SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic design and nonlinear response comparison of a hybrid timber building configured with BRB- and SMA-braced LVL frames

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To achieve adequate performance during earthquakes, mass timber buildings are often combined with structural systems including other materials, resulting in seismic-resistant hybrid timber (SRHT) buildings. The state-of-the-art on the subject indicates that some of these hybrid systems have only aimed at increased stiffness and energy dissipation capability compared to timber-only structures, whilst others have also targeted a higher performance with minimal post-earthquake downtime for re-occupation. To compare both cases, this work presents the seismic design and nonlinear response evaluation of a SRHT building, 12-storeys tall, whose main seismic-resistant system included Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) frames braced with either Buckling Restrained Braces (BRB) or Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) devices-equipped steel braces. The design process showed that despite dividing the site response spectrum by a not so large reduction factor due to the existence of timber, practical and reasonable sizes of the structural members were able to satisfy the demand requirements. The results of the nonlinear dynamic analysis (NLDA) of the structures showed that both of them would respond within the accepted limits prescribed by international codes. The inclusion of the SMA devices upgraded the response of the hybrid building in terms of residual displacements and strains, but at the expense of having larger floor accelerations due to a reduced energy dissipation capability compared to the BRBs. It was concluded that both of the investigated systems are preliminary suitable for construction, and there is not a strict need for utilizing increased reduction factors. However, further research involving proper experimental testing is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AISC Committee 341 (2016) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago, USA

  • American Wood Council (2018) National design specification (NDS) for wood construction. Washington DC, USA

  • Black CJ, Makris N, Aiken ID (2004) Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces. J Struct Eng 130(6):880–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaß HJ, Fellmoser P (2004) Design of solid wood panels with cross layers: influence of shear deformation. In: Proceedings of the 8th world conference on timber engineering, Helsinki, Finland

  • Buchanan A, Deam B, Fragiacomo M, Pampanin S, Palermo A (2008) Multi-storey prestressed timber buildings in New Zealand. Struct Eng Int 18(2):166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr AJ (2015) Ruaumoko—inelastic analysis computer program, volume three: appendices. Carr Research Limited, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr AJ (2016) Ruaumoko—inelastic analysis computer program, volume two: user’s manual for the 2D version, Ruaumoko2D. Carr Research Limited, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccotti A, Sandhass C, Okabe M, Yasumura C, Kawai N (2013) SOFIE project—3D shaking table test on a seven-storey full-scale cross-laminated timber building. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:2003–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark P, Aiken I, Kasai K, Ko E, Kimura I (1999) Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic dam** devices. In: Proceedings of 68th annual convention SEAOC, Santa Barbara, CA

  • Cortés MF, Quintana Gallo P, Carradine DM (2022) Seismic analysis and design of an LTF building complying with the New Zealand and Chilean seismic standards using novel expressions for the equivalent linear-elastic properties of the panels. N Z Timber Des Soc J 30(2):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan H et al (2011) The M8.8 Chile earthquake, 27 February 2010. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 44(3):123–166

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Della Corte G, D'Aniello M, Landolfo R, Mazzolani FM (2011) Review of steel buckling-restrained braces. Steel Constr 4(2):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201110012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R (2000) Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29:945–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo FC, Valente C (2005) Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1687–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R, Mucciarelli M, Nigro D, Ponzo FC, Santarsiero G (2004) Experimental static and dynamic response of a real R/C frame upgraded with SMA recentering and dissipative braces. 13th WCEE, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Futurebuild (2018) LVL specific engineering design guide. Auckland, New Zealand

  • Gagnon S, Pirvu C (2011) CLT: handbook cross laminated timber. FPInnovations, Vancouver, Canada

  • Gilbert C, Erochko J (2019) Development and testing of hybrid timber-steel braced frames. Eng Struct 198:109495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert C, Gohlich R, Erochko J (2015) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of innovative high R-factor hybrid timber-steel buildings. In: 11th Canadian association for earthquake engineering, Victoria, Canada

  • Gohlich R, Erochko J, Woods JE (2018) Experimental testing and numerical modelling of a heavy timber moment-resisting frame with ductile steel links. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(6):1460–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green M, Karsh E (2012) Tall wood: the case for tall wood buildings. Creative Commons, British Columbia, Canada

  • Hein C (2014) Develo** hybrid timber construction for sustainable tall buildings. CTBUH J 3:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Normalización (INN) (2012) NCh433Of.96mod2012: Seismic design of buildings. Santiago, Chile (in Spanish)

  • Iqbal A, Pampanin S, Palermo A, Buchanan AH (2015) Performance and design of LVL walls coupled with UFP dissipaters. J Earthq Eng 19(3):383–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.987406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council of Canada (NRC) (2020) National building code of Canada (NBCC), Ottawa, Canada

  • Newcombe MP, Pampanin S, Buchanan AH, Palermo A (2008) Section analysis and cyclic behaviour of post-tensioned jointed ductile connections for multi-story timber buildings. J Earthq Eng 12(1):83–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe MP, Pampanin S, Buchanan AH (2010). Global response of a two storey Press-Lam timber building. In Proceedings of 2010 New Zealand society for earthquake engineering conference, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Palermo A, Pampanin S, Calvi GM (2004) The use of “controlled rocking” in the seismic design of bridges. In Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada

  • S Pampanin S, Kam WY, Akguzel U, Tasligedik AS, Quintana Gallo P (2012) Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the Christchurch CBD on 22 February 2011 earthquake. Part I: overview. Technical Report University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Pei S, van de Lindt JW, Barbosa AR, Berman JW, McDonnell E, Dolan JD, Blomgren HE, Zimmerman RB, Huang D, Wichman S (2019) Experimental seismic response of a resilient 2-story mass-timber building with post-tensioned rocking walls. J Struct Eng 145(11):04019120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Sritharan S, Conley JR, Pampanin S (1999) Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J 44(6):42–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana Gallo P (2019) Seismic shear demands in columns of RC frames accounting for dynamic amplification effects. Obras Proy 26:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana Gallo P, Carradine DM (2021) Philosophical reflexions following the Lyttleton 2011 New Zealand earthquake: ten years after. In: Proceedings of 2021 New Zealand society for earthquake engineering conference, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Quintana Gallo P, Bonelli P, Pampanin S, Carr AJ (2020) Seismic design of RC walls in Chile: damage observations and identified deficiencies after the 2010 Maule earthquake. Report 2020–01, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand (ISSN 1172-9511)

  • Quintana Gallo P, Carradine D, Bazaez R (2021) State of the art and practice of seismic-resistant hybrid timber structures. Eur J Wood Prod 79:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncari A, Gobbi F, Loss C (2021) Nonlinear static seismic response of a building equipped with hybrid cross-laminated timber floor diaphragms and concentric x-braced steel frames. Buildings 11:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio R (2020) Análisis y diseño de un edificio híbrido de madera procesada (CLT, LVL) combinada con riostras con amortiguamiento suplementario. Trabajo de Título, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile (in Spanish)

  • Rubio R, Quintana Gallo P, Carradine DM (2021) Seismic analysis and design of a 12-storey hybrid timber structure combining LVL frames, CLT rocking walls and BRB and SMA steel braces. In Proceedings of WCTE 2021, Santiago, Chile

  • Sakamoto I, Kawai N, Okada H, Isoda H, Yusa S (2004) Final report of a research and development project on timber-based hybrid building structures. In: 8th WCTE, Lahti, Finland

  • Sarti F (2015) Seismic design of low-damage post-tensioned timber wall systems. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Sarti F, Palermo A, Pampanin S (2012) Simplified design procedures for post-tensioned seismic resistant timber walls. In Proceedings of 15th WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Standards New Zealand (SNZ) (2004) NZS1170.5:2004, Structural design actions: part 5, earthquake actions. Wellington, New Zealand

  • Stanton J, Stone WC, Cheok GS (1997) A hybrid reinforced precast frame for seismic regions. PCI J 2(2):20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmers M, Tsay Jacobs A (2018) Concrete apartment tower in Los Angeles reimagined in mass timber. Eng Struct 167:716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay R, Poncet L, Bolduc P, Neville R, De Vall R (2004) Testing and design of buckling restrained braces for Canadian application. In: Proceedings of the 13th WCEE, Vancouver, Canada

  • Uang CM, Nakashima M (2004) Steel buckling-restrained braced frames. In: Earthquake engineering from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC Press

  • Uang CM, Nakashima M, Tsai KC (2004) Research and application of buckling-restrained braced frames. Steel Struct 4:301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe A, Hitomi Y, Yaeki E, Wada A, Fujimoto M (1988) Properties of brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube. Proc. 9th WCEE, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan

Download references

Acknowledgements

The help of Mr. Brand Saxey (CoreBrace) with the design of the BRBs is greatly appreciated. Part of this work was presented at the World Conference on Timber Engineering 2021. The Corresponding Author acknowledges the support of the Department of Steel and Timber Structures of the Czech Technical University in Prague for writing this article as part of the FB – CTU Global Postdoc Fellowship Program.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TEAM Engineering and Research Limitada, Viña del Mar, Chile

    Ricardo Rubio

  2. Department of Steel and Timber Structures, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

    Patricio Quintana Gallo

  3. BRANZ Limited, Judgeford, New Zealand

    David M. Carradine

Authors
  1. Ricardo Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricio Quintana Gallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David M. Carradine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RR: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft Writing. PQG: Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft Writing. DC: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing—Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricio Quintana Gallo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Consent to participate

All the authors agreed to participate in the writing of this manuscript.

Consent to publication

All the authors agreed to submit this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubio, R., Quintana Gallo, P. & Carradine, D.M. Seismic design and nonlinear response comparison of a hybrid timber building configured with BRB- and SMA-braced LVL frames. Bull Earthquake Eng 22, 461–486 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01781-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01781-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation