Log in

The new international neuroblastoma response criteria

  • Pediatric oncologic imaging
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over recent years significant advances in histopathology and functional imaging techniques for the diagnosis and restaging of children with neuroblastoma have led to better quantification of disease and assessment of disease response, allowing for better treatment stratification. In this review we summarise recent changes to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria including the use of RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) guidance for measurable soft-tissue disease, replacement of technetium-99 m-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scans with metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan or [F-18]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scanning, and a new category of minimal residual bone marrow disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park JR, Bagatell R, Cohn SL et al (2017) Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: a consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute clinical trials planning meeting. J Clin Oncol 35:2580–2587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagatell R, McHugh K, Naranjo A et al (2016) Assessment of primary site response in children with high-risk neuroblastoma: an international multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 34:740–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A et al (1988) International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 6:1874–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F et al (1993) Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 11:1466–1477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF et al (2009) The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG task force report. J Clin Oncol 27:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cecchetto G, Mosseri V, De Bernardi B et al (2005) Surgical risk factors in primary surgery for localized neuroblastoma: the LNESG1 study of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group. J Clin Oncol 23:8483–8489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sundell IB, Hallmans G, Nilsson TK et al (1989) Plasma glucose and insulin, urinary catecholamine and cortisol responses to test breakfasts with high or low fibre content: the importance of the previous diet. Ann Nutr Metab 33:333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weetman RM, Rider PS, Oei TO et al (1976) Effect of diet on urinary excretion of VMA, HVA, metanephrine, and total free catecholamine in normal preschool children. J Pediatr 88:46–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goo HW (2010) Whole-body MRI of neuroblastoma. Eur J Radiol 75:306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brisse HJ, McCarville MB, Granata C et al (2011) Guidelines for imaging and staging of neuroblastic tumors: consensus report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group project. Radiology 261:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller WP, Coppenrath E, Pfluger T (2013) Nuclear medicine and multimodality imaging of pediatric neuroblastoma. Pediatr Radiol 43:418–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bar-Sever Z, Biassoni L, Shulkin B et al (2018) Guidelines on nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:2009–2024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewington V, Lambert B, Poetschger U et al (2017) (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy in neuroblastoma: development of a SIOPEN semi-quantitative reporting method by an international panel. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:234–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yanik GA, Parisi MT, Shulkin BL et al (2013) Semiquantitative mIBG scoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Nucl Med 54:541–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharine E. Orr.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orr, K.E., McHugh, K. The new international neuroblastoma response criteria. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1433–1440 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04397-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04397-2

Keywords

Navigation