Abstract
Background
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common following surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) involves intraoperative stretching of the anal sphincter while an anal single port is placed, which can potentially further disturb anorectal function. The aim of our study was to systematically assess anal function after TaTME using anorectal manometry and questionnaires.
Methods
Patients who had TaTME for rectal cancer at our institution were prospectively assessed by means of anorectal manometry and the standard LARS score. The primary endpoint was the resting pressure to assess internal sphincter damage and the secondary endpoints were squeeze pressure to assess external anal sphincter and analysis of correlation between LARS score and these two manometry parameters. Patients who had laparoscopic TME (LaTME) served as a control group.
Results
Out of 81 patients invited to participate 48 accepted. There were 36 in theTaTMEgroup, and 12 in the LaTMEgroup. The mean follow-up time from the index operation date to the assessment date was 41.34 months (± SD 24.834). The mean resting pressure did not differ significantly between the groups (36.44 mmHg ± 18.514 and 36.58 mmHg ± 13.318 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.981). The mean squeeze pressure was also comparable (125.00 mmHg ± 66.141 and 111.83 mmHg ± 51.111 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.533). The mean LARS score was comparable and showed comparable results. The analysis of correlation between LARS score and manometry parameters showed no significant associations between resting or squeeze pressure and L:ARS score.
Conclusions
Following TME surgery, the resting and squeeze pressures of the anal sphincter measured by manometry were generally decreased, with no differences between the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bulow S, Harling H, Iversen LH, Ladelund S (2010) Improved survival after rectal cancer in Denmark. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 12(7 Online):e37–e42
Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–281
Jeong S-Y, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang S-B, Lim S-B et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):194
Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Sietses C et al (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215
Denost Q, Quintane L, Buscail E, Martenot M, Laurent C, Rullier E (2013) Short- and longterm impact of body mass index on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 15(4):463–469
Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321
Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):1–11
Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS, Martin-Perez B, Alrawi S, Lacy AM et al (2018) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: from top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):28–39
Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–928
Juul T, Battersby NJ, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Laurberg S et al (2015) Validation of the English translation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 17(10):908–916
Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630
Harling H, Nickelsen T (2005) The Danish colorectal cancer database. Ugeskr Laeger 167(44):4187–4189
Badic B, Joumond A, Thereaux J, Gancel CH, Bail JP (2018) Long-term functional and oncological results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer—cohort study. Int J Surg Lond Engl 52:1–6
Coco C, Valentini V, Manno A, Rizzo G, Gambacorta MA, Mattana C et al (2007) Functional results after radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(8):903–910
De Nardi P, Testoni SGG, Corsetti M, Andreoletti H, Giollo P, Passaretti S et al (2017) Manometric evaluation of anorectal function in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver 49(1):91–97
Ihnat P, Slivova I, Tulinsky L, Ihnat Rudinska L, Maca J, Penka I (2018) Anorectal dysfunction after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer with and without radiotherapy (manometry study). J Surg Oncol 117(4):710–716
Kupsch J, Jackisch T, Matzel KE, Zimmer J, Schreiber A, Sims A et al (2018) Outcome of bowel function following anterior resection for rectal cancer-an analysis using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(6):787–798
Canda AE, Terzi C, Gorken IB, Oztop I, Sokmen S, Fuzun M (2010) Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal sphincter functions and quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(2):197–204
Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) Usefulness of anorectal manometry for diagnosing continence problems after a low anterior resection. Ann Coloproctology 32(3):101–104
Biviano I, Balla A, Badiali D, Quaresima S, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche E et al (2017) Anal function after endoluminal locoregional resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 19(6):O177–O185
Efthimiadis C, Basdanis G, Zatagias A, Tzeveleki I, Kosmidis C, Karamanlis E et al (2004) Manometric and clinical evaluation of patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s205–207
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Patients were fully informed about the study and gave an informed consent to participate.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bjoern, M.X., Perdawood, S.K. Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 24, 231–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02147-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02147-3