Log in

Efficacy of intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation for preventing anastomotic leakage after left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis

  • Dynamic Manuscript
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intestinal perfusion at the anastomotic site is thought to be one of the most influential risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL). We evaluated the efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging at the stump of the proximal colon in left-sided colectomy or rectal resection in terms of decreasing the incidence of AL.

Methods

Prospectively collected data were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent left-sided colectomy or rectal resection were enrolled (ICG group; n = 197), and patients who had undergone a similar procedure before the ICG group were enrolled from the charts as historical controls (HC group; n = 187). After ICG evaluation, anastomosis was performed where fluorescence was sufficient. The incidence of AL was compared between the ICG and HC groups. Propensity score (PS)-matched data were analyzed to clarify the risk of AL.

Results

AL occurred in 6 patients (3.3%) in the ICG group and 17 (10.7%) in the HC group. ICG evaluation revealed 179 patients with good fluorescence and 18 with poor/none perfusion (9.1%). The transection line was changed in all patients with poor/none fluorescence. Three of these 18 patients developed AL (16.7%), though transection line was changed at which is thought to be good. We hope AL in poor/none fluorescence can be prevented at the same rate of cases with good fluorescence. Actually, the rate of that was significantly higher compared with good fluorescence patients (P = 0.038). 93 patients in each group were compared by PS-matched data analysis, which showed the AL rate in the ICG group was significantly lower than that in the HC group (3.2% vs 10.8%, respectively; P = 0.046).

Conclusions

Even though this study has limitations of comparison of data prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation could significantly decrease the incidence of AL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohigashi S, Taketa T, Shimada G, Kubota K, Sunagawa H, Kishida A (2018) Fruitful first experience with an 8K ultra-high-definition endoscope for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang J, Choi GS, Oh JH, Kim NK, Park JS, Kim MJ, Lee KY, Baik SH (2015) Multicenter analysis of long-term oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: the Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramphal W, Boeding JRE, Gobardhan PD, Rutten HJT, de Winter L, Crolla R, Schreinemakers JMJ (2018) Oncologic outcome and recurrence rate following anastomotic leakage after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 27:730–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ha GW, Kim JH, Lee MR (2017) Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3289–3299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim CW, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2016) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is different between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery. Ann Surg 263:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qin Q, Ma T, Deng Y, Zheng J, Zhou Z, Wang H, Wang L, Wang J (2016) Impact of preoperative radiotherapy on anastomotic leakage and stenosis after rectal cancer resection: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 59:934–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawada K, Sakai Y (2016) Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 22:5718–5727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC, Kim JC (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:902–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parthasarathy M, Greensmith M, Bowers D, Groot-Wassink T (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17 518 patients. Colorectal Dis 19:288–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V (2000) Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 43:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ, Mills SD, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3003–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A (2015) Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boni L, David G, Mangano A, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Spampatti S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A (2015) Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 29:2046–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Margolin DA, Sherwinter DA, Lee SW, Senagore AJ, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(82–92):e81

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tamura K, Hotta T, Yokoyama S, Matsuda K, Iwamoto H, Yamaue H (2018) Using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging to successfully resect metachronous regional lymph node recurrence of rectosigmoid cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 11:47–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Suwa Y, Suwa H, Ota M, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2020) Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 34:202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Villegas-Tovar E, Jimenez-Lillo J, Jimenez-Valerio V, Diaz-Giron-Gidi A, Faes-Petersen R, Otero-Pineiro A, De Lacy FB, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Lacy AM (2020) Performance of Indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node map** and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 34:1035–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Degett TH, Andersen HS, Gogenur I (2016) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for intraoperative assessment of gastrointestinal anastomotic perfusion: a systematic review of clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401:767–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boni L, Fingerhut A, Marzorati A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E (2017) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 31:1836–1840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of rectal cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ris F, Hompes R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I, Guy R, Jones O, George B, Cahill RA, Mortensen NJ (2014) Near-infrared (NIR) perfusion angiography in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 28:2221–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fengler J (2015) Near-infrared fluorescence laparoscopy–technical description of PINPOINT(R) a novel and commercially available system. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 3):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishigori N, Koyama F, Nakagawa T, Nakamura S, Ueda T, Inoue T, Kawasaki K, Obara S, Nakamoto T, Fujii H, Nakajima Y (2016) Visualization of lymph/blood flow in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery by ICG fluorescence imaging (Lap-IGFI). Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 2):S266-274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Wada T, Takahashi R, Hisamori S, Hida K, Sakai Y (2017) Evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 31:1061–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spinelli A, Cantore F, Kotze PG, David G, Sacchi M, Carvello M (2017) Fluorescence angiography during transanal trans-stomal proctectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, Welton M (2015) Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum 58:582–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim JC, Lee JL, Park SH (2017) Interpretative guidelines and possible indications for indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations. Dis Colon Rectum 60:376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shen R, Zhang Y, Wang T (2018) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography and the incidence of anastomotic leak after colorectal resection for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 61:1228–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanco-Colino R, Espin-Basany E (2018) Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 22:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang YK, Foo CC, Yip J, Wei R, Ng KK, Lo O, Choi HK, Law WL (2018) The impact of indocyanine-green fluorescence angiogram on colorectal resection. Surgeon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2018.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ris F, Liot E, Buchs NC, Kraus R, Ismael G, Belfontali V, Douissard J, Cunningham C, Lindsey I, Guy R, Jones O, George B, Morel P, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R, Cahill RA (2018) Multicentre phase II trial of near-infrared imaging in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 105:1359–1367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. van den Bos J, Jongen A, Melenhorst J, Breukink SO, Lenaerts K, Schols RM, Bouvy ND, Stassen LPS (2019) Near-infrared fluorescence image-guidance in anastomotic colorectal cancer surgery and its relation to serum markers of anastomotic leakage: a clinical pilot study. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06673-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wada T, Kawada K, Takahashi R, Yoshitomi M, Hida K, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y (2017) ICG fluorescence imaging for quantitative evaluation of colonic perfusion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 31:4184–4193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Son GM, Kwon MS, Kim Y, Kim J, Kim SH, Lee JW (2018) Quantitative analysis of colon perfusion pattern using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6439-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the surgical team in our hospital. We thank our colleagues who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. We would like to thank Ms. Nobuko Yamada, a secretary in our surgical department, who greatly assisted in the registration of this research, and appreciate voluntary help of Dr. Tamaki Layman and Dr. Ronald Layman.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayasu Hara.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Takeshi Yanagita, Masayasu Hara, Satoshi Osaga, Nozomu Nakai, Yuzo Maeda, Kazuyoshi Shiga, Takahisa Hirokawa, Yoichi Matsuo, Hiroki Takahashi, and Shuji Takiguchi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 295791 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yanagita, T., Hara, M., Osaga, S. et al. Efficacy of intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation for preventing anastomotic leakage after left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 35, 2373–2385 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08230-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08230-y

Keywords

Navigation