Log in

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and toxicities

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (CL-HCC).

Methods

Fifty-three patients with CL-HCC were treated with SBRT from 2011 to 2017 in our institution. CL-HCC was defined as a tumor sited in segments 4, 5, or 8 adjacent to the hepatic hilum, or < 1.5 cm from main portal branches. Primary endpoints were treatment response, local control (LC), and hepatobiliary toxicity (HBT).

Results

Thirty-three (62.3%) patients had Child–Turcotte–Pugh score A, 20 (37.77%)—score B. Albumin–bilirubin grade 1 constituted 6 (11.3%) cases, grade 2–32 (60.4%), grade 3–15 (28.3%). Median tumor diameter was 34 mm. Median BED10 was 72 Gy. Complete/partial response was observed in 40 (75.5%) lesions, stable disease—in 9 (17.0%). At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, there were 6 (11.3%) local failures. The actuarial 2-year LC rate was 87.9%. 2-year LC was better with higher BED10 (> 70 vs ≤ 70 Gy) 96.9 vs 72.5%, p = 0.01. The 2-year rates for disease-specific and overall survival were 53.2 and 39.1%, respectively. The incidence of any Grade ≥ 3 AE was 9 (17.0%). There were no grade 5 AEs. There was a trend toward an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 AE with mean liver dose > 10 Gy (p = 0.07).

Conclusions

In the present cohort, SBRT to the CL-HCC produced excellent treatment response with acceptable HBT and LC. Select HCC patients who are not candidates for surgery or other locoregional therapies can be considered for SBRT to the central liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andolino DL, Johnson CS, Maluccio M et al (2011) Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:e447–e453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujold A, Massey CA, Kim JJ et al (2013) Sequential phase I and II trials of stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 31:1631–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenes HR, Price TR, Perkins SM et al (2010) Phase I feasibility trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 12:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriguchi T, Takeda A, Sanuki N et al (2013) Acceptable toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumors adjacent to the central biliary system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:1006–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gkika E, Schultheiss M, Bettinger D et al (2017) Excellent local control and tolerance profile after stereotactic body radiotherapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 12:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huertas A, Baumann AS, Saunier-Kubs F et al (2015) Stereotactic body radiation therapy as an ablative treatment for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 115:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang WI, Kim MS, Bae SH et al (2013) High-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy correlates increased local control and overall survival in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 8:250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon JH, Bae SH, Kim JY et al (2010) Long-term effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for local ablation therapy or surgical resection. Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver cancer. BMC Cancer 10:475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez Romero A, Wunderink W, Hussain SM et al (2006) Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors: a single institution phase I-II study. Acta Oncol 45:831–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmundson EC, Wu Y, Luxton G et al (2015) Predictors of toxicity associated with stereotactic body radiation therapy to the central hepatobiliary tract. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda A, Sanuki N, Tsurugai Y et al (2016) Phase 2 study of stereotactic body radiotherapy and optional transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to resection and radiofrequency ablation. Cancer 122(13):2041–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toesca DA, Osmundson EC, Eyben RV et al (2017) Central liver toxicity after SBRT: an expanded analysis and predictive nomogram. Radiother Oncol 122:130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse RV, Hawkins M, Lockwood G et al (2008) Phase I study of individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 26:657–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl DR, Stenmark MH, Tao Y et al (2016) Outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 34:452–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner AA, Olsen J, Ma D et al (2016) Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary hepatic malignancies—report of a phase I/II institutional study. Radiother Oncol 121:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita H, Onishi H, Murakami N et al (2015) Survival outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy for 79 Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Radiat Res 56:561–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Buckstein.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of the study have no commercial interests, and no actual, or potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 102 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazarev, S., Hardy-Abeloos, C., Factor, O. et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and toxicities. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144, 2077–2083 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2729-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2729-y

Keywords

Navigation