Log in

Calcium urolithiasis course in young stone formers is influenced by the strength of family history: results from a retrospective study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of the strength of family history of stones (FHS), i.e., degree of relatives with the disease, on the course of calcium urolithiasis (CU) is not fully understood, particularly in young patients where genetic background has the greatest influence on disease expression. Thus, with a retrospective cross-sectional design, we examined baseline clinical parameters and urinary chemistries of 369 subjects (196 M) with CU and 96 controls (41 M) aged between 15 and 25 at the time of the first visit at our stone clinic. Subjects with metabolic syndrome traits, known causes of CU or CU onset before the age of 15 were excluded. Clinical and metabolic parameters were compared among stone formers (SF) and controls, stratified by gender, the presence and type of FHS determined through the kinship coefficient of relatives with stones. No significant differences in clinical course were found between SF with and without FHS, except for the presence of bilateral stones (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.20–3.39, p < 0.01). A significant age-, sex- and disease duration-adjusted trend for a higher number of colics (p for trend = 0.001), number of stones (p for trend = 0.002), stone rate (p for trend = 0.003) and the presence of retained stones (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14–2.21, p = 0.006) was detected with increasing FHS strength. Urinary chemistries were unaffected by FHS in both SF and controls, except for a higher calcium excretion in females with FHS (p < 0.05). The type of FHS, thus, significantly influences the clinical course of CU in young SF, mainly irrespective of urinary factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resnick M, Pridgen DB, Goodman HO (1968) Genetic predisposition to formation of calcium oxalate renal calculi. N Engl J Med 278(24):1313–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trinchieri A, Mandressi A, Luongo P, Coppi F, Pisani E (1988) Familial aggregation of renal calcium stone disease. J Urol 139:478–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gambaro G, Marchini F, Piccoli A, Nassuato MA, Bilora F, Baggio B (1996) The abnormal red-cell oxalate transport is a risk factor for idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:608–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ (1997) Family history and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:1568–1573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guerra A, Folesani G, Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, Allegri F, Pinelli S, Prati B, Morelli I, Guida L, Aloe R, Meschi T (2016) Family history influences clinical course of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: case–control study of a large cohort of Italian patients. J Nephrol 29:645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guerra A, Ticinesi A, Allegri F, Nouvenne A, Pinelli S, Folesani G, Lauretani F, Maggio M, Borghi L, Meschi T (2016) The influence of maternal and paternal history on stone composition and clinical course of calcium nephrolithiasis in subjects aged between 15 and 25. Urolithiasis 44:521–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rule AD, Lieske JC, Li X, Melton LJ III, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ (2014) The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:2878–2886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldfarb DS, Fisher ME, Keich Y, Goldberg J (2005) A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int 67:1053–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vezzoli G, Soldati L, Gambaro G (2008) Update on primary hypercalciuria from a genetic perspective. J Urol 179:1676–1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu W, Chen M, Li M, Ma H, Tong S, Lei Y, Qi L (2014) Vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) polymorphisms and the urolithiasis risk: an updated meta-analysis based on 20 case–control studies. Urolithiasis 42:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vezzoli G, Terranegra A, Aloia A, Arcidiacono T, Milanesi L, Mosca E, Mingione A, Spotti D, Cusi D, Hou J, Hendy GN, Soldati L, Network GENIAL (2013) Decreased transcriptional activity of calcium-sensing receptor gene promoter 1 is associated with calcium nephrolithiasis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3839–3847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gambaro G, Vezzoli G, Casari G, Rampoldi L, D’Angelo A, Borghi L (2004) Genetics of hypercalciuria and calcium nephrolithiasis: from the rare monogenic to the colon polygenic forms. Am J Kidney Dis 44(6):963–986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, Allegri F, Guerra A, Guida L, Morelli I, Borghi L, Meschi T (2014) Twenty-five years of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: has anything changed? Clin Chem Lab Med 52(3):337–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edvardsson VO, Palsson R, Indridason OS, Thorvaldsson S, Stefansson K (2009) Familiality of kidney stone disease in Iceland. Scand J Urol Nephrol 43(5):420–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pak CYC (1982) Should patients with single renal stone occurrence undergo diagnostic evaluation? J Urol 127:855–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gambaro G, Croppi E, Coe F, Lingeman J, Moe O, Worcester E, Buchholz N, Bushinsky D, Curhan GC, Ferraro PM, Fuster D, Goldfarb DS, Heilberg IP, Hess B, Lieske J, Marangella M, Milliner D, Preminger GM, Reis Santos JM, Sakhaee K, Sarica K, Siener R, Strazzullo P, Williams JC, The Consensus Conference Group (2016) Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement. J Nephrol. doi:10.1007/s40620-016-0329-y (ahead of print)

  17. Strauss AL, Coe FL, Parks JH (1982) Formation of a single calcium stone of renal origin. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients. Arch Intern Med 142(3):504–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mardis HK, Parks JH, Muller G, Ganzel K, Coe FL (2004) Outcome of metabolic evaluation and medical treatment for calcium nephrolithiasis in a private urological practice. J Urol 171(1):85–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisner BH, Sheth S, Dretler SP, Herrick B, Pais VM Jr (2012) Abnormalities of 24-hour urine composition in first-time and recurrent stone-formers. Urology 80:776–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaggi M, Nakagawa Y, Zipperle L, Hess B (2007) Tamm-Horsfall protein in recurrent calcium kidney stone formers with positive family history: abnormalities in urinary excretion, molecular structure and function. Urol Res 35(2):55–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baumann JM, Affolter B (2014) From crystalluria to kidney stones, some physicochemical aspects of calcium nephrolithiasis. World J Nephrol 3(4):256–267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Mr. Michele Zenna for technical assistance in software management, Dr. Maurizio Rossi for assistance in statistical analysis and Dr. Giuseppina Folesani for assistance in the study protocol preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Ticinesi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Tiziana Meschi received an unconditional grant for research in the field of urolithiasis from Acqua & Terme Fiuggi S.p.a. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical standards

The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee. The study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained according to Italian law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerra, A., Ticinesi, A., Allegri, F. et al. Calcium urolithiasis course in young stone formers is influenced by the strength of family history: results from a retrospective study. Urolithiasis 45, 525–533 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0955-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0955-9

Keywords

Navigation