Log in

Retrospective analysis of preoperative application of triple-modal pre-rehabilitation on postoperative recovery of colorectal cancer patients

  • Research
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively analyze the difference between triple-modal pre-rehabilitation and common treatment in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

A total of 145 patients with CRC diagnosed by pathology and admitted to our hospital for surgery between June 2020 and June 2022 were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups: the triple-modal pre-rehabilitation group (pre-rehabilitation group) and the common treatment group. The triple-modal pre-rehabilitation strategy included exercise (3–5 times per week, with each session lasting more than 50 min), nutritional support, and psychological support. The study was designed to assess the potential of the pre-rehabilitation intervention to accelerate postoperative recovery by assessing the 6-min walk test, nutritional indicators, and HADS score before and after surgery.

Results

The pre-rehabilitation intervention did not reduce the duration of initial postoperative recovery or the incidence of postoperative complications, but it did increase the patients’ exercise capacity (as determined by the 6-min walk test), with the pre-rehabilitation group performing significantly better than the common group (433.0 (105.0) vs. 389.0 (103.5), P < 0.001). The study also found that triple-modal pre-rehabilitation was beneficial for the early recovery of nutritional status in surgical patients and improved anxiety and depression in patients after surgery, especially in those who had not received neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

The triple-modal pre-rehabilitation strategy is of significant importance for reducing stress and improving the functional reserve of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) during the perioperative period. The results of our study provide further support for the integration of the triple-modal pre-rehabilitation strategy into the treatment and care of CRC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors will make the data available upon request.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB (2019) Colorectal cancer Lancet Lond Engl 394(10207):1467–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Engelman RM, Rousou JA, Flack JE et al (1994) Fast-track recovery of the coronary bypass patient. Ann Thorac Surg 58(6):1742–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)91674-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43(3):659–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet Lond Engl 345(8952):763–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arrick L, Mayson K, Hong T, Warnock G (2019) Enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: impact of protocol adherence on patient outcomes. J Clin Anesth 55:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Awasthi R, Minnella EM, Ferreira V, Ramanakumar AV, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Carli F (2019) Supervised exercise training with multi-modal pre-habilitation leads to earlier functional recovery following colorectal cancer resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63(4):461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Durrand JW, Batterham AM, Danjoux GR (2014) Pre-habilitation. I: aggregation of marginal gains. Anaesthesia 69(5):403–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ćorović A, Griffiths R (2014) Pre-habilitation. II: time for a patient-doctor contract? Anaesthesia 69(5):407–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrandis C, Souche R, Bardol T et al (2020) Personalized pre-habilitation reduces anastomotic complications compared to up front surgery before ileocolic resection in high-risk patients with Crohn’s disease: A single center retrospective study. Int J Surg Lond Engl 105:106815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jianjun W, **ng W, Guozhong Y, Chuming Z, Jiang Y (2019) Application of exercised-based pre-rehabilitation in perioperative period of patients with gastric cancer. Open Med Wars Pol 14:875–882. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dieli-Conwright CM, Courneya KS, Demark-Wahnefried W et al (2018) Aerobic and resistance exercise improves physical fitness, bone health, and quality of life in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res BCR 20(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1051-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sacomori C, Araya-Castro P, Diaz-Guerrero P, Ferrada IA, Martínez-Varas AC, Zomkowski K (2020) Pre-rehabilitation of the pelvic floor before radiation therapy for cervical cancer: a pilot study. Int Urogynecology J 31(11):2411–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04391-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant LF, Cooper DJ, Conroy JL (2017) The HAPI “hip arthroscopy pre-habilitation intervention” study: does pre-habilitation affect outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoro-acetabular im**ement? J Hip Preserv Surg 4(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnw046

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen BT, Laustsen S, Jensen JB, Borre M, Petersen AK (2016) Exercise-based pre-habilitation is feasible and effective in radical cystectomy pathways-secondary results from a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 24(8):3325–3331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3140-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillis C, Carli F (2015) Promoting perioperative metabolic and nutritional care. Anesthesiology 123(6):1455–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soeters PB, Grimble RF (2009) Dangers, and benefits of the cytokine mediated response to injury and infection. Clin Nutr 28(6):583–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. English KL, Paddon-Jones D (2010) Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 13(1):34–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e328333aa66

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson RJ, Davies S, Yates D et al (2010) Impaired functional capacity is associated with all-cause mortality after major elective intra-abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 105(3):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152(3):292–298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nygren J, Soop M, Thorell A et al (2009) An enhanced-recovery protocol improves outcome after colorectal resection already during the first year: a single-center experience in 168 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 52(5):978–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henriksen MG, Hessov I, Dela F et al (2003) Effects of preoperative oral carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative endocrine response, mobilization, nutrition and muscle function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47(2):191–9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00047.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Basse L, Raskov HH, HjortJakobsen D et al (2002) Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 89(4):446–53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02044.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suk H, Kwon OK, Yu W (2015) Preoperative quality of life in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 15(2):121–126. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.2.121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultan J, Griffin SM, Di Franco F et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of omega-3 fatty acid-supplemented enteral nutrition versus standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 99(3):346–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guzmán Y, Ríos J, Paredes J et al (2023) Time interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and elective resection of locally advanced rectal cancer in the CRONOS study. JAMA Surg e232521. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2521

  27. Ludford K, Ho WJ, Thomas JV et al (2023) Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in localized microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair solid tumors. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 41(12):2181–2190. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Foxtrot Collaborative Group (2012) Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13(11):1152–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70348-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Clifford K, Woodfield JC, Tait W, Campbell HA, Baldi JC (2023) Association of preoperative high-intensity interval training with cardiorespiratory fitness and postoperative outcomes among adults undergoing major surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 6(6):e2320527. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Albergoni M, Storelli L, Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Filippi M (2023) The insula modulates the effects of aerobic training on cardiovascular function and ambulation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 270(3):1672–1681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11513-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee K, Jung JH, Kwon W et al (2023) The prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and HFA-PEFF in patients with unexplained dyspnea and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Int J Cardiol 386:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McSorley ST, Roxburgh CSD, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2018) The relationship between cardiopulmonary exercise test variables, the systemic inflammatory response, and complications following surgery for colorectal cancer. Perioper Med Lond Engl 7:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0093-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by **g-Qiong Huang, Ying **ao and Rong Wang. Ling Gu, Lin-Tong Zhang, Dan Gu and **ang-Sheng Li prepared the Tables 15. Cong Xu prepared the Fig. 1. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Cong XU and Guang-Sheng DU. Wei-Dong **ao was the leader of this team. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cong Xu, Guang-Sheng Du or Wei-Dong **ao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was supported by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Military Medical University (2020–149-01) and performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**g-Qiong Huang, Ying **ao, and Rong Wang contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, JQ., **ao, Y., Wang, R. et al. Retrospective analysis of preoperative application of triple-modal pre-rehabilitation on postoperative recovery of colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 32, 217 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08423-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08423-4

Keywords

Navigation