Log in

A New Method to Investigate the Size Effect and Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties of Columnar Jointed Rock Mass

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a special type of rock mass, the columnar jointed rock masses (CJRMs) present anisotropic mechanical properties and complicated failure modes due to the existence of columnar joints and micro-fractures. The determinations of mechanical properties and representative volume element (RVE) of CJRMs are important for the design, construction, and stability evaluation of hydropower projects. In this paper, the numerical simulations of CJRMs with different inclination angles and sizes under uniaxial and true triaxial compression conditions were conducted to investigate the size effect and anisotropic characteristics of mechanical properties. Results showed the failure modes presented anisotropic and size effect characteristics and the confining pressure influenced the failure modes by providing lateral enhancement. In addition, the mechanical properties first fluctuated and then reached stability as size increased, and the RVE were concentrated in 2 m to 3 m. The RVE were affected by the loading conditions and the CJRMs with inclination angles of 90° and 75° exhibited the smallest and largest RVE respectively. The anisotropy coefficients (ACs) of mechanical properties possessed a RVE of 2.5 m. Based on the simulations, a new method was proposed to investigate the correlation between the size effect and anisotropy of mechanical properties. Results showed the mechanical properties of CJRMs presented most stably at the inclination angle of 90°, and the inclination angles ranging from 40° to 75° were the most unfavorable. Based on this method, the anisotropy of size effect and the size effect of anisotropy, which were difficult to investigate in the past, could be discussed in detail through numerical simulations.

Highlights

  • A new method aimed to acquire the values and representative elementary volume of mechanical properties of columnar jointed rock mass was proposed and testified.

  • The failure modes of columnar jointed rock mass at different inclination angles presented anisotropic and size effect characteristics and they were influenced by the confining pressure.

  • The representative elementary volume of compressive strength and elastic module were ranging from 2.5 to 3 m and presented anisotropic characteristics.

  • The anisotropy coefficients of elastic module were stabilized at about 1.3 and the representative elementary volumes were both around 2 m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article. All data generated or analyzed during this study are available.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

α :

Inclination angle of column

UCS:

Peak strength in uniaxial compressive test

UEM:

Ratio of peak strength to peak strain in uniaxial compressive test

TCS:

Peak strength in true triaxial compressive test

TEM:

Ratio of peak strength to peak strain in true triaxial compressive test

x :

Arbitrary random point in Voronoi polygon

P k :

Seed point in Voronoi polygon

d(x, p k ) :

Distance between x and pk

VC :

Variation coefficient of mechanical properties

P max :

Maximum value of the mechanical properties of CJRMs at different sizes

P min :

Minimum value of the mechanical properties of CJRMs at different sizes

AC p :

Anisotropy coefficient of mechanical properties

RVE:

Representative elementary volume of mechanical properties

References

  • Amadei B (1996) Importance of anisotropy when estimating and measuring in situ stresses in rock: importance of anisotropy when estimating and measuring in situ stresses in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 33(3):293–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazant ZP, Chen E (1997) Scaling of structural failure. Appl Mech Rev 50(10):593–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J, Verruijt A (1987) Modeling groundwater flows and pollution. D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, p p20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1968) The effect of specimen size on compressive strength of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 5(4):325–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosshard SA, Mattsson HB, Hetényi G (2012) Origin of internal flow structures in columnar-jointed basalt from Hrepphólar, Iceland: i. textural and geochemical characterization. Bull Volcanol 74:1645–1666

    Google Scholar 

  • Budkewitsch P, Robin P (1994) Modelling the evolution of columnar joints. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 59:219–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Brostow W, Dussault JP, Fox BL (1978) Construction of voronoi polyhedral. J Comput Phys 29(1):81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui J, Jiang Q, Feng XT, Li SJ, Liu JF, Chen WF, Zhang JC, Pei SF (2018) Insights into statistical structural characteristics and deformation properties of columnar jointed basalts: field investigation in the Baihetan dam base, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:775–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Li B, Xu N, Meng G, Wu J, Fan Y (2017) Microseismic monitoring of the left bank slope at the Baihetan hydropower station, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Di S, Xu W, Ning Y, Wang W, Wu G (2011) Macro-mechanical properties of columnar jointed basaltic rock masses. J Cent South Univ Technol 18(6):2143–2149

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Q, Wang Z, Xu J, Zhou M, Jiang Q, Li G (2018) Study on deformation and control measures of columnar jointed basalt for Baihetan super-high arch dam foundation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:2569–2595

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard CM (1982) Elastic models of rock masses having one, two and three sets of joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 19(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuze FE (1980) Scale effects in the determination of rock mass strength and deformability. Rock Mech Rock Eng 12:167–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu G, Ma G (2021) Size effect of parallel-joint spacing on uniaxial compressive strength of rock. PLoS ONE 16:e0257245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Harrison JP, Popescu ME (2002) Engineering rock mechanics: an introduction to the principles. Appl Mech Rev 55(2):72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji H, Zhang JC, Xu WY, Wang RB, Wang HL, Yan L (2017) Experimental investigation of the anisotropic mechanical properties of a columnar jointed rock mass: observations from laboratory-based physical modelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1919–1931

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Feng XT, Hatzor YH, Hao X, Li S (2014) Mechanical anisotropy of columnar jointed basalts: an example from the Baihetan hydropower station, China. Eng Geol 175:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Cui J, Feng XT, Zhang YH, Zhang MZ (2017) Demonstration of spatial anisotropic deformation properties for jointed rock mass by an analytical deformation tensor. Comput Geotech 88:111–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Feng XT, Fan YL, Zhu XD (2013) Survey and laboratory study of anisotropic properties for columnar jointed basaltic rock mass. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 32(12):2527–2535 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Wang B, Feng XT, Fan QX, Wang ZL, Pei SF, Jiang S (2019) In situ failure investigation and time-dependent damage test for columnar jointed basalt at the Baihetan left dam foundation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:3875–3890

    Google Scholar 

  • ** C, Li S, Liu J (2018) Anisotropic mechanical behaviors of columnar jointed basalt under compression. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • ** C, Yang C, Fang D, Xu S (2015) Study on the failure mechanism of basalts with columnar Joints in the unloading process on the basis of an experimental cavity. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1275–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Khani A, Baghbanan A, Hashemolhosseini H (2013) Numerical investigation of the effect of fracture intensity on deformability and rev of fractured rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 63(63):104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Panda BB (2000) Effect of block size and joint geometry on jointed rock hydraulics and RVE. J Eng Mech 126(8):850–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JH, Zhang LM, Wang Y, Fredlund D (2009) Permeability tensor and representative elementary volume of saturated cracked soil. Can Geotech J 46(8):928–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW, Liu CY, Yao QL, Si GY (2020a) The position of hydraulic fracturing to initiate vertical fractures in hard hanging roof for stress relief. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 132:104328

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW, Liu CY, Li XH (2020b) Determination of fracture location of double-sided directional fracturing pressure relief for hard roof of large upper goaf-side coal pillars. Energy Explor Exploit 38(1):111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW, Wu N, Si GY et al (2021) Experimental study on mechanical properties and failure behavior of the pre-cracked coal-rock combination. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:2307–2321

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Xu W, Wang H, Zhang J, Wei W, Wang R (2017) Anisotropic characteristic of irregular columnar-jointed rock mass based on physical model test. Ksce J Civ Eng 21:1728–1734

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HN, Wang JM, Wang SJ (2010) Experimental research of columnar jointed basalt with true triaxial apparatus at Baihetan hydropower station. Rock Soil Mech 31:163–171 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Long JCS, Remer JS, Wilson CR, Witherspoon PA (1982) Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures. Water Resour Res 18(3):645–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Zhu Z, He Y, Que X (2021) Strength characteristics and failure mechanism of a columnar jointed rock mass under uniaxial, triaxial, and true triaxial confinement. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54:2425–2439

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Wang H, Xu W, Chen Y (2019) Numerical homogenization study on the effects of columnar jointed structure on the mechanical properties of rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 124:104–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Min KB, **g L (2003) Numerical determination of the equivalent elastic compliance tensor for fractured rock masses using the distinct element method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 4(6):795–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Oda M (1988) A method for evaluating the representative elementary volume based on joint survey of rock masses. Can Geotech J 25(3):440–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariseau WG, Puri S, Schmelter SC (2008) A new model for effects of impersistent joint sets on rock slope stability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(2):122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JC, Humphreys MCS, Daniels KA, Brown RJ, Witham F (2013) The formation of columnar joints produced by cooling in basalt at Staffa. Scotland Bull Volcanol 75:715

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt HR, Black AD, Brown WS, Brace WF (1972) The effect of specimen size on the mechanical properties of unjointed diorite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9(4):513–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Que XC, Zhu ZD, Lu WB (2020) Anisotropic constitutive model of pentagonal prism columnar jointed rock mass. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon MDG (1968) Elastic moduli of a stratified rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 5(6):519–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan Z, Di S (2013) Loading-unloading test analysis of anisotropic columnar jointed basalts. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 14:603

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun QC, Li SJ, Guo HS, Zheng MZ, Yang ZY (2021) In situ test of excavation damage zone of columnar jointed rock masses under different borehole conditions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:2991–3007

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari RP, Rao KS (2007) Response of an anisotropic rock mass under polyaxial stress state. J Mater Civil Eng 19:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Kulatilake PHSW, Um J, Narvaiz J (2002) Estimation of RVE size and three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor for a fractured rock mass through a single well packer test and discrete fracture fluid flow modeling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(7):887–904

    Google Scholar 

  • **a YJ, Liu BC, Zhang CQ et al (2022) Investigations of mechanical and failure properties of 3D printed columnar jointed rock mass under true triaxial compression with one free face. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 8:26

    Google Scholar 

  • **a Y, Zhang C, Zhou H et al (2020a) Study on model structure and mechanical anisotropy of columnar jointed rock mass based on 3D printing method. Int J Geomech 20(11):04020208

    Google Scholar 

  • **a Y, Zhang C, Zhou H et al (2020b) Mechanical behavior of structurally reconstructed irregular columnar jointed rock mass using 3D printing. Eng Geol 268:105509

    Google Scholar 

  • **a Y, Zhang C, Zhou H, Chen J, Gao Y, Liu N (2020c) Structural characteristics of columnar jointed basalt in drainage tunnel of Baihetan hydropower station and its influence on the behavior of P-wave anisotropy. Eng Geol 264:105304

    Google Scholar 

  • **a Y, Zhang C, Zhou H, Zhang C, Hong W (2019a) Mechanical anisotropy and failure characteristics of columnar jointed rock masses (CJRM) in baihetan hydropower station: structural considerations based on digital image processing technology. Energies 12:3602

    Google Scholar 

  • **a Y, Zhou H, Zhang C, He S, Gao Y, Wang P (2019b) The evaluation of rock brittleness and its application: a review study. Eur J Environ Civ En 26(1):1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • **ao W, Deng R, Zhong Z, Fu X, Wang C (2015) Experimental study on the mechanical properties of simulated columnar jointed rock masses. J Geophys Eng 12:80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu WY, Zheng WT, Ning Y, Meng GT, Wu GY, Shi AC (2010) 3D anisotropic numerical analysis of rock mass with columnar joints for dam foundation. Rock Soil Mech 31:949–955 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan DX, Xu WY, Wang W, Shi C, Shi AC, Wu GY (2012) Research of size effect on equivalent elastic modulus of columnar jointed rock mass. Chin J Geotech Eng 34:243–250 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JP, Chen WZ, Dai YH, Yu HD (2014) Numerical determination of elastic compliance tensor of fractured rock masses by finite element modeling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:474–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz E, Belem T, Benzaazoua M (2015) Specimen size effect on strength behavior of cemented paste backfills subjected to different placement conditions. Eng Geol 185:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Yao W, Duan K, Liu X, Zhu Y (2020) Experimental study and discrete element method modeling of compression and permeability behaviors of weakly anisotropic sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 134:104437

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaytsev DV, Kochanov AN, Panteleev IA, Panflov PY (2017) Influence of the scale effect in testing the strength of rock samples. Bull Russ Acad Sci Phys 81(3):337–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, **a Y, Zhang C et al (2022a) Laboratory test and numerical simulations for 3D printed irregular columnar jointed rock masses under biaxial compression. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81:124

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, **a Y, Zhang C et al (2022b) Failure modes and excavation stability of large-scale columnar jointed rock masses containing interlayer shear weakness zones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 159:105222

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chen J, Cao Z, Wang R (2013a) Size effect of RQD and generalized representative volume elements: a case study on an underground excavation in Baihetan dam, Southwest China. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 35:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chen J, Chen H, Xu D, Li Y (2013b) Determination of RVE with consideration of the spatial effect. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chen JP, Liu C, Huang R, Li M, Zhang Y (2012) Determination of geometrical and structural representative volume elements at the Baihetan dam site. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(3):409–419

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42077251, 41807269, U1865203). The work presented in this paper was also supported by Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant NO. Z020011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Danchen Zhao, Yingjie **a, Chuanqing Zhang, Chun’an Tang, Hemant Kumar Singh, Jun Chen and Peng Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Danchen Zhao and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingjie **a.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A. Code of Generating Voronoi diagram based on random points

[x,y] = meshgrid(0.0015:0.0015:1);

i = length(x);

x = x + (rand(i)-0.5)*randi([10,15],1)*0.01;

y = y + (rand(i)-0.5)*randi([10,15],1)*0.01;

p = randi(length(x(:)),1,round(length(x(:))/10));

x = x(:);

x(p) = [];

y = y(:);

y(p) = [];

data = [x(:),y(:)];

dots = delaunayTriangulation(data);

edge = dots.ConnectivityList;

num = [];

for i = 1:length(edge).

if n or m(dots. Points (edge (i, 1)) − dots. Points (edge (i, 2))) < 0.001.

num = [num,i];

end.

end.

edge(num,:) = [];

edge = [edge,edge];

edge = [edge(:,[1,2]);edge(:,[3,4]);edge(:,[5,6])];

edge = sortrows(edge,[1,2]);

result = tabulate(edge(:,1));

r1 = result;

result = tabulate(result(:,2));

r2 = result;

c = find(r2(:,1) =  = 3);

r3 = r2([c:end],[1,2]);

r3(:,2) = r3(:,2)./sum(r3(:,2));

sum_3456 = sum(r3(1:4,2)).

sum_triplus = sum(result([3,4,5,6],3));

delaunay_voronoi(x,y); %See Appendix B. Code of the Function of Voronoi diagram.

[v,c] = voronoin(data);

area = [];

for i = 1:length(c).

area_add = polyarea(v(c{i},1),v(c{i},2))*400,000,000;

if area_add <  = 100,000.

area = [area,area_add];

end

end

sum_area = [];

sum_area(1) = length(area(find(area <  = 2500)));

sum_area(2) = length(area(find(area > 2500&area < 10,000)));

sum_area(3) = length(area(find(area >  = 10,000&area < 22,500)));

sum_area(4) = length(area(find(area >  = 22,500)));

sum_area_portion = sum_area/sum(sum_area);

Appendix B. Code of the Function of Voronoi diagram (referenced from MATLAB)

Function [vxx,vy] = delaunay_voronoi(varargin).

if nargin > 0.

[varargin{:}] = convertStringsToChars(varargin{:});

end

[cax,args,nargs] = axescheck(varargin{:});

if nargs < 1.

error(message('error'));

elseif nargs > 4.

error(message('error'));

end

if isa(args{1}, 'DelaunayTri').

dt = args{1};

if dt.size(1) =  = 0.

error(message('error'));

elseif dt.size(2) ~  = 3.

error(message('error'));

end

x = dt.X(:,1);

y = dt.X(:,2);

tri = dt(:,:);

if nargs =  = 1.

ls = '';

else

ls = args{2};

end

elseif isa(args{1}, 'delaunayTriangulation').

dt = args{1};

if dt.size(1) =  = 0.

error(message('error'));

elseif dt.size(2) ~  = 3.

error(message('error'));

end

x = dt.Points(:,1);

y = dt.Points(:,2);

tri = dt(:,:);

if nargs =  = 1.

ls = '';

else.

ls = args{2};

end

else

x = args{1};

y = args{2};

if ~ isequal(size(x),size(y)).

error(message('error'));

end

if ~ ismatrix(x) ||~ ismatrix(y).

error(message('error'));

end

x = x(:);

y = y(:);

if nargs =  = 2.

tri = delaunay(x,y);

ls = '';

else

arg3 = args{3};

if nargs =  = 3.

ls = '';

else

arg4 = args{4};

ls = arg4;

end

if isempty(arg3).

tri = delaunay(x,y);

elseif ischar(arg3).

tri = delaunay(x,y);

ls = arg3;

elseif iscellstr(arg3) || isstring(arg3).

error(message('error'));

else

tri = arg3;

end

end

end

if isempty(tri).

return;

end

tr = triangulation(tri,x,y);

c = tr.circumcenter();

n = numel(x);

t = repmat((1:size(tri,1))',1,3);

T = sparse(tri,tri(:,[3 1 2]),t,n,n);

E = (T & T').*T;

F = xor(T, T').*T;

[~ , ~ ,v] = find(triu(E));

[~ , ~ ,vv] = find(triu(E'));

vx = [c(v,1) c(vv,1)]';

vy = [c(v,2) c(vv,2)]';

[i,j,z] = find(F);

dx = x(j)−x(i);

dy = y(j)−y(i);

rx = max(x)-min(x);

ry = max(y)-min(y);

cx = (max(x) + min(x))/2−c(z,1);

cy = (max(y) + min(y))/2−c(z,2);

nm = sqrt(rx.*rx + ry.*ry) + sqrt(cx.*cx + cy.*cy);

scale = nm./sqrt((dx.*dx + dy.*dy));

ex = [c(z,1) c(z,1)-dy.*scale]';

ey = [c(z,2) c(z,2) + dx.*scale]';

vx = [vx ex];

vy = [vy ey];

if nargout < 2.

if isempty(cax).

cax = gca;

end

if isempty(ls).

ls = '-';

end

[l,c,mp,msg] = colstyle(ls);

error(msg).

if isempty(mp).

mp = '.';

end

if isempty(l).

l = get(ancestor(cax,'figure'),'DefaultAxesLineStyleOrder');

end

if isempty(c).

co = get(ancestor(cax,'figure'),'DefaultAxesColorOrder');

c = co(1,:);

end

nume = size(vx,2);

vx = [vx; NaN(1,nume)];

vx = vx(:);

vy = [vy; NaN(1,nume)];

vy = vy(:);

line(vx,vy,'color','k','linestyle',l,'linewidth',0.1,'parent',cax,'yliminclude','off','xliminclude','off');

hold on

box on

set(gca,'xtick',[]);

set(gca,'ytick',[]);

set(gca,'position',[0 0 1 1]);

axis normal

axis square

hold off

print("picc","-dpng","-r1200");

if nargout =  = 1

vxx = [h1; h2];

end

else

vxx = vx;

end

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, D., **a, Y., Zhang, C. et al. A New Method to Investigate the Size Effect and Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties of Columnar Jointed Rock Mass. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56, 2829–2859 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03200-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03200-3

Keywords

Navigation