Abstract
The ground-breaking works of Weinberg have opened the way to calculations of atomic nuclei that are based on systematically improvable Hamiltonians. Solving the associated many-body Schrödinger equation involves non-trivial difficulties, due to the non-perturbative nature and strong spin-isospin dependence of nuclear interactions. Artificial neural networks have proven to be able to compactly represent the wave functions of nuclei with up to \(A=4\) nucleons. In this work, we extend this approach to \(^6\)Li and \(^6\)He nuclei, using as input a leading-order pionless effective field theory Hamiltonian. We successfully benchmark their binding energies, point-nucleon densities, and radii with the highly-accurate hyperspherical harmonics method.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00601-021-01706-0/MediaObjects/601_2021_1706_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00601-021-01706-0/MediaObjects/601_2021_1706_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00601-021-01706-0/MediaObjects/601_2021_1706_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)90938-3
S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B 363, 3 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(91)90231-L
S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B 295, 114 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(92)90099-P
U. van Kolck, Eff. Field Theor. Loosely Bound Nucl. 879, 123 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45141-6_4
E. Epelbaum, H.W. Hammer, U.G. Meissner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1773
R. Machleidt, D. Entem, Phys. Rept. 503, 1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001
P.F. Bedaque, U. van Kolck, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52, 339 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.52.050102.090637
H. Hergert, Front. Phys. 8, 379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00379
J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva, S.C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, K. Schmidt, R. Wiringa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1067 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1067
K. Schmidt, S. Fantoni, Phys. Lett. B 446, 99 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01522-6
M. Piarulli, I. Bombaci, D. Logoteta, A. Lovato, R. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 101(4), 045801 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.045801
D. Lonardoni, I. Tews, S. Gandolfi, J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022033
S. Gandolfi, D. Lonardoni, A. Lovato, M. Piarulli, Front. Phys. 8, 117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00117
E. Dumitrescu, A. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. Jansen, T. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. Pooser, D. Dean, P. Lougovski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(21), 210501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.210501
A. Roggero, J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. C 100(3), 034610 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034610
A. Roggero, A. Baroni, Phys. Rev. A 101(2), 022328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.022328
G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. Vogt-Maranto, L. Zdeborová, Rev. Modern Phys. 91(4), 045002 (2019)
G. Carleo, M. Troyer, Science 355(6325), 602 (2017)
Y. Nomura, A.S. Darmawan, Y. Yamaji, M. Imada, Phys. Rev. B 96(20), 205122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152
H. Saito, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2018). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.87.074002
K. Choo, G. Carleo, N. Regnault, T. Neupert, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.167204
Y. Nomura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89(5), 054706 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.89.054706
N. Yoshioka, R. Hamazaki, Phys. Rev. B 99(21), 214306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.214306
A. Nagy, V. Savona, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(25), 250501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250501
F. Vicentini, A. Biella, N. Regnault, C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250503
M.J. Hartmann, G. Carleo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(25), 250502 (2019)
F. Ferrari, F. Becca, J. Carrasquilla, Phys. Rev. B 100(12), 125131 (2019)
D. Pfau, J.S. Spencer, A.e.G.d.G. Matthews, W.M.C. Foulkes, ar**v e-prints ar**v:1909.02487 (2019)
J. Hermann, Z. Schätzle, F. Noé, ar**v e-prints ar**v:1909.08423 (2019)
K. Choo, A. Mezzacapo, G. Carleo, Nat. Commun. 11(1), 2368 (2020)
J.W.T. Keeble, A. Rios, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135743 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135743
C. Adams, G. Carleo, A. Lovato, N. Rocco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(2), 022502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.022502
A. Kievsky, S. Rosati, M. Viviani, L. Marcucci, L. Girlanda, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35(6), 063101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/35/6/063101
R. Schiavilla, L. Girlanda, A. Gnech, A. Kievsky, A. Lovato, L.E. Marcucci, M. Piarulli, M. Viviani, Phys. Rev. C 103(5), 054003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054003
J.W. Chen, G. Rupak, M.J. Savage, Nucl. Phys. A 653, 386 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00298-5
R.B. Wiringa, V.G.J. Stoks, R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.38
C.J. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. A 56(3), 96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00104-0
P.F. Bedaque, H. Hammer, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 463 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.463
N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth, A.H. Teller, E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114
P. Massella, F. Barranco, D. Lonardoni, A. Lovato, F. Pederiva, E. Vigezzi, J. Phys. G 47, 035105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab588c
M. Zaheer, S. Kottur, S. Ravanbakhsh, B. Poczos, R. Salakhutdinov, A. Smola, ar**v e-prints ar**v:1703.06114 (2017)
E. Wagstaff, F.B. Fuchs, M. Engelcke, I. Posner, M. Osborne, ar**v e-prints ar**v:1901.09006 (2019)
C. Dugas, Y. Bengio, F. Bélisle, C. Nadeau, R. Garcia, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001), pp. 472–478
S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 71, 241103 (2005)
L.E. Marcucci, J. Dohet-Eraly, L. Girlanda, A. Gnech, A. Kievsky, M. Viviani, Front. Phys. 8, 69 (2020)
A. Gnech, M. Viviani, L.E. Marcucci, Phys. Rev. C 102, 014001 (2020)
A. Gnech, L.E. Marcucci, R. Schiavilla, M. Viviani, (2021). Ar**v:2016.07439. To be published on Phys. Rev. C
J. Beringer et al., Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001
J.L. Friar, J. Martorell, D.W.L. Sprung, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4579 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4579
NNDC (2021), Nudat2, https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/
E. Tiesinga, P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell, B.N. Taylor, CODATA2018 (2020). Available at http://physics.nist.gov/constants
A. Amroun, V. Breton, J.M. Cavedon, B. Frois, D. Goutte, F. Juster, P. Leconte, J. Martino, Y. Mizuno, X.H. Phan, S. Platchkov, I. Sick, S. Williamson, Nucl. Phys. A 579(3), 596 (1994)
D.C. Morton, Q. Wu, G.W.F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 73, 034502 (2006)
J. Krauth, K. Schuhmann, M. Ahmed et al., Nature 598, 527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03183-1
L.B. Wang, P. Mueller, K. Bailey, G.W.F. Drake, J.P. Greene, D. Henderson, R.J. Holt, R.V.F. Janssens, C.L. Jiang, Z.T. Lu, T.P. O’Connor, R.C. Pardo, K.E. Rehm, J.P. Schiffer, X.D. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 142501 (2004)
M. Puchalski, K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 243001 (2013)
R. Wiringa. Private communication
L. Contessi, A. Lovato, F. Pederiva, A. Roggero, J. Kirscher, U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 772, 839 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.048
H. Kamada et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 044001 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.044001
P. Maris, J.P. Vary, S. Gandolfi, J. Carlson, S.C. Pieper, Phys. Rev. C 87(5), 054318 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.054318
R.J. Furnstahl, D.R. Phillips, S. Wesolowski, J. Phys. G 42(3), 034028 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/3/034028
J.A. Melendez, R.J. Furnstahl, D.R. Phillips, M.T. Pratola, S. Wesolowski, Phys. Rev. C 100(4), 044001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044001
Acknowledgements
The present research is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 (A.G.), DE-AC02-06CH11357, by the NUCLEI SciDAC program (A.L., N.B.) and by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics (N.R.). A.L. and N.B. were also supported by DOE Early Career Research Program and Argonne LDRD awards. A.L acknowledges funding from the INFN grant INNN3, and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 824093. This research used resources of the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. The calculations were performed using resources of the Laboratory Computing Resource Center of Argonne National Laboratory, the National Energy Research Supercomputer Center (NERSC), and through a CINECA-INFN agreement that provides access to resources on MARCONI at CINECA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gnech, A., Adams, C., Brawand, N. et al. Nuclei with Up to \(\varvec{A=6}\) Nucleons with Artificial Neural Network Wave Functions. Few-Body Syst 63, 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01706-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01706-0