Abstract
Atmospheric rivers (ARs) reach High Mountain Asia (HMA) about 10 days per month during the winter and spring, resulting in about 20 mm day\(^{-1}\) of precipitation. However, a few events may exceed 100 mm day\(^{-1}\), providing most of the total winter precipitation and increasing the risk of precipitation-triggered landslides and flooding, particularly when the height of the height of the 0 \(^{\circ }\)C isotherm, or freezing level is above-average. This study shows that from 1979 to 2015, integrated water vapor transport (IVT) during ARs that reach Western HMA has increased 16% while the freezing level has increased up to 35 m. HMA ARs that have an above-average freezing level result in 10–40% less frozen precipitation compared to ARs with a below-average freezing level. To evaluate the importance of these trends in the characteristics of ARs, we investigate mesoscale processes leading to orographic precipitation using Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW-WRF) simulations at 6.7 km spatial resolution. We contrast two above- and below- average freezing level AR events with otherwise broadly similar characteristics and show that with a 50–600 m increase in freezing level, the above-average AR resulted in 10–70% less frozen precipitation than the below-average event. This study contributes to a better understanding of climate change-related impacts within HMA’s hydrological cycle and the associated hazards to vulnerable communities living in the region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In High Mountain Asia (HMA), cool-season precipitation and the resulting spring and summer glacial melt provides water resources for hundreds of millions of people, but also presents risks for many extreme weather conditions (Kääb et al. 2012; Hewitt 2005). Recent work has shown that atmospheric rivers (ARs), long conduits of strong moisture transport, are significant contributors to winter and spring precipitation in HMA (Nash et al. 2021). ARs occur in a variety of locations across the globe and are associated with extreme precipitation, flooding, lightning, landslides and anomalous snow accumulation (Cannon et al. 2018; Nash and Carvalho 2020; Oakley et al. 2018; Zhu and Newell 1994, among others). In HMA, ARs contribute to extreme precipitation and are associated with flood events in the Nepal and Bay of Bengal areas (Thapa et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2017). Nash et al. (2021) found and characterized three distinct types of ARs producing above-average precipitation in northwestern, western, and eastern HMA. Moreover, they determined that there are typically between 9 and 11 HMA ARs per month in the winter and spring, contributing between 40 and 60% of total seasonal precipitation. However, on some occasions, a single strong AR event can provide up to a quarter of that precipitation, with precipitation totals exceeding 100 mm day\(^{-1}\) increasing rainfall-related risks, such as landslides and flooding.
Many studies have investigated long-term climate trends over HMA. In western HMA, Norris et al. (2019) identified positive trends of cloud ice and liquid cloud, indicating the higher frequency of extratropical cyclones in recent years. Nash et al. (2021) demonstrated that of the three types of HMA ARs, Northwestern and Western HMA ARs are primarily associated with extratropical cyclones, where the warm, moist air from the AR is advected in the area ahead of the cold front. Given this information, it is likely there have been changes in the frequency or intensity of HMA ARs, although this has yet to be quantified. Furthermore, Wang et al. (2014) observed upward trends in the height of the 0 \(^{\circ }\)C isotherm (hereafter, the freezing level) during summer in HMA. Changes in winter freezing levels have yet to be quantified in HMA, but increases in the freezing level are likely to result in decreased frozen precipitation, particularly during ARs. Previous studies have observed the increase of the freezing level during an AR, as extratropical cyclones associated with an AR are typically warmer than those without (Lundquist et al. 2008; Neiman et al. 2008, 2011). Above-average freezing levels during ARs can increase the likelihood of precipitation-related hazards because the fraction of rain to snow at higher elevations results in increased runoff and snow melt (Guan et al. 2016).
Espinoza et al. (2018) demonstrated that under the RCP 8.5 warming scenario, the frequency of HMA ARs is expected to increase by 6–8% while the intensity of integrated water vapor transport (IVT) is expected to remain the same between 2073 and 2096. Kirschbaum et al. (2020) showed that increases in extreme precipitation in HMA has the potential to increase landslides by 10–70% more in the years 2061–2100. Increases in ARs and their intensity could potentially increase precipitation and precipitation-related hazards; therefore, it is important to understand recent changes in AR properties to determine their influence on local warming and precipitation trends.
This study highlights the importance of long-term trends in the freezing level associated with HMA ARs by contrasting two events that both resulted in extreme precipitation across western HMA. These two events featured greatly differing freezing level heights and thus outcomes regarding precipitation-related hazards. Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW-WRF, hereafter WRF) simulations at 6.7 km resolution are used to differentiate between the mesoscale characteristics of these two events. The finer spatial resolution of this model largely overcomes the typical limitations of scarce observational data and coarse reanalysis resolution (> 27 km) amidst the complex topography of HMA. Focus is placed on mesoscale characteristics that are important to extreme precipitation, such as water vapor flux, the orientation of the AR relative to topography, the height of the freezing level, and the orographic mechanisms related to precipitation in the foothills of HMA.
The organization of this paper is as follows: Sects. 2 and 3 describes the data used for this analysis and outlines WRF model set up. Section 4.1 describes thermodynamic trends during HMA AR events using 36 years of dynamically downscaled reanalyses over HMA. We evaluate changes in the freezing level and moisture, focusing on areas where HMA ARs typically result in above-average precipitation during the winter. Sections 4.2 and 4.3 outlines the selection of two extreme AR events that had similar overall characteristics but had different freezing levels and precipitation amounts. Section 4.4 compares the synoptic patterns of both events. Using the WRF model, Sect. 4.5 examines the mesoscale meteorology of two ARs associated with extreme precipitation, emphasizing the differences between an AR event with an above- and below-average freezing level. We summarize our results in Sect. 5.
2 Data
2.1 AR detection: tARget v3
To detect ARs, we use the Tracking Atmospheric Rivers Globally as Elongated Targets (tARget) algorithm version 3 which was applied to global, 6-hourly ERA-Interim data from 1979 to 2015 (Guan and Waliser 2019). This AR detection algorithm is useful for the HMA region as it detects ARs via relative IVT intensity thresholds, which is particularly useful during the winter in HMA, as there is, on average, little to no moisture (Nash et al. 2021). Nash et al. (2021) identified three main types of ARs that reach HMA in winter and spring months using tARget v3. We use the resulting classification of HMA AR types in this study to focus on Northwestern and Western HMA AR Types that resulted in extreme precipitation.
2.2 WRF setup
This study uses 36 years of Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) (Saha et al. 11a). Results are similar for 34.09\(^{\circ }\)N and 74.02\(^{\circ }\)E, except the moisture flux for the February 2010 AR extended almost all the way to 400 hPa, peaking at 0.8 m s\(^{-1}\) between 750 and 600 hPa (Fig. 11b). Possible explanations for the deeper profiles of water vapor flux during the 2010 event include a stronger AR, a longer-duration AR (possibly allowing more time for moist parcels to rise), and a warmer air mass requiring more moisture to reach saturation. However, future work is needed to more fully quantify the relationships between AR / IVT intensity, duration, temperature, and the vertical profile of water vapor flux at inland locations.
a Climatological vertical profile of horizontal water vapor flux (m s\(^{-1}\)) based on WRF at 34.87\(^{\circ }\)N, 72.66\(^{\circ }\)E for all days when AR conditions are met during the months of December, January, or February between 1979 and 2015 at this location (blue line and box-and-whisker plots show the distribution of the 284 events), and vertical profile of horizontal water vapor flux (m s\(^{-1}\)) based on WRF at the same location on 5 January 1989 12:00 UTC (red solid line) and 8 February 2010 06:00 UTC (red dashed line). The box extends from lower to upper quartiles of the data, with a black line at the mean. The whiskers show the range of the data from the 5th percentile to the 95th percentile, and outliers are shown as points past the end of the whiskers. b Same as (a) but for 34.09\(^{\circ }\)N and 74.02\(^{\circ }\)E. The locations of both points are identified by the black triangles in Figs. 1b, 6e–h, 9e,f, and 10e,f
5 Conclusions
This study shows that between 1979 and 2015, southerly IVT has significantly increased in western India and Pakistan during Western HMA ARs, indicating that in recent decades, there has been an increase in the intensity of Western HMA ARs. Additionally, the height of the freezing level has significantly increased across southern Asia during HMA ARs. One consequence of these findings is that there is significantly less frozen precipitation during HMA ARs with an above-average freezing level compared to those with a below-average freezing level. Should future trends continue as currently observed, western HMA will see an increase in the intensity of ARs with an above-average freezing level. With more liquid precipitation during these events, there is a higher likelihood of risk for associated natural hazards such as landslides and floods.
To further highlight the importance of the freezing level on resulting precipitation in western HMA, this study focused on two impactful western HMA ARs: one that occurred during below-average freezing level conditions and one that occurred during above-average freezing level conditions. Both ARs transitioned from Northwestern to Western HMA ARs, were quasi-stationary over this area, featured greater than the 85th percentile of IVT for Western HMA ARs, and resulted in greater than the 85th percentile of precipitation for these storm types, largely due to a long duration of orographically lifted moisture within the AR plume. We used dynamically downscaled CFSR at 6.7 km spatial resolution to compare their mesoscale characteristics to determine the influence of the freezing level on orographic precipitation.
The below-average freezing level AR occurred in January 1989, lasted for just under 4 days, and resulted in about 175 mm of precipitation across western HMA. The above-average freezing level AR occurred in February 2010, lasted for about 5 days, resulted in about 200–450 mm of precipitation, and was related to six separate landslide events in western HMA. Although freezing levels were only 50–600 m higher during the 2010 AR, this event resulted in 10–70% less frozen precipitation than the 1989 AR (Fig. 6). This is an extreme difference between two disparate events, but even in aggregate from 1979 to 2015, there was a 10–40% reduction in frozen precipitation during above-average freezing level ARs (Fig. 4).
This study illustrates the importance of mesoscale conditions in modulating the interaction of ARs, topography, freezing level, and precipitation-triggered landslides. During the 2010 AR, a deep moist layer was orographically lifted directly perpendicular to the topography near the foothills of HMA, resulting in a combination of rain and snow of about 150 mm day\(^{-1}\). This triggered multiple landslides across western HMA near and upstream of where the freezing level intersected with the topography, in the transition zone from rain to snow. Future studies seeking to improve the predictive skill of these destructive events will therefore need to consider both the synoptic and mesoscale environments in which they occur.
While freezing level likely plays a large role in determining the likelihood of landslides, other factors are also important. Naturally, storm intensity and total precipitation (liquid or frozen) plays a role. Moderate, long-duration precipitation interspersed with short-duration high intensity precipitation increases the likelihood of precipitation-triggered shallow landslides (Cordeira et al. 2019; Kirschbaum et al. 2020; Oakley et al. 2018). Other factors that may need to be considered are antecedent soil moisture conditions, and the possibility of rain-on-snow events, which have been shown to increase the risk for floods and landslides when they occur (e.g., Guan et al. 2016).
In summary, this work conclusively shows that from 1979–2015 across HMA, the freezing level has increased (1–4%), the intensity of Western HMA ARs has increased (2–16% increase in IVT), and that when the freezing level is above-average, there is significantly less frozen precipitation. Furthermore, the examples of below- and above-average freezing level ARs presented here demonstrate the importance of mesoscale processes in orographic precipitation and highlight the varying outcomes that can result across HMA from relatively small differences in freezing level height.
Availability of data and material
The AR data were provided by Bin Guan via https://dataverse.ucla.edu/dataverse/ar. Development of the AR detection algorithm and databases was supported by NASA. ERA5 data on single levels (Hersbach et al. 2018b, https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47) and pressure levels (Hersbach et al. 2018a, https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6) were downloaded from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store. The results contain modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2020. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains. The Global Landslide Catalog from (Kirschbaum et al. 2010, 2015) can be found at https://data.nasa.gov/Earth-Science/Global-Landslide-Catalog-Export/dd9e-wu2v. Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) (Saha et al. 2010, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds093.0/) were dynamically downscaled using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW-WRF) modeling system version 3.7.1 (Skamarock et al. 2008, https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download/get_source.html).
Code availability
The code for this analysis can be found at https://github.com/dlnash/HMA_AR_freezing_level.
References
Cannon F, Hecht CW, Cordeira JM, Ralph FM (2018) Synoptic and mesoscale forcing of Southern California extreme precipitation. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(24):13714–13730. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029045
Cordeira JM, Stock J, Dettinger MD, Young AM, Kalansky JF, Ralph FM (2019) A 142-year climatology of northern California landslides and atmospheric rivers. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 100(8):1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0158.1
Espinoza V, Waliser DE, Guan B, Lavers DA, Ralph FM (2018) Global analysis of climate change projection effects on atmospheric rivers. Geophys Res Lett 45(9):4299–4308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GL076968
Guan B, Waliser DE (2015) Detection of atmospheric rivers: evaluation and application of an algorithm for global studies. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(24):12514–12535. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024257
Guan B, Waliser DE (2019) Tracking atmospheric rivers globally: spatial distributions and temporal evolution of life cycle characteristics. J Geophys Res Atmos 124(23):12523–12552. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031205
Guan B, Waliser DE, Ralph FM, Fetzer EJ, Neiman PJ (2016) Hydrometeorological characteristics of rain-on-snow events associated with atmospheric rivers. Geophys Res Lett 43(6):2964–2973. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067978
Harris J, Bowman KP, Shin DB (2000) Comparison of freezing-level altitudes from the NCEP reanalysis with TRMM precipitation radar brightband data. J Clim 13(23):4137–4148
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Biavati G, Horányi A, Muñoz Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Rozum I, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Dee DP, Thépaut JN (2018a) ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1979 to present. https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Biavati G, Horányi A, Muñoz Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Rozum I, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Dee DP, Thépaut JN (2018b) ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Abdalla S, Abellan X, Balsamo G, Bechtold P, Biavati G, Bidlot J, Bonavita M, De Chiara G, Dahlgren P, Dee DP, Diamantakis M, Dragani R, Flemming J, Forbes R, Fuentes M, Geer A, Haimberger L, Healy S, Hogan RJ, Hólm E, Janisková M, Keeley S, Laloyaux P, Lopez P, Lupu C, Radnoti G, de Rosnay P, Rozum I, Vamborg F, Villaume S, Thépaut JN (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 146(730):1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Hewitt K (2005) The Karakoram Anomaly? Glacier Expansion and the ‘Elevation Effect’. Karakoram Himalaya. Mt Res Dev 25(4):332–341. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2005)025[0332:TKAGEA]2.0.CO;2
Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134(9):2318–2341. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1
Iacono MJ, Delamere JS, Mlawer EJ, Shephard MW, Clough SA, Collins WD (2008) Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J Geophys Res Atmos 113(D13):13103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944
Kääb A, Berthier E, Nuth C, Gardelle J, Arnaud Y (2012) Contrasting patterns of early twenty-first-century glacier mass change in the Himalayas. Nature 488(7412):495–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11324
Kain JS (2004) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 43(1):170–181. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043
Kirschbaum D, Adler R, Hong Y, Hill S, Lerner-Lam A (2010) A global landslide catalog for hazard applications: method, results, and limitations. Nat Hazards 52(3):561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11069-009-9401-4/TABLES/3
Kirschbaum D, Stanley T, Zhou Y (2015) Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog. Geomorphology 249:4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.016
Kirschbaum D, Kapnick SB, Stanley T, Pascale S (2020) Changes in extreme precipitation and landslides over high mountain Asia. Geophys Res Lett 47(4):e2019GL085347. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085347
Lang TJ, Barros AP (2004) Winter storms in the central Himalayas. J Meteorol Soc Japan 82(3):829–844. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2004.829
Lundquist JD, Neiman PJ, Martner B, White AB, Gottas DJ, Ralph FM (2008) Rain versus snow in the Sierra Nevada, California: comparing doppler profiling radar and surface observations of melting level. J Hydrometeorol 9(2):194–211. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM853.1
Minder JR, Durran DR, Roe GH (2011) Mesoscale controls on the mountainside snow line. J Atmos Sci 68(9):2107–2127. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-10-05006.1
Monin AS, Obukhov AM (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Tr Akad Nauk SSSR Geophiz Inst 24(151):163–187
Nash D, Carvalho LMV (2020) Brief Communication: An electrifying atmospheric river - understanding the thunderstorm event in Santa Barbara County during March 2019. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20(7):1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1931-2020
Nash D, Carvalho LMV, Jones C, Ding Q (2021) Winter and spring atmospheric rivers in High Mountain Asia: climatology, dynamics, and variability. Clim Dyn 58(9–10):2309–2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00382-021-06008-Z
Neiman PJ, Ralph FM, Wick GA, Lundquist JD, Dettinger MD (2008) Meteorological characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the west coast of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations. J Hydrometeorol 9(1):22–47. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jhm855.1
Neiman PJ, Schick LJ, Ralph FM, Hughes M, Wick GA (2011) Flooding in Western Washington: the connection to atmospheric rivers. J Hydrometeorol 12(6):1337–1358. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jhm1358.1
Niu GY, Yang ZL, Mitchell KE, Chen F, Ek MB, Barlage M, Kumar A, Manning K, Niyogi D, Rosero E, Tewari M, **a Y (2011) The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1 Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J Geophys Res Atmos 116(D12):12109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139
Norris J, Carvalho LMV, Jones C, Cannon F (2015) WRF simulations of two extreme snowfall events associated with contrasting extratropical cyclones over the western and central Himalaya. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(8):3114–3138. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022592
Norris J, Carvalho LMV, Jones C, Cannon F, Bookhagen B, Palazzi E, Tahir AA (2017) The spatiotemporal variability of precipitation over the Himalaya: evaluation of one-year WRF model simulation. Clim Dyn 49(5–6):2179–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3414-y
Norris J, Carvalho LMV, Jones C, Cannon F (2019) Deciphering the contrasting climatic trends between the central Himalaya and Karakorum with 36 years of WRF simulations. Clim Dyn 52(1–2):159–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4133-3
Oakley NS, Lancaster JT, Kaplan ML, Ralph FM (2017) Synoptic conditions associated with cool season post-fire debris flows in the Transverse Ranges of southern California. Nat Hazards 88(1):327–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2867-6
Oakley NS, Lancaster JT, Hatchett BJ, Stock J, Ralph FM, Roj S, Lukashov S (2018) A 22-year climatology of cool season hourly precipitation thresholds conducive to shallow landslides in California. Earth Interact 22(14):1–35. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-17-0029.1
Ralph FM, Rutz JJ, Cordeira JM, Dettinger MD, Anderson M, Reynolds D, Schick LJ, Smallcomb C (2019) A scale to characterize the strength and impacts of atmospheric rivers. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 100(2):269–289. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0023.1
Rutz JJ, Steenburgh WJ, Ralph FM (2014) Climatological characteristics of atmospheric rivers and their inland penetration over the Western United States. Mon Weather Rev 142(2):905–921. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00168.1
Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan HL, Wu X, Wang JJ, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Woollen J, Behringer D, Liu H, Stokes D, Grumbine R, Gayno G, Wang JJ, Yt Hou, Hy Chuang, Juang HMH, Sela J, Iredell M, Treadon R, Kleist D, Delst PV, Keyser D, Derber J, Ek MB, Meng J, Wei H, Yang R, Lord S, Hvd Dool, Kumar A, Wang W, Long C, Chelliah M, Xue Y, Huang B, Jk Schemm, Ebisuzaki W, Lin R, **e P, Chen M, Zhou S, Higgins RW, Cz Zou, Liu Q, Chen Y, Han Y, Cucurull L, Reynolds RW, Rutledge G, Goldberg M (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91(8):1015–1058. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF Version 3. Tech. rep., National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA, https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH
Stauffer DR, Seaman NL (1990) Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I: Experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon Weather Rev 118(6):1250–1277
Stauffer DR, Seaman NL, Binkowski FS (1991) Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model Part II: Effects of data assimilation within the planetary boundary layer. Mon Weather Rev 119(3):734–754
Thapa K, Endreny TA, Ferguson CR (2018) Atmospheric rivers carry nonmonsoon extreme precipitation into Nepal. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(11):5901–5912. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027626
Thompson G, Field PR, Rasmussen RM, Hall WD (2008) Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon Weather Rev 136(12):5095–5115. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1
Wallace JM, Hobbs PV (2006) Atmospheric science: an introductory survey. Academic Press, Burlington
Wang S, Zhang M, Pepin NC, Li Z, Sun M, Huang X, Wang Q (2014) Recent changes in freezing level heights in High Asia and their impact on glacier changes. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(4):1753–1765. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020490
Yang Y, Zhao T, Ni G, T Sun (2018) Atmospheric rivers over the Bay of Bengal lead to northern Indian extreme rainfall. Int J Climatol 38:1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5229
Zhu Y, Newell RE (1994) Atmospheric rivers and bombs. Geophys Res Lett 21(18):1999–2002. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01710
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jesse Norris at University of California Los Angeles for their insight into preprocessing the WRF simulations. Additionally, we would like to thank Craig Steffens at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for their assistance in improving the analysis workflow via high-performance computing and insight on data storage and management.
Funding
This research was part of the Blue Waters sustained-petascale computing project, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (Awards OCI-0725070 and ACI-1238993) the State of Illinois, and as of December 2019, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Blue Waters is a joint effort of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and its National Center for Supercomputing Applications. NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program - Grant 80NSSC18K1412 supported a portion of this research. A portion of this research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Coastlines and People Program (award 2052972). The 20 km and 6.7 km WRF simulations were supported by the Climate and Large-scale Dynamics Program, from the NSF (award AGS-1116105).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DN conceptualized this article and participated in data collection, analysis, interpretation, drafting, and revision of the article. JR and LC participated in data interpretation and revision of the article. CJ provided computing resources and original WRF data from Norris et al. (2019). All authors participated in the revision and final version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Calculation of IVT for WRF
Integrated water vapor transport (IVT), a variable widely used for the detection and identification of ARs (e.g., Guan and Waliser 2015; Ralph et al. 2019) is calculated by taking the 3-hourly model data, interpolating u and v wind components (m s\(^{-1}\)), and water vapor mixing ratio (kg kg\(^{-1}\)) to 20 pressure levels (1000, 975, 950, 925, 900, 875, 850, 825, 800, 775, 750, 700, 650, 600, 550, 500, 450, 400, 350, and 300 hPa). Only data at pressure levels above ground level were used for each grid cell in the integration. Then, using water vapor mixing ratio, we computed specific humidity (q) and then integrated u and v wind components with q at all pressure levels above ground level using the following equations:
where g is the gravitational acceleration (m \(\hbox {s}^{-2}\)), u is zonal wind (m s\(^{-1}\)), v is meridional wind (m s\(^{-1}\)), q is specific humidity (kg kg\(^{-1}\)), p is pressure (Pa = kg m\(^{-1}\) \(\hbox {s}^{-2}\)), and the column integration is between pressure levels 1000 and 250 hPa inclusive.
The magnitude of IVT is calculated using the following equation:
Specific humidity (kg kg \(^{-1}\)) is derived from water vapor mixing ratio (kg kg \(^{-1}\)) using the formula from Wallace and Hobbs (2006) where q is specific humidity and w is the water vapor mixing ratio.
Appendix B: Calculation of water vapor flux
Water vapor flux, a variable used in multiple AR-related studies to examine the vertical profile of water vapor (e.g., Guan and Waliser 2015), is the flux of water vapor at each identified pressure level. The following equations were used to calculate water vapor flux:
where q is specific humidity (kg kg\(^{-1}\)), u is zonal wind (m s\(^{-1}\)), v is meridional wind (m s\(^{-1}\)) at specified pressure, p. If specific humidity retains its kg kg\(^{-1}\), the resulting units for water vapor flux are m s\(^{-1}\).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nash, D., Carvalho, L.M.V., Rutz, J.J. et al. Influence of the freezing level on atmospheric rivers in High Mountain Asia: WRF case studies of orographic precipitation extremes. Clim Dyn 62, 589–607 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06929-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06929-x