Log in

Sensing-gain constrained participant selection mechanism for mobile crowdsensing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participant selection is a fundamental challenge to perform sensing tasks with adequate data quality in various mobile crowdsensing (MCS) applications. In this paper, we explore participant selection mechanisms with sensing-gain constraints in MCS. First, we propose a novel quality-aware participant reputation model with active factors. Second, since user density differs in various applications, we propose two kinds of sensing-gain constrained participant selection mechanisms with both sufficient and insufficient user resources. Particularly, in the case of sufficient user resources, we formulate the sensing-gain objective on recruit cost and participant scale under constraints on data quality and task coverage, and propose a M ulti-S tage D ecision mechanism via G reedy strategy (MSD-G); in the case of insufficient user resources, we formulate the sensing-gain objective on data quality, abstract it as a 0-1 knapsack problem, and devise a S ensing-G ain C onstrained D ynamic P rogramming (SGC-DP) mechanism. Extensive simulations over a real-world dataset have verified that our participant reputation model with active factors can distinguish high-quality participants with different active levels, and our MSD-G and SGC-DP algorithms can effectively select suitable participants with ideal recruit budget and guaranteed data quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo B, Zhai S, Yu Z et al (2017) Crowdsensing big data: sensing data selection, and understanding. Big Data Res 3(5):57–69

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu J, Tao D (2019) Theories and methods of quality measure and assurance for mobile crowd sensing. J Chin Comput Syst 40(5):918–923

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu Z, Zhang D, Yu Z et al (2015) Participant selection for offline event marketing leveraging Location-Based social networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 45(6):853–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang X, Sun W, **ng K (2016) Incentives for mobile crowd sensing: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 18(1):54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jurca R (2002) Towards incentive-compatible reputation management. In: International Conference on Trust Springer-Verlag

  6. Yan J, Ku S, Yu C (2017) Reputation model of crowdsourcing workers based on active degree. J Comput Appl 37(7):2039–2043

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pournajaf L, **ong L, Sunderam V, Goryczka S (2014) Spatial task assignment for crowd sensing with cloaked locations. In: IEEE 15th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Brisbane, QLD, pp 73–82

  8. Liu C, Zhang B, Su X et al (2017) Energy-aware participant selection for smartphone-enabled mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Syst J 11(3):1435–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang D, **ong H, Wang L (2014) Crowdrecruiter: selecting participants for piggyback crowdsensing under probabilistic coverage constraint. In: ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive & Ubiquitous Computing

  10. Guo W, Zhu W, Yu Z, Wang J, Guo B (2019) A survey of task allocation: contrastive perspectives from wireless sensor networks and mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Access 7:78406–78420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang J, Wang Y, Zhang D et al (2018) Multi-task allocation in mobile crowd sensing with individual task quality assurance. IEEE Trans Mobil Comput 17(9):2101–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu L, Song Y, Zhang H, Ma H et al (2015) Physarum optimization: a biology-inspired algorithm for the Steiner tree problem in networks. IEEE Trans Comput 64(3):819–832

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Li P, Wang H (2017) Participant reputation aware data collecting mechanism for mobile crowd sensing. In: 2017 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), pp 1–6

  14. Yu Z, Zheng X, Huang F et al (2019) A framework based on sparse representation model for time series prediction in Smart City. Front Comput Sci

  15. Wang J, Wang F, Wang Y (2020) Hytasker: hybrid task allocation in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Trans Mobil Comput 19(3):598–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu Z, Guo W, Zhang D, Wang L, Guo B (2020) Cyber-physical-social-mediated communication. IT Prof 22(2):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen X, Xu J, Wu M, Dai H (2015) Research of data collection technology in crowd sensing based on social behavior analysis. Appl Res Comput 32(12):3534–3541

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu Z, Zhang D, Yu Z, Yang D (2015) Participant selection for offline event marketing leveraging location-based social networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst (TSMC-S) 45(6):853– 864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, Zhang B, Su X et al (2015) Energy-Aware Participant selection for smartphone-enabled mobile crowd Sensing[J]. IEEE Syst J 1–12

  20. Zhao D, Li X, Ma H (2016) Budget-feasible online incentive mechanisms for crowdsourcing tasks truthfully. ACM/IEEE Trans Netw 24(2):647–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. **ao M, Wu J, Huang L et al (2015) Multi-task assignment for crowdsensing in mobile social networks. In: Computer Communications IEEE

  22. Karaliopoulos M, Telelis O, Koutsopoulos I (2015) User recruitment for mobile crowdsensing over opportunistic networks. In: IEEE Computer Communications

  23. **ao M, Huang L et al (2017) Online task assignment for crowdsensing in predictable mobile social networks. IEEE Trans Mobil Comput 16(8):2306–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nan WQ (2016) Quality-enhanced incentive mechanism based on mobile crowd sensing. Northwestern Polytechnical University

  25. Liu L, Liu W, Zheng Y, Ma H D (2018) Third-Eye: a mobilephone-enabled crowdsensing system for air quality monitoring. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 26:1–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks Prof. Liang Liu in IoT technology laboratory of Bei**g University of Posts and Telecommunications for providing all the materials of “Third-Eye” project.

Funding

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61872027 and No. 62072029, Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks under Grant No. ISN21-16, and Bei**g NSF No. L192004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Tao.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, D., Gao, R. & Sun, H. Sensing-gain constrained participant selection mechanism for mobile crowdsensing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 27, 631–645 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01470-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01470-8

Keywords

Navigation