy: Viewers’ perceptions of a sexualized versus nonsexualized Facebook profile photograph. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000048
Daniels, E. A., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016b). “It’s not the right way to do stuff on Facebook”: An investigation of adolescent girls’ and young women’s attitudes toward sexualized photos on social media. Sexuality & Culture, 20(4), 936–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9367-9
Daniels, E. A., Zurbriggen, E. L., & Ward, L. M. (2020). Becoming an object: A review of self-objectification in girls. Body Image, 33, 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.016
Davies, B., Turner, M., & Udell, J. (2020). Add a comment … How fitspiration and body positive captions attached to social media images influence the mood and body esteem of young female Instagram users. Body Image, 34, 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.009
De Veirman, M., Hudders, L., & Nelson, M. R. (2019). What is influencer marketing and how does it target children? A review and direction for future research. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02685
de Vries, D. A., Peter, J., de Graaf, H., & Nikken, P. (2016). Adolescents’ social network site use, peer appearance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: Testing a mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0266-4
de Vries, D. A., Peter, J., Nikken, P., & de Graaf, H. (2014). The effect of social network site use on appearance investment and desire for cosmetic surgery among adolescent boys and girls. Sex Roles, 71(9–10), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0412-6
Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2018). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000143
Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M. A., Tremblay, P. F., Litt, D. M., & Ellis, W. (2020). Gaining likes, but at what cost? Longitudinal relations between young adults’ deceptive like-seeking on Instagram, peer belonging and self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106467
Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman hating. New York: Dutton.
Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38(4), 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127100
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000611
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002
Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2016). Social media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005
Fatt, S. J., Fardouly, J., & Rapee, R. M. (2019). #Malefitspo: Links between viewing fitspiration posts, muscular-ideal internalisation, appearance comparisons, body satisfaction, and exercise motivation in men. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818821064
Ferreiro, F., Seoane, G., & Senra, C. (2014). Toward understanding the role of body dissatisfaction in the gender differences in depressive symptoms and disordered eating: A longitudinal study during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 37(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.10.013
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Galla, B. M., Baelen, R. L., Fiore, H. M., Hutt, S., & Shenhav, A. (2018). Social media desire and impulsiveness: Intensified by self-immersion, reduced by mindfulness. Preprint available at: https://psyarxiv.com/ch43n/
Galla, B. M., Choukas-Bradley, S., Fiore, H. M., & Esposito, M. V. (2021). Values-alignment messaging boosts adolescents’ motivation to control social media use. Child Development, 92, 1717–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13553
Galmiche, M., Déchelotte, P., Lambert, G., & Tavolacci, M. P. (2019). Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000–2018 period: A systematic literature review. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 109, 1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy342
Geiger, A. W., & Davis, L. (2019, July 12). A growing number of American teenagers—particularly girls—are facing depression. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/12/
Ghaznavi, J., & Taylor, L. D. (2015). Bones, body parts, and sex appeal: An analysis of #thinspiration images on popular social media. Body Image, 14, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.03.006
Gordon, C. S., Jarman, H. K., Rodgers, R. F., McLean, S. A., Slater, A., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., & Paxton, S. J. (2021). Outcomes of a cluster randomized controlled trial of the SoMe social media literacy program for improving body image-related outcomes in adolescent boys and girls. Nutrients, 13(11), 3825. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113825
Gordon, C. S., Rodgers, R. F., Slater, A. E., McLean, S. A., Jarman, H. K., & Paxton, S. J. (2020). A cluster randomized controlled trial of the SoMe social media literacy body image and wellbeing program for adolescent boys and girls: Study protocol. Body Image, 33, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.003
Granic, I., Morita, H., & Scholten, H. (2020). Beyond screen time: Identity development in the digital age. Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820214
Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10005
Gültzow, T., Guidry, J. P. D., Schneider, F., & Hoving, C. (2020). Male body image portrayals on Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(5), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0368
Halliwell, E., & Harvey, M. (2006). Examination of a sociocultural model of disordered eating among male and female adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910705X39214
Hamilton, J. L., Nesi, J., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2021). Re-examining adolescent social media and socioemotional well-being through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic: A theoretical review and directions for future research. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211014189
Harlow, S., & Benbrook, A. (2019). How #Blacklivesmatter: Exploring the role of hip-hop celebrities in constructing racial identity on Black Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1386705
Harris, J. S., Stewart, D. G., & Stanton, B. C. (2017). Urge surfing as aftercare in adolescent alcohol use: A randomized control trial. Mindfulness, 8(1), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0588-7
Hawes, T., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Campbell, S. M. (2020). Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity. Body Image, 33, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.010
Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), Girls at puberty (pp. 201–228). Springer.
Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image, 17, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008
Holm-Denoma, J. M., Hankin, B. L., & Young, J. F. (2014). Developmental trends of eating disorder symptoms and comorbid internalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Eating Behaviors, 15(2), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.03.015
Impett, E. A., Henson, J. M., Breines, J. G., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2011). Embodiment feels better: Girls’ body objectification and well-being across adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310391641
Ivie, E. J., Pettitt, A., Moses, L. J., & Allen, N. B. (2020). A meta-analysis of the association between adolescent social media use and depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 275, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.014
Jarman, H. K., Marques, M. D., McLean, S. A., Slater, A., & Paxton, S. J. (2021). Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison. Body Image, 36, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.005
Johnson, B. K., Potocki, B., & Veldhuis, J. (2019). Is that my friend or an advert? The effectiveness of Instagram native advertisements posing as social posts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(3), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz003
Jones, D. C. (2001). Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles, 45(9), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014815725852
Jones, D. C., Vigfusdottir, T. H., & Lee, Y. (2004). Body image and the appearance culture among adolescent girls and boys: An examination of friend conversations, peer criticism, appearance magazines, and the internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258847
Jones, L. R., Fries, E., & Danish, S. J. (2007). Gender and ethnic differences in body image and opposite sex figure preferences of rural adolescents. Body Image, 4(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.11.005
Kapidzic, S., & Herring, S. C. (2015). Race, gender, and self-presentation in teen profile photographs. New Media & Society, 17(6), 958–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813520301
Keyes, K. M., Gary, D., O’Malley, P. M., Hamilton, A., & Schulenberg, J. (2019). Recent increases in depressive symptoms among U.S. adolescents: Trends from 1991 to 2018. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 54(8), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01697-8
Kim, H. M. (2020). What do others’ reactions to body posting on Instagram tell us? The effects of social media comments on viewers’ body image perception. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820956368
Kleemans, M., Daalmans, S., Carbaat, I., & Anschütz, D. (2018). Picture perfect: The direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychology, 21(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392
Klump, K. L. (2013). Puberty as a critical risk period for eating disorders: A review of human and animal studies. Hormones and Behavior, 64(2), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.02.019
Knoll, J. (2016). Advertising in social media: A review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 266–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1021898
Knorr, C. (2017, January 23). Most popular beauty vloggers on YouTube. Common Sense Media. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/blog/most-popular-beauty-vloggers-on-youtube
Kohler, M. T., Turner, I. N., & Webster, G. D. (2020). Social comparison and state–trait dynamics: Viewing image-conscious Instagram accounts affects college students’ mood and anxiety. Psychology of Popular Media. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000310
Ladd, B. A., Choukas-Bradley, S., Lewis, J. A., Maheux, A. M., Roberts, S. R., & Hunt, R. A. (2022). [Project ROSE data; Qualitative interviews with Black young women aged 18–24] [Unpublished raw data]. University of Delaware.
Lawler, M., & Nixon, E. (2011). Body dissatisfaction among adolescent boys and girls: The effects of body mass, peer appearance culture and internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9500-2
Lazuka, R. F., Wick, M. R., Keel, P. K., & Harriger, J. A. (2020). Are we there yet? Progress in depicting diverse images of beauty in Instagram’s body positivity movement. Body Image, 34, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.05.001
Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior (1st ed.). Routledge.
Lee, H. Y., Jamieson, J. P., Reis, H. T., Beevers, C. G., Josephs, R. A., Mullarkey, M. C., O’Brien, J. M., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Getting fewer “Likes” than others on social media elicits emotional distress among victimized adolescents. Child Development, 91(6), 2141–2159. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13422
Leskin, P. (2019, October 8). From David Dobrik to The Rock, these are teens’ favorite people to follow on YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter. Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/teens-favorite-influencers-celebrities-david-dobrik-kylie-jenner-2019-10
Lewis-Smith, H., Bray, I., Salmon, D., & Slater, A. (2020). Prospective pathways to depressive symptoms and disordered eating in adolescence: A 7-year longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(10), 2060–2074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01291-1
Li, M., & Mustillo, S. (2020). Linking mother and offspring depressive symptoms: The mediating role of child appearance contingent self-worth. Journal of Affective Disorders, 273, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.117
Lonergan, A. R., Bussey, K., Fardouly, J., Griffiths, S., Murray, S. B., Hay, P., Mond, J., Trompeter, N., & Mitchison, D. (2020). Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(5), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23256
Lowe-Calverley, E., & Grieve, R. (2021). Do the metrics matter? An experimental investigation of Instagram influencer effects on mood and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 36, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.003
Lowy, A. S., Rodgers, R. F., Franko, D. L., Pluhar, E., & Webb, J. B. (2021). Body image and internalization of appearance ideals in Black women: An update and call for culturally-sensitive research. Body Image, 39, 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.10.005
Ma, J., Korpak, A. K., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Macapagal, K. (2021). Patterns of online relationship seeking among transgender and gender diverse adolescents: Advice for others and common inquiries. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000482
Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7
Maheux, A. J., Nesi, J., Galla, B. M., Roberts, S. R., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2021). #Grateful: Longitudinal associations between adolescents’ social media use and gratitude during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31, 734–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12650
Maheux, A. J., Roberts, S. R., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2022). Longitudinal associations between appearance-related social media consciousness and adolescents’ depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12009
Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72(1–2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1
Marengo, D., Longobardi, C., Fabris, M. A., & Settanni, M. (2018). Highly-visual social media and internalizing symptoms in adolescence: The mediating role of body image concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.003
Markey, C. N. (2010). Invited commentary: Why body image is important to adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1387–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9510-0
Mascheroni, G., Vincent, J., & Jimenez, E. (2015). “Girls are addicted to likes so they post semi-naked selfies”: Peer mediation, normativity and the construction of identity online. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-5
Maughan, B., Collishaw, S., & Stringaris, A. (2013). Depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820214
Mayeux, L., & Kleiser, M. (2020). A gender prototypicality theory of adolescent peer popularity. Adolescent Research Review, 5(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00123-z
McConnell, E. A., Clifford, A., Korpak, A. K., Phillips, G., & Birkett, M. (2017). Identity, victimization, and support: Facebook experiences and mental health among LGBTQ youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.026
McCrae, N., Gettings, S., & Purssell, E. (2017). Social media and depressive symptoms in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review. Adolescent Research Review, 2(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0053-4
McEntee, M. L., Serier, K. N., Smith, J. M., & Smith, J. E. (2020). The sum is greater than its parts: Intersectionality and measurement validity of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in Latinx undergraduates in the United States. Sex Roles, 84, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01149-7
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
McLean, S. A., Jarman, H. K., & Rodgers, R. F. (2019). How do “selfies” impact adolescents’ well-being and body confidence? A narrative review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S177834
McLean, S. A., Paxton, S. J., & Wertheim, E. H. (2016). Does media literacy mitigate risk for reduced body satisfaction following exposure to thin-ideal media? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(8), 1678–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0440-3
Meier, E. P., & Gray, J. (2014). Facebook photo activity associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(4), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0305
Mendle, J., Turkheimer, E., & Emery, R. E. (2007). Detrimental psychological outcomes associated with early pubertal timing in adolescent girls. Developmental Review, 27(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.11.001
Mills, J. S., Musto, S., Williams, L., & Tiggemann, M. (2018). “Selfie” harm: Effects on mood and body image in young women. Body Image, 27, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.007
Moreno, M. A., & Uhls, Y. T. (2019). Applying an affordances approach and a developmental lens to approach adolescent social media use. Digital Health, 5, 2055207619826678. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619826678
Naar-King, S. (2011). Motivational interviewing in adolescent treatment. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105601103
Nesi, J., Dredge, R., Maheux, A.J., Roberts, S.R., Fox, K.A., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (in press). Peer experiences via social media. In B. Halpern-Felsher (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health. Elsevier. Author version retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/s8mru/
Nesi, J. (2020). The impact of social media on youth mental health: Challenges and opportunities. North Carolina Medical Journal, 81(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.81.2.116
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., Maheux, A. J., Roberts, S. R., Sanzari, C., Widman, L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2021). Selfie appearance investment and peer feedback concern: Multimethod investigation of adolescent selfie practices and adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(4), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000342
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018a). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018b). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 2—Application to peer group processes and future directions for research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9
Neumark-Sztainer, D., Paxton, S. J., Hannan, P. J., Haines, J., & Story, M. (2006). Does body satisfaction matter? Five-year longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(2), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.001
Neumark-Sztainer, D., Wall, M., Larson, N. I., Eisenberg, M. E., & Loth, K. (2011). Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: Findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111(7), 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.012
Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: Facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190
Olayinka, J. T., Gohara, M. A., & Ruffin, Q. K. (2021). #BlackGirlMagic: Impact of the social media movement on Black women’s self esteem. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, 7(2), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.01.006
Orben, A., Przybylski, A. K., Blakemore, S. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2022). Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media. Nature Communications, 13, 1649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3
Parker, K., Horowitz, J., Stepler, R. (2017). On gender differences: No consensus on nature vs. nurture. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/12/05/on-gender-differences-no-consensus-on-nature-vs-nurture/
Pennesi, J.-L., & Wade, T. D. (2016). A systematic review of the existing models of disordered eating: Do they inform the development of effective interventions? Clinical Psychology Review, 43, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.004
Perloff, R. M. (2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 71(11–12), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6
Pouwels, J. L., Valkenburg, P. M., Beyens, I., van Driel, I. I., & Keijsers, L. (2021). Social media use and friendship closeness in adolescents’ daily lives: An experience sampling study. Developmental Psychology, 57(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001148
Prnjak, K., Pemberton, S., Helms, E., & Phillips, J. G. (2020). Reactions to ideal body shapes. Journal of General Psychology, 147(4), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2019.1676190
Ramati-Ziber, L., Shnabel, N., & Glick, P. (2020). The beauty myth: Prescriptive beauty norms for women reflect hierarchy-enhancing motivations leading to discriminatory employment practices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000209
Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. Common Sense Media. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709
Robinson, L., Prichard, I., Nikolaidis, A., Drummond, C., Drummond, M., & Tiggemann, M. (2017). Idealised media images: The effect of fitspiration imagery on body satisfaction and exercise behaviour. Body Image, 22, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.06.001
Rodgers, R. F. (2016). The relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and internet use, part II: An integrated theoretical model. Adolescent Research Review, 1, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0017-5
Rodgers, R. F., & Melioli, T. (2016). The relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and internet use, part I: A review of empirical support. Adolescent Research Review, 1, 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0016-6
Rodgers, R. F., Paxton, S. J., & McLean, S. A. (2014). A biopsychosocial model of body image concerns and disordered eating in early adolescent girls. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0013-7
Rodgers, R. F., Paxton, S. J., & Wertheim, E. H. (2021). #Take idealized bodies out of the picture: A sco** review of social media content aiming to protect and promote positive body image. Body Image, 38, 10–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.009
Rodgers, R. F., Slater, A., Gordon, C. S., McLean, S. A., Jarman, H. K., & Paxton, S. J. (2020). A biopsychosocial model of social media use and body image concerns, disordered eating, and muscle-building behaviors among adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(2), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01190-0
Romito, M., Salk, R. H., Thoma, B. C., Romito, M., Levine, M. D., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2021). Exploring transgender adolescents’ body image concerns and disordered eating: Semi-structured interviews with nine gender minority youth. Body Image, 37, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.01.008
Rounds, E. G., & Stutts, L. A. (2021). The impact of fitspiration content on body satisfaction and negative mood: An experimental study. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000288
Saiphoo, A. N., & Vahedi, Z. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028
Salomon, I., & Brown, C. S. (2020). That selfie becomes you: Examining taking and posting selfies as forms of self-objectification. Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1817091
Saunders, J. F., & Eaton, A. A. (2018). Snaps, selfies, and shares: How three popular social media platforms contribute to the sociocultural model of disordered eating among young women. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0713
Schlenker, B. R., & Pontari, B. A. (2000). The strategic control of information: Impression management and self-presentation in daily life. In A. Tesser, R. B. Felson, & J. M. Sels (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 199–232). American Psychological Association.
Schooler, D., & Daniels, E. A. (2014). “I am not a skinny toothpick and proud of it”: Latina adolescents’ ethnic identity and responses to mainstream media images. Body Image, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.09.001
Scully, M., Swords, L., & Nixon, E. (2020). Social comparisons on social media: Online appearance-related activity and body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.93
Seekis, V., Bradley, G. L., & Duffy, A. L. (2021). Social networking sites and men’s drive for muscularity: Testing a revised objectification model. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(1), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000265
Sharpe, H., Patalay, P., Choo, T.-H., Wall, M., Mason, S. M., Goldschmidt, A. B., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2018). Bidirectional associations between body dissatisfaction and depressive symptoms from adolescence through early adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 30(4), 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417001663
Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The power of the Like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673
Shroff, H., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: A replication with adolescent girls. Body Image, 3(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.10.004
Simoncic, T. E., Kuhlman, K. R., Vargas, I., Houchins, S., & Lopez-Duran, N. L. (2014). Facebook use and depressive symptomatology: Investigating the role of neuroticism and extraversion in youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.039
Skowronski, M., Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2020). Predicting adolescents’ self-objectification from sexualized video game and Instagram use: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01187-1
Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2012). Time since menarche and sport participation as predictors of self-objectification: A longitudinal study of adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 67(9–10), 571–581.
Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314554606
Solomon-Krakus, S., Sabiston, C. M., Brunet, J., Castonguay, A. L., Maximova, K., & Henderson, M. (2017). Body image self-discrepancy and depressive symptoms among early adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.08.024
Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413476512
Steele, R. G., Hall, J. A., & Christofferson, J. L. (2020). Conceptualizing digital stress in adolescents and young adults: Toward the development of an empirically based model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00300-5
Steinsbekk, S., Wichstrøm, L., Stenseng, F., Nesi, J., Hygen, B. W., & Skalická, V. (2021). The impact of social media use on appearance self-esteem from childhood to adolescence—A 3-wave community study. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106528
Stice, E., Hayward, C., Cameron, R. P., Killen, J. D., & Taylor, C. B. (2000). Body-image and eating disturbances predict onset of depression among female adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.438
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Durant, S. (2011). Risk factors for onset of eating disorders: Evidence of multiple risk pathways from an 8-year prospective study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(10), 622–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.009
Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital youth: The role of media in development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6278-2
Subrahmanyam, K., Šmahel, D., & Greenfield, P. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.395
Sudhir, P. M. (2015). Cognitive behaviour therapy with adolescents. In M. Mehta & R. Sagar (Eds.), A practical approach to cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents (pp. 21–42). Springer Science + Business Media.
Tech Transparency Project (2021). ‘Thinstagram’: Instagram’s algorithm fuels eating disorder epidemic. Retrieved from https://www.techtransparencyproject.org/articles/thinstagram-instagrams-algorithm-fuels-eating-disorder-epidemic
“The Facebook Files” (2021). The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on April 6, 2022 from https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039
Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. American Psychological Association.
Tiggemann, M., Anderberg, I., & Brown, Z. (2020). Uploading your best self: Selfie editing and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 33, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.03.002
Tiggemann, M., Hayden, S., Brown, Z., & Veldhuis, J. (2018). The effect of Instagram “likes” on women’s social comparison and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 26, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.07.002
Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2018). ‘Strong is the new skinny’: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(8), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316639436
Tolman, D. L., & Porche, M. V. (2000). The adolescent femininity ideology scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(4), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00219.x
Trekels, J., Ward, L. M., & Eggermont, S. (2018). I “like” the way you look: How appearance-focused and overall Facebook use contribute to adolescents’ self-sexualization. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.020
Twenge, J. M. (2020). Increases in depression, self-harm, and suicide among U.S. adolescents after 2012 and links to technology use: Possible mechanisms. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 2(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20190015
Twenge, J., & Farley, E. (2020). Not all screen time is created equal: Associations with mental health vary by activity and gender. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01906-9
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617723376
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
van der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., & Sumter, S. R. (2019). Social media use, social media stress, and sleep: Examining cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships in adolescents. Health Communication, 34(5), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422101
van Eldik, A. K., Kneer, J., Lutkenhaus, R. O., & Jansz, J. (2019). Urban influencers: An analysis of urban identity in YouTube content of local social media influencers in a super-diverse city. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02876
Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2016). The interrelated roles of mass media and social media in adolescents’ development of an objectified self-concept: A longitudinal study. Communication Research, 43(8), 1116–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600488
Vendemia, M. A., DeAndrea, D. C., & Brathwaite, K. N. (2021). Objectifying the body positive movement: The effects of sexualizing and digitally modifying body-positive images on Instagram. Body Image, 38(1), 37–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.017
Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Sage.
Wang, Y., Chu, X., Nie, J., Gu, X., & Lei, L. (2021b). Selfie-editing, facial dissatisfaction, and cosmetic surgery consideration among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01280-4
Wang, Y., **e, X., Fardouly, J., Vartanian, L. R., & Lei, L. (2021a). The longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between selfie-related behaviors and self-objectification and appearance concerns among adolescents. New Media & Society, 23(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819894346
Watson, L. B., Lewis, J. A., & Moody, A. T. (2019). A sociocultural examination of body image among Black women. Body Image, 31, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.03.008
Wick, M. R., & Keel, P. K. (2020). Posting edited photos of the self: Increasing eating disorder risk or harmless behavior? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(6), 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23263
Wilfred, S. A., & Lundgren, J. D. (2021). The double consciousness body image scale: A body image assessment centering the experiences of Black women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 54, 1771–1781. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23581
Wilksch, S. M., O’Shea, A., Ho, P., Byrne, S., & Wade, T. D. (2020). The relationship between social media use and disordered eating in young adolescents. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23198
Williams, A., & Gonlin, V. (2017). I got all my sisters with me (on Black Twitter): Second screening of how to get away with murder as a discourse on black womanhood. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1303077
Williamson, G., & Karazsia, B. T. (2018). The effect of functionality-focused and appearance-focused images of models of mixed body sizes on women’s state-oriented body appreciation. Body Image, 24, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.12.008
Winter, V. R., Danforth, L. K., Landor, A., & Pevehouse-Pfeiffer, D. (2019). Toward an understanding of racial and ethnic diversity in body image among women. Social Work Research, 43, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svy033
Wolf, N. (1990). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. Morrow.
Yau, J. C., & Reich, S. M. (2019). “It’s just a lot of work”: Adolescents’ self-presentation norms and practices on Facebook and Instagram. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(1), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12376
Zheng, D., Ni, X., & Luo, Y. (2019). Selfie posting on social networking sites and female adolescents’ self-objectification: The moderating role of imaginary audience ideation. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0937-1
Zillich, A. F., & Riesmeyer, C. (2021). Be yourself: The relative importance of personal and social norms for adolescents’ self-presentation on Instagram. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033810
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Hawes, T., & Pariz, J. (2021). A closer look at appearance and social media: Measuring activity, self-presentation, and social comparison and their associations with emotional adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000277
Acknowledgements
We thank Brianna A. Ladd for her assistance with literature searches and manuscript preparation. We also appreciate the thoughtful feedback from anonymous reviewers.
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships under Grant No. 1940700 awarded to Anne J. Maheux and Savannah R. Roberts. Jacqueline Nesi is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (K23-MH122669). Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National Science Foundation or National Institute of Mental Health, and these organizations had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SCB developed the idea for this theoretical framework and review paper, wrote the majority of the original draft and subsequent drafts, and coordinated and supervised all work related to literature searches, writing, and revisions. SRR and AJM contributed to the development of the theoretical framework, assisted with writing the original draft and revising subsequent drafts, and contributed to literature searches. JN contributed to the development of the theoretical framework and to revising multiple drafts.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
This review paper does not constitute research involving human subjects.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choukas-Bradley, S., Roberts, S.R., Maheux, A.J. et al. The Perfect Storm: A Developmental–Sociocultural Framework for the Role of Social Media in Adolescent Girls’ Body Image Concerns and Mental Health. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 25, 681–701 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00404-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00404-5