Log in

Molecular differences between arterial and venous grafts in the first year after coronary artery bypass grafting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Histochemistry and Cell Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite commonly used for coronary artery bypass surgery, saphenous vein (SV) grafts have significantly lower patency rates in comparison to internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts, which might be due to the structural characteristics of the vessel wall but also due to differences in oxidative stress adaptation and molecular signaling and regulation. This human post mortem study included a total of 150 human bypass grafts (75 SV grafts and 75 ITA grafts) obtained from 60 patients divided into five groups due to the time period of implantation: group 1: baseline group without grafting; group 2: 1 day; group 3: > 1 day–1 week; group 4: > 1 week–1 month; group 5: > 1 month–1 year. Pieces of 3 mm length were fixed with formaldehyde, dehydrated, wax embedded, cut into sections of 3 µm thickness, and histologically and immunohistochemically examined. Over the whole time period, we observed a lower neointima formation and a better preserved media in ITA grafts with a higher percentage of TNF-α, PDGFR-α, and VEGF-A in nearly all vessel wall layers, a higher amount of MMP-7, MMP-9, EGFR, and bFGF positive cells in SV grafts and a timely different peak not only between ITA and SV grafts but also within the various vessel wall layers of both graft types. Since most of the examined growth factors, growth factor receptors and cytokines are regulated by MAPKs, our results suggest an activation of different pathways in both vessel graft types immediately after bypass grafting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiguzel E, Ahmad PJ, Franco C, Bendeck MP (2009) Collagens in the progression and complications of atherosclerosis. Vasc Med 14:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelini GD, Soyombo AA, Newby AC (1991) Smooth muscle cell proliferation in response to injury in an organ culture of human saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Surg 5:5–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borović ML, Borović S, Marinković-Erić J, Todorović V, Puškaš N, Kočica M, Radak Đ, Lačković V (2013) A comprehensive morphometric analysis of the internal thoracic artery with emphasis on, gender and left-to-right specific differences. Histol Histopathol 28:1299–1314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa MG (1994) Long-term vein graft patency. Curr Opin Cardiol 9:685–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries MR, Quax PHA (2018) Inflammation in vein graft disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 5:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari G, Pintucci G, Seghezzi G (2006) VEGF, a prosurvival factor, acts in concert with TGF-beta1 to induce endothelial cell apoptosis. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A 103:17260–17265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foglieni C, Maisano F, Dreas L, Giazzon A, Ruotolo G, Ferrero E, Li Volsi L, Coli S, Sinagra G, Zingone B, Alfieri O, Becker AE, Maseri A (2008) Mild inflammatory activation of mammary arteries in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294:2831–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frings W, Dreier J, Sorg C (2002) Only the soluble form of scavenger receptor CD163 acts inhibitory on phorbol ester-activated T-lymphocytes, whereas membrane bound protein has no effect. FEBS Lett 526:93–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, Akahori H, Harari E, Smith SL, Polavarapu R, Karmali V, Otsuka F, Gannon RL, Braumann RE, Dickinson MH, Gupta A, Jenkins AL, Lipinski MJ, Kim J, Chhour P, de Vries PS, **nouchi H, Kutys R, Mori H, Kutyna MD, Torii S, Sakamoto A, Choi CU, Cheng Q, Grove ML, Sawan MA, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Kolodgie FD, Cormode DP, Arking DE, Boerwinkle E, Morrison AC, Erdmann J, Sotoodehnia N, Virmani R, Finn AV (2018) CD163+ macrophages promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability accompanied by inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest 128:1106–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Rajfur Z, Borchers C, Schaller MD, Jacobson K (2003) JNK phosphorylates paxillin and regulates cell migration. Nature 424:219–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Shukla A, Miller BL, Espino DR, Tao M, Berceli SA, Ozaki CK (2007) Tumor necrosis factor-α and the early vein graft. J Vasc Surg 45:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura S, Egashira K, Nakano K, Iwata E, Miyagawa M, Tsujimoto H, Hara K, Kawashima Y, Tominaga R, Sunagawa K (2008) Local delivery of imatinib mesylate (STI571)-incorporated nanoparticle ex vivo suppresses vein graft neointima formation. Circulation 118(14 Suppl):S65–S70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo FA, Muto A, Maloney SP, Pimiento JM, Bergaya S, Fitzgerald TN, Westvik TS, Frattini JC, Breuer CK, Cha CH, Toshiya N, Tellides G, Sessa WC, Dardik A (2007) Venous identity is lost but arterial identity is not gained during vein graft adaptation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:1562–1571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta D, Izzat MB, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD (1997) Towards the prevention of vein graft failure. Int J Cardiol 62(Suppl 1):S55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra AK, Gangahar DM, Agrawal DK (2006) Cellular, molecular and immunological mechanisms in the pathophysiology of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. Immunol Cell Biol 84:115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motwani JG, Topol EJ (1998) Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 97:916–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muto A, Model L, Ziegler K, Eghbalieh SDD, Dardik A (2010) Mechanisms of vein graft adaption to the arterial circulation: insights into the neointimal algorithm and management strategies. Circ J 74:1501–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, Virmani R (2013) Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:519–526

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Owens CD (2010) Adaptive changes in autogenous vein grafts for arterial reconstruction: clinical implications. J Vasc Surg 51:736–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padua D, Massague J (2009) Roles of TGF beta in metastasis. Cell Res 19:89–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pioli PA, Goonan KE, Wardwell K, Guyre PM (2004) TGF-B regulation of human macrophage scavenger receptor CD163 is Smad3-dependent. J Leukoc Biol 76:500–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjzad P, Salem HK, Kingston PA (2009) Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of fibromodulin inhibits neointimal hyperplasia in an organ culture model of human saphenous vein graft disease. Gene Ther 16:1154–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rekhter MD (1999) Collagen synthesis in atherosclerosis: too much and not enough. Cardiovasc Res 41:376–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner T (2006) Pharmacologic inhibition of vein graft neointimal hyperplasia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:1065–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharony R, Pintucci G, Saunders PC, Grossi EA, Baumann FG, Galloway AC, Mignatti P (2006) Matrix metalloproteinase expression in vein grafts: role of inflammatory mediators and extracellular signal-regulated kinases-1 and -2. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H1651–1659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu A, Philips K, Vyavahare N (2005) Elastin-derived peptides and TGF-beta1 induce osteogenic responses in smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 334:524–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wadey K, Lopes J, Bendeck M, George S (2018) Role of smooth muscle cells in coronary artery bypass grafting failure. Cardiovasc Res 114:601–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff RA, Malinowski RL, Heaton NS, Hullett DA, Hoch JR (2006) Transforming growth factor-beta1 antisense treatment of rat vein grafts reduces the accumulation of collagen and increases the accumulation of h-caldesmon. J Vasc Surg 43:1028–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita A, Hanna AK, Hirata S, Dardik A, Sumpio BE (2003) Antisense basic fibroblast growth factor alters the time course of mitogen-activated protein kinase in arterialized vein graft remodeling. J Vasc Surg 37:866–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Maria Steger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All performed procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from next of kin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steger, C.M., Hartmann, A. & Rieker, R.J. Molecular differences between arterial and venous grafts in the first year after coronary artery bypass grafting. Histochem Cell Biol 154, 405–419 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-020-01896-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-020-01896-4

Keywords

Navigation