Log in

The effect of flexion balance on functional outcomes in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the relations between flexion balances and functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Sixty-one knees that underwent a TKA were included in this study. Clinical assessments were performed and flexion balances of the knee were assessed on varus and valgus stress radiographs at 90° of knee flexion. Total laxity was defined as the sum of medial and lateral laxities. Knees were divided into balanced (≤3°, n = 51) and unbalanced (>3°, n = 10) groups based on the only difference of mediolateral laxity regardless of total laxity. And the balanced group was divided into Grade I (<6°), Grade II (≥6° but ≤10°) or Grade III (>10°) groups based on the amount of total laxity.

Results

Although no statistically significant differences were observed between the balanced and unbalanced groups in terms of range of motion (ROM) and KS pain scores, the balanced group achieved better results in terms of KS function and WOMAC scores than the unbalanced group. Total laxity was significantly less in the balanced group. In addition, Grade II knees in the balanced group had significantly better KS pain and function scores, and WOMAC scores than Grade Ior Grade III knees.

Conclusions

These results suggest that total knees with good balanced flexion stability can provide good functional outcomes after TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Unitt L, Sambatakakis A, Johnstone D, Briggs TW, Balancer Study Group (2008) Short-term outcome in total knee replacement after soft-tissue release and balancing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters CL, Jimenez C, Erickson J, Anderson MB, Pelt CE (2013) Lessons learned from selective soft-tissue release for gap balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 1216 consecutive total knee arthroplasties: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e152

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seon JK, Park SJ, Yoon TR, Lee KB, Moon ES, Song EK (2010) The effect of anteroposterior laxity on the range of movement and knee function following a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1090–1095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Song IS, Sun DH, Chon JG, Jang SW, Sun DH (2014) Results of revision surgery and causes of unstable total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 6:165–172

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Besson A, Brazier J, Chantelot C, Miqaud H, Gouqeon F, Duquennoy A (1999) Laxity and functional results of Miller-Galante total knee prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament sparing after a 6-year follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 85:797–802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehring TK, Valadie AL (1994) Knee instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:157–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krackow KA (2003) Instability in total knee arthroplasty: loose as a goose. J Arthroplasty 18:45–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeda M, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Sato J (2012) Changes in varus–valgus laxity after total knee arthroplasty over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1988–1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weale AE, Feikes J, Prothero D, O’Connor JJ, Murray D, Goodfellow J (2002) In vitro evaluation of the resistance to dislocation of a meniscal-bearing total knee prosthesis between 30° and 90° of knee flexion. J Arthroplasty 17:475–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuda Y, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R (2005) Varus-valgus balance and range of movement after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:804–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:754–765

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanekasu K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y (2005) Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stähelin T, Kessler O, Pfirrmann C, Jacob HA, Romero J (2003) Fluoroscopically assisted stress radiography for varus-valgus stability assessment in flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:513–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuster MS, Bitschnau B, Votruba T (2004) Influence of collateral ligament laxity on patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative bilateral study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:415–417

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamakado K, Kitaoka K, Yamada H, Hashiba K, Nakamura R, Tomita K (2003) Influence of stability on range of motion after cruciate-retaining TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitts K, Muldoon MP, Gladden M Jr, Padgett DE (2001) Instability after total knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Gallante II total knee: 5- to 7-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 16:422–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards E, Miller J, Chan KH (1988) The effect of postoperative collateral ligament laxity in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:44–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant of the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2014R1A1A2059147).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Keun Seon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, CS., Song, E.K., Seon, J.K. et al. The effect of flexion balance on functional outcomes in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 401–406 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2159-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2159-0

Keywords

Navigation