Abstract
Purpose
Job stress has proven to be a relevant cause of stress for adults, but its effect on the development of metabolic alterations in individuals with obesity is still poorly explored. We aimed to investigate the association between job stress and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) phenotype in participants with obesity at the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) baseline assessment.
Methods
This study analyzed data collected at the baseline examination between 2008 and 2010. A total of 2371 individuals with obesity were included. Two metabolic phenotypes were characterized based on the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey criteria. The job stress scale was based on the Brazilian version of the Swedish Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire. The association between job stress domains and MUO phenotype was assessed by binary logistic models.
Results
In our sample, 1297 (54.7%) participants were women, mean age was 49.6 ± 7.1 years and 1696 (71.5%) had MUO. Low skill discretion was associated with MUO after adjustment for age, sex and race. However, in fully-adjusted models, the MUO phenotype was not associated with high job demand (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.82–1.35), low skill discretion (OR = 1.26; 95%CI 0.95–1.68), low decision authority (OR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.70–1.25) nor low social support (OR = 0.93; 95%CI 0.71–1.20).
Conclusion
We found a significant association between low skill discretion and an adverse metabolic profile in models adjusted for age, sex and race. No associations were significant between job stress domains and the metabolic profile of individuals with obesity in full models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahima RS, Lazar MA (2013) The health risk of obesity—better metrics imperative. Science 341(6148):856–858. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241244
Alves MGM, Chor D, Faerstein E, Lopes CS, Werneck GL (2004) Short version of the “job stress scale”: a Portuguese-language adaptation. Rev Saude Publica 38(2):164–171. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000200003
Aquino EML, Barreto SM, Bensenor IM et al (2012) Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil): objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 175(4):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr294
Brunner EJ, Chandola T, Marmot MG (2007) Prospective effect of job strain on general and central obesity in the Whitehall II Study. Am J Epidemiol 165(7):828–837. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk058
Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M (2006) Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ 332(7540):521–525. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38693.435301.80
Cho YK, Kang YM, Yoo JH et al (2019) Implications of the dynamic nature of metabolic health status and obesity on risk of incident cardiovascular events and mortality: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Metabolism 97:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2019.05.002
Chor D, de Mello Alves MG, Giatti L et al (2013) Questionnaire development in ELSA-Brasil: challenges of a multidimensional instrument. Rev Saude Publica 47(suppl 2):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003835
Chungkham HS, Ingre M, Karasek R, Westerlund H, Theorell T (2013) Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of the demand control support model: an evidence from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH). PLoS ONE 8(8):e70541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070541
De Bacquer D, Van Risseghem M, Clays E, Kittel F, De Backer G, Braeckman L (2009) Rotating shift work and the metabolic syndrome: a prospective study. Int J Epidemiol 38(3):848–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn360
Diniz MFHS, Beleigoli AMR, Ribeiro ALP et al (2016) Factors associated with metabolically healthy status in obesity, overweight, and normal weight at baseline of ELSA-Brasil. Medicine 95(27):e4010. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004010
Edwards EM, Stuver SO, Heeren TC, Fredman L (2012) Job strain and incident metabolic syndrome over 5 years of follow-up: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. J Occup Environ Med 54(12):1447–1452. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182783f27
Fandiño-Losada A, Forsell Y, Lundberg I (2013) Demands, skill discretion, decision authority and social climate at work as determinants of major depression in a 3-year follow-up study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86:591–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0791-3
Fedeli LG, Vidigal PG, Leite CM et al (2013) Logistics of collection and transportation of biological samples and the organization of the central laboratory in the ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 47(suppl 2):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003807
Garbarino S, Magnavita N (2015) Work stress and metabolic syndrome in police officers: a prospective study. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0144318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144318
Gimeno D, Tabák AG, Ferrie JE et al (2010) Justice at work and metabolic syndrome: the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 67(4):256–262. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.047324
Griep RH, Rotenberg L, Vasconcellos AGG, Landsbergis P, Comaru CM, Alves MGM (2009) The psychometric properties of demand-control and effort–reward imbalance scales among Brazilian nurses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(10):1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0460-3
Heikkilä K, Fransson EI, Nyberg ST et al (2013) Job strain and health-related lifestyle: findings from an individual participant meta-analysis of 118,000 working adults. Am J Public Health 103:2090–2097. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301090
Ishizaki M, Nakagawa H, Morikawa Y et al (2008) Influence of job strain on changes in body mass index and waist circumference–6-year longitudinal study. Scand J Work Environ Health 34(4):288–296. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1267
Karasek RA Jr (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24(2):285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
Kelly SJ, Ismail M (2015) Stress and type 2 diabetes: a review of how stress contributes to the development of type 2 diabetes. Annu Rev Public Health 36(1):441–462. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122921
Kivimäki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD et al (2012) Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 380(9852):1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60994-5
Kyrou I, Tsigos C (2009) Stress hormones: physiological stress and regulation of metabolism. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9(6):787–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPH.2009.08.007
Liu M-Y, Li N, Li WA, Khan H (2017) Association between psychosocial stress and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Res 39(6):573–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2017.1317904
Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and b-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28(7):412–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280883
Mill JG, Pinto K, Griep RH et al (2013) Medical assessments and measurements in ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 47(suppl 2):54–62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003851
Rey-López JP, de Rezende LF, Pastor-Valero M, Tess BH (2014) The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used. Obes Ver 15(10):781–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12198
Santos IS, Griep RH, Alves MGM et al (2014) Job stress is associated with migraine in current workers: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Eur J Pain 18(9):1290–1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.489.x
Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Mill JG et al (2015) Cohort profile: longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil). Int J Epidemiol 44(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu027
Siegrist J, Li J (2017) Work stress and altered biomarkers: a synthesis of findings based on the effort–reward imbalance model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(11):1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111373
Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E et al (2018) Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392:1923–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6
Theorell T, De Manzano Ö, Lennartsson AK, Pedersen NL, Ullén F (2016) Self-reported psychological demands, skill discretion and decision authority at work: a twin study. Scand J Public Health 44:354–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494815626610
Ushakov AV, Ivanchenko VS, A. Gagarina AA, (2017) Psychological stress in pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rev 12(3):203–214. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573402112666161230121622
Watanabe K, Sakuraya A, Kawakami N et al (2018) Work-related psychosocial factors and metabolic syndrome onset among workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 19(11):1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12725
World Health Organization (2013) Controlling the global obesity epidemic. https://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/obesity/en/. Accessed 21 Aug 2020
World Health Organization (2019) Overweight and obesity. https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/overweight_text/en/. Accessed 21 Aug 2020
Funding
The ELSA-Brasil baseline study was supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Science and Technology Department) and the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos and CNPq National Research Council) (Grants 01 06 0010.00 RS, 01 06 0212.00 BA, 01 06 0300.00 ES, 01 06 0278.00 MG, 01 06 0115.00 SP, 01 06 0071.00 RJ). The funding sources had no role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. LI received a scholarship grant from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Grant number 2016/24183-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LI: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing original draft. BHT: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing original draft. RHG: conceptualization, investigation, writing (review and editing), supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. MJMF: conceptualization, investigation, writing (review and editing), supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. ACP: methodology, investigation, writing (review and editing). MFSD: conceptualization, investigation, writing (review and editing). PAL: conceptualization, investigation, writing (review and editing), supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. IMB: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing (review and editing), supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. ISS: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing original draft writing (review and editing), supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Boards from all six centers approved the study.
Consent to participate
All participants provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
All authors agreed with publication.
Availability of data and material (data transparency)
Because of the sensitive nature of the data collected for this study, requests to access the data set from qualified researchers trained in human subject confidentiality protocols may be sent to the corresponding author.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imbiriba, L., Tess, B.H., Griep, R.H. et al. Metabolic status is not associated with job stress in individuals with obesity: the ELSA-Brasil baseline. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 94, 639–646 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01613-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01613-7