Log in

A new prognostic model for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a new prognostic model for febrile neutropenia (FN).

Methods

This study comprised 1001 episodes of FN: 718 for the derivation set and 283 for the validation set. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with unfavorable outcome as the primary endpoint and bacteremia as the secondary endpoint.

Results

In the derivation set, risk factors for adverse outcomes comprised age ≥60 years (2 points), procalcitonin ≥0.5 ng/mL (5 points), ECOG performance score ≥2 (2 points), oral mucositis grade ≥3 (3 points), systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (3 points), and respiratory rate ≥24 breaths/min (3 points). The model stratified patients into three severity classes, with adverse event rates of 6.0 % in class I (score ≤2), 27.3 % in class II (score 3–8), and 67.9 % in class III (score ≥9). Bacteremia was present in 1.1, 11.5, and 29.8 % of patients in class I, II, and III, respectively. The outcomes of the validation set were similar in each risk class. When the derivation and validation sets were integrated, unfavorable outcomes occurred in 5.9 % of the low-risk group classified by the new prognostic model and in 12.2 % classified by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index.

Conclusions

With the new prognostic model, we can classify patients with FN into three classes of increasing adverse outcomes and bacteremia. Early discharge would be possible for class I patients, short-term observation could safely manage class II patients, and inpatient admission is warranted for class III patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB et al (2000) The multinational association for supportive care in cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 18(16):3038–3051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baskaran ND, Gan GG, Adeeba K (2008) Applying the multinational association for supportive care in cancer risk scoring in predicting outcome of febrile neutropenia patients in a cohort of patients. Ann Hematol 87(7):563–569. doi:10.1007/s00277-008-0487-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Innes H, Lim SL, Hall A et al (2008) Management of febrile neutropenia in solid tumours and lymphomas using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index: feasibility and safety in routine clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 16(5):485–491. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0334-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Talcott JA, Siegel RD, Finberg R et al (1992) Risk assessment in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a prospective, two-center validation of a prediction rule. J Clin Oncol 10(2):316–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Naurois J, Novitzky-Basso I, Gill MJ et al (2010) Management of febrile neutropenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v252–v256. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA et al (2011) Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 52(4):e56–e93. doi:10.1093/cid/cir073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Worth LJ, Lingaratnam S, Taylor A et al (2011) Use of risk stratification to guide ambulatory management of neutropenic fever. Australian Consensus Guidelines 2011 Steering Committee. Intern Med J 41(1b):82–89. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02339.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engel A, Steinbach G, Kern P et al (1999) Diagnostic value of procalcitonin serum levels in neutropenic patients with fever: comparison with interleukin-8. Scand J Infect Dis 31(2):185–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Grecka P, Poulakou G et al (2001) Assessment of procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker of underlying infection in patients with febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis 32(12):1718–1725. doi:10.1086/320744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hambach L, Eder M, Dammann E et al (2002) Diagnostic value of procalcitonin serum levels in comparison with C-reactive protein in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 87(6):643–651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Persson L, Engervall P, Magnuson A et al (2004) Use of inflammatory markers for early detection of bacteraemia in patients with febrile neutropenia. Scand J Infect Dis 36(5):365–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraunberger P, Wang Y, Holler E et al (2006) Prognostic value of interleukin 6, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein levels in intensive care unit patients during first increase of fever. Shock 26(1):10–12. doi:10.1097/01.shk.0000215319.06866.bd

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakr Y, Sponholz C, Tuche F et al (2008) The role of procalcitonin in febrile neutropenic patients: review of the literature. Infection 36(5):396–407. doi:10.1007/s15010-008-7374-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee DG, Kim SH, Kim SY et al (2011) Evidence-based guidelines for empirical therapy of neutropenic fever in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 26(2):220–252. doi:10.3904/kjim.2011.26.2.220

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr (2004) Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham study risk score functions. Stat Med 23(10):1631–1660. doi:10.1002/sim.1742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uys A, Rapoport BL, Anderson R (2004) Febrile neutropenia: a prospective study to validate the Multinational Association of Supportive Care of Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score. Support Care Cancer 12(8):555–560. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0614-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uys A, Rapoport BL, Fickl H et al (2007) Prediction of outcome in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: comparison of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care of Cancer risk-index score with procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and interleukins-1beta, -6, -8 and -10. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 16(6):475–483. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00780.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Georgala A et al (2006) Outpatient oral antibiotics for febrile neutropenic cancer patients using a score predictive for complications. J Clin Oncol 24(25):4129–4134. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klastersky J, Paesmans M (2013) The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score: 10 years of use for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 21(5):1487–1495. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1758-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruokonen E, Nousiainen T, Pulkki K et al (1999) Procalcitonin concentrations in patients with neutropenic fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18(4):283–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahn S, Lee YS (2012) Predictive factors for poor prognosis febrile neutropenia. Curr Opin Oncol 24(4):376–380. doi:10.1097/CCO.0b013e328352ead2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carmona-Bayonas A, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Billalabeitia E et al (2011) Prognostic evaluation of febrile neutropenia in apparently stable adult cancer patients. Br J Cancer 105(5):612–617. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.284

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Escalante CP, Weiser MA, Manzullo E et al (2004) Outcomes of treatment pathways in outpatient treatment of low risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 12(9):657–662. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0613-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlachonikolis IG et al (2002) The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team. Resuscitation 54(2):125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P et al (2001) Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions. QJM 94(10):521–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

YSL received a research grant from from Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea (No. AILS10-498); SA, JLL, KSL, and SCY have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoon-Seon Lee.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 418 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, S., Lee, YS., Lee, JL. et al. A new prognostic model for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Int J Clin Oncol 21, 46–52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0853-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0853-0

Keywords

Navigation