Log in

Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents in Develo** Microextraction Methods Based on Solidification of Floating Drop: Application to the Trace HPLC/FLD Determination of PAHs

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we evaluated the applicability of hydrophobic carboxylic acid-based deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as environmentally friendly alternatives to common organic solvents in microextraction methods based on solidification of floating drop (SFD). Due to the limited number of solvents that can be used in SFD, the introduction of new solvents can help in the development of these attractive methods. Deep eutectic solvents consisting of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB) and carboxylic acids were prepared and used as extraction solvent. They had the desirable characteristics such as low density, suitable freezing point and proper hydrophobicity which make them suitable alternatives to conventional organic solvents for SFD. With the help of the synthesized hydrophobic DESs, a simple, fast, efficient and environmentally friendly microextraction method was developed based on solidification of deep eutectic solvent (SFDES) without using any organic solvent. The proposed organic solvent-less microextraction method based on SFDES was applied in the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as model compounds in environmental water samples. By coupling this method with high-performance liquid chromatography–fluorescence detection, we achieved low LOD values which is a necessity in the ultra-trace analysis of PAHs in environmental water samples. Under the optimized conditions, good linearity and low limits of detection of 0.7–6.6 ng L−1 were obtained. The analysis of six PAHs in real water samples gave acceptable relative recoveries ranging from 83 to 117% with 5.4–10.5% intra-day relative standard deviations (RSD) and 4–7.1% interday RSD.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rezaee M, Assadi Y, Milani Hosseini M-R, Aghaee E, Ahmadi F, Berijani S (2006) Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1116:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gharehbaghi M, Shemirani F (2011) Ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and enhanced spectrophotometric determination of molybdenum (VI) in water and plant leaves samples by FO-LADS. Food Chem Toxicol 49:423–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moradi M, Yamini Y, Esrafili A, Seidi S (2010) Application of surfactant assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for sample preparation of chlorophenols in water samples. Talanta 82:1864–1869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghambarian M, Yamini Y, Esrafili A (2012) Developments in hollow fiber based liquid-phase microextraction: principles and applications. Microchim Acta 177:271–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. López-García I, Vicente-Martínez Y, Hernández-Córdoba M (2012) Determination of very low amounts of chromium(iii) and (vi) using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction by in situ formation of an ionic liquid followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 27:874–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khalili Zanjani MR, Yamini Y, Shariati S, Jönsson J (2007) A new liquid-phase microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop. Anal Chim Acta 585:286–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghambarian M, Yamini Y, Esrafili A (2013) Liquid-phase microextraction based on solidified floating drops of organic solvents. Microchim Acta 180:519–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leong M-I, Huang S-D (2008) Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with gas chromatography with electron-capture or mass spectrometry detection. J Chromatogr A 1211:8–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farahmand F, Ghasemzadeh B, Naseri A (2018) Air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction using floating organic droplet solidification for simultaneous extraction and spectrophotometric determination of some drugs in biological samples through chemometrics methods. Spectrochim Acta A 188:72–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang M, Zhang P, Hu L, Lu R, Zhou W, Zhang S, Gao H (2014) Ionic liquid-assisted liquid-phase microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic droplets combined with high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of benzoylurea insecticide in fruit juice. J Chromatogr A 1360:47–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karadaş C, Kara D (2017) Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop for preconcentration and determination of trace amounts of copper by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Chem 220:242–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mansour FR, Danielson ND (2017) Solidification of floating organic droplet in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as a green analytical tool. Talanta 170:22–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng Q, Wang Y, Huang Y, Ding X, Chen J, Xu K (2014) Deep eutectic solvents as novel extraction media for protein partitioning. Analyst 139:2565–2573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu P, Hao J-W, Mo L-P, Zhang Z-H (2015) Recent advances in the application of deep eutectic solvents as sustainable media as well as catalysts in organic reactions. RSC Adv 5:48675–48704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbott AP, Boothby D, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK (2004) Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: versatile alternatives to ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 126:9142–9147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamei N, Ezoddin M, Abdi K (2017) Air assisted emulsification liquid-liquid microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent for preconcentration of methadone in water and biological samples. Talanta 165:176–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang B, Bi W, Zhang H, Row KH (2014) Deep eutectic solvent-based HS-SME coupled with GC for the analysis of bioactive terpenoids in Chamaecyparis obtusa leaves. Chromatographia 77:373–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu G-W, Cheng Q, Nie J, Wang X-J, Wang P, Li Z-G, Lee M-R (2018) Microwave hydrodistillation based on deep eutectic solvent for extraction and analysis of essential oil from three Amomum species using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Chromatographia 81:657–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Lee YR, Row KH (2016) Synthesis of mesoporous siliceous materials in choline chloride deep eutectic solvents and the application of these materials to high-performance size exclusion chromatography. Chromatographia 79:375–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Farajzadeh MA, Afshar Mogaddam MR, Aghanassab M (2016) Deep eutectic solvent-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Anal Methods 8:2576–2583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Florindo C, Branco LC, Marrucho IM (2017) Development of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for extraction of pesticides from aqueous environments. Fluid Ph Equilibria 448:135–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yousefi SM, Shemirani F, Ghorbanian SA (2017) Deep eutectic solvent magnetic bucky gels in develo** dispersive solid phase extraction: application for ultra trace analysis of organochlorine pesticides by GC-micro ECD using a large-volume injection technique. Talanta 168:73–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zarei AR, Nedaei M, Ghorbanian SA (2017) Application of deep eutectic solvent based magnetic colloidal gel for dispersive solid phase extraction of ultra-trace amounts of some nitroaromatic compounds in water samples. J Mol Liq 246:58–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao J, Yang M, Cao F, Wang J, Su E (2017) Tailor-made hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for cleaner extraction of polyprenyl acetates from Ginkgo biloba leaves. J Clean Prod 152:399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao J, Yang M, Cao F, Wang J, Su E (2017) Well-designed hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as green and efficient media for the extraction of artemisinin from Artemisia annua leaves. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:3270–3278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cao J, Chen L, Li M, Cao F, Zhao L, Su E (2018) Two-phase systems developed with hydrophilic and hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for simultaneously extracting various bioactive compounds with different polarities. Green Chem 20:1879–1888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yousefi SM, Shemirani F, Ghorbanian SA (2018) Enhanced headspace single drop microextraction method using deep eutectic solvent based magnetic bucky gels: application to the determination of volatile aromatic hydrocarbons in water and urine samples. J Sep Sci 41:966–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Osch DJGP, Zubeir LF, van den Bruinhorst A, Rocha MAA, Kroon MC (2015) Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as water-immiscible extractants. Green Chem 17:4518–4521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Osch DJGP, Parmentier D, Dietz CHJT, van den Bruinhorst A, Tuinier R, Kroon MC (2016) Removal of alkali and transition metal ions from water with hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents. Chem Commun 52:11987–11990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ribeiro BD, Florindo C, Iff LC, Coelho MAZ, Marrucho IM (2015) Menthol-based Eutectic Mixtures: Hydrophobic Low Viscosity Solvents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2469–2477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hii TM, Basheer C, Lee HK (2009) Commercial polymeric fiber as sorbent for solid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water. J Chromatogr A 1216:7520–7526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo L, Lee HK (2011) Development of multiwalled carbon nanotubes based micro-solid-phase extraction for the determination of trace levels of sixteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples. J Chromatogr A 1218:9321–9327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSM (2016) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt J Pet 25:107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Foan L, Ricoul F, Vignoud S (2015) A novel microfluidic device for fast extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from environmental waters—comparison with stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE). Int J Environ Anal Chem 95:1171–1185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yilmaz E, Soylak M (2016) Ultrasound assisted-deep eutectic solvent based on emulsification liquid phase microextraction combined with microsample injection flame atomic absorption spectrometry for valence speciation of chromium(III/VI) in environmental samples. Talanta 160:680–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Arain MB, Yilmaz E, Soylak M (2016) Deep eutectic solvent based ultrasonic assisted liquid phase microextraction for the FAAS determination of cobalt. J Mol Liq 224:538–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo W, Hou Y, Wu W, Ren S, Tian S, Marsh KN (2013) Separation of phenol from model oils with quaternary ammonium salts via forming deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem 15:226–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Morrison HG, Sun CC, Neervannan S (2009) Characterization of thermal behavior of deep eutectic solvents and their potential as drug solubilization vehicles. Int J Pharm 378:136–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zeng H, Qiao K, Li X, Yang M, Zhang S, Lu R, Li J, Gao H, Zhou W (2017) Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidification of deep eutectic solvent for the determination of benzoylureas in environmental water samples. J Sep Sci 40:4563–4570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh BS, Lobo HR, Shankarling GS (2012) Choline chloride based eutectic solvents: magical catalytic system for carbon–carbon bond formation in the rapid synthesis of β-hydroxy functionalized derivatives. Catal Commun 24:70–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang C, Anderson JL (2014) Polymeric ionic liquid bucky gels as sorbent coatings for solid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1344:15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Benedé JL, Anderson JL, Chisvert A (2018) Trace determination of volatile polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in natural waters by magnetic ionic liquid-based stir bar dispersive liquid microextraction. Talanta 176:253–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Amiri A, Ghaemi F (2017) Graphene grown on stainless steel mesh as a highly efficient sorbent for sorptive microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from water samples. Anal Chim Acta 994:29–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fatemi MH, Hadjmohammadi MR, Shakeri P, Biparva P (2012) Extraction optimization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by alcoholic-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and their determination by HPLC. J Sep Sci 35:86–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pena MT, Casais MC, Mejuto MC, Cela R (2009) Development of an ionic liquid based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples. J Chromatogr A 1216:6356–6364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Villar-Navarro M, Martín-Valero MJ, Fernández-Torres RM, Callejón-Mochón M, Bello-López M (2017) Easy, fast and environmental friendly method for the simultaneous extraction of the 16 EPA PAHs using magnetic molecular imprinted polymers (mag-MIPs). J Chromatogr B 1044–1045:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fernández-Amado M, Prieto-Blanco MC, López-Mahía P, Muniategui-Lorenzo S, Prada-Rodríguez D (2016) A novel and cost-effective method for the determination of fifteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in low volume rainwater samples. Talanta 155:175–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this study by the Research Council of the University of Tehran through grants is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzaneh Shemirani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 612 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousefi, S.M., Shemirani, F. & Ghorbanian, S.A. Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents in Develo** Microextraction Methods Based on Solidification of Floating Drop: Application to the Trace HPLC/FLD Determination of PAHs. Chromatographia 81, 1201–1211 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-018-3548-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-018-3548-7

Keywords

Navigation