Log in

An automatic and accurate deep learning-based neuroimaging pipeline for the neonatal brain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Accurate segmentation of neonatal brain tissues and structures is crucial for studying normal development and diagnosing early neurodevelopmental disorders. However, there is a lack of an end-to-end pipeline for automated segmentation and imaging analysis of the normal and abnormal neonatal brain.

Objective

To develop and validate a deep learning-based pipeline for neonatal brain segmentation and analysis of structural magnetic resonance images (MRI).

Materials and methods

Two cohorts were enrolled in the study, including cohort 1 (582 neonates from the develo** Human Connectome Project) and cohort 2 (37 neonates imaged using a 3.0-tesla MRI scanner in our hospital).We developed a deep leaning-based architecture capable of brain segmentation into 9 tissues and 87 structures. Then, extensive validations were performed for accuracy, effectiveness, robustness and generality of the pipeline. Furthermore, regional volume and cortical surface estimation were measured through in-house bash script implemented in FSL (Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain Software Library) to ensure reliability of the pipeline. Dice similarity score (DSC), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (H95) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the quality of our pipeline. Finally, we finetuned and validated our pipeline on 2-dimensional thick-slice MRI in cohorts 1 and 2.

Results

The deep learning-based model showed excellent performance for neonatal brain tissue and structural segmentation, with the best DSC and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (H95) of 0.96 and 0.99 mm, respectively. In terms of regional volume and cortical surface analysis, our model showed good agreement with ground truth. The ICC values for the regional volume were all above 0.80. Considering the thick-slice image pipeline, the same trend was observed for brain segmentation and analysis. The best DSC and H95 were 0.92 and 3.00 mm, respectively. The regional volumes and surface curvature had ICC values just below 0.80.

Conclusions

We propose an automatic, accurate, stable and reliable pipeline for neonatal brain segmentation and analysis from thin and thick structural MRI. The external validation showed very good reproducibility of the pipeline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and code used in this study are available from the corresponding author without any restrictions.

Notes

  1. https://www.develo**connectome.org.

  2. http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk.

  3. https://github.com/MIRTK/DrawEM.

  4. https://monai.io/.

  5. http://pytorch.org/.

References

  1. Antonios M, Paul et al (2016) Regional growth and atlasing of the develo** human brain. Neuroimage 125:456–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubois J, Germanaud D, Angleys H et al (2016) Exploring the successive waves of cortical folding in the develo** brain using MRI and spectral analysis of gyrification. 2016 IEEE 13th Int Symp Biomed Imaging (ISBI). IEEE, pp 261–264

  3. Pappas A, Adams-Chapman I, Shankaran S et al (2018) Neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes in extremely premature neonates with ventriculomegaly in the absence of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage. JAMA Pediatr 172:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hintz SR, Barnes PD, Bulas D et al (2015) Neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics 135:e32–e42. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0898

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyall AE, Shi F, Geng X et al (2015) Dynamic development of regional cortical thickness and surface area in early childhood. Cereb Cortex 25:2204–2212. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Makropoulos A, Counsell SJ, Rueckert D (2018) A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuroimage 170:231–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khalili N, Lessmann N, Turk E et al (2019) Automatic brain tissue segmentation in fetal MRI using convolutional neural networks. Magn Reson Imaging 64:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolz J, Gopinath K, Yuan J et al (2019) HyperDense-Net: a hyper-densely connected CNN for multi-modal image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38:1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2878669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moeskops P, Viergever MA, Mendrik AM et al (2016) Automatic segmentation of MR brain images with a convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35:1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2016.2548501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Urru A, Nakaki et al (2022) An automatic pipeline for atlas-based fetal and neonatal brain.ar** human connectome project: a minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 173:88–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes EJ, Winchman T, Padormo F et al (2017) A dedicated neonatal brain imaging system. Magn Reson Med 78:794–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cordero-Grande L, Rui P, Hughes EJ et al (2016) Sensitivity encoding for aligned multishot magnetic resonance reconstruction. IEEE Trans Comput Imaging 2:266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA et al (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:1310–1320. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2010.2046908

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10062

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Makropoulos A, Gousias IS, Ledig C et al (2014) Automatic whole brain MRI segmentation of the develo** neonatal brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:1818–1831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2322280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Siciarz P, McCurdy B (2022) U-net architecture with embedded Inception-ResNet-v2 image encoding modules for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk in head and neck cancer radiation therapy based on computed tomography scans. Phys Med Biol 67. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac530e

  17. Cheng J, Liu J, Kuang H et al (2022) A fully automated multimodal MRI-based multi-task learning for glioma segmentation and IDH genoty**. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 41:1520–1532. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3142321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cipolla R, Gal Y, Kendall A (2018) Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 7482–7491

  19. Beare RJ, Chen J, Kelly CE et al (2016) Neonatal brain tissue classification with morphological adaptation and unified segmentation. Front Neuroinform 10:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2016.00012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Guha Roy A, Conjeti S, Navab N et al (2019) QuickNAT: a fully convolutional network for quick and accurate segmentation of neuroanatomy. Neuroimage 186:713–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dolz J, Desrosiers C, Wang L et al (2020) Deep CNN ensembles and suggestive annotations for infant brain MRI segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 79:101660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.101660

  22. Hatamizadeh A, Yang D, Roth H et al (2021) UNETR: transformers for 3D medical image segmentation.ar**v preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2103.10504

  23. Cao H, Wang Y, Chen J et al (2021) Swin-Unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmentation.ar**v preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2105.05537

  24. Gao Y, Zhou M, Metaxas D (2021) UTNet: a hybrid transformer architecture for medical image segmentation.ar**v preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2107.00781

  25. Henschel L, Conjeti S, Estrada S et al (2020) FastSurfer - a fast and accurate deep learning based neuroimaging pipeline. Neuroimage 219:117012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117012

  26. Chen J, YL, QY et al (2021) TransUNet: transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation.ar**v preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2102.04306

  27. Zeng N, Li H, Peng Y (2021) A new deep belief network-based multi-task learning for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06149-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Song Z, Awate SP, Licht DJ et al (2007) Clinical neonatal brain MRI segmentation using adaptive nonparametric data models and intensity-based Markov priors. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 10:883–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmahmann JD (2019) The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett 688:62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kamnitsas K, Ledig C, Newcombe V et al (2016) Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med Image Anal 36:61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dolz J, Desrosiers C, Ben Ayed I (2018) 3D fully convolutional networks for subcortical segmentation in MRI: a large-scale study. Neuroimage 170:456–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Zheng Jia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital and Medical School of Nantong University (No.2021-K027-01).

Conflict of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, D.D., Bao, S.L., Wang, Y. et al. An automatic and accurate deep learning-based neuroimaging pipeline for the neonatal brain. Pediatr Radiol 53, 1685–1697 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05620-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05620-x

Keywords

Navigation