Abstract
Auxins can induce the formation of nodule-like structures (NLS) in plant roots even in the absence of rhizobia and nitrogen-fixing bacteria can colonize these structures. Interestingly, NLS can be induced in roots of both legumes and non-legumes. However, our understanding of NLS formation in non-legumes at a molecular level is limited. This study aims to investigate NLS formation at a developmental and molecular level in Brachypodium distachyon. We treated Brachypodium roots with the synthetic auxin, 2,4-D, to induce NLS at a high frequency (> 80%) under controlled conditions. A broad base and a diffuse meristem characterized these structures. Next, we performed a comprehensive RNA-sequencing experiment to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Brachypodium roots during NLS formation. We identified 618 DEGs; several of which are promising candidates for control of NLS based on their biological and molecular functions. We validated the expression pattern of several genes via RT-PCR. Next, we compared the expression profile of Brachypodium roots with rice roots during NLS formation. We identified 76 single-copy ortholog pairs in rice and Brachypodium that are both differentially expressed during this process. Some of these genes are involved in auxin signaling, root development, and legume-rhizobia symbiosis. We established an experimental system to study NLS formation in Brachypodium at a developmental and genetic level, and used RNA-sequencing analysis to understand the molecular mechanisms controlling this root organogenesis program. Furthermore, our comparative transcriptome analysis in Brachypodium and rice identified a key set of genes for further investigating this genetic pathway in grasses.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10142-018-0594-z/MediaObjects/10142_2018_594_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10142-018-0594-z/MediaObjects/10142_2018_594_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10142-018-0594-z/MediaObjects/10142_2018_594_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10142-018-0594-z/MediaObjects/10142_2018_594_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- NLS:
-
nodule-like structures
- RNS:
-
root nodule symbiosis
- LHK1:
-
Lotus histidine kinase 1
- CRE1:
-
cytokinin response 1
- 2,4-D:
-
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
- dpt:
-
days post treatment
- DEGs:
-
differentially expressed genes
- FDR:
-
false discovery rate
- FC:
-
fold change
- GO:
-
gene ontology
- SEA:
-
singular enrichment analysis
- TFs:
-
transcription factors
- AP2/ERF:
-
APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor
- NAC:
-
NAM (for no apical meristem), ATAF1 and -2, and CUC2 (for cup-shaped cotyledon)
- ARFs:
-
auxin response factors
- bHLH:
-
basic helix-loop-helix
- GRAS:
-
gibberellic-acid insensitive (GAI), REPRESSOR of GAI (RGA), and SCARECROW (SCR)
- LOB:
-
lateral organ boundaries
- WUS:
-
WUSCHEL
- RLKs:
-
receptor-like kinases
- LRR:
-
leucine-rich repeat
- ABC:
-
ATP-binding cassette
- MATE:
-
multi-antimicrobial extrusion protein
- SAUR:
-
small auxin upregulated RNA
- RT-PCR:
-
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
- PLT:
-
PLETHORA
- WOX11:
-
WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 11
- BRX:
-
BREVIS RADIX
- SCR:
-
SCARECROW
- SHR:
-
SHORT ROOT
- NSP1:
-
NODULATION SIGNALING PATHWAY1
- NSP2:
-
NODULATION SIGNALING PATHWAY2
- PIN:
-
PIN-FORMED
- LAX:
-
LIKE AUXIN1
- CLV:
-
CLAVATA
- CLE:
-
CLAVAT3 (CLV3)/ENDOSPERM SURROUNDING REGION (ESR)
- FON:
-
FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER
- FOS1:
-
FON2 SPARE1
- CPM:
-
counts per million
References
Adamowski M, Friml J (2015) PIN-dependent auxin transport: action, regulation, and evolution. Plant Cell 27:20–32
Aida M, Beis D, Heidstra R, Willemsen V, Blilou I, Galinha C, Nussaume L, Noh YS, Amasino R, Scheres B (2004) The PLETHORA genes mediate patterning of the Arabidopsis root stem cell niche. Cell 119:109–120
Andrews S (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/fastqc
Benjamins R, Scheres B (2008) Auxin: the loo** star in plant development. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:443–465
Bensmihen S (2015) Hormonal control of lateral root and nodule development in legumes. Plants 4:523–547
Briggs GC, Mouchel CF, Hardtke CS (2006) Characterization of the plant-specific BREVIS RADIX gene family reveals limited genetic redundancy despite high sequence conservation. Plant Physiol 140:1306–1316
Brkljacic J, Grotewold E, Scholl R, Mockler T, Garvin DF, Vain P, Brutnell T, Sibout R, Bevan M, Budak H, Caicedo AL, Gao C, Gu Y, Hazen SP, Holt BF III, Hong SY, Jordan M, Manzaneda AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Mochida K, LAJ M, Park CM, Sedbrook J, Watt M, Zheng SJ, Vogel JP (2011) Brachypodium as model for the grasses: today and the future. Plant Physiol 157:3–13
Budak H, Hernandez P, Schulman A (2014) Analysis and exploitation of cereal genomes with the aid of Brachypodium. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E (eds) Genomics of plant genetic resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1978-1094-1007-7572-1005_1024
Charpentier M, Oldroyd G (2010) How close are we to nitrogen-fixing cereals? Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:556–564
Christiansen-Weniger C (1998) Endophytic establishment of diazotrophic bacteria in auxin-induced tumors of cereal crops. Crit Rev Plant Sci 17:55–76
Davidson RM, Gowda M, Moghe G, Lin H, Vaillancourt B, Shiu SH, Jiang N, Robin Buell C (2012) Comparative transcriptomics of three Poaceae species reveals patterns of gene expression evolution. Plant J 71:492–502
Ding Y, Oldroyd G (2009) Positioning the nodule, the hormone dictum. Plant Signal Behav 4:89–93
Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z (2010) agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1310
Franssen HJ, **ao TT, Kulikova O, Wan X, Bisseling T, Scheres B, Heidstra R (2015) Root developmental programs shape the Medicago truncatula nodule meristem. Development 142:2941–2950
Geiser M, Murphy AS (2005) The ABC of auxin transport: the role of p-glycoproteins in plant development. FEBS Lett 580:1094–1102
Goodstein DM et al (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40:1178–1186
Gopalaswamy G, Kannaiyan S, O'Callaghan KJ, Davey MR, Cocking EC (2000) The xylem of rice (Oryza sativa) is colonized by Azorhizobium caulinodans. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:103–107
Guilfoyle TJ, Hagen G (2007) Auxin response factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:453–460
Guilfoyle TJ, Hagen G (2012) Getting a grasp on domain III/IV responsible for Auxin Response Factor-IAA protein interactions. Plant Sci 190:82–88
Haecker A, Gross-Hardt R, Geiges B, Sarkar A, Breuninger H, Herrmann M, Laux T (2004) Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131:657–668
Heckmann AB, Lombardo F, Miwa H, Perry JA, Bunnewell S, Parniske M, Wang TL, Downie JA (2006) Lotus japonicus nodulation requires two GRAS domain regulators, one of which is functionally conserved in a non-legume. Plant Physiol 142:1739–1750
Hiltenbrand R et al (2016) A developmental and molecular view of formation of auxin-induced nodule-like structures in land plants. Front Plant Sci 7:1692
Hirsch S, Oldroyd G (2009) GRAS-domain transcription factors that regulate plant development. Plant Signal Behav 4:698–700
Hirsch AM, Bhuvaneswari TV, Torrey JG, Bisseling T (1989) Early nodulin genes are induced in alfalfa root outgrowths elicited by auxin transport inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:1244–1248
Huan Q, Mao Z, Zhang J, Xu Y, Chong K (2013) Transcriptome-wide analysis of vernalization reveals conserved and species-specific mechanisms in Brachypodium. J Integr Plant Biol 55:696–709
Huo X, Schnabel E, Hughes K, Frugoli J (2006) RNAi phenotypes and the localization of a protein::GUS fusion imply a role for Medicago truncatula PIN genes in nodulation. J Plant Growth Regul 25:156–165
Initiative TIB (2010) Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 463:763–768
Inukai Y, Sakamoto T, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Shibata Y, Gomi K, Umemura I, Hasegawa Y, Ashikari M, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2005) Crown rootless1, which is essential for crown root formation in rice, is a target of an Auxin Response Factor in auxin signaling. Plant Cell 17:1387–1396
Jansen L, Hollunder J, Roberts I, Forestan C, Fonteyne P, van Quickenborne C, Zhen RG, McKersie B, Parizot B, Beeckman T (2013) Comparative transcriptomics as a tool for the identification of root branching genes in maize. Plant Biotechnol J 11:1092–1102
Kalo P et al (2005) Nodulation signaling in legumes requires NSP2, a member of the GRAS family of transcriptional regulators. Science 308:1786–1789
Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK (2014) Voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol 15:R29
Lee HW, Cho C, Kim J (2015) Lateral Organ Boundaries Domain16 and 18 act downstream of the Auxin1 and Like-Auxin3 Auxin Influx Carriers to control lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 168:1792–1806
Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS (2003) OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13:2178–2189
Li SB, **e ZZ, Hu CG, Zhang JZ (2016) A review of auxin response factors (ARFs) in plants. Front Plant Sci 7:47
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2013) The subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read map** by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e108
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930
Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P (2013) APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol 199:639–649
Liu H, Wang S, Yu X, Yu J, He X, Zhang S, Shou H, Wu P (2005) ARL1, a LOB-domain protein required for adventitious root formation in rice. Plant J 43:47–56
Mukherjee A, Ané JM (2011) Plant hormones and initiation of legume nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhization. In: Polacco JC, Todd CD (eds) Ecological aspects of nitrogen metabolism in plants. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, pp 354–396
Murray JD, Karas BJ, Sato S, Tabata S, Amyot L, Szczyglowski K (2007) A cytokinin perception mutant colonized by rhizobium in the absence of nodule organogenesis. Science 315:101–104
Mus F et al (2016) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and challenges to extending it to non-legumes. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01055-01016
Narula N, Deubel A, Gans W, Behl RK, Merbach WPSE (2006) Paranodules and colonization of wheat roots by phytohormone producing bacteria in soil. Plant Soil Environ 3:167–176
Nuruzzaman M, Sharoni AM, Kikuchi S (2013) Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front Microbiol 4:248
Okushima Y, Fukaki H, Onoda M, Theologis A, Tasaka M (2007) ARF7 and ARF19 regulate lateral root formation via direct activation of LBD/ASL genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:118–130
Oldroyd GE, Downie JA (2008) Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:519–546
Ozdemir BS, Hernandez P, Filiz E, Budak H (2008) Brachypodium genomics. Int J Plant Genomics 2008:536104
Pislariu C, Dickstein R (2007) An IRE-like AGC kinase gene, MtIRE, has unique expression in the invasion zone of develo** root nodules in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 144:682–694
Ridge RW, Ride KM, Rolfe BG (1993) Nodule-like structures induced on the roots of rice seedlings by addition of the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Aust J Plant Physiol 20:705–717
Rightmyer AP, Long SR (2011) Pseudonodule formation by wildtype and symbiotic mutant Medicago truncatula in response to auxin transport inhibitors. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 24:1372–1384
Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43(7):e47
Robert HS, Offringa R (2008) Regulation of auxin transport polarity by AGC kinases. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:495–502
Rogers C, Oldroyd G (2014) Synthetic biology approaches to engineering the nitrogen symbiosis in cereals. J Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru1098
Roy S, Robson F, Lilley J, Liu CW, Cheng X, Wen J, Walker S, Sun J, Cousins D, Bone C, Bennett MJ, Downie JA, Swarup R, Oldroyd G, Murray JD (2017) MtLAX2, a functional homologue of the Arabidopsis auxin influx transporter AUX1, is required for nodule organogenesis. Plant Physiol 174:326–338
Ryu H, Cho H, Choi D, Hwang I (2012) Plant hormonal regulation of nitrogen-fixing nodule organogenesis. Mol Cells 34:117–126
Senthilkumar M, Madhaiyan M, Sundaram S, Kannaiyan S (2009) Intercellular colonization and growth promoting effects of Methylobacterium sp. with plant-growth regulators on rice (Oryza sativa L. Cv CO-43). Microbiol Res 164:92–104
Sharma A, Sharma N, Bhalla P, Singh M (2017) Comparative and evolutionary analysis of grass pollen allergens using Brachypodium distachyon as a model system. PLoS One 12:e0169686
Sibout R, Proost S, Hansen BO, Vaid N, Giorgi FM, Ho-Yue-Kuang S, Legée F, Cézart L, Bouchabké-Coussa O, Soulhat C, Provart N, Pasha A, le Bris P, Roujol D, Hofte H, Jamet E, Lapierre C, Persson S, Mutwil M (2017) Expression atlas and comparative coexpression network analyses reveal important genes involved in the formation of lignified cell wall in Brachypodium distachyon. New Phytol 215:1009–1025
Smit P, Raedts J, Portyanko V, Debelle F, Gough C, Bisseling T, Geurts R (2005) NSP1 of the GRAS protein family is essential for rhizobial Nod factorinduced transcription. Science 308:1789–1791
Sriskandarajah S, Kennedy IR, Yu D, Tchan YT (1993) Effects of plant growth regulators on acetylene-reducing associations between Azospirillum brasilense and wheat. Plant Soil 153:165–178
Stahl Y, Simon R (2012) Peptides and receptors controlling root development. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:1453–1460
Suzaki T, Toriba T, Fujimoto M, Tsutsumi N, Kitano H, Hirano HY (2006) Conservation and diversification of meristem maintenance mechanism in Oryza sativa: function of the Floral Organ Number2 gene. Plant Cell Physiol 47:1591–1602
Swarup R, Peret B (2012) AUX/LAX family of auxin influx carriers. Front Plant Sci 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00225
Tirichine L, Sandal N, Madsen LH, Radutoiu S, Albrektsen AS, Sato S, Asamizu E, Tabata S, Stougaard J (2007) A gain-of-function mutation in a cytokinin receptor triggers spontaneous root nodule organogenesis. Science 315:104–107
Verrier PJ, Bird D, Burla B, Dassa E, Forestier C, Geisler M, Klein M, Kolukisaoglu Ü, Lee Y, Martinoia E, Murphy A, Rea PA, Samuels L, Schulz B, Spalding EP, Yazaki K, Theodoulou FL (2008) Plant ABC proteins—a unified nomenclature and updated inventory. Trends Plant Sci 13:151–159
Wang R, Estelle M (2014) Diversity and specificity: auxin perception and signaling through the TIR1/AFB pathway. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:51–58
Wang C, Yu H, Zhang Z, Yu L, Xu X, Hong Z, Luo L (2015) Phytosulfokine is involved in positive regulation of Lotus japonicus nodulation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:847–855
Watt M, Schneebeli K, Dong P, Wilson IW (2009) The shoot and root growth of Brachypodium and it’s potential as a model for wheat and other cereal crops. Funct Plant Biol 36:960–969
Wu C, Dickstein R, Cary AJ, Norris JH (1996) The auxin transport inhibitor N-(1-Napthyl)phthalamic acid elicits pseudonodules on nonnodulating mutants of white sweetclover. Plant Physiol 10:501–510
**e Q, Frugis G, Colgan D, Chua N (2000) Arabidopsis NAC1 transduces auxin signal downstream of TIR1 to promote lateral root development. Genes Dev 14:3024–3036
Yamada M, Sawa S (2013) The roles of peptide hormones during plant root development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:56–61
Zhao Y, Hu Y, Dai M, Huang L, Zhou DX (2009) The WUSCHEL-related homeobox gene WOX11 is required to activate shoot-borne crown root development in rice. Plant Cell 21:736–748
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Arkansas Center for Plant-Powered Production, as part of the National Science Foundation’s Research Infrastructure Improvement Award EPS-1003970; the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority basic research award (Project No. 15-B-07); the Arkansas INBRE program supported by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), P20 GM103429 from the National Institutes of Health and a University Research Council award, University of Central Arkansas, AR. The authors would like to thank Dr. Rahul Mehta, University of Central Arkansas, for his help with the SEM images. The authors would also like to thank Ryan Hiltenbrand, Ashley Spurr, Hannah McCarthy, David Zimulinda, and Raj Singh for their assistance with the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AM received grant support and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. AM conceived and designed the experiments. JT, AV, and HRK performed the experiments. JT, HRK, MJB, and AM analyzed the data. AM, JT, and MJB prepared the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Table 1
(XLSX 77 kb)
Supplementary Table 2
(XLSX 41 kb)
Supplementary Table 3
(XLSX 32 kb)
Supplementary Table 4
(XLSX 46 kb)
Supplementary Table 5
(XLSX 43 kb)
Supplementary Table 6
(XLSX 58 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1
Lateral root numbers in Brachypodium roots during 2,4-D treatment. A) shows that lateral root numbers are decreased in Brachypodium roots upon 2,4-D treatment when compared to controls at 7dpt. Data represents the average of 3 experimental replications (n = 15–20) ± SE. The asterisk (*) shows a significant difference between the two conditions by t test (P < 0.001). B) shows that lateral root numbers are decreased in Brachypodium roots upon 2,4-D treatment when compared to controls at 14dpt. Data represents the average of 3 experimental replications (n = 15–20) ± SE. The asterisk (*) shows a significant difference between the two conditions by t test (P < 0.01). (JPEG 34 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, J., Bowman, M.J., Vega, A. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis provides key insights into gene expression pattern during the formation of nodule-like structures in Brachypodium. Funct Integr Genomics 18, 315–326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-018-0594-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-018-0594-z