Log in

Surgical Resources in South Africa: An International Comparison and Deficit Calculation

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical conditions lead to premature death and disability resulting in a massive economic burden. Contributing to this global crisis is the lack of data on the limited surgical infrastructure and workforce in many low- and middle-income countries.

Methods

This study involved a descriptive analysis of surgical resources in South Africa and included the total number of hospitals, number of hospital beds, number of surgical beds, number of general surgeons, and the number of functional operating theatres. All hospitals in South Africa were contacted between the 1 October 2014 and the 31 December 2014. An international comparison of South Africa’s surgical resources was then made with several countries.

Results

The results showed one hospital per 100,000 population. There were 186.64 hospital beds, 41.55 surgical beds, 1.78 specialist general surgeons, 2.90 non-specialist general surgeons, and 3.59 operating theatres per 100,000 people in South Africa. These numbers fell far below international recommendations, as well as for developed countries such as the UK and USA.

Conclusion

Strengthening surgical systems will reduce the surgical burden of disease and improve health outcomes globally. This description of surgical infrastructure and workforce provided insight into the surgical capacity of South Africa. Furthermore, this research provided a comparison of surgical resources between South Africa and the rest of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozgediz D, Jamison D, Cherian M, McQueen K (2008) The Burden of surgical conditions and access to surgical care in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 86(8):646–647. doi:10.2471/BLT.07.050435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozgediz D, Riviello R (2008) The “other” neglected diseases in global public health: surgical conditions in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Med 5(6):e121. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiser TG, Regenbogen S, Thompson K et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372(9633):139–144. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wadee H, Khan F (2007) Human resources for health: health care delivery, South African Health Review. Health System Trust, Durban, p 141

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. www.who.int

  6. World Bank. www.worldbank.org

  7. Kakande I, Mkandawire N, Thompson M (2008) A review of surgical capacity and surgical education programmes in the COSECSA Region. East Cent Afr J Surg 16(3):6–34

    Google Scholar 

  8. Funk L, Weiser T, Berry W et al (2010) Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: an estimation from reported data. Lancet 376:1055–1061. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60392-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Royal College of Surgeons of England. Surgical Workforce 2011. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/surgeons/surgical-standards/docs/2011-surgical-workforce-census-report

  10. American College of Surgeons Health Policy Research Institute (2010) The Surgical Workforce in the United States: profiles and recent trends. http://www.acshpri.org/pubs.html

  11. Royal Australian College of Surgeons (2011) Surgical workforce projection to 2025, vol 1. The Australian Workforce: Briefing paper for the National Training Plan consultation process. www.surgeons.org/media/437871/rpt_racs_workforce_projection_to_2025

  12. Statistics SA Annual 2013/2014 report. www.statssa.gov.za

  13. South African overview—World Bank. www.worldbank.org

  14. Massyn N, Day C, Peer N, Padarath A, Barron P, English R (eds) District Health Barometer. 2013/2014. Health Systems Trust. www.hst.org.za/publications/district-health-barometer-201314

  15. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 8 386(9993):569–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collignon P (2009) We have 38% fewer hospital beds than in 1981: it’s a scandal. Crikey. http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/20

  17. Roberts L, Clifton R, Ferguson B, Kampen K, Langlois S (eds) (2005) Recent social trends in Canada 1960–2000. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, pp 316–317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rose J, Weiser T, Hider P et al (2015) Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Health Estimate. Lancet 3(52):513–520

    Google Scholar 

  19. http://www.southafrica.info/about/government/govprov

  20. Hoyler M, Finlayson S, McClain Meara J, Hagander L (2014) Shortage of doctors, shortage of data: a review of the global surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia workforce literature. World J Surg 38(2):269–280. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2324-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Dell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dell, A.J., Kahn, D. Surgical Resources in South Africa: An International Comparison and Deficit Calculation. World J Surg 42, 541–548 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4176-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4176-3

Navigation