Abstract
Purpose
Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) is a rare form of cervical spondylosis that causes muscle weakness of upper extremities. The pathophysiology and appropriate surgical method for the treatment of CSA are still controversial. We investigated clinical outcomes in surgically treated distal-type CSA.
Methods
The authors executed an analysis of the outcomes of 43 consecutive spinal surgeries performed in distal-type CSA patients. The duration of symptoms, perioperative manual muscle test (MMT) results, radiological findings, and perioperative complications were reviewed. We compared surgical outcomes between different approaches and examined the factors related to poor outcomes (MMT improvement ≤ 0) after surgery.
Results
The pathophysiology of CSA was mostly caused by a combination of multiple lesions in the anterior horn and/or nerve root. Nineteen of 29 patients (65.5%) who received anterior approach methods were included in the good outcome group (MMT improvement ≥ 1), whereas 7 of 14 patients (50.0%) in the posterior group were classified as good. In the anterior group, the mean MMT grade significantly improved from 2.6 to 3.4 (p = 0.0035) despite the higher rate of complications. The duration of symptoms was substantially associated with poor outcomes. The MMT grade significantly improved from 2.2 to 3.2 (p = 0.0118) in the < 6 months group. Cervical alignments and preoperative MMT grade were not statistically associated with poor outcomes.
Conclusions
Patients with poor outcomes had symptoms for a longer duration. We found tolerable clinical outcomes within 6 months from onset. The anterior approaches might be recommended because this procedure significantly improved MMT levels in the hands.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Inui Y, Miyamoto H, Sumi M, Uno K (2011) Clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to prognosis of conservative and surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:794–799. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e531a1
Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Sato R, Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, Mwaka ES, Baba H (2009) Anterior and posterior decompressive surgery for progressive amyotrophy associated with cervical spondylosis: a retrospective study of 51 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 11:330–337. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08635
Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, Matsubara Y, Harada A, Hachiya Y, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H, Ito Z, Ando K, Ishiguro N (2013) Risk factors for a poor outcome following surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter study. Eur Spine J 22:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2506-6
Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Ochi M (2006) Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E728–E732. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000240207.00747.82
Johnson JP, Filler AG, McBride DQ, Batzdorf U (2000) Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:905–909
Mori K, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Maeda M (2006) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy treated by anterior decompression. Three case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 46:366–370
Srinivasa Rao NV, Rajshekhar V (2009) Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: incidence and outcome after central corpectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 10:374–379. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.12.SPINE08526
Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Imamura T, Morimoto N (1993) Dissociated motor loss in the upper extremities. Clinical features and pathophysiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1964–1967
Takebayashi T, Yoshimoto M, Ida K, Tsuda H, Terashima Y, Yamashita T (2013) Minimum invasive posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Orthop Sci 18:205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0330-9
Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, Sakai Y, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H, Ito Z, Ando K, Muramoto A, Matsui H, Matsumoto T, Ukai J, Kobayashi K, Shinjo R, Nakashima H, Morozumi M, Ishiguro N (2014) Characteristics and surgical results of the distal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Neurosurg Spine 21:411–416. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13681
Medical Research Council (1976) Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum no. 45. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London
Imajo Y, Kato Y, Kanchiku T, Suzuki H, Taguchi T (2011) Pathology and prognosis of proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: new assessment using compound muscle action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E476–E481. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e08d93
Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2011) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Eur Spine J 20:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1544-1
Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Toyoda K, Kato Y, Azuma Y, Kawai S (2004) Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: assessment of pathophysiology from radiological findings on magnetic resonance imaging and epidurally recorded spinal cord responses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E185–E188
Funaba M, Kanchiku T, Imajo Y, Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Nishida N, Fujimoto K, Taguchi T (2017) A novel scoring system associated with surgical outcome of distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Clin Spine Surg 30:E1182–E1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000389
Zheng C, Nie C, Zhu Y, Yu Q, Zhu D, Lu F, Weber R, Jiang J (2019) Changes in central motor conduction time and its implication on dysfunction of distal upper limb in distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Clin Neurophysiol 36:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000532
Li T, Shi G, Shi L, Miao J, Chen D, Chen Y (2019) Clinical features and long-term surgical outcomes of patients with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. World Neurosurg 121:e172–e180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.072
Zheng C, ** X, Zhu Y, Lu F, Jiang J, **a X (2017) Repetitive nerve stimulation as a diagnostic aid for distinguishing cervical spondylotic amyotrophy from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur Spine J 26:1929–1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5060-4
Zhang J, Cui C, Liu Z, Tong T, Niu R, Shen Y (2016) Predisposing factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multivariate analysis. Sci Rep 6:39512. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39512
Shinomiya K, Komori H, Matsuoka T, Mutoh N, Furuya K (1994) Neuroradiologic and electrophysiologic assessment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:21–25
Kameyama T, Ando T, Yanagi T, Yasui K, Sobue G (1998) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstration of intrinsic cord pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:448–452
Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (2003) Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1258–1262. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000065487.82469.D9
Shibuya R, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto K, Kuratsu S, Kanazawa M, Onoue K, Yoshikawa H (2005) Acute arm paresis with cervical spondylosis: three case reports. Surg Neurol 63:220-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2004.04.023. (discussion 228)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No benefits in any form have been or will be received from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, T., Yoshii, T., Ushio, S. et al. Surgical outcomes for distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 43 cases. Eur Spine J 28, 2333–2341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06060-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06060-8