Log in

Seismic fragility analysis of irregular bridges with non-circular tall piers considering ground motion directionality

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To fully assess the seismic performance of irregular bridge structures with non-circular piers, a novel seismic fragility analysis method for bridge components is proposed accordingly. The method is proposed based on engineering structural reliability theory, and three independent limit state equations are adopted to represent three types of seismic damage, two of which are related to pier biaxial bending and shearing damage separately and the other is related to bearing deformation damage. The pier biaxial bending and shearing limit state equations are developed with reference to current well-established theory on the failure surfaces of reinforced concrete columns. The bearing deformation limit state equation is developed based on bearing’s relative displacement. Each limit state equation is defined with 4 different limit states and the quantitative criteria on different limit states are also specified together. The seismic fragility analysis for the components of a certain irregular rigid-frame continuous combined bridge under the excitations of 3D ground motions is taken as a case study to thoroughly interpret the novel seismic fragility analysis method, and the impacts of incidence angles for horizontal ground motion on the component fragilities are discussed. It is shown that the proposed method is more appropriate in evaluating seismic performance of bridge components. In addition, the seismic vulnerability of the bridge structure system is also discussed by incorporating the first-order reliability theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Mohti A, Pekcan G (2013) Effect of skew angle on seismic vulnerability of RC box-girder highway bridges. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 13(6):1350013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MS, Bhuiyan MAR, Billah AHMM (2012) Seismic fragility assessment of SMA-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1885–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirihormozaki E, Pekcan G, Itani A (2015) Analytical fragility functions for horizontally curved steel I-girder highway bridges. Earthq Spectra 31(4):2235–2254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(5):1486–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar UR, Banerjee S (2015) Fragility of skewed bridges under orthogonal seismic ground motions. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11(9):1113–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billah AHM, Alam MS (2015) Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11(6):804–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boris B (1974) Reinforced concrete engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2013) Seismic design criteria, Version1.7. Division of structures, Sacramento. California: California Department of Transportation

  • Deshan S, Erhua Z, Jun D, Shan G (2017) Ground motion attenuation characteristics of Wenchuan earthquake and seismic response law of long-span continuous rigid frame bridge with high-rise pier. China Civil Eng J 04:107–115 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng R, Wang X, Yuan W et al (2018) Impact of seismic excitation direction on the fragility analysis of horizontally curved concrete bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 16(10):4705–4733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galal KE, Ghobarah A (2003) Flexural and shear hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns with variable axial load. Eng Struct 25(1):1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidaris I, Padgett JE, Barbosa AR et al (2017) Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the United States: state-of-the-art review. J Struct Eng 143(3):4016188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jangid RS (1996) Seismic response of sliding structures to bidirectional earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(11):1301–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon J, Shafieezadeh A, Lee DH et al (2015) Damage assessment of older highway bridges subjected to three-dimensional ground motions: characterization of shear–axial force interaction on seismic fragilities. Eng Struct 87:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon J, Desroches R, Kim T et al (2016) Geometric parameters affecting seismic fragilities of curved multi-frame concrete box-girder bridges with integral abutments. Eng Struct 122:121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CJ, Hung H, Liu K et al (2010) Reconnaissance observation on bridge damage caused by the 2008 Wenchuan (China) Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 26(4):1057–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud KM (2009) Safety and reliability of bridge structures. CRC Press, New York City

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mangalathu S, Choi E, Park HC et al (2018) Probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment of tall horizontally curved concrete bridges in California. J Perform Constr Facil 32(6):4018080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(1):823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori HZ, Amiri GG, Nekooei M et al (2016) Seismic fragility assessment of skewed MSSS-I girder concrete bridges with unequal height columns. J Earthq Tsunami 10(01):1550013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omranian E, Abdelnaby AE, Abdollahzadeh G (2018) Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC skew bridges subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 114:186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlavan H, Zakeri B, Amiri GG et al (2016) Probabilistic vulnerability assessment of horizontally curved multiframe RC box-girder highway bridges. J Perform Constr Facil 30(3):4015038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Paulay T (1975) Reinforced concrete structures. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park HG, Yu EJ, Choi KK (2012) Shear strength degradation model for RC columns subjected to cyclic loading. Eng Struct 34(1):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People’s Republic of China industry recommended standards (2008) JTG/T B02-01-2008 guidelines for seismic design of highway bridge. China Communications Press, Bei**g

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Republic of China industry standards (2004) JTG D62-2004 Code for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts. China Communications Press, Bei**g

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricles JM, Yang YS, Priestley MJN (1998) Modeling non-ductile R/C columns for seismic analysis of bridges. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(4):415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraf Shirazi R, Pekcan G, Itani A (2018) Analytical fragility curves for a class of horizontally curved box-girder bridges. J Earthq Eng 22(5):881–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdar N, Folić R (2018) Vulnerability and optimal probabilistic seismic demand model for curved and skewed RC bridges. Eng Struct 176:411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanieh S, Memarpour MM, Kilanehei F (2019) Performance assessment of bridge-soil-foundation system with irregular configuration considering ground motion directionality effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 118:19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taskari O, Sextos A (2015) Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(13):2281–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoulidis N, Karakostas C, Lekidis V et al (2016) The Cephalonia, Greece, January 26 (M6.1) and February 3, 2014 (M6.0) earthquakes: near-fault ground motion and effects on soil and structures. Bull Earthq Eng 14(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Third Survey and Design Institute of China Railway Ministry (2005) Code for design on subsoil and foundation of railway bridge and culvert (TB 10002.5-2005). China Railway Press

  • Torbol M, Shinozuka M (2012) Effect of the angle of seismic incidence on the fragility curves of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(14):2111–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torbol M, Shinozuka M (2014) The directionality effect in the seismic risk assessment of highway networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng 10(2):175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transport Ministry of People’s Republic of China (2006) Code for Seismic Design of Railway Engineering(GB 50111-2006). China Planning Press

  • Vecchio F, Collins M (1986) The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Struct J 83(1):19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei B, Zuo C, He X et al (2018) Effects of vertical ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track-bridge system of high-speed railway. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 115:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson T, Chen S, Mahmoud H (2015) Analytical case study on the seismic performance of a curved and skewed reinforced concrete bridge under vertical ground motion. Eng Struct 100:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Werner SD, Desroches R (2015) Seismic fragility analysis of skewed bridges in the central southeastern United States. Eng Struct 83:116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri B, Padgett JE, Amiri GG (2014) Fragility analysis of skewed single-frame concrete box-girder bridges. J Perform Constr Facil 28(3):571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri B, Padgett JE, Amiri GG (2015) Fragility assessment for seismically retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete box girder bridges. J Perform Constr Facil 29(2):4014043

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here has been conducted as part of the result of a series of research projects granted by the National Key Research and Development Plan with 2016YFC0802202, National Science Foundation with 51678489&51978577, Science and Technology Program of Yunnan Provincial Communication Department with 2017(A)03, Science and Technology Project of Power China with SCMQ-201728-ZB. Special thanks to Prof. Yuk Hon Chai, Prof. Qiao Li, Dr. Jun Dong & Mr. Jiaqi Yao for their helps and comments to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deshan Shan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shan, D., Qu, F. & Deng, X. Seismic fragility analysis of irregular bridges with non-circular tall piers considering ground motion directionality. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 1723–1753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00769-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00769-z

Keywords

Navigation