Log in

Predictors of Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery in South Korean Women

  • Original Article
  • Special Topic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Examining the characteristics of the growing cosmetic surgery (CS) consumer population could help promote safer cosmetic procedure practices. We identified the predictors of acceptance of cosmetic surgery (ACS) among South Korean women aged 20–69 years.

Methods

An online survey was administered to 291 randomly sampled participants during August 30–September 6, 2021. An equal number of participants from each age group was selected. They completed a questionnaire concerning the general and CS-related characteristics, acceptance of cosmetic surgery scale, appearance satisfaction, self-esteem, and depression. The mean participants’ age and body mass index were 44.12 (± 13.79) years and 22.15 (± 3.39) kg/m2, respectively.

Results

Approximately 90.0% of the participants had been exposed to a CS advertisement, with 96.2% having acquired information regarding the CS side effects and 52.6% considering CS in future. Eighty-eight (30.2%) participants had undergone CS. The most common surgical and non-surgical categories were eyelid surgery and botulinum toxin injection, respectively. The ACS increased with decreasing age (β = − 0.12, p < .05), exposure to a CS advertisement (β = 0.10, p < .05), consideration of undergoing CS in future (β = 0.59, p < .001), and increasing depression scores (β = 0.29, p < .001); collectively, these factors explained 43.0% of the variance (F = 25.21, p < .001).

Conclusions

“Consideration of undergoing CS” was the strongest ACS predictor in the multiple regression analysis for the entire study population and according to CS history. Future studies should conduct an in-depth analysis based on the current CS trends, intention to undergo CS in future, and past CS experiences of South Korean women aged 20–69 years.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Korean Women’s Development Institute (2020) Research on gender and health inequality in Korean society III: focusing on obsession with appearance and cosmetic surgery. Internet Korean Womens Dev Institute, Seoul. https://eng.kwdi.re.kr/publications/reportView.do?s=searchAll&w=gender&p=1&idx=102745. Accessed 1 Oct 2021

  2. Shilling C (1993) The body and social theory. Sage publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Son EJ (2012) Critical factors of the intention of plastic surgery among women: a comparison of young and middle-aged groups. Korea J Couns Psychother 24:149–173 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karupiah P (2013) Modification of the body: a comparative analysis of views of youths in Penang, Malaysia and Seoul, South Korea. J Youth Stud 16:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2014) ISAPS global statistics. Internet ISAPS, Hanover. https://www.isaps.org/news/isaps-global-statistics. Accessed 1 Oct 2021

  6. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2019) ISAPS global statistics. Internet ISAPS, Hanover. https://www.isaps.org/news/isaps-global-statistics. Accessed 1 Oct 2021

  7. Gallup Korea (2020) Appearance and recognition of cosmetic surgery-1994/2004/2015/2020 compare. Internet Gallup Korea, Seoul. https://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=1097. Accessed 1 Oct 2021 (in Korean)

  8. Seo YA, Chung HC, Kim YA (2019) Experience and acceptance of cosmetic procedures among South Korean women in their 20s. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:531–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1257-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seo YA, Kim YA (2020) Factors affecting acceptance of cosmetic surgery in adults in their 20s–30s. Aesthet Plast Surg 44:1881–1888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01761-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Swami V, Arteche A, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Furnham A, Stieger S, Haubner T, Voracek M (2008) Looking good: factors affecting the likelihood of having cosmetic surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 30:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-007-0185-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee MS, Lee MJ (2016) Body satisfaction and attitudes toward cosmetic surgical vs. nonsurgical procedures. Int J Humanit Soc Sci 6:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson-King D, Henderson-King E (2005) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: scale development and validation. Body Image 2:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YA, Chae DH, Kim HL (2017) Factors affecting acceptance of cosmetic surgery among undergraduate students. J Korea Contents Assoc 17:455–464. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.01.455 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ambro BT, Wright RJ (2010) Depression in the cosmetic surgery patient. Facial Plast Surg 26:333–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Naraghi M, Atari M (2015) A comparison of depression scores between aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty patients. Asian J Psychiatr 14:28–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (2014) Determine the status of cosmetic plastic procedure and the development of information booklet for the users. Internet National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul. https://www.neca.re.kr/eng/lay1/program/S120T140C141/report/view.do?seq=133. Accessed 1 Oct 2021

  17. Shilling C (2003) The body and social theory, 2nd edn. Sage publications, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YA, Cho Chung HI (2018) Side effect experiences of South Korean women in their twenties and thirties after facial plastic surgery. Int J Womens Health 10:309–316. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S163991

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Phuah KT, Ting JL, Kelly WKS (2019) Propensity to undergo cosmetic surgery and services in Seoul. Int J Commun Dev Manag Stud 3:01–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alotaibi AS (2021) Demographic and cultural differences in the acceptance and pursuit of cosmetic surgery: a systematic literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9:e3501. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SW, Lee YR (2012) What is beauty? The aesthetic cognition of Korean women in their 20s and 30s. J Con Stud 23:351–382 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim SW (2021) Effect of appearance instrumentality on the acceptance of cosmetic surgery: moderated mediation effects of ambivalent emotions toward attractive friends and appearance appreciation. KSC 21:38–53. https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2021.21.1.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park RH, Myers PL, Langstein HN (2019) Beliefs and trends of aesthetic surgery in South Korean young adults. Arch Plast Surg 46:612–616. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.01172

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Secord PF, Jourard SM (1953) The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 17:343–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho MJ, Kim KH (1993) Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 32:381–399 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A (2009) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 6:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoon SH, Kim YA (2020) Cosmetic surgery and self-esteem in South Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 44:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01515-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Park SY, Allgayer S (2018) Cosmetic surgery advertising exposure, attitudes toward the surgery and surgeons, and perceptions of the advertisement features. J Commun Healthc 11:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2017.1390943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (no. NRF-2020R1I1A3065986).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young A. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Considerations

The study was conducted after obtaining IRB approval from Jeju National University (JJNU-IRB-2021-053).

Human Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, Y.A., Kim, Y.A. Predictors of Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery in South Korean Women. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 2031–2039 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02795-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02795-w

Keywords

Navigation