Log in

Early discharge after enhanced recovery rectal resection does not increase emergency department visits and readmissions: a single institution analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4–7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1–2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1–3, POD-4–5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions.

Results

A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1–3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1–3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1–3 group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stapler SJ, Brockhaus KK, Battaglia MA, Mahoney ST, McClure AM, Cleary RK (2022) A single institution analysis of targeted colorectal surgery enhanced recovery pathway strategies that decrease readmissions. Dis Colon Rectum 65:e728–e740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Curfman KR, Poola AS, Blair GE, Kosnik CL, Pille SA, Thilo EK, Hawkins ME, Rashidi L (2022) Ambulatory colectomy: a pilot protocol for same day discharge in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. An J Surg 224:757–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Curfman KR, Blair GE, Pille SA, Kosmik CL, Rashidi L (2022) he patient perspective of same day discharge colectomy: one hundred patients surveyed on their experience following colon surgery. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09446-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee L, Eustache J, Baldini G, Liberman AS, Chrlebois P, Stein B, Fiore JF, Feldman LS (2022) Enhanced recovery 2.0 – Same day discharge with mobile app follow-up after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 276:812–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regenbogen SE, Franz MG, Hendren S, Krapohl G, Vandewarker JF, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:455–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhama AR, Obias V, Welch KB, Vandewarker JF, Cleary RK (2016) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 30:1576–1584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin TD, Lorenz T, Ferraro J, Chagin K, Lampman RM, Emery KL, Zurkan JE, Boyd JL, Montgomery K, Lang RE, Vandewarker JF, Cleary RK (2016) Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay. Surg Endosc 30:4019–4028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedrick TL, Thiele RH, Hassinger TE, Donovan J, Reines HD, Damico E, Fogel S, Jones JE, Posadas J, Jones RS, Turrentine FE (2019) Multicenter observational study examining the implementation of enhanced recovery within the Virginia Surgical Quality Collaborative in patients undergoing elective colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 229:374–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Milelr TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM (2023) Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 66:15–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seux H, Gignoux B, Blanchet MC, Frering V, Fara R, Malbec A, Darnis B, Camerlo A (2023) Ambulatory colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective bicentric study of 177 patients. J Surg Oncol 127:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Blanchet MC, Frering V, Faucheron JL, Chasserant P (2019) Short-term outcomes of ambulatory colectomy for 157 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 270:317–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Studniarek A, Borsuk DJ, Kochar K, Park JJ, Marecik SJ (2021) Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moon J, Pang A, Ghituescu G, Faria J, Morin N, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M (2022) Early discharge after colorectal cancer resection: trends and impact on patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 36:6617–6628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turrentine FE, McMurry TL, Adams RB, Jones RS, Zaydfudim VM (2022) Early patient discharge in selected patients is not associated with higher readmission after major abdominal operations. Ann Surg 276:e698–e705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grass F, Hübner M, Mathis KL, Hahnloser D, Dozois EJ, Kelley SR, Demartines N, Larson DW (2020) Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 hours of colorectal resection. Br J Surg 107:546–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McLemore EC, Lee L, Hedrick TL, Rashidi L, Askenasy EP, Popowich D, Sylla P (2022) A review of enhanced recovery protocols and early outcomes by the SAGES Colorectal Surgical Committee with recommendations regarding patient selection, remote monitoring, and successful implementation. Surg Endosc 36:7898–7914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert K. Cleary.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Robert K Cleary reports personal fees from Intuitive Surgical, outside the submitted work. Maseray Kumar, Katherine Baur, Marianne Huebner, and Carole Ramm have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamara, M., Baur, K., Langmeyer, J. et al. Early discharge after enhanced recovery rectal resection does not increase emergency department visits and readmissions: a single institution analysis. Surg Endosc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9

Keywords

Navigation