SpringerLink
Log in

Translation and validation of the French version of the child perceptions questionnaire for children aged 11 to 14 years old (CPQ11-14) short-form

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The COHQoL is a set of questionnaires used to evaluate the impact of oral health on children’s quality of life. Although the CPQ8-10 and the P-CPQ have been translated and validated in French, the CPQ11-14 14 has not yet been validated. The aim was to develop a French version of the CPQ11-14 16-items.

Materials and methods

The French version of CPQ11-14 was obtained by a forward-backward translation process and pretested. The final version was tested on children aged 11–14 and divided into three groups: children with orofacial clefts, children with rare dental diseases other than clefts, and children without anomalies. We conducted a cross-sectional study and evaluated the reliability with test-retest and internal consistency, and the questionnaire validity with construct validity and discriminant validity. We performed an Exploratory Factory Analysis (EFA).

Results

187 children tested the questionnaire. The ICC of the test-retest was 0.76 and the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.77. The correlation between the CPQ11-14 and self-assessment of oral health and general well-being was > 0.2. Patients with orofacial clefts and rare diseases had significantly higher scores for overall short-form CPQ11-14. The EFA revealed six factors.

Conclusion

The French CPQ11-14 is valid to assess the impact of oral health on children’s quality of life.

Clinical relevance

The translation of this questionnaire into French will enable us to assess the impact of oral health on the quality of life of adolescents. This questionnaire complements the 8–10 years version of the CPQ, as well as the parental version that can be used in conjunction with the questionnaire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Petersen PE, The World Oral Health Report (2003) : continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century–the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. déc 2003;31 Suppl 1:3–23

  2. Sischo L, Broder HL (2011) Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res nov 90(11):1264–1270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G (2002) Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res Juill 81(7):459–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain V, Agarwal N, Jabin Z, Singh S, Anand A, Jain M (2021) Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Hindi version of child perception questionnaire (CPQ11-14) in school children. Int J Paediatr Dent 31(4):459–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar S, Kroon J, Lalloo R, Johnson NW (2016) Psychometric properties of translation of the child perception questionnaire (CPQ11-14) in Telugu speaking Indian children. PLoS ONE 1 mars 11(3):e0149181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin HS, Han DH, Shin MS, Lee HJ, Kim MS, Kim HD (2015) Korean Version of Child Perceptions Questionnaire and Dental Caries among Korean Children. PLoS ONE. 12 févr. ;10(2):e0116011

  7. Turton BJ, Thomson WM, Foster Page LA, Saub RB, Razak IA (2015) Validation of an oral health–related quality of life measure for Cambodian children. Asia Pac J Public Health 1 mars 27(2):NP2339–NP2349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olivieri A, Ferro R, Benacchio L, Besostri A, Stellini E (2013) Validity of Italian version of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ11-14). BMC Oral Health 16 oct 13:55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abanto J, Albites U, Bönecker M, Martins-Paiva S, Castillo JL, Aguilar-Gálvez D (2013) Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the child perceptions questionnaire 11–14 (CPQ11-14) for the Peruvian Spanish language. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Nov 18(6):e832–e838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bekes K, John MT, Zyriax R, Schaller HG, Hirsch C (2012) The German version of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ-G11-14): translation process, reliability, and validity in the general population. Clin Oral Investig 1 févr 16(1):165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gururatana O, Baker S, Robinson PG (2011) Psychometric properties of long and short forms of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ11-14) in a Thai population. Community Dent Health Sept 28(3):232–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wogelius P, Gjørup H, Haubek D, Lopez R, Poulsen S (2009) Development of Danish version of child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaires (CPQ8–10 and CPQ11–14). BMC Oral Health 22 avr 9:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM, Ramos-Jorge ML, Cornacchia GM, Pordeus IA et al (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation of the child perceptions Questionnaire 11–14 (CPQ11–14) for the Brazilian Portuguese language. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14 janv 6:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McGRATH C, Pang HN, Lo ECM, King NM, Hägg U, Samman N (2008) Translation and evaluation of a Chinese version of the child oral health-related quality of Life measure. Int J Paediatr Dent 18(4):267–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown A, Al-Khayal Z (2006) Validity and reliability of the arabic translation of the child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaire (CPQ11 – 14) in Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent 16(6):405–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Jokovic A, Locker D (2005) Validation of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ 11–14). J Dent Res Juill 84(7):649–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGrath C, Alkhatib MN, Al-Munif M, Bedi R, Zaki AS (2003) Translation and validation of an arabic version of the UK oral health related quality of life measure (OHQoL-UK) in Syria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Health déc 20(4):241–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kassis A, El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, El Osta L, Ghoubril J (2018) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ11-14) among children in Lebanon. BMC Oral Health. 6 févr. ;18(1):18

  19. Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Mohamed AR, Traebert J (2011) Performance and cross-cultural comparison of the short-form version of the CPQ11-14 in New Zealand, Brunei and Brazil. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 7 juin. ;9:40

  20. Salinas-Martínez AM, Hernández-Elizondo RT, Núñez-Rocha GM, Ramos Peña EG (2014) Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the short-form child perceptions questionnaire for 11-14-year-olds for assessing oral health needs of children. J Public Health Dent 74(2):168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G (2006) Short forms of the child perceptions questionnaire for 11–14-year-old children (CPQ11–14): development and initial evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19 janv 4:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Torres CS, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Oliveira AC et al (2009) Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ11–14) – short forms. Health Qual Life Outcomes 17 mai 7:43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshman Z, Gibson BJ, Benson PE (2010) Is the short-form child perceptions questionnaire meaningful and relevant to children with Malocclusion in the UK? J Orthod 1 mars 37(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boy-Lefèvre ML, Razanamihaja N, Azogui-Lévy S, Vigneron A, Jordan L, Berdal A et al (2018) Translation and validation of the French version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for children aged from 8 to 10 years old (CPQ 8–10). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 3 mai. ;16(1):86

  25. Razanamihaja N, Boy-Lefèvre ML, Jordan L, Tapiro L, Berdal A, de la Dure-Molla M et al (2018) Parental-caregivers perceptions questionnaire (P-CPQ): translation and evaluation of psychometric properties of the French version of the questionnaire. BMC Oral Health 11(1):211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mokkink LB, Boers M, van der Vleuten CPM, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL et al (2020) COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 3 déc. ;20(1):293

  27. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 21(4):651–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 15 déc 25(24):3186–3191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol déc 46(12):1417–1432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nunnally J, Bernstein I (1995) Psychometric theory. Appl Psychol Meas 1 sept 19(3):303–3053rd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1 sept 16(3):297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomson WM, Foster Page LA, Robinson PG, Do LG, Traebert J, Mohamed AR et al Psychometric assessment of the short-form child perceptions Questionnaire: an international collaborative study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol [Internet]. 1 août 2016 [cité 18 avr 2023]; Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12248

  33. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 1 janv 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de La Dure-Molla M, Fournier BP, Manzanares MC, Acevedo AC, Hennekam RC, Friedlander L et al (2019) Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the teeth and classifying genetic dental disorders. Am J Med Genet Oct 179(10):1913–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dental Faculty, Universite Paris Cité, Paris, France

    Margot Charlotte Riou, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Marie-laure Boy-Lefevre & Lisa Friedlander

  2. Reference Center of Oral and Dental Rare Diseases. Hôpital Rothschild, Odontology Department, APHP, Paris, France

    Margot Charlotte Riou, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Marie-laure Boy-Lefevre & Lisa Friedlander

  3. Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Molecular Oral Pathophysiology, Universite Paris Cité, Sorbonne Universite, INSERM UMRS 1138, Paris, France

    Margot Charlotte Riou

  4. Filière de Santé Maladies Rares TETECOU, Hôpital Necker, Malformations Rares de la tête, du cou et des dents, Paris, France

    Margot Charlotte Riou, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Marie-laure Boy-Lefevre & Lisa Friedlander

  5. Dental School, FHU DDS-Net, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

    Margot Charlotte Riou, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Marie-laure Boy-Lefevre & Lisa Friedlander

  6. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Robert Debré Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM CIC-EC 1426, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

    Aurélie Bourmaud, Priscilla Boizeau & Lisa Friedlander

  7. Université Paris Cité, Laboratoire ECEVE INSERM, UMR1123, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France

    Aurélie Bourmaud, Priscilla Boizeau & Lisa Friedlander

  8. Reference center for skeletal dysplasia, Universite Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1163, Institut Imagine, Necker Hospital, Paris, France

    Muriel de La Dure-Molla & Lisa Friedlander

  9. Data Science Platform, Université Paris Cité, Imagine Institute, INSERM UMR 1163, Paris, F-75015, France

    Lisa Friedlander

Authors
  1. Margot Charlotte Riou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aurélie Bourmaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Priscilla Boizeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muriel de La Dure-Molla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marie-laure Boy-Lefevre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lisa Friedlander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MR was involved in the translation of the questionnaire, data collection, data interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. AB was involved in the data analysis and interpretation and helped in writing the manuscript. PB performed the statistical analysis and helped in writing the manuscript. MLDM was involved in the conception of the study, helped in data collection, and help in writing the manuscript. MLBL designed the study, was involved in the translation of the questionnaire, and helped in data collection and in writing the manuscript. LF was involved in data analysis and evaluated and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margot Charlotte Riou.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was declared to the CNIL and obtained authorization from the Ethics Review Committee of the Robert Debré Hospital (AP-HP), Paris (N°2015/250-2). An information document about the study was given to the children and the parents of each child, and the questionnaire was completed anonymously after obtaining the child’s agreement and the parents’ written consent.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest for the publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riou, M.C., Bourmaud, A., Boizeau, P. et al. Translation and validation of the French version of the child perceptions questionnaire for children aged 11 to 14 years old (CPQ11-14) short-form. Clin Oral Invest 28, 403 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05793-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05793-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation