Log in

A systematic literature review of mobile application usability: addressing the design perspective

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advances in mobile technologies and wireless Internet services have accelerated the growth of the mobile app market. To nurture such growth, the usability of mobile apps must be addressed as a priority. Indeed, the unique characteristics of mobile phones, such as the screen size, connectivity, processing capabilities, and context of use, require a high level of usability for mobile apps. Mobile app usability requirements vary with the category of the app. However, mobile app usability is not well understood, and this may lead to the ineffective design of mobile apps and may thus influence users’ acceptance of mobile apps. This study systematically reviews and discusses mobile app usability. It identifies and interprets the relationships among the usability principles, attributes, and design features with the objective of informing mobile app usability design. It also identifies and discusses a set of common usability design features in mobile app design and a set of usability design features that are required in specific mobile app categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh, Y., Suri, P.K.: An empirical analysis of mobile learning app usage experience. Technol. Soc. 68, 101929 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  2. GSMA: Mobile economy (2022). https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

  3. Tang, A.K.Y.: A systematic literature review and analysis on mobile apps in m-commerce: implications for future research. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 37, 100885 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  4. Erdenebat, M.U., Piao, Y.L., Kwon, K.C., Lee, M.H., Kwon, K.H., Kim, M.Y., Kim, N.: Advanced visualization using image super-resolution method for three-dimensional mobile system. Opt. Commun. 480, 126494 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  5. Hoehle, H., Aljafari, R., Venkatesh, V.: Leveraging Microsoft’s mobile usability guidelines: conceptualizing and develo** scales for mobile application usability. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 89, 35–53 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  6. Jabangwe, R., Edison, H., Duc, A.N.: Software engineering process models for mobile app development: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 145, 98–111 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  7. Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.A.: Develo** SMASH: a set of SMArtphone’s uSability heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 43, 40–52 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  8. Hoehle, H., Venkatesh, V.: Mobile application usability: conceptualization and instrument development. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 39, 435–472 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  9. Păsărelu, C.R., Andersson, G., Dobrean, A.: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder mobile apps: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 138, 104133 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  10. Chittaro, L., Cin, P.D.: Evaluating interface design choices on WAP phones: navigation and selection. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 6, 237–244 (2002)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  11. Beauchemin, M., Gradilla, M., Baik, D., Cho, H., Schnall, R.: A multi-step usability evaluation of a self-management app to support medication adherence in persons living with HIV. Int. J. Med. Inform. 122, 37–44 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  12. Human Interface Guidelines: Visual design (2018). https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/visual-design/adaptivity-and-layout/. Accessed 16 Nov 2018

  13. Kortum, P., Sorber, M.: Measuring the usability of mobile applications for phones and tablets. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31, 518–529 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  14. Richardson, B., Campbell-Yeo, M., Smit, M.: Mobile application user experience checklist: a tool to assess attention to core UX principles. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 37(13), 1283–1290 (2021)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  15. Guo, F., Wang, X.S., Shao, H., Wang, X.R., Liu, W.L.: How user’s first impression forms on mobile user interface?: an ERPs study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(9), 870–880 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  16. Joyce, G., Lilley, M., Barker, T., Jefferies, A.: Mobile application usability heuristics: decoupling context-of-use. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 10288, 410–423 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  17. Joyce, G., Lilley, M., Barker, T., Jefferies, A.: Smartphone application usability evaluation: the applicability of traditional heuristics. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9187, 541–550 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  18. Lim, B., **e, Y., Haruvy, E.: The impact of mobile app adoption on physical and online channels. J. Retail. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.10.001

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  19. Islam, N., Want, R.: Smartphones: past, present, and future. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 13, 89–92 (2014)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  20. Al-Subaihin, A.A., Sarro, F., Black, S., Capra, L., Harman, M. Jia, Y.: Clustering mobile apps based on mined textual features. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Spain (2016), pp. 1–10

  21. Akdim, K., CasalΓ³, L.V., FlaviΓ‘n, C.: The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 66, 102888 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  22. Chen, G.C.C.: Users’ adoption of mobile applications: Product type and message framing’s moderating effect. J. Bus. Res. 68, 2317–2321 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  23. Liu, C.Z., Au, Y.A., Choi, H.S.: Effects of freemium strategy in the mobile app market: an empirical study of google play. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 31, 326–354 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  24. Alamoodi, A.H., Garfan, S., Zaidan, B.B., Zaidan, A.A., Shuwandy, M.L., Alaa, M., Alsalem, M.A., Mohammed, A., Aleesa, A.M., Albahri, O.S., Al-Hussein, W.A., Alobaidi, O.R.: A systematic review into the assessment of medical apps: motivations, challenges, recommendations and methodological aspect. Health Technol. 10, 1045–1061 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  25. Tarute, A., Nikou, S., Gatautis, R.: Mobile application driven consumer engagement. Telemat. Inform. 34, 145–156 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  26. Xu, R., Frey, R.M., Fleisch, E., Ilic, A.: Understanding the impact of personality traits on mobile app adoptionβ€”insights from a large-scale field study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 244–256 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  27. Santos-Vijande, M.L., GΓ³mez-RicoRobert, M., Molina-Collado, A., Davison, R.M.: Building user engagement to mhealth apps from a learning perspective: relationships among functional, emotional and social drivers of user value. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 66, 102956 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  28. Palomba, F., Linares-VΓ‘squez, M., Bavota, G., Oliveto, R., Penta, M.D., Poshyvanyk, D., Lucia, A.D.: Crowdsourcing user reviews to support the evolution of mobile apps. J. Syst. Softw. 137, 143–162 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  29. Malik, H., Shakshuki, E.M., Yoo, W.: Comparing mobile apps by identifying β€˜Hot’ features. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 107, 659–669 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  30. Huang, Z.: Usability of tourism websites: a case study of heuristic evaluation. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed. 26, 55–91 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  31. Cong, J., Zheng, P., Bian, Y., Chen, C.H., Li, J., Li, X.: A machine learning-based iterative design approach to automate user satisfaction degree prediction in smart product-service system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 165, 107939 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  32. Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation: Usability inspection methods. SAGE Publications, New York (1994)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  33. Masood, M., Thigambaram, M.: The usability of mobile applications for pre-schoolers. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 197, 1818–1826 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  34. Billi, M., Burzagli, L., Catarci, T., Santucci, G., Bertini, E., Gabbanini, F., Palchetti, E.: A unified methodology for the evaluation of accessibility and usability of mobile applications. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 337–356 (2010)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  35. Pee, L.G., Jiang, J., Klein, G.: Signaling effect of website usability on repurchase intention. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 39, 228–241 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  36. Greeson, J.K.P., Treglia, D., Morones, S., Hopkins, M., Mikell, D.: Youth Matters: Philly (YMP): development, usability, usefulness, & accessibility of a mobile web-based app for homeless and unstably housed youth. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 108, 104586 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  37. Dianat, I., Adeli, P., Jafarabadi, M.A., Karimi, M.A.: User-centred web design, usability and user satisfaction: the case of online banking websites in Iran. Appl. Ergon. 81, 102892 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  38. Zaina, L.A.M., Fortes, R.P.M., Casadei, V., Nozaki, L.S., Paiva, D.M.B.: Preventing accessibility barriers: guidelines for using user interface design patterns in mobile applications. J. Syst. Softw. 186, 111213 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  39. Kumar, B.A., Mohite, P.: Usability of mobile learning applications: a systematic literature review. J. Comput. Educ. 5, 1–17 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  40. Ahmad, N., Rextin, A., Kulsoom, U.E.: Perspectives on usability guidelines for smartphone applications: an empirical investigation and systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 94, 130–149 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  41. Harrison, R., Flood, D., Duce, D.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. 2013(1), 1 (2013)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  42. Karjaluoto, H., Shaikh, A.A., SaarijΓ€rvi, H., Saraniemi, S.: How perceived value drives the use of mobile financial services apps. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i**fomgt.2018.08.014. (in press)

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  43. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews, vol. 33, pp. 1–26. Keele University, Keele (2004)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  44. Lorca-Cabrera, J., Grau, C., MartΓ­-Arques, R., Raigal-Aran, L., FalcΓ³-Pegueroles, A., Albacar-RiobΓ³o, N.: Effectiveness of health web-based and mobile app-based interventions designed to improve informal caregiver’s well-being and quality of life: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform 134, 104003 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  45. Amaral, J.V.S., Montevechi, J.A.B., Miranda, R.C., Junior, W.T.S.: Metamodel-based simulation optimization: a systematic literature review. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 114, 102403 (2021)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  46. Sarkar, U., Gourley, G., Lyles, C.R., Tieu, L., Clarity, C., Newmark, L., Singh, K., Bates, D.W.: Usability of commercially available mobile applications for diverse patients. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 31, 1417–1426 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  47. Dantas, T., Santos, M., QueirΓ³s, A., Silva, A.G.: Mobile applications in the management of headache. Procedia Comput. Sci. 100, 369–374 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  48. Choosing a category: Apple App Store (2022). https://developer.apple.com/app-store/categories/. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

  49. Ji, Y.G., Park, J.H., Lee, C., Yun, M.H.: A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mobile phone user interface. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 20, 207–231 (2006)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  50. Mendes, I.N., Dias-Neto, A.C.: A process-based approach to test usability of multi-platform mobile applications, Part I. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9746, 456–468 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  51. Cho, H., Yen, P., Dowding, D., Merrill, J.A., Schnall, R.: A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: a case study. J. Biomed. Inform. 86, 79–89 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  52. Khowaja, K., Al-Thani, D.: New checklist for the heuristic evaluation of mHealth apps (HE4EH): development and usability study. J. Med. Internet Res. mHealth uHealth 8, e20353 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  53. Prado, M.P., Vincenzi, A.M.R.: Towards cognitive support for unit testing: A qualitative study with practitioners. J. Syst. Softw. 141, 66–84 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  54. Athilingam, P., Labrador, M.A., Remo, E.F.J., Mack, L., Juan, A.B.S., Elliott, A.F.: Features and usability assessment of a patient-centered mobile application (HeartMapp) for self-management of heart failure. Appl. Nurs. Res. 32, 156–163 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  55. Bax, S., Chan, S.: Using eye-tracking research to investigate language test validity and design. System 83, 64–78 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  56. Saad Missen, M.M., Javed, A., Asmat, H., Nosheen, M., Coustaty, M., Salamat, N., Surya Prasath, V.B.: Systematic review and usability evaluation of writing mobile apps for children. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed. 25, 137–160 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  57. Fang, J., Zhao, Z., Wen, C., Wang, R.: Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37, 269–283 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  58. Mattson, D.C.: Usability assessment of a mobile app for art therapy. Arts Psychother. 43, 1–6 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  59. Lee, D., Moon, G., Kim, Y.J., Yi, M.Y.: Antecedents and consequences of mobile phone usability: linking simplicity and interactivity to satisfaction, trust, and brand loyalty. Inf. Manag. 52, 295–304 (2015)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  60. VΓ©lez, O., Okyere, P.B., Kanter, A.S., Bakken, S.: A usability study of a mobile health application for rural Ghanaian midwives. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 59, 184–191 (2014)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  61. Yu, N., Kong, J.: User experience with web browsing on small screens: experimental investigations of mobile-page interface design and homepage design for news websites. Inf. Sci. 330, 427–443 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  62. BitriΓ‘n, P., Buil, I., CatalΓ‘n, S.: Enhancing user engagement: the role of gamification in mobile apps. J. Bus. Res. 132, 170–185 (2021)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  63. Kascak, L.R. Rebola, C.B., Sanford, J.A.: Integrating universal design (UD) principles and mobile design guidelines to improve design of mobile health applications for older adults. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (2014), pp. 343–348

  64. Jennings, P.A.: Comprehensive systems of support: where do we go from here? J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 61, 56–60 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  65. Joyce, G., Lilley, M.: Towards the development of usability heuristics for native smartphone mobile applications. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 8517, 465–474 (2014)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  66. Faliagka, E., Rigou, M., Sirmakessis, S.: A usability study of iPhone built-in applications. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34, 799–808 (2014)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  67. Ko, S.M., Chang, W.S., Ji, Y.G.: Usability principles for augmented reality applications in a smartphone environment. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 29, 501–515 (2013)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  68. Flood, D., Harrison, R., Iacob, C., Duce, D.: Evaluating mobile applications: a spreadsheet case study. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 4(4), 37–65 (2013)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  69. Sauer, J., Sonderegger, A.: Visual aesthetics and user experience: a multiple-session experiment. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 165, 102837 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  70. Kuck, N., Dietel, F.A., Buhlmann, U.: A smartphone app for the prevention and early intervention of body dysmorphic disorder: development and evaluation of the content, usability, and aesthetics. Internet Interv. 28, 100521 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  71. Binti Ayob, N.Z., Hussin, A.R.C., Dahlan, H.M. Three layers design guideline for mobile application. In: International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (2009). IEEE

  72. Huang, G., Sun, M., Jiang, L.C.: Core social network size is associated with physical activity participation for fitness app users: The role of social comparison and social support. Comput. Hum. Behav. 129, 107169 (2022)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  73. Falloon, G.: Young students using iPads: app design and content influences on their learning pathways. Comput. Educ. 68, 505–521 (2013)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  74. Pensabe-Rodriguez, A., Lopez-Dominguez, E., Hernandez-Velazquez, Y., Dominguez-Isidro, S., De-la-Calleja, J.: Context-aware mobile learning system: usability assessment based on a field study. Telemat. Inform. 48, 101346 (2020)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  75. Wang, W.T., Ou, W.M., Chen, W.Y.: The impact of inertia and user satisfaction on the continuance intentions to use mobile communication applications: a mobile service quality perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 44, 178–193 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  76. McMullan, M.: Evaluation of a medication calculation mobile app using a cognitive load instructional design. Int. J. Med. Inform. 118, 72–77 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  77. Kim, S., Lee, I., Lee, K., Jung, S., Park, J., Kim, Y.B., Kim, S.R., Kim, J.: Mobile web 2.0 with multi-display buttons. Commun. ACM 53(1), 136–141 (2010)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  78. Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., Gabrielli, S.: Navigation techniques for small-screen devices: an evaluation on maps and web pages. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 66, 78–97 (2008)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  79. Lee, K., Bejerano, I.L, Han, M., Choi, H.S.: Willingness to use smartphone apps for lifestyle management among patients with schizophrenia. Arch. Psychiatric Nurs. (in press) (2019)

  80. Kim, H., Kankanhalli, A., Lee, H.: Investigating decision factors in mobile application purchase: a mixed-methods approach. Inf. Manag. 53, 727–739 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  81. Rieger, C., Kuchen, H.: A process-oriented modeling approach for graphical development of mobile business apps. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 53, 43–58 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  82. Huang, Z., Benyoucef, M.: The effects of social commerce design on consumer purchase decision-making: an empirical study. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 25, 40–58 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  83. Iqbal, M.W., Ahmad, N., Shahzad, S.K.: Usability evaluation of adaptive features in smartphones. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 2185–2194 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  84. Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., Manresa-Yee, C., de-Marcos, L., Pages-Arevalo, C.: Validation of navigation guidelines for improving usability in the mobile web. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 52, 51–62 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  85. Salamat, A., Luo, X., Jafari, L.: HeteroGraphRec: a heterogeneous graph-based neural networks for social recommendations. Knowl. Based Syst. 217, 106817 (2021)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  86. Bradwell, H.L., Noury, G.E.A., Edwards, K.J., Winnington, R., Thill, S., Jones, R.B.: Design recommendations for socially assistive robots for health and social care based on a large scale analysis of stakeholder positions: social robot design recommendations. Health Policy Technol. 10, 100544 (2021)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  87. Aysolmaz, B., Reijers, H.A.: Animation as a dynamic visualization technique for improving process model comprehension. Inf. Manag. 58, 103478 (2021)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  88. Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.M.: Principled animation design improves comprehension of complex dynamics. Learn. Instr. 45, 72–84 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  89. Sui, K., Lee, W.H.: Image processing analysis and research based on game animation design. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 60, 94–100 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  90. Monkman, H., Kushniruk, A.: A health literacy and usability heuristic evaluation of a mobile consumer health application. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 192, 724–728 (2013)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  91. Aceituno, J., Malacria, S., Quinn, P., Roussel, N., Cockburn, A., Casiez, G.: The design, use, and performance of edge-scrolling techniques. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 97, 58–76 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  92. Stoll, R.D., Pina, A.A., Gary, K., Amresh, A.: Usability of a smartphone application to support the prevention and early intervention of anxiety in youth. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 24, 393–404 (2017)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  93. Tung, L., Debreceny, R., Chan, Y., Chan, A., Le, S.: Interacting with hypertext: an experimental investigation of navigation tools. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2, 61–72 (2003)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  94. Dewri, R., Thurimella, R.: Mobile local search with noisy locations. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 32, 78–92 (2016)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  95. Silva, D.B., Eler, M.M., Durelli, V.H.S., Endo, A.T.: Characterizing mobile apps from a source and test code viewpoint. Inf. Softw. Technol. 101, 32–50 (2018)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  96. Deniz, G., Durdu, P.O.: A comparison of mobile form controls for different tasks. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 61, 97–106 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

  97. Sharma, S.K., Sharma, M.: Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 44, 65–75 (2019)

    Google ScholarΒ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by research grants funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number. 61771297) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi, China (Grant No. 2022JM-334).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhao Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix A. Data extraction form

figure a

1.2 Appendix B. Usability features within mobile app categories

Β 

Mobile app categories

Study

Β 

Pr

To

Ed

He

Li

En

Mu

Bu

Ga

So

Ne

UA1: Simplicity

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[5, 11, 16, 65]

UA1F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

√

–

Β 

UA1F2

√

√

–

√

√

–

–

√

–

√

–

Β 

UA1F3

√

√

–

√

√

–

–

√

√

√

–

Β 

UA2: Ease of use

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[7, 33, 40]

UA2F1

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA2F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA2F3

√

–

√

√

–

–

–

–

√

–

–

Β 

UA3: System support

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[13, 16, 92]

UA3F1

–

–

√

√

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Β 

UA3F2

–

–

√

–

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA4: Functions integration

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[13, 58, 59, 65]

UA4F1

√

√

√

√

–

–

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA4F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

√

Β 

UA4F3

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA5: Consistency

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[65, 90]

UA5F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA5F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA6: Learnability

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[13, 41, 58, 61]

UA6F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA6F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA6F3

–

–

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA7: Visibility of system status

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[7, 16, 65]

UA7F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA7F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

Β 

UA8: Match system and real world

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[7, 17, 65, 90, 92];

UA8F1

√

–

√

√

–

√

√

√

√

–

√

Β 

UA8F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA8F3

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

√

Β 

UA8F4

–

–

–

–

√

–

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA9: Aesthetics design

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[5, 7, 16, 25, 34, 40, 50, 65, 90]

UA9F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA9F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA9F3

–

–

√

–

–

–

–

–

–

√

√

Β 

UA9F4

√

√

–

√

–

–

–

√

–

√

√

Β 

UA9F5

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

√

Β 

UA9F6

–

–

√

√

–

–

–

√

–

√

√

Β 

UA9F7

–

–

√

√

–

–

–

√

–

√

√

Β 

UA9F8

–

–

√

√

–

–

√

√

–

–

√

Β 

UA9F9

–

–

–

√

–

–

–

√

–

√

√

Β 

UA10: Flexible input

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[17, 34, 39, 65]

UA10F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA10F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

–

√

√

–

Β 

UA10F3

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA11: Screen readability

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[16, 40, 54]

UA11F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA11F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA12: Flexibility and personalization

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[7, 16, 34, 61]

UA12F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA12F2

–

–

√

√

√

–

√

√

√

–

√

Β 

UA12F3

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA13: Privacy and social conventions

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[34, 40]

UA13F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA13F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA14: Error management

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[7, 40, 65, 92]

U14F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA14F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA14F3

–

–

√

–

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA15: Effectiveness

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[11, 50]

UA15F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA15F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA16: Efficiency

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[11, 16, 17, 34, 41]

UA16F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

–

Β 

UA16F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA16F3

–

–

√

√

–

√

√

√

√

–

–

Β 

UA16F4

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

√

Β 

UA17: Satisfaction

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[11, 40, 92]

UA17F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA17F2

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA18: Memorability

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[33, 39]

UA18F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

Β 

UA18F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA19: Cognitive load

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[7, 16, 39, 40]

UA19F1

–

–

√

√

–

√

√

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA19F2

√

√

√

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

√

Β 

UA19F3

–

√

√

√

–

√

√

√

√

–

–

Β 

UA20: Navigation and control

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[5, 16, 17, 34, 39,40,41, 65, 90]

UA20F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA20F2

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA20F3

–

√

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA20F4

–

–

√

√

–

√

√

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA20F5

√

–

√

–

–

–

–

√

√

–

√

Β 

UA20F6

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA20F7

√

√

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA20F8

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA20F9

–

–

√

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Β 

UA20F10

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA20F11

–

–

–

–

–

–

√

–

–

–

√

Β 

UA21: Content provision

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[5, 34, 40, 61, 90]

UA21F1

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

√

–

–

√

Β 

UA21F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA21F3

–

–

√

√

√

–

√

√

–

√

√

Β 

UA21F4

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA21F5

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

√

–

–

Β 

UA21F6

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA21F7

–

–

√

√

–

√

–

√

–

–

–

Β 

UA21F8

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA21F9

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

–

√

√

Β 

UA22: Usefulness

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 

[39, 54]

UA22F1

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 

UA22F2

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Β 
  1. Pr, productivity; To,  Tool; Ed, Education; He, Health and fitness; Li, Lifestyle; En, Entertainment; Mu, Music and audio; Bu, Business and commerce; Ga, Game; So, Social networking; Ne, News, √ means Indicated; – means Not indicated

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Benyoucef, M. A systematic literature review of mobile application usability: addressing the design perspective. Univ Access Inf Soc 22, 715–735 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00903-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00903-w

Keywords

Navigation