Log in

Reduction genioplasty for mandibular prognathism and long chin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

When evaluating patients’ profile, surgeons usually note the lack of the chin projection and may suggest chin augmentation, but they rarely discuss reduction of an over-projecting chin. This is unfortunate, since there are quite many individuals who have macrogenia and would aesthetically benefit from corrective surgery, but the chin reduction is seldom offered. The reason for this is the lack of experience, lack of the technical equipment necessary, or sometimes lack of knowledge. The present study conveys 25 years of experience with the reduction genioplasty.

Methods

From 1994 to 2019, 47 patients (39 females, 6 males, and 2 male to female transsexuals) underwent 49 chin reduction procedures. All patients were operated and followed up by the author. The transoral approach was used in 23 patients, and in 24 patients the procedure was done through the straight 4- to 6-cm-long submental incision. The air-driven pneumatic chisel was employed for reduction of the mandibular bone (MicroAire, Charlottesville, VA, USA). Forty-eight operations were carried out under dissociative and local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis, and one procedure was done under general endotracheal anaesthesia.

Results

Both mandibular bone and the soft tissues of the chin were reduced, or modulated according to the needs of each patient. Operations were technically easier when executed by the submental approach because of better exposure of the mandibular rim and the higher precision in the remodelling of the soft tissues. Thirty-six patients (77%) could be followed up for a mean of 2.5 years (range 9 months to 12 years). Twenty-eight of evaluated patients (78%) described the outcome as very good or good. Four patients described the result as acceptable and another 4 as bad. In the majority of cases the evaluation by the surgeon correlated well with the opinion of patients, but in five cases surgeon estimated result with the higher score than the patient. Overall good results were illustrated by the photographs of the clinical examples. Complications were few and manageable. Transient neuropathies were common and more frequent with the transoral approach. Five patients required minor intervention for skin indentations at the jaw line developed during the healing phase.

Conclusions

Skilful chin reduction surgery is safe and the aesthetic improvement could be quite spectacular, which is also rewarding for the patients. Complications in this patient series were few and manageable. More surgeons should include chin reduction in their repertoire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niechajev I (2012) Facial reconstruction using porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor): long-term results. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2012) Chin surgery skyrockets among women and men in all age groups http://www.plasticsurgery.org/ News-and-Resources/Chin-Surgery/ April 17

  3. Lee EI (2013) Aesthetic alterations of the chin. Semin Plast Surg 27(3):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guyuron B, Weinfeld AB (2012) Genioplasty in E-book aesthetic plastic surgery. Video atlas Saunders pp 179-197

  5. Ho C-T, Huang C-S, Jo J-L (2012) Improvement of chin profile after mandibular setback and reduction genioplasty for mandibular prognathism and long chin. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:1198–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park MC, Kang M, Lim H, Lee IJ, Shin SJ (2011) Mandibular tubercle resection : a means of maximizing the benefits of reduction mandibuloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2076–2082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman JJ (2003) Chin surgery III: revelations (discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1551–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guyuron B (2008) Genioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(Apr 4 Suppl): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000305931.98111.c3

  9. Rosen HM (1991) Aesthetic guidelines in genioplasty: the role of the labiomenthal fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:760–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zide BM, Pfeifer TM, Longaker MT (1999) Chin surgery I. Augmentation- the allures and the alerts. Plast Reconstr Surg 10(104):1843–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zide BM, Boutros S (2003) Chin surgery III: revelations. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1542–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niechajev I, Haraldsson PO (1996) Two methods of dissociative anaesthesia for rhinoplasty in outpatient setting. Aesthet Plast Surg 20:159–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McKinney P, Rosen PB (1982) Reduction mentoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 70:147–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zide BM (2000) The mentalis muscle: an essential component of chin and lower lip position. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:1213–1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Warren SM, Spector JA, Zide BM (2007) Chin surgery V: treatment of the long nonprojecting chin. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:760–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzales-Ulloa M (1962) Quantitative principles in cosmetic surgery of the face (profileplasty). Plast Reconstr Surg 29:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen HM (1995) Aesthetic guidelines in genioplasty: the role of facial dysproportions. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:463–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Trauner R, Obwegeser H (1957) The surgical correction of mandibular prognatism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. Oral Surg 10:677-18. 689

  19. Zide BM, Warren SM, Spector JA (2007) Chin surgery IV: the large chin—key parameters for successful chin reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:530–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zide BM, Longaker MT (1999) Chin surgery: I I. Submental ostectomy and soft- tissue excision. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1854–1860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rustemeyer J, Lehman A (2013) Reduction genioplasty enhances quality of life in female patients with prognathism and maxillary hypoplasia undergoing bimaxillary osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1083–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Niechajev.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Patient consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in this study.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niechajev, I. Reduction genioplasty for mandibular prognathism and long chin. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24, 333–341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00853-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00853-8

Keywords

Navigation