Abstract
FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations are key to defining the genetic risk profile of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed to assess the prognostic features of the FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations in old and/or unfit individuals with AML treated with non-intensive therapies in the era before azacitidine-venetoclax approbation. The results of various non-intensive regimens were also compared. We conducted a retrospective analysis that included patients treated with different non-intensive regimens, between 2007 and 2020 from PETHEMA AML registry. We compiled 707 patients with a median age of 74 years and median follow-up time of 37.7 months. FLT3-ITD patients (N = 98) showed a non-significant difference in overall survival (OS) compared to FLT3-ITD negative-patients (N = 608) (P = 0.17, median OS was 5 vs 7.3 months respectively). NPM1-mutated patients (N = 144) also showed a non-significant difference with NPM1 wild type (N = 519) patients (P = 0.25, median OS 7.2 vs 6.8 respectively). In the Cox regression analysis neither NPM1 nor FLT3-ITD nor age were significant prognostic variables for OS prediction. Abnormal karyotype and a high leukocyte count showed a statistically significant deleterious effect. Azacitidine also showed better survival compared to FLUGA (low dose cytarabine plus fludarabine). NPM1 and FLT3-ITD seem to lack prognostic value in older/unfit AML patients treated with non-intensive regimens other than azacitidine-venetoclax combination.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00277-024-05840-7/MediaObjects/277_2024_5840_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00277-024-05840-7/MediaObjects/277_2024_5840_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00277-024-05840-7/MediaObjects/277_2024_5840_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are property of the PETHEMA foundation. Data may be available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Shimony S, Stahl M, Stone RM (2023) Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 98(3):502–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26822
Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND et al (2016) Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 374(23):2209–2221
Yang JJ, Park TS, Wan TS (2017) Recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia. Methods Mol Biol 1541:223–245
Döhner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD (2015) Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 373(12):1136–1152
Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H et al (2022) Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood 140(12):1345–1377. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022016867
Falini B, Brunetti L, Martelli MP (2021) How I diagnose and treat NPM1-mutated AML. Blood 137(5):589–599
Bullinger L, Döhner K, Döhner H (2017) Genomics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Diagnosis and Pathways. J Clin Oncol 35(9):934–946. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.2208
Sargas C, Ayala R, Larráyoz MJ, Chillón MC, Rodriguez-Arboli E, Bilbao C et al (2023) Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group. Blood Cancer J 13(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5
DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, Thirman MJ, Garcia JS, Wei AH et al (2020) Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med 383(7):617–629. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2012971
Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, Wierzbowska A, Selleslag D, Jang JH et al (2015) International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood 126(3):291–299. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664
Vives S, Martínez-Cuadrón D, Bergua Burgues J, Algarra L, Tormo M, Martínez-Sánchez MP; PETHEMA Group et al (2021) A phase 3 trial of azacitidine versus a semi-intensive fludarabine and cytarabine schedule in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 127(12):2003–2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33403
DiNardo CD, Tiong IS, Quaglieri A, MacRaild S, Loghavi S et al (2020) Molecular patterns of response and treatment failure after frontline venetoclax combinations in older patients with AML. Blood 135(11):791–803. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019003988
Thiede C, Steudel C, Mohr B, Schaich M, Schäkel U, Platzbecker U et al (2002) Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis. Blood 99(12):4326–4335. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v99.12.4326
Kuendgen A, Müller-Thomas C, Lauseker M, Haferlach T, Urbaniak P, Schroeder T et al (2018) Efficacy of azacitidine is independent of molecular and clinical characteristics – an analysis of 128 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia and a review of the literature. Oncotarget 9(45):27882–27894. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25328
Juliusson G, Jädersten M, Deneberg S, Lehmann S, Möllgård L, Wennström L et al (2020) The prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutation in adult AML is age-dependent in the population-based setting. Blood Adv 4(6):1094–1101
Straube J, Ling VY, Hill GR, Lane SW (2018) The impact of age, NPM1mut, and FLT3ITD allelic ratio in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 131(10):1148–1153. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-09-807438
Ostronoff F, Othus M, Lazenby M, Estey E, Appelbaum FR, Evans A et al (2015) Prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations in the absence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SWOG and UK National Cancer Research Institute/Medical Research Council report. J Clin Oncol 33(10):1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.0571
Sargas C, Ayala R, Larráyoz MJ, Chillón MC, Rodriguez-Arboli E; PETHEMA cooperative study group et al (2023) Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group. Blood Cancer J 13(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00835-5.
Ayala R, Carreño-Tarragona G, Barragán E, Boluda B, Larráyoz MJ et al (2022) Impact of FLT3-ITD Mutation Status and Its Ratio in a Cohort of 2901 Patients Undergoing Upfront Intensive Chemotherapy: A PETHEMA Registry Study. Cancers (Basel) 14(23):5799. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235799
Labrador J, Martínez-Cuadrón D, de la Fuente A, Rodríguez-Veiga R, Serrano J, Tormo M et al (2022) Azacitidine vs. Decitabine in Unfit Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from the PETHEMA Registry. Cancers (Basel) 14(9):2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092342
DiGennaro J, Sallman DA (2023) TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Guidelines. Therapies and Future Considerations Acta Haematol. https://doi.org/10.1159/000535628
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the physicians and data managers from the PETHEMA group.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Conceptualization, E.U., J.M.A., and P.M.; methodology, J.M.A., and P.M; formal analysis, J.M.A., and P.M.; investigation, E.U., B.B., E.L., M.T., C.B., C.G., S.V., C.R., J.S., M.J., P.M., F.R., L.A., JM., J.A., P.H., M.B., V.N.C., J.A.R., R.A., E.B., D.M.C., M.L., J.L.L.,, A.L., J.E., M.C., R.G.B., B.R.C., M.F.G., A.H., J.L., J.M.A., and P.M.; data curation, E.U., J.M.A., and P.M.; writing original draft preparation, E.U., J.M.A., and P.M.; writing review and editing, E.U., J.M., and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Suárez, E.U., Boluda, B., Lavilla, E. et al. Do NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations modify prognosis in patients treated with non-intensive regimens?. Ann Hematol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05840-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05840-7