Log in

Surgical outcomes for distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 43 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) is a rare form of cervical spondylosis that causes muscle weakness of upper extremities. The pathophysiology and appropriate surgical method for the treatment of CSA are still controversial. We investigated clinical outcomes in surgically treated distal-type CSA.

Methods

The authors executed an analysis of the outcomes of 43 consecutive spinal surgeries performed in distal-type CSA patients. The duration of symptoms, perioperative manual muscle test (MMT) results, radiological findings, and perioperative complications were reviewed. We compared surgical outcomes between different approaches and examined the factors related to poor outcomes (MMT improvement ≤ 0) after surgery.

Results

The pathophysiology of CSA was mostly caused by a combination of multiple lesions in the anterior horn and/or nerve root. Nineteen of 29 patients (65.5%) who received anterior approach methods were included in the good outcome group (MMT improvement ≥ 1), whereas 7 of 14 patients (50.0%) in the posterior group were classified as good. In the anterior group, the mean MMT grade significantly improved from 2.6 to 3.4 (p = 0.0035) despite the higher rate of complications. The duration of symptoms was substantially associated with poor outcomes. The MMT grade significantly improved from 2.2 to 3.2 (p = 0.0118) in the < 6 months group. Cervical alignments and preoperative MMT grade were not statistically associated with poor outcomes.

Conclusions

Patients with poor outcomes had symptoms for a longer duration. We found tolerable clinical outcomes within 6 months from onset. The anterior approaches might be recommended because this procedure significantly improved MMT levels in the hands.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inui Y, Miyamoto H, Sumi M, Uno K (2011) Clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to prognosis of conservative and surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:794–799. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e531a1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Sato R, Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, Mwaka ES, Baba H (2009) Anterior and posterior decompressive surgery for progressive amyotrophy associated with cervical spondylosis: a retrospective study of 51 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 11:330–337. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, Matsubara Y, Harada A, Hachiya Y, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H, Ito Z, Ando K, Ishiguro N (2013) Risk factors for a poor outcome following surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter study. Eur Spine J 22:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2506-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Ochi M (2006) Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E728–E732. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000240207.00747.82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson JP, Filler AG, McBride DQ, Batzdorf U (2000) Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:905–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mori K, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Maeda M (2006) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy treated by anterior decompression. Three case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 46:366–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasa Rao NV, Rajshekhar V (2009) Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: incidence and outcome after central corpectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 10:374–379. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.12.SPINE08526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Imamura T, Morimoto N (1993) Dissociated motor loss in the upper extremities. Clinical features and pathophysiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1964–1967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takebayashi T, Yoshimoto M, Ida K, Tsuda H, Terashima Y, Yamashita T (2013) Minimum invasive posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Orthop Sci 18:205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0330-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, Sakai Y, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H, Ito Z, Ando K, Muramoto A, Matsui H, Matsumoto T, Ukai J, Kobayashi K, Shinjo R, Nakashima H, Morozumi M, Ishiguro N (2014) Characteristics and surgical results of the distal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Neurosurg Spine 21:411–416. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Medical Research Council (1976) Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum no. 45. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London

  12. Imajo Y, Kato Y, Kanchiku T, Suzuki H, Taguchi T (2011) Pathology and prognosis of proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: new assessment using compound muscle action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E476–E481. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e08d93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2011) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Eur Spine J 20:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1544-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Toyoda K, Kato Y, Azuma Y, Kawai S (2004) Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: assessment of pathophysiology from radiological findings on magnetic resonance imaging and epidurally recorded spinal cord responses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E185–E188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Funaba M, Kanchiku T, Imajo Y, Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Nishida N, Fujimoto K, Taguchi T (2017) A novel scoring system associated with surgical outcome of distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Clin Spine Surg 30:E1182–E1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng C, Nie C, Zhu Y, Yu Q, Zhu D, Lu F, Weber R, Jiang J (2019) Changes in central motor conduction time and its implication on dysfunction of distal upper limb in distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Clin Neurophysiol 36:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li T, Shi G, Shi L, Miao J, Chen D, Chen Y (2019) Clinical features and long-term surgical outcomes of patients with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. World Neurosurg 121:e172–e180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng C, ** X, Zhu Y, Lu F, Jiang J, **a X (2017) Repetitive nerve stimulation as a diagnostic aid for distinguishing cervical spondylotic amyotrophy from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur Spine J 26:1929–1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5060-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang J, Cui C, Liu Z, Tong T, Niu R, Shen Y (2016) Predisposing factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multivariate analysis. Sci Rep 6:39512. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinomiya K, Komori H, Matsuoka T, Mutoh N, Furuya K (1994) Neuroradiologic and electrophysiologic assessment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:21–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kameyama T, Ando T, Yanagi T, Yasui K, Sobue G (1998) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstration of intrinsic cord pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:448–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (2003) Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1258–1262. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000065487.82469.D9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shibuya R, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto K, Kuratsu S, Kanazawa M, Onoue K, Yoshikawa H (2005) Acute arm paresis with cervical spondylosis: three case reports. Surg Neurol 63:220-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2004.04.023. (discussion 228)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshitaka Yoshii.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 141 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamada, T., Yoshii, T., Ushio, S. et al. Surgical outcomes for distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 43 cases. Eur Spine J 28, 2333–2341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06060-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06060-8

Keywords

Navigation