Introduction

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignant tumor worldwide and the third highest cause of cancer mortality. Although the 5-year survival rate of patients with early gastric cancer exceeds 90%, for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the 5-year survival rate is low even with radical surgery [1,2,3,4]. In 1994, Kitano et al. [5] reported laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, with the development of minimally invasive equipment and technology, the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy are gradually being recognized [6]. Since the MAGIC trial in 2006, which proved for the first time that preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with surgery can significantly improve the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with AGC [7], NAC has gradually become an indispensable part of treatment for AGC patients. However, for patients receiving NAC, fibrosis of lymphatic tissue caused by NAC and loss of normal anatomical planes caused by cytotoxicity are technical challenges for laparoscopic lymph-node (LN) dissection [8,9,10]. Although studies have confirmed the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for patients with neoadjuvant gastric cancer, for more technically difficult whole-stomach resections and for inexperienced surgeons, neoadjuvant standard gastric cancer radical resection after chemotherapy is a challenge. In contrast, Taylor et al. [11] found that, due to reasons including tumor downgrading, patients receiving NAC require more LN dissections to truly reflect the prognosis of patients. Therefore, for patients with gastric cancer who have undergone NAC and plan to undergo laparoscopic surgery, surgeons should focus on how to safely complete the operation and complete the standardized and precise LN dissection.

Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared light imaging technology, as a new surgical navigation technology, has achieved relatively positive results in sentinel LN dissection and in detecting the location of tumors such as breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer [11,12,13,14]. Furthermore, in gastric cancer research, prospective studies have reported that ICG can significantly increase the number of LN dissections during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy [28,29,30,31]. However, in neoadjuvant patients with AGC, fibrosis reaction or cytotoxicity caused by chemotherapy can cause loss of the normal tissue plane. However, evidence regarding whether it will affect LN visualization or tissue discrimination by ICG in these patients is lacking. This study included patients with AGC who underwent laparoscopic radical resection after NAC in two centers in China and analyzed the relationship between ICG injection and the number of LNs dissected and LN non-compliance in detail. Our study shows that ICG can reduce intraoperative blood loss without increasing the operation time and number of complications, and it can guide the surgeon to dissected more LNs during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy and reduce the LN non-compliance rate. In particular, for surgical patients with poor chemotherapy effects, the effect is obvious.

The total number of LNs dissected and the LN non-compliance rate are of great significance in radical gastrectomy. Previous studies have confirmed that, regardless of whether the dissected LNs are metastasized, the perigastric LNs are thoroughly dissected during surgery, the number of LNs is detected, and the rate of LN non-conformance is reduced. Accurate staging, selection of appropriate subsequent treatment options, and improvement in prognoses are of great significance. Studies have proven that patients with NAC need more LN dissections to truly reflect the tumor stage and prognosis of patients [11]. Among patients with gastric cancer who did not receive NAC, our center concluded through randomized-controlled trial research that, in the early stage of disease, ICG can guide the surgeon to dissect more LNs and LNs during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy without increasing the operation time and complications, effectively reducing LN inconsistencies in patients undergoing total gastrectomy [

Data accessibility statement

Huang CM and Yan S had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

References

  1. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Hahn S, Kim WH, Lee KU, Sano T, et al. Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification. Cancer. 2010;116:5592–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (6th edn). New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook (7th edn). New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH, et al. Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg. 2011;98:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopyassisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: The CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(20):1983–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. MAGIC trial participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Z, Shan F, Ying X, et al. Assessment of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(12):1093–101. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. An JY, Kim KM, Kim YM, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Surgical complications in gastric cancer patients preoperatively treated with chemotherapy: their risk factors and clinical relevance. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2452–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2267-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujisaki M, Mitsumori N, Shinohara T, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surg Endosc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07552-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vahrmeijer AL, Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, van de Velde CJH, Frangioni JV. Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(9):507–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123

  12. Valente SA, Al-Hilli Z, Radford DM, Yanda C, Tu C, Grobmyer SR. Near infrared fluorescent LN map** with indocyanine green in breast cancer patients: a prospective trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(4):672–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamashita S, Tokuishi K, Anami K, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel LNs in non–small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(1):141–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brouwer OR, Klop WMC, Buckle T, et al. Feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma using a hybrid radioactive and fluorescent tracer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(6):1988–94. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2180-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen QY, **e JW, Zhong Q, et al. Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green tracer-guided LN dissection during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(4):300–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Association JGC. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang CM, Zheng CH. Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Berlin: Springer; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang CM, et al. Laparoscopic suprapancreatic LN dissection for advanced gastric cancer using a left-sided approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang CM, et al. A 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No.10 LN dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study. Plos One 2014;9:e108480.

  21. Chen QY, et al. Strategies of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar LN dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8:402–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Maezawa Y, et al. Priority of LN dissection for proximal gastric cancer invading the greater curvature. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:569–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Association JGC. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101.

  24. De Steur WO, et al. Quality control of LN dissection in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen QY, et al. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for upper-middle advanced gastric cancer: analysis based on LN noncompliance. Gastric Cancer 2019.

  26. Dindo D, et al. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabbagh C, Manceau G, Mege D, et al. Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for obstructing stage II colon cancer? Results from a propensity score analysis of the french surgical association database. Ann Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lan Y-T, Huang K-H, Chen P-H, et al. A pilot study of LN map** with indocyanine green in robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. SAGE Open Med. 2017;5(114):2050312117727444. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117727444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim T-H, Kong S-H, Park J-H, et al. Assessment of the completeness of LN dissection using near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2018;18(2):161–71. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tajima Y, Murakami M, Yamazaki K, et al. Sentinel node map** guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(7):1787–93. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0944-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwon IG, Son T, Kim H-I, Hyung WJ. Fluorescent lymphography-guided lymphadenectomy during robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(2):150–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu X. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi. Chinese J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;16(6):509–12.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gioux S, et al. Image-guided surgery using invisible near-infrared light: fundamentals of clinical translation. Mol Imaging. 2010;9:237–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schaafsma BE, et al. The clinical use of indocyanine green as a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent for image-guided oncologic surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:323–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by scientific and technological innovation joint capital projects of Fujian province (2017Y9011, 2017Y9004, and 2018Y9041) and the general project of Startup Fund of Fujian Medical University (2019QH1033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Ze-Ning Huang, Cheng-Hao Liu, Wen-Wu Qiu, Su-Yan, and Changming Huang. Provision of study materials or patients: all authors. Collection and assembly of data: all authors. Data analysis and interpretation: Ze-Ning Huang, Cheng-Hao Liu, Wen-Wu Qiu, Su-Yan, Chao-Hui Zheng, and ** Li. Manuscript writing: all authors. Final approval of manuscript: all authors. Accountable for all aspects of the work: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Ming Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose from any of author.

Human rights statement and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients for inclusion in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, ZN., Su-Yan, Qiu, WW. et al. Assessment of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: results from a multicenter analysis based on propensity matching. Gastric Cancer 24, 1355–1364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01211-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01211-7

Keywords