Log in

A new model (Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB) for predicting the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarin patients

  • Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to analyze the factors influencing warfarin-related major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and to develop a score that would provide a reference for assessing the risk of major GIB associated with warfarin treatment.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data from warfarin-treated patients. Scores were analyzed using logistic regression. The area under the subject working characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the scoring performance.

Results

A total of 1591 patients who met the requirements for warfarin use were included in this study, and 46 developed major GIB. After univariate analysis as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis, nine factors were found to be associated with increased risk of major GIB, namely age ≥ 65 years, history of peptic ulcer, history of major bleeding, abnormal liver function, abnormal renal function, cancer, anemia, labile international normalized ratio, and combination of antiplatelet agents/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score was constructed using these nine factors. The AUC and Bootstrap method-corrected AUC of the Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score were 0.916 (95% CI: 0.862–0.970, P < 0.001) and 0.919 (95% CI: 0.860–0.967, P < 0.001), respectively, which were higher than those of the HAS-BLED score (AUC = 0.868, 95% CI: 0.812–0.924, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Based on nine risk factors, the Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score was constructed to predict the risk of warfarin-related major GIB. The newly developed Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB score has a better predictive value than the HAS-BLED score and may be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of major GIB in patients on warfarin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Gu ZC, Wei AH, Zhang C et al (2020) Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 18(4):792-799.e61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen WC, Chen YH, Hsu PI et al (2014) Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in warfarin anticoagulated patients: incidence, risk factor, management, and outcome. Biomed Res Int 2014:463767

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J et al (2003) American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. Circulation 107(12):1692–1711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs LG (2008) Warfarin pharmacology, clinical management, and evaluation of hemorrhagic risk for the elderly. Cardiol Clin 26(2):157–67

  5. Sun Y (2013) Chinese expert consensus on warfarin anticoagulant therapy. Chinese J Int Med 01:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rubin TA, Murdoch M, Nelson DB (2003) Acute GI bleeding in the setting of supratherapeutic international normalized ratio in patients taking warfarin: endoscopic diagnosis, clinical management, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 58(3):369–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Minno A, Spadarella G, Spadarella E et al (2015) Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulation: Current treatment and pharmacological perspectives. Thromb Res 136(6):1074–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R et al (2010) A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 138(5):1093–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gage BF, Yan Y, Milligan PE et al (2006) Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF). Am Heart J 151(3):713–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y et al (2011) A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage: The ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(4):395–401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Strate LL, Gralnek IM (2016) ACG clinical guideline: Management of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 111:459–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Laine L, Jensen DM (2012) Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 107:345,60; quiz 361

  13. Shimomura A, Nagata N, Shimbo T et al (2018) New predictive model for acute gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulants: A cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33(1):164–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lv M, Jiang S, Wu T, Huang N, Chen X, Chen C, Zhang J (2022) A new model to predict the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran and rivaroxaban). Br J Clin Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulman S, Kearon C (2005) Subcommittee on control of anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3(4):692–694

  16. Yin MY, Ruckel S, Kfoury AG et al (2018) Novel Model to Predict Gastrointestinal Bleeding During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support. Circ Heart Fail 11(11):e005267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mandrekar JN (2010) Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 5(9):1315–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nable JV, Graham AC (2016) Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Emerg Med Clin North Am 34(2):309–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Srygley FD, Gerardo CJ, Tran T et al (2012) Does this patient have a severe upper gastrointestinal bleed?. JAMA 307(10):1072–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S et al (2004) Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ 329(7456):15–19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mercadante S, Barresi L, Casuccio A et al (2000) Gastrointestinal bleeding in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 19(3):160–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abrignani MG, Gatta L, Gabrielli D et al (2021) Gastroprotection in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy: a position paper of National Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO). Eur J Intern Med 85:1–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Olsen AS, McGettigan P, Gerds TA et al (2020) Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with oral anticoagulation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 6(5):292–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Masclee GM, Valkhoff VE, Coloma PM et al (2014) Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding from different drug combinations. Gastroenterology 147(4):784–792.e9; quiz e13–4

  25. Johannsdottir GA, Onundarson PT, Gudmundsdottir BR et al (2012) Screening for anemia in patients on warfarin facilitates diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancies and pre-malignant lesions. Thromb Res 130(3):e20–e25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lanas-Gimeno A, Lanas A (2017) Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulant treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf 16(6):673–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alcalá-González L, Jiménez C, Cortina V et al (2022) Severity of gastrointestinal bleeding is similar between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists. Rev Esp Enferm Dig

  28. He X, Chen Y (2012) Study of coagulation indexes in patients with cirrhosis. Chinese journal of medicine guide 10(14):126–127

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gerson LB (2013) Causes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with chronic renal failure. Gastroenterology 145:895,7; discussion 897

  30. Holtz BE (2021) Patients Perceptions of Telemedicine Visits Before and After the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health 27(1):107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Science and Technology Innovation Startup Foundation of Fujian Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital (YCXY23-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JZ initiated the study. JZ, SW, ML, FM, FZ, and GF collected and entered the data. ML and FM performed data collation. SW and ML performed data extraction and analyses. SW drafted the first version of the manuscript. JZ, SW, ML, FM, FZ, and GF critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. SW and FZ worked on data validation. SJ performed the graphical revisions. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **hua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was authorized by The Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.

Informed consent

The requirement for patient consent was waived due to its retrospective nature.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 43 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, S., Lv, M., Ma, F. et al. A new model (Alfalfa-Warfarin-GIB) for predicting the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarin patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 79, 1195–1204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-023-03533-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-023-03533-0

Keywords

Navigation