Log in

BDD Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Among Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons Worldwide

  • Survey
  • Special Topic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The French poet, Voltaire, said ‘if you were to ask a peacock where his soul were situated, he would say “In the tip of my magnificent tail.” [1].

Abstract

Background

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a controversial topic in the field of plastic surgery.

Objective

Our aim was to determine whether BDD knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) are affected by the experience of the surgeon in the field, sex of the surgeon, country of practice, and the number of patients the surgeon sees annually. We were particularly interested in uncovering any significant relations in KAP of BDD between plastic surgeons practicing in developed versus develo** countries.

Methods

We created a two-page survey of 24 questions about the KAP of BDD. The survey was sent to aesthetic plastic surgeons worldwide via ISAPS global email list. The data were collected over a period of 20 days at the end of 2020.

Results

A total of 464 plastic surgeons completed the survey. The only factor that determines the awareness of BDD is the experience of the surgeon. The more experienced the surgeon is, the more likely he/she is to be familiar with the clinical picture of BDD. Although aware, the more experienced surgeons tend to dismiss the importance of referring BDD patients to psychiatrists/psychologists. Male surgeons tend to diagnose more patients with BDD than female surgeons. Surgeons who estimated the correct prevalence of BDD among patients seeking surgery acquired knowledge of BDD from scientific journals. The KAP is relatively similar between surgeons practicing in developed and develo** countries, and the main statistically significant difference was in the questions used during the course of the interviews to diagnose BDD.

Conclusion

We can deduce from the results that most aesthetic surgeons worldwide have got knowledge of the presentation of BDD and are keen to diagnose the disorder in their practice. It is worth noting that surgeons usually have their unique approach in the management of BDD. Our study highlights the importance of not only raising awareness of the best management of BDD, but also of establishing a consensus that BDD is a contraindication to aesthetic treatment. The best methods to raise awareness are through journals and plastic surgery residency.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartley P (1993) Body images. Development, deviance and change. Edited by Thomas Cash, Thomas Pruzinsky, Pat Hartley. The Guilford Press: New York. (1990) pp. 361, £35.65. Eur Eat Disorders Rev 1:64–66

  2. Kling J et al (2019) Systematic review of body image measures. Body Image 30:170–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author

  4. Veale D et al (2016) Body dysmorphic disorder in different settings: a systematic review and estimated weighted prevalence. Body Image 18:168–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ribeiro RVE (2017) Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder in plastic surgery and dermatology patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):964–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider SC et al (2017) Prevalence and correlates of body dysmorphic disorder in a community sample of adolescents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 51(6):595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson RC (2003) Body dysmorphic disorder: recognition and treatment. Plast Surg Nurs 23(3):125. (quiz 129)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips K (2005) The broken mirror: understanding and treating body dysmorphic disorder. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peck H, Peck S (1970) A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40(4):284–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodley A (2019) The role of body image in appearance-related cosmetic procedures. J Aesthet Nursing 8(7):318–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Houschyar KS et al (2019) The body dysmorphic disorder in plastic surgery: a systematic review of screening methods. Laryngorhinootologie 98(5):325–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sweis IE et al (2017) A review of body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic surgery patients and the legal implications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(4):949–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouman TK, Mulkens S, van der Lei B (2017) Cosmetic professionals’ awareness of body dysmorphic disorder. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):336–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarwer DB et al (2015) Identification and management of mental health issues by dermatologic surgeons: a survey of American society for dermatologic surgery members. Dermatol Surg 41(3):352–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarwer DB (2002) Awareness and identification of body dysmorphic disorder by aesthetic surgeons: results of a survey of american society for aesthetic plastic surgery members. Aesthet Surg J 22(6):531–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kattan AE et al (2020) Awareness and experiences of cosmetic treatment providers with body dysmorphic disorder in Saudi Arabia. Peer J 8:e8959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Szepietowski J et al (2008) Body dysmorphic disorder and dermatologists. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 22(7):795–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Felix GAA et al (2014) Patients with mild to moderate body dysmorphic disorder may benefit from rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(5):646–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Veale D, De Haro L, Lambrou C (2003) Cosmetic rhinoplasty in body dysmorphic disorder. Br J Plast Surg 56(6):546–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to record my gratitude and profound thanks to Ms. Catherine Foss, past executive director of ISAPS, for her suggestions and tremendous help in sending out the questionnaire.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nada Raafat Khattab.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human or Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. No ethical committee approval was required.

Informed Consent

Participants knowingly and willingly participated in the research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khattab, N.R., Mills, D. BDD Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Among Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons Worldwide. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 2491–2501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02344-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02344-x

Keywords

Navigation