Log in

Automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass and automated detection of renal mass in CT urography using 3D U-Net-based deep convolutional neural network

  • Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a 3D U-Net-based deep learning model for automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass, and detection of renal mass in corticomedullary phase of computed tomography urography (CTU).

Methods

Data on 882 kidneys obtained from CTU data of 441 patients with renal mass were used to learn and evaluate the deep learning model. The CTU data of 35 patients with small renal tumors (diameter ≤ 1.5 cm) were used for additional testing. The ground truth data for the kidney, renal tumor, and cyst were manually annotated on corticomedullary phase images of CTU. The proposed segmentation model for kidney and renal mass was constructed based on a 3D U-Net. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated through the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The volume of the maximum 3D volume of interest of renal tumor and cyst in the predicted segmentation by the model was used as an identification indicator, while the detection performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operation characteristic curve.

Results

The proposed model showed a high accuracy in segmentation of kidney and renal tumor, with average DSC of 0.973 and 0.844, respectively. It performed moderately in the renal cyst segmentation, with an average DSC of 0.536 in the test set. Also, this model showed good performance in detecting renal tumor and cyst.

Conclusions

The proposed automated segmentation and detection model based on 3D U-Net shows promising results for the segmentation of kidney and renal tumor, and the detection of renal tumor and cyst.

Key Points

• The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net showed high accuracy in segmentation of kidney and renal neoplasm, and good detection performance of renal neoplasm and cyst in corticomedullary phase of CTU.

• The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net is a fully automated aided diagnostic tool that could be used to reduce the workload of radiologists and improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

• The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net would be helpful to provide quantitative information for diagnosis, treatment, surgical planning, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

3D:

Three dimensional

AI:

Artificial intelligence

AUC:

Area under receiver operation characteristic curve

CMP:

Corticomedullary phase

CT:

Computed tomography

CTU:

Computed tomography urography

DCNN:

Deep convolution neural network

DSC:

Dice similarity coefficient

KiTS19:

The 2019 kidney and kidney tumor segmentation challenge

RCC:

Renal cell carcinoma

ROC:

Receiver operation characteristic curve

VOI:

Volume of interest

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A et al (2019) Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 75:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giménez-Bachs JM, Salinas-Sánchez AS (2019) Improving the diagnosis of renal masses: can we approach the histological diagnosis to the image? Ann Transl Med 7:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S et al (2017) Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryniarski P, Kaletka Z, Życzkowski M, Prokopowicz G, Muskała B, Paradysz A (2013) Ten year treatment outcomes including blood cell count disturbances in patients with simple renal cysts. Med Sci Monit 19:518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Songib N, Nazri M, Yaakup NA, Nor HM, Sun Z (2013) Multiphase renal CT in the evaluation of renal masses: is the nephrographic phase necessary? Clin Imaging 37:1037–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith ND, Campbell SC (2001) Evaluation of the renal mass. In: Kursh ED, Ulchaker JC (eds) Office urology: the clinician’s guide. Humana Press, Totowa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-010-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Garant M, Bonaldi VM, Taourel P, Pinsky MF, Bret PM (1998) Enhancement patterns of renal masses during multiphase helical CT acquisitions. Abdom Imaging 23:431–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gakis G, Kramer U, Schilling D, Kruck S, Stenzl A, Schlemmer H (2011) Small renal oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT. Eur J Radiol 80:274–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haji-Momenian S, Lin Z, Patel B et al (2020) Texture analysis and machine learning algorithms accurately predict histologic grade in small (< 4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 45:789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganesan A, Alakhras M, Brennan PC, Mello Thoms C (2018) A review of factors influencing radiologists’ visual search behaviour. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 62:747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang G, Gu J, Chen Y et al (2014) Automatic kidney segmentation in CT images based on multi-atlas image registration. Annu Int Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014:5538–5541

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X (2010) Automated segmentation and registration of the kidney in CT datasets. Available via https://search.proquest.com/docview/520461346?accountid=13151. Accessed 12 Apr 2020

  14. Ma Y, Cao F, Xu X, Ma W (2020) Can whole-tumor radiomics-based CT analysis better differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: compared with conventional CT analysis? Abdom Radiol (NY) 45:2500–2507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee HS, Hong H, Jung DC, Park S, Kim J (2017) Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification. Med Phys 44:3604–3614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee H, Hong H, Kim J, Jung DC (2018) Deep feature classification of angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images with texture image patches and hand-crafted feature concatenation. Med Phys 45:1550–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim T, Lee K, Ham S et al (2020) Active learning for accuracy enhancement of semantic segmentation with CNN-corrected label curations: evaluation on kidney segmentation in abdominal CT. Sci Rep 10:366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Song H, Song H, Kang W et al (2015) Kidney segmentation in CT sequences using SKFCM and improved GrowCut algorithm. BMC Syst Biol 9:S5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp SS, Brox T, Ronneberger O (2016) 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49

  20. Sabarinathan D, Beham MP, Roomi SMMM (2019) Hyper Vision Net: kidney tumor segmentation using coordinate convolutional layer and attention unit. Available via https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03339. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  21. Chen S, Zhong X, Hu S et al (2020) Automatic multi-organ segmentation in dual-energy CT (DECT) with dedicated 3D fully convolutional DECT networks. Med Phys 47:552–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heller N, Isensee F, Maier-Hein KH et al (2020) The state of the art in kidney and kidney tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced CT imaging: results of the KiTS19 Challenge. Med Image Anal 67:101821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heller N, Sathianathen N, Kalapara A et al (2019) The KiTS19 Challenge data: 300 kidney tumor cases with clinical context, CT semantic segmentations, and surgical outcomes. Available via http://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.00445. Accessed 17 Feb 2020

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **aoying Wang.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is **aoying Wang.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 359 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Z., Cui, Y., Liu, J. et al. Automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass and automated detection of renal mass in CT urography using 3D U-Net-based deep convolutional neural network. Eur Radiol 31, 5021–5031 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07608-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07608-9

Keywords

Navigation