Log in

Seismic response of masonry-infilled steel frames via multi-scale finite-element analyses

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of masonry infills on the seismic vulnerability of steel frames is studied through multi-scale numerical modelling. First, a micro-modelling approach is utilized to define a homogenized masonry material, calibrated on experimental tests, which is used for modelling the nonlinear response of a one-story, single span, masonry-infilled portal under horizontal loads. Based on results of the micro-model, the constitutive behavior of a diagonal strut macro-element equivalent to the infill panel is calibrated. Then, the diagonal strut is used to model infill panels in the macro-scale analysis of a multi-span multi-story infilled moment-resisting (MR) steel frame. The seismic vulnerability of the MR frame is evaluated through a nonlinear static procedure. Numerical analyses highlight that infills may radically modify the seismic response and the failure mechanism of the frame, hence the importance of the infill correct modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreini M, De Falco A, Giresini L, Sassu M (2014) Structural damage in the cities of Reggiolo and Carpi after the earthquake on May 2012 in Emilia Romagna. Bull Earthq Eng 12(5):2445–2480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS Inc. (1998) ANSYS v.11.0 manual, Canonsburg (PA)

  • ASCE (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356, Washington (DC)

  • Asteris PG, Antoniou ST, Sophianopoulos DS, Chrysostomou CZ (2011a) Mathematical macro-modelling of infilled frames: state-of-the-art. J Struct Eng ASCE 137(12):1508–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteris PG, Chrysostomou CZ, Giannopoulos IP, Smyrou E (2011b) Masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN 2011), Corfu, Greece

  • Barua HK, Mallick SK (1977) Behaviour of mortar infilled steel frames under lateral load. Build Environ 12(4):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beconcini ML, Croce P, Pellegrini D (2007) Comportamento meccanico di tamponamenti in blocchi di laterizio rettificati e giunti sottili. L'Industria dei Laterizi 106:248–261 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti M, Salvatori L, Orlando M, Spinelli P (2016) Unreinforced masonry walls with irregular opening layouts: reliability of equivalent-frame modelling for seismic vulnerability assessment. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9985-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti M, Bartoli G, Orlando M (2010) Evaluation study on structural fault of a Renaissance Italian palace. Eng Struct 32(7):1801–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betti M, Orlando M, Vignoli A (2011) Static behaviour of an Italian Medieval Castle: damage assessment by numerical modelling. Comput Struct 89(21–22):1956–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliò I, Pantò B (2014) A macro-element modelling approach of infilled frame structures. Comput Struct 143:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (Comite´ Europe´en de Normalisation) (2003) Eurocode: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Comite´ Europe´en de Normalisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiostrini S, Vignoli A (1996) Ultimate strength evaluation of unreinforced masonry buildings via numerical simulations. In: Proceedings of the eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

  • Chrysostomou CZ (1991) Effects of degrading infill walls on the nonlinear seismic response of two-dimensional steel frames. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca (NY)

  • Chrysostomou CZ, Asteris PG (2012) On the in-plane properties and capacities of infilled frames. Eng Struct 41:385–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysostomou CZ, Gergely P, Abel JF (2002) A six-strut model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel infilled frames. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2(3):335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisafulli FJ, Carr AJ, Park R (2000) Analytical modelling of infilled frame structures—a general review. Bull NZ Soc Earthq Eng 33(1):30–47

    Google Scholar 

  • CSI, SAP2000 V-16 (2013) Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures basic analysis reference manual. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawe JL, McBride RT (1985) Experimental investigation of the shear resistance of masonry panels in steel frames. In: Proceedings of the seventh brick masonry conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp 791–801

  • Doudoumis IN (2007) Finite element modelling and investigation of the behaviour of elastic infilled frames under monotonic loading. Eng Struct 29(6):1004–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell RK, Seible FS, Wilson EL (1998) Pivot hysteretic model for reinforced concrete memers. ACI Struct J 95:607–617

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Dakhakhni WW, Elgaaly M, Hamid AA (2003) Three-strut model for concrete masonry-infilled frames. J Struct Eng 129(2):177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 306 (1999) Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings—basic procedures manual, prepared by the Applied Technology Council (ATC-43), Washington (DC)

  • Giresini L, Fragiacomo M, Lourenço PB (2015) Comparison between rocking analysis and kinematic analysis for the dynamic out-of-plane behavior of masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(13):2359–2376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes M (1961) Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling. Proc Inst Civ Eng 19:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingner RE, Bertero VV (1978) Earthquake resistance of infilled frames. J Struct Div ASCE 104(6):973–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Liauw TC, Kwan KH (1984) Nonlinear behaviour of non-integral infilled frames. Comput Struct 18:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liauw TC, Lo CQ (1988) Multibay infilled frames without shear connectors. J Am Concr Inst 85(4):423–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainstone RJ (1971) On the stiffnesses and strengths of infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng suppl iv:57–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallick DV, Garg RP (1971) Effect of openings on the lateral stiffness of infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng 49:193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi AB, Shing PB, Schuller MP, Noland JL (1996) Experimental evaluation of masonry infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng ASCE 3:228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki S (1988) Inelastic behavior of framed shear wall governed by slip failure of wall panel. In: Proceedings of the ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp 505–510

  • Moghaddam HA (2004) Lateral load behavior of masonry infilled steel frames with repair and retrofit. J Struct Eng 130(1):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam HA, Dowling PJ (1987) The state of the art in infilled frames. ESEE research report no. 87-2, Imperial College of Science and Technology, Civil Eng. Department, London (UK)

  • Orlando M, Salvatori L, Spinelli P, De Stefano M (2016) Displacement capacity of masonry piers: parametric numerical analyses versus international building codes. Bull Earthq Eng 14(8):2259–2271. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9903-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN (1996) Seismic Response of Infilled RC Frame Structures. In: Proceedings of the eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

  • Salvatori L, Marra AM, Bartoli G, Spinelli P (2015) Probabilistic seismic performance of masonry towers: general procedure and a simplified implementation. Eng Struct 94:82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruvengadam V (1985) On the natural frequencies of infilled frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13(3):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willam KJ, Warnke EP (1975) Constitutive model for the triaxial behaviour of concrete. In: Proceedings of the IASBE seminar on concrete structures subjected to triaxial stresses. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering 19, pp 1–30

  • Wood RH (1978) Plasticity, composite action and collapse design of unreinforced shear wall panels in frames. ICE Proc 65:381–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchini A, Lourenço PB (2007) Mechanics of masonry in compression: results from a homogenisation approach. Comput Struct 85(3–4):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Federico Margiacchi thankfully acknowledges the support and suggestions of Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfhard Zhalten and Dr.-Ing. Renato Eusani during his internship at EZI Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Solingen, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Orlando.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Margiacchi, F., Salvatori, L., Orlando, M. et al. Seismic response of masonry-infilled steel frames via multi-scale finite-element analyses. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 3529–3546 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0012-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0012-7

Keywords

Navigation