Abstract
Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (expressed in photosynthetic photon flux density, Qp) is an important parameter in different biological and ecological processes. Despite its importance, there is no worldwide network for its measurement. This paper analyzes the behavior of PAR in the period of 1 year, from April 2020 to March 2021, using the information collected from a meteorological station located in the city of Chihuahua, Mexico. The annual mean value of Qp at noon was 1820.1 μmol m−2 s−1; the annual mean value of Qp/Rs at noon was 1.96 μmol J−1; the annual mean daily of Qp was 42.9 mol m−2 day−1. The information collected throughout the year at the meteorological station was used to develop an empirical model to estimate Qp in Chihuahua City and its zone of influence. The developed model provided satisfactory estimations of Qp by having an MBE of 14.7 μmol m−2 s−1, RMSE of 22.8 μmol m−2 s−1, and R2 > 0.99.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data created or used during this study are available from the Instituto Tecnológico de Chihuahua Data Archive at https://posgradoitch.mx/categoria/dataset-par-chihuahua/.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Aguiar LJG, Fischer GR, Ladle RJ, Malhado ACM, Justino FB, Aguiar RG, da Costa JMN (2011) Modelling the photosynthetically active radiation in South West Amazonia under all sky conditions. Theoret Appl Climatol 108:631–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0625-y
Akitsu TK, Nasahara KN, Ijima O, Hirose Y, Ide R, Takagi K, Kume A (2022) The variability and seasonality in the ratio of photosynthetically active radiation to solar radiation: a simple empirical model of the ratio. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation 108:102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102724
Alados I, Alados-Arboledas L (1999) Validation of an empirical model for photosynthetically active radiation. Int J Climatol 19:1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199908)19.10<1145::AID-JOC428>3.0.CO;2-3
Alados I, Foyo-Moreno I, Alados-Arboledas L (1996) Photosynthetically active radiation: measurements and modelling. Agric for Meteorol 78:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02245-7
Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 5(180214):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214
Cai M, Prince SD, Tao B, Small J, Li K (2005) Regional pattern and interannual variations in global terrestrial carbon uptake in response to changes in climate and atmospheric CO2. Tellus b Chem Phys Meteorol 57(3):210–217. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v57i3.16536
Custódio LLM, da Silva BB, dos Santos CAC (2021) Relationship between photosynthetically active radiation and global radiation in Petrolina and Brasília, Brazil. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 25(9):612–619. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v25n9p612-619
Climate Data (2022) Climate Data México from Climate-Data.org. climate-data.org/america-del-norte/mexico-179/. Accessed 20 Dec 2020 (in Spanish)
Del Ángel-Hernández M, Zermeño-Gonzalez A, Melendres-Alvarez AI, Campos-Magaña SG, Cadena-Zapata M, Del Bosque-Villarreal GA (2017) Characteristics of a tunnel cover effect on radiation, chlorophyll and yield of squash. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agricolas 8(5):1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i5.113. (in Spanish)
DOF (Official Daily of the Federation) (2013) Meteorological, climatological and hydrological stations - part 1: technical specifications to be met by the materials and measuring instruments of automatic and conventional meteorological stations. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/166835/nmx-aa-166-1-scfi-2013_1_.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2022 (in Spanish)
DOF (Official Daily of the Federation) (2015) Meteorological, climatological and hydrological stations. Part 2: technical specifications to be met by the location and exposure of measuring instruments for automatic and conventional meteorological stations. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/166838/nmx-aa-166-2-scfi-2015.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2022 (in Spanish)
Escobedo-Sánchez MM, Conejo-Flores R, Durón-Torres SM, García-González JM (2020) Photosynthetically active radiation assessed in the city of Zacatecas. Revista de Energía Química y Física 7(22):1–11. https://doi.org/10.35429/JCPE.2020.22.7.1.11
Feenders C (2018) Data quality-flags. https://uol.de/f/5/inst/icbm/Datenmanagement/ICBM_quality-flags.pdf. Accessed on 21 Dec 2022
Foyo-Moreno I, Alados I, Alados-Arboledas L (2017) A new conventional regression model to estimate hourly photosynthetic photon flux density under all sky conditions. Int J Climatol 37:1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5063
Foyo-Moreno I, Alados I, Alados-Arboledas L (2018) A new empirical model to estimate hourly diffuse photosynthetic photon flux density. Atmos Res 203:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.12.012
García-Rodríguez A, García-Rodríguez S, Díez-Mediavilla M, Alonso-Tristán C (2020) Photosynthetic active radiation, Solar Irradiance and the CIE Standard Sky Classification. Appl Sci 10(22):8007. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228007
Hu B, Wang Y (2012) The climatological characteristics of photosynthetically active radiation in arid and semi-arid regions of China. J Atmos Chem 69:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-012-9235-4
Hu B, Wang Y (2013) Comparison of multi-empirical estimation models of photosynthetically active radiation under all sky conditions in Northeast China. Theoret Appl Climatol 116:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0941-x
Hu B, Liu H, Wang Y (2016) Investigation of the variability of photosynthetically active radiation in the Tibetan Plateau, China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.155
Hu B, Tang L, Liu H, Zhao X, Liu Z, Wang Y, Wang L (2018) Trends of photosynthetically active radiation over China from 1961 to 2014. International J Climatol 38(10):4007–4024. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5551
INEGI (National Institute of Statistic and Geography) (2018) Relieve Chihuahua. cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/chih/territorio/relieve.aspx?tema=me&e=08. Accessed 19 Sept 2022 (in Spanish)
Long CN, Ackerman TP (2000) Identification of clear skies from broadband pyranometer measurements and calculation of downwelling shortwave cloud effects. J Geophys Res 105:15609–15626. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900077
LuMa S, Zainali S, Stridh B, Avelin A, Amaducci S, Colauzzi M, Campana PE (2022) Photosynthetically active radiation decomposition models for agrovoltaic systems applications. Sol Energy 244(15):536–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.05.046
Maycotte-Morales CC, Velázquez-Martínez A, Vargas-Hernández J, Trinidad-Santos G, Vera-Castillo G (2002) Photosynthetically active radiation and physicochemical properties in forest soils with and without fire. Madera y Bosques 8(2):39–55. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2002.821300. (in Spanish)
Mayer H, Holst T, Schindler D (2002) Microclimate within Beech Stands – Part I: photosynthetically active radiation. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 121(6):301–321. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0337.2002.02038.x
McCree KJ (1971) The Action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric Meteorol 9:191–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(71)90022-7
McCree KJ (1972) Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation againts leaf photosynthesis data. Plant Physiol 10:443–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(72)90045-3
Michalsky JJ (1988) The astronomical almanac’s algorithm for approximate solar position (1950–2050). Sol Energy 40(3):227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(88)90045-X
NEO (NASA Earth Observations) (2022a) Aerosol optical thickness. https://neo.gsfc.nasa.gov/view.php?datasetId=MODAL2_D_AER_OD. Accessed 24 Dec 2022
NEO (NASA Earth Observations) (2022b) Water vapor. https://neo.gsfc.nasa.gov/view.php?datasetId=MYDAL2_M_SKY_WV. Accessed 24 Dec 2022
Noriega-Gardea MMA, Corral-Martínez LF, Anguiano-Morales M, Trujillo-Schiaffino G, Salas-Peimbert DP (2020, August 20) Assessment of global PAR empirical models in the Mexican Northern Plateau. Infrared Remote Sens Instrum XXVII I:11502. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2567306
Noriega-Gardea MMA, Corral-Martínez LF, Anguiano-Morales M, Trujillo-Schiaffino G, Salas-Peimbert DP (2021) Modeling photosynthetically active radiation: a review. Atmósfera 34(3):357–370. https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.52737
Peng S, Du Q, Lin A, Hu B, **ao K, ** Y (2015) Observation and estimation of photosynthetically active radiation in Lhasa (Tibetan Plateau). Adv Space Res 55:1604–1612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.002
Proutsos N, Liakatas A, Alexandris S (2019) Ratio of photosynthetically active to total incoming radiation above a Mediterranean deciduous oak forest. Theoret Appl Climatol 137:2927–2939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02786-z
Secretaría de Hacienda Chihuahua (2017) Sector program rural development secretariat. http://ihacienda.chihuahua.gob.mx/tfiscal/indtfisc/progsec17/anexo065-2017rural.pdf. Accessed on 22 Sept 2022 (in Spanish)
Sudharsan D, Adinarayana J, Reddy DR, Sreenivas G, Ninomiya S, Hirafuji M (2013) Evaluation of weather-based rice yield models in India. Int J Biometeorol 57:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-012-0538-6
Tang W, Qin J, Yang K, Niu X, Min M, Liang S (2017) An efficient algorithm for calculating photosynthetically active radiation with MODIS products. Remote Sens Environ 194:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.028
Tsubo M, Walker S (2005) Relationships between photosynthetically active radiation and clearness index at Bloemfontein, South Africa. Theor Appl Climatol 80:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0080-5
Wang L, Kisi O, Zounemat-Kermani M, Hu B, Gong W (2016) Modeling and comparison of hourly photosynthetically active radiation in different ecosystems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:436–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.068
Willey GR (2022) Mesa del Norte. Britannica. www.britannica.com/place/Mexico. Accessed on 20 Sept 2022
Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteor Soc 63(11):1309–1313. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063%3c1309:SCOTEO%3e2.0.CO;2
**a X, Li Z, Wang P, Cribb M, Chen H, Zhao Y (2008) Analysis of photosynthetic photon flux density and its parameterization in Northern China. Agric for Meteorol 148:1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.008
Yu X, Guo X (2015) Hourly photosynthetically active radiation estimation in Midwestern United States from artificial neural networks and conventional regressions models. Int J Biometeorol 60:1247–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1120-9
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhoub Y (2000) Measuring and modelling photosynthetically active radiation in Tibet Plateau during April–October. Agric for Meteorol 102:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00093-9
Funding
The authors wish to thank the financial support of Tecnológico Nacional de México and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (México).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data was prepared by MMANG and LFCM. The manuscript was written by MMANG. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This work is original, and this manuscript is not submitted to other journal even other form or language.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All the authors consent to publish the study in a journal article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Noriega-Gardea, M.M.A., Corral-Martínez, L.F., Anguiano-Morales, M. et al. Empirical model for the estimation of photosynthetically active radiation in the city of Chihuahua and its zone of influence. Theor Appl Climatol 152, 1221–1229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04446-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04446-9